Re: mutt not y2k compliant???

2000-01-22 Thread Maciej Kalisiak
On Tue, Jan 18, 2000 at 04:19:20PM -0500, Brian May wrote: > Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge > | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed > |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: > uppercase=bad) > ||/ NameVersionDes

Re: mutt not y2k compliant???

2000-01-19 Thread David Wright
Quoting Brian May ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > ii mutt0.95.3-0.2 Text-based mailreader ... > > Date: Mon, 10 Jan 00 12:59:30 +1100 > > Most programs recognise "00" as the year 2000 (eg Gnus). Not mutt > though - it displays the same entry as: > > 188 * Feb 16 Ger Vloothuis ( 0)

mutt not y2k compliant???

2000-01-18 Thread Brian May
Hello, I noticed something strange with mutt from slink: Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ NameVersionDescription +

Re: alien not y2k compliant?

2000-01-03 Thread Joey Hess
Brian Servis wrote: > Since you did not get a suggestion about dpkg-dev I assume you are using > a version prior to 6.26. Just to make sure, do you have dpkg-dev > installed? In slink dpkg-dev was only a Recommends dependency for > alien, in potato it is a Depends dependency. Thanks Brian -- tha

Re: alien not y2k compliant?

2000-01-02 Thread Brian Servis
*- On 1 Jan, Robert L. Harris wrote about "alien not y2k compliant?" > > Ok... > I'm trying to scan myself and build a nice little security tool. This > is the first thing I've run into but still > > > > > {0}:wally:/usr/src/Util-System/

alien not y2k compliant?

2000-01-02 Thread Robert L. Harris
Ok... I'm trying to scan myself and build a nice little security tool. This is the first thing I've run into but still {0}:wally:/usr/src/Util-System/nmap>alien -d nmap-2.3BETA12*rpm -- Examining nmap-2.3BETA12-1.i386.rpm -- Unpacking nmap-2.3BETA12-1.i386.rpm 1222 blocks -- Automatic p

Re: Y2K Compliant?

1998-10-14 Thread Immanuel Yap
Here's a link to Debian's Y2K statement: http://www.debian.org/News/1998/19980104 Noel

Re: Y2K Compliant?

1998-10-14 Thread servis
*- Robert Dominguez wrote about "Y2K Compliant?" | Hello, | | I am Robert Dominguez. My company uses Debian GNU Linux 1.3 | running a DNS server. The OS works fine with no bugs. My question | is, is this version compliant with Y2K. I really don't see how it's | directl

Re: Y2K Compliant?

1998-10-14 Thread Nikolai Andreyevich Luzan
On Wed, 14 Oct 1998, Robert Dominguez wrote: > I am Robert Dominguez. My company uses Debian GNU Linux 1.3 > running a DNS server. The OS works fine with no bugs. My question > is, is this version compliant with Y2K. I really don't see how it's > directly affected but I had to ask. If you

Y2K Compliant?

1998-10-14 Thread Robert Dominguez
Hello, I am Robert Dominguez. My company uses Debian GNU Linux 1.3 running a DNS server. The OS works fine with no bugs. My question is, is this version compliant with Y2K. I really don't see how it's directly affected but I had to ask. If you have a white paper in it, please let me know