On Tue, Jan 18, 2000 at 04:19:20PM -0500, Brian May wrote:
> Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge
> | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
> |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err:
> uppercase=bad)
> ||/ NameVersionDes
Quoting Brian May ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> ii mutt0.95.3-0.2 Text-based mailreader ...
>
> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 00 12:59:30 +1100
>
> Most programs recognise "00" as the year 2000 (eg Gnus). Not mutt
> though - it displays the same entry as:
>
> 188 * Feb 16 Ger Vloothuis ( 0)
Hello,
I noticed something strange with mutt from slink:
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ NameVersionDescription
+
Brian Servis wrote:
> Since you did not get a suggestion about dpkg-dev I assume you are using
> a version prior to 6.26. Just to make sure, do you have dpkg-dev
> installed? In slink dpkg-dev was only a Recommends dependency for
> alien, in potato it is a Depends dependency.
Thanks Brian -- tha
*- On 1 Jan, Robert L. Harris wrote about "alien not y2k compliant?"
>
> Ok...
> I'm trying to scan myself and build a nice little security tool. This
> is the first thing I've run into but still
>
>
>
>
> {0}:wally:/usr/src/Util-System/
Ok...
I'm trying to scan myself and build a nice little security tool. This
is the first thing I've run into but still
{0}:wally:/usr/src/Util-System/nmap>alien -d nmap-2.3BETA12*rpm
-- Examining nmap-2.3BETA12-1.i386.rpm
-- Unpacking nmap-2.3BETA12-1.i386.rpm
1222 blocks
-- Automatic p
Here's a link to Debian's Y2K statement:
http://www.debian.org/News/1998/19980104
Noel
*- Robert Dominguez wrote about "Y2K Compliant?"
| Hello,
|
| I am Robert Dominguez. My company uses Debian GNU Linux 1.3
| running a DNS server. The OS works fine with no bugs. My question
| is, is this version compliant with Y2K. I really don't see how it's
| directl
On Wed, 14 Oct 1998, Robert Dominguez wrote:
> I am Robert Dominguez. My company uses Debian GNU Linux 1.3
> running a DNS server. The OS works fine with no bugs. My question
> is, is this version compliant with Y2K. I really don't see how it's
> directly affected but I had to ask. If you
Hello,
I am Robert Dominguez. My company uses Debian GNU Linux 1.3
running a DNS server. The OS works fine with no bugs. My question
is, is this version compliant with Y2K. I really don't see how it's
directly affected but I had to ask. If you have a white paper in it,
please let me know
10 matches
Mail list logo