apt-get update jessie 32 bits

Bonjour, Lorsque je fais un apt-get update, j'obtiens à la fin ce message d'erreur : "W: Aucune clé publique n'est disponible pour la/les clé(s) suivante(s) : 1397BC53640DB551 W: Impossible de récupérer http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/dists/stable/Release Impossible de trouver l'e

Re: how to ignore checksum in apt-get update

On Tuesday 19 April 2016 07:23:23 Abdelkader Belahcene wrote: > HI, > I got the entire site from debian and ubuntu ( with apt-mirror) (not > necessary stable), > sometimes there is a problem of the cheksum, I want to disable the > check sum, > in apt-get update command. >

how to ignore checksum in apt-get update

HI, I got the entire site from debian and ubuntu ( with apt-mirror) (not necessary stable), sometimes there is a problem of the cheksum, I want to disable the check sum, in apt-get update command. How to tell apt-get to ignore the checksum. thanks a lot

Re: Depot Squeeze - apt-get update - erreur 404

quot; <mor...@gmail.com> À: "Liste Debian" <debian-user-french@lists.debian.org> Envoyé: Lundi 7 Mars 2016 09:01:06 Objet: Re: Depot Squeeze - apt-get update - erreur 404 Salut Au vue des retours d experiences que les membres de la liste ont eu, il semblerait que cela pose pro

Re: Depot Squeeze - apt-get update - erreur 404

Le 4 mars 2016 à 12:24, maderios a écrit : > On 03/04/2016 10:45 AM, Hugues MORIN wrote: > Bonjour > >> Je vais potasser les releasenotes (qui ont l'air tres complete) et >> passer sous Wheezy. >> > Je prends le train en marche, donc ce message est peut-être inutile. > Une

Re: Depot Squeeze - apt-get update - erreur 404

Salut Au vue des retours d experiences que les membres de la liste ont eu, il semblerait que cela pose probleme. Surement du a de trop grande difference entre squeeze et jessie. Je profite de ce probleme pour apprendre a faire les upgrade car tout desinstaller puis tout reinstaller peut s

Re: Depot Squeeze - apt-get update - erreur 404

On 03/04/2016 10:45 AM, Hugues MORIN wrote: Bonjour Je vais potasser les releasenotes (qui ont l'air tres complete) et passer sous Wheezy. Je prends le train en marche, donc ce message est peut-être inutile. Une question me titille: pourquoi ne pas passer à la dernière stable, Jessie?

Re: Depot Squeeze - apt-get update - erreur 404

Bonjour Merci pour vos reponses et vos conseils :D Je vais potasser les releasenotes (qui ont l'air tres complete) et passer sous Wheezy. Cordialement Hugues Le 3 mars 2016 à 18:11, Sébastien NOBILI a écrit : > Le jeudi 03 mars 2016 à 17:38, Olivier a écrit : > >

Re: Depot Squeeze - apt-get update - erreur 404

Le jeudi 03 mars 2016 à 17:38, Olivier a écrit : > Sans polémique aucune, je n'ai eu que des expériences très douloureuses > d'upgrade de Wheezy à Jessie, expériences qui contrastent avec la facilité > des autres migrations vers Wheezy, par exemple. De mon coté, je n’ai jamais autant galéré qu’au

Re: Depot Squeeze - apt-get update - erreur 404

Le 3 mars 2016 à 15:26, Gabriel Moreau a écrit : > La pause sous wheezy peut être minimale sans configurer aux petits oignons > le bousin. > Configurer aux petits oignons, non, mais comme le faisait remarquer Daniel, il vaut mieux faire un tantinet de

Re: Depot Squeeze - apt-get update - erreur 404

Le 03/03/2016 14:37, Hugues MORIN a écrit : > Y a-t-il des trucs particuliers aux quels il faut faire attention? > > Et en pratique, suffit-il juste de modifier le source.list (comme > indiquer ici: https://wiki.debian.org/fr/LTS/Using) pour que le noyau et > les paquet puissent etre upgrader?

Re: Depot Squeeze - apt-get update - erreur 404

Salut OK, Wheezy d'abord :D Je n'ai jamais fait cette operation, passer d'une version a la version superieure. Y a-t-il des trucs particuliers aux quels il faut faire attention? Et en pratique, suffit-il juste de modifier le source.list (comme indiquer ici:

Re: Depot Squeeze - apt-get update - erreur 404

Le 03/03/2016 11:00, Hugues MORIN a écrit : Salut Bonjour Merci de vos reponses C'est que je supposais... et donc si j'ai bien compris la fin du support pour une version signifie qu'il n'y aura plus aucunes ameliorations ou corrections pour cette versions. La version en question et

Re: Depot Squeeze - apt-get update - erreur 404

Le Wed, 2 Mar 2016 18:43:05 +0100, Sébastien NOBILI a écrit : > Le mercredi 02 mars 2016 à 18:06, Bernard Schoenacker a écrit : > > Depuis 3 jours il n'y a plus de support pour la version 6.0 et il > > serait sage de basculer vers la version 7.0 > > J'abonde dans ce

Re: Depot Squeeze - apt-get update - erreur 404

Le Wed, 2 Mar 2016 17:19:59 +0100, Hugues MORIN a écrit : 8<-- couic 8<--- bonjour, Depuis 3 jours il n'y a plus de support pour la version 6.0 et il serait sage de basculer vers la version 7.0 https://www.debian.org/releases/squeeze/ l'annonce:

Depot Squeeze - apt-get update - erreur 404

Bonjour Depuis aujourd'hui, j'ai une erreur 404 qui apparait quant je fais un apt-get update sur une de mes machines qui est en squeeze: :/etc/apt# apt-get update Ign http://mirror.ovh.net squeeze Release.gpg Ign http://mirror.ovh.net/debian/ squeeze/main Translation-en Ign http

Re: error message after apt-get update

On Sat, November 28, 2015 8:50 pm, Charles Kroeger wrote: > I was hoping someone might know what this message means after running > apt-get update: ... > Reading package lists... Done > W: Problem unlinking the file q - Clean (21: Is a directory) Now and then something gets corrup

Re: error message after apt-get update

On Sun, 29 Nov 2015 05:20:01 +0100 rlhar...@oplink.net wrote: > On Sat, November 28, 2015 8:50 pm, Charles Kroeger wrote: > > I was hoping someone might know what this message means after running > > apt-get update: > ... > > Reading package lists... Done > > W

Re: error message after apt-get update

On Sat, November 28, 2015 11:18 pm, Charles Kroeger wrote: > Ah, thanks so much..the offending q directory was in there (///lists) so > I just deleted that instead, but all is now well. If you delete the entire directory, it is rebuilt automatically as soon as you execute "apt-get upd

error message after apt-get update

I was hoping someone might know what this message means after running apt-get update: Reading package lists... Done W: Problem unlinking the file q - Clean (21: Is a directory) I cannot find any directory named 21 or Clean. A search with dpkg -l | grep q Clean or 21 turns

Re: apt-get update hanging on security and backports.

On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 16:20:11 -0400, Ed Jabbour wrote: > On Monday, October 12, 2015 02:34:25 AM Reco wrote: > > Hi. > > > > On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 21:19:32 -0400 > > > > Ed Jabbour wrote: > > > Running Wheezy. Recently, update has been hanging on > > >

Re: apt-get update hanging on security and backports.

Hi. On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 21:19:32 -0400 Ed Jabbour wrote: > Running Wheezy. Recently, update has been hanging on > http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main and > http://http.debian.net/debian wheezy-backports main. The other repos > at uchicago.edu breeze

Re: apt-get update hanging on security and backports.

On Monday, October 12, 2015 02:34:25 AM Reco wrote: > Hi. > > On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 21:19:32 -0400 > > Ed Jabbour wrote: > > Running Wheezy. Recently, update has been hanging on > > http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main and > > http://http.debian.net/debian

Re: apt-get update hanging on security and backports.

On 10/12/2015 01:20 PM, Ed Jabbour wrote: Looks OK to me. I changed the backports repo from debian.net to uchicago.edu and everything just flows. Now, if I can only find the problem with security.debian.net, which as I understand it, has no trustworthy mirrors I'm not using backports, but for

probleme de check somme avec apt-get update

5sum du fichier jessie/main/binary-i386/Packages, c'est le meme que celui declaré dans dists/jessie/release ???,* *Y a t il un moyen d'eviter ce checksum* * dans la commande apt-get update ??? merci beaucoupsalutations*

apt-get update hanging on security and backports.

Running Wheezy. Recently, update has been hanging on http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main and http://http.debian.net/debian wheezy-backports main. The other repos at uchicago.edu breeze through, but the two above just sit there waiting -- waiting -- waiting until they finally

Re: Erro no apt-get update usando repositório do Google Chrome

Enviado por Samsung Mobile. Mensagem original De : Listeiro 037 <listeiro_...@yahoo.com.br> Data:23/08/2015 08:23 (GMT-03:00) Para: debian-user-portuguese@lists.debian.org Assunto: Re: Erro no apt-get update usando repositório do Google Chrome Olá. Sim, co

Re: Erro no apt-get update usando repositório do Google Chrome

viado por Samsung Mobile. > > > Mensagem original > De : Listeiro 037 > Data:23/08/2015 08:23 (GMT-03:00) > Para: debian-user-portuguese@lists.debian.org > Assunto: Re: Erro no apt-get update usando repositório do Google Chrome > > > Olá. > > Sim, confo

Re: Erro no apt-get update usando repositório do Google Chrome

Enviado por Samsung Mobile. Mensagem original De : Listeiro 037 <listeiro_...@yahoo.com.br> Data:23/08/2015 08:23 (GMT-03:00) Para: debian-user-portuguese@lists.debian.org Assunto: Re: Erro no apt-get update usando repositório do Google Chrome Olá. Sim, co

Re: Erro no apt-get update usando repositório do Google Chrome

Em 23 de agosto de 2015 21:55, Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA l...@dutras.org escreveu: Le 23 août 2015 21:49:35 GMT-03:00, Listeiro 037 listeiro_...@yahoo.com.br a écrit : Mas quem configurou essa linha automaticamente no sources.list.d ? Como outros colegas já falaram, o próprio

Re: Erro no apt-get update usando repositório do Google Chrome

Em 23 de agosto de 2015 03:46, Listeiro 037 listeiro_...@yahoo.com.br escreveu: Saudações. Estou tendo problemas com a linha do repositório do Chrome no sources.list e as mensagens que aparecem após o apt-get update são Lendo listas de pacotes... Pronto W: Duplicate sources.list entry http

Re: Erro no apt-get update usando repositório do Google Chrome

: Saudações. Estou tendo problemas com a linha do repositório do Chrome no sources.list e as mensagens que aparecem após o apt-get update são Lendo listas de pacotes... Pronto W: Duplicate sources.list entry http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/ stable/main amd64 Packages (/var/lib/apt

Re: Erro no apt-get update usando repositório do Google Chrome

repositório do Chrome no sources.list e as mensagens que aparecem após o apt-get update são Lendo listas de pacotes... Pronto W: Duplicate sources.list entry http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/ stable/main amd64 Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/dl.google.com_linux_chrome_deb_dists_stable_main_binary

Erro no apt-get update usando repositório do Google Chrome

Saudações. Estou tendo problemas com a linha do repositório do Chrome no sources.list e as mensagens que aparecem após o apt-get update são Lendo listas de pacotes... Pronto W: Duplicate sources.list entry http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/ stable/main amd64 Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists

Re: Erro no apt-get update usando repositório do Google Chrome

Verificou no seu /etc/apt/sources.list se não possui alguma linha duplicado? Em Dom, 2015-08-23 às 03:46 -0300, Listeiro 037 escreveu: Saudações. Estou tendo problemas com a linha do repositório do Chrome no sources.list e as mensagens que aparecem após o apt-get update são Lendo listas

Re: Erro no apt-get update usando repositório do Google Chrome

problemas com a linha do repositório do Chrome no sources.list e as mensagens que aparecem após o apt-get update são Lendo listas de pacotes... Pronto W: Duplicate sources.list entry http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/ stable/main amd64 Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists

Re: Erro no apt-get update usando repositório do Google Chrome

037listeiro_...@yahoo.com.br escreveu: Saudações. Estou tendo problemas com a linha do repositório do Chrome no sources.list e as mensagens que aparecem após o apt-get update são Lendo listas de pacotes... Pronto W: Duplicate sources.list entry http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/ stable

Re: Erro no apt-get update usando repositório do Google Chrome

Le 23 août 2015 21:49:35 GMT-03:00, Listeiro 037 listeiro_...@yahoo.com.br a écrit : Mas quem configurou essa linha automaticamente no sources.list.d ? Como outros colegas já falaram, o próprio Google Chrome. Por isso o ideal é você tirar a que está em sources.list, porque cada atualização do

Re: Erro no apt-get update usando repositório do Google Chrome

a linha do repositório do Chrome no sources.list e as mensagens que aparecem após o apt-get update são Lendo listas de pacotes... Pronto W: Duplicate sources.list entry http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/ stable/main amd64 Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists

Apt pinning breaks apt-get update when net is temporarily down

Hi, yesterday I noticed something strange in the behavior of apt-get on my debian Jessie system. When I do apt-get update apt-get dist-upgrade the system is reported as up to date, no upgrades available - fine. Now I tried and simulated a temporarily broken internet connection (just to see

Coisa estranha com apt-get update/upgrade

Saudações. Aconteceu uma coisa bastante estranha. Rodei o apt-get update e apt-get upgrade prá atualizar o sistema. Isso é banal. Depois de muito tempo fui conferir e vi que esqueci de pressionar o 'S' prá atualizar (usar opção -y prá automatizar é meio Win prá mim). Precisava só atualizar o

Re: Coisa estranha com apt-get update/upgrade

parecendo problema de mirror desatualizado. Você deve estar apontando para alguma entrada DNS com diversos mirrors, e algum deles não estava tão atual quanto o outro na hora do apt-get update. O problema vai corrigir-se sozinho quando todos os mirrors que você acertar no apt-get update possuirem

apt-get update W: A error occurred during the signature verification.

debian-user: I've been seeing apt-get update failures lately: 2015-03-22 08:52:02 root@i72600s ~ # apt-get update Hit http://approx wheezy Release.gpg Get:1 http://approx wheezy-updates Release.gpg [836 B] Hit http://approx wheezy/updates Release.gpg Hit http://approx wheezy Release Get:2

apt-get update GPG error: Internal error: Good signature, but could not determine key fingerprint?!

Hello all I am seeing a rather strange error. I have a wheezy VM which I am trying to update, but I get the above error on the main source and also on security source: W: GPG error: http://security.debian.org wheezy/updates Release: Internal error: Good signature, but could not determine

Re: apt-get update GPG error: Internal error: Good signature, but could not determine key fingerprint?!

Hi, On 11/17/2014 05:26 PM, i...@thargoid.co.uk wrote: I am seeing a rather strange error. I have a wheezy VM which I am trying to update, but I get the above error on the main source and also on security source: W: GPG error: http://security.debian.org wheezy/updates Release: Internal

Re: apt-get update GPG error: Internal error: Good signature, but could not determine key fingerprint?!

On 2014-11-17 17:02, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: Hi, On 11/17/2014 05:26 PM, i...@thargoid.co.uk wrote: I am seeing a rather strange error. I have a wheezy VM which I am trying to update, but I get the above error on the main source and also on security source: W: GPG error:

Re: apt-get update GPG error: Internal error: Good signature, but could not determine key fingerprint?!

On 2014-11-17 17:05, i...@thargoid.co.uk wrote: On 2014-11-17 17:02, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: Hi, On 11/17/2014 05:26 PM, i...@thargoid.co.uk wrote: I am seeing a rather strange error. I have a wheezy VM which I am trying to update, but I get the above error on the main source and also on

Erro no apt-get update

Boa tarde pessoal, Quando digito o comando no terminal apt-get update o programa faz a atualização, mas alguns repositórios dão erro, Vou postar abaixo meu arquivo source.lst: # # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 7.6.0 _Wheezy_ - Official amd64 CD Binary-1 20140712-14:11]/ wheezy main deb cdrom

Re: Erro no apt-get update

Mazoniwmaz...@icloud.com escreveu: Boa tarde pessoal, Quando digito o comando no terminal apt-get update o programa faz a atualização, mas alguns repositórios dão erro, Vou postar abaixo meu arquivo source.lst: # # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 7.6.0 _Wheezy_ - Official amd64 CD Binary-1 20140712

Re: Erro no apt-get update

/stable/ Em 09/11/14, Wellington Mazoniwmaz...@icloud.com escreveu: Boa tarde pessoal, Quando digito o comando no terminal apt-get update o programa faz a atualização, mas alguns repositórios dão erro, Vou postar abaixo meu arquivo source.lst: # # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 7.6.0 _Wheezy_

Re: Erro no apt-get update

] http://debian-handbook.info/browse/pt-BR/stable/ Em 09/11/14, Wellington Mazoniwmaz...@icloud.com escreveu: Boa tarde pessoal, Quando digito o comando no terminal apt-get update o programa faz a atualização, mas alguns repositórios dão erro, Vou postar abaixo meu arquivo source.lst

Re: apt-get update problem

On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 06:20:38PM -0700, John Conover wrote: Running apt-get update on one of my machines gives: W: Failed to fetch copy:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/Debian%20GNU_Linux%207%20%5fWheezy%5f%20-%20Official%20Snapshot%20i386%20LIVE_INSTALL%20Binary%2020140723-18

Re: apt-get update problem

Darac Marjal writes: On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 06:20:38PM -0700, John Conover wrote: Running apt-get update on one of my machines gives: W: Failed to fetch copy:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/Debian%20GNU_Linux%207%20%5fWheezy%5f%20-%20Official%20Snapshot%20i386%20LIVE_INSTALL%20Binary

Re: apt-get update problem

On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 06:20:38PM -0700, John Conover wrote: Running apt-get update on one of my machines gives: W: Failed to fetch copy:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/Debian%20GNU_Linux%207%20%5fWheezy%5f%20-%20Official%20Snapshot%20i386%20LIVE_INSTALL%20Binary%2020140723-18

apt-get update problem

Running apt-get update on one of my machines gives: W: Failed to fetch copy:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/Debian%20GNU_Linux%207%20%5fWheezy%5f%20-%20Official%20Snapshot%20i386%20LIVE_INSTALL%20Binary%2020140723-18:32_dists_wheezy_main_binary-i386_Packages Failed to stat - stat (2

Re: apt-get update during boot

On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 07:21:09AM +0200, Matthias Bodenbinder wrote: Hi, somehow my system is running an apt-get update or something similar during boot. Whenever I login after boot I can do a apt-get dist-upgrade directly because the package list is already up to date. If I am too fast

Re: apt-get update during boot

On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 07:21:09AM +0200, Matthias Bodenbinder wrote: Hi, somehow my system is running an apt-get update or something similar during boot. Whenever I login after boot I can do a apt-get dist-upgrade directly because the package list is already up to date. If I am too fast

Re: apt-get update during boot

Matthias Bodenbinder: somehow my system is running an apt-get update or something similar during boot. Whenever I login after boot I can do a apt-get dist-upgrade directly because the package list is already up to date. If I am too fast with the apt-get dist-upgrade it even complains

error apt-get update

applein@debian:~$ sudo apt-get update Atingido http://ftp.br.debian.org squeeze Release.gpg Ign http://ftp.br.debian.org/debian/ squeeze/main Translation-en Ign http://ftp.br.debian.org/debian/ squeeze/main Translation-pt Ign http://ftp.br.debian.org/debian/ squeeze/main Translation-pt_BR

apt-get update during boot

Hi, somehow my system is running an apt-get update or something similar during boot. Whenever I login after boot I can do a apt-get dist-upgrade directly because the package list is already up to date. If I am too fast with the apt-get dist-upgrade it even complains that the database is locked

Re: apt-get update not downloading Packages.gz|bz2 - trying to load Packages which is not on server

, which both return 403. AND apt-get update then falls back to trying to download Packages, which does not exist, producing the 404. So the solution is file access permissions, not lack of existence (nor unzipping a .bz2 file for example). Could the default error (Warning) output for apt-get update

apt-get update not downloading Packages.gz|bz2 - trying to load Packages which is not on server

On a wheezy install (basically default from what I can tell), why would apt-get update try to load Packages file from server when the server serves Packages.gz and Packages.bz2? The repo is a http served mirror created with debmirror. I think I came across this once a few years ago

Re: apt-get update fails

On 08/07/14 21:31, Bob Proulx wrote: Tony van der Hoff wrote: Err http://security.debian.org wheezy/updates/main amd64 Packages 403 Forbidden ... Any suggestions as to what's wrong here? Do you have any other apt config settings such as for a proxy server that would get in the middle?

apt-get update fails

Hi, I'm trying to update my VPS via SSH, but am drawing a blank: root@shell2:~# apt-get update Ign http://ftp.uk.debian.org wheezy Release.gpg Ign http://security.debian.org wheezy/updates Release.gpg Ign http://security.debian.org wheezy/updates Release Ign http://ftp.uk.debian.org wheezy

Re: apt-get update fails

Does elinks http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian run on your system? or you see 403 forbidden? W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/dists/wheezy-updates/non-free/binary-amd64/Packages 403 Forbidden E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used

Re: apt-get update fails

On 08/07/14 19:04, Pol Hallen wrote: Does elinks http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian run on your system? or you see 403 forbidden? Thanks for the reply, Pol. I don't have elinks (and can't install it using apt-get), but wget resolves fine. W: Failed to fetch

Re: apt-get update fails

Tony van der Hoff wrote: Err http://security.debian.org wheezy/updates/main amd64 Packages 403 Forbidden ... Any suggestions as to what's wrong here? Do you have any other apt config settings such as for a proxy server that would get in the middle? Look in /etc/apt/apt.conf and

Re: apt-get update: unnecessary use of disk space

On Du, 06 iul 14, 23:30:28, Bob Proulx wrote: Andrei POPESCU wrote: Bob Proulx wrote: Of course now with SSDs that standard thinking needs to be thought out again. I haven't seen any benchmark data for full SSDs. I imagine that it will have much flatter performance curves up to very

Re: apt-get update: unnecessary use of disk space

On Vi, 20 iun 14, 18:54:45, Bob Proulx wrote: Of course now with SSDs that standard thinking needs to be thought out again. I haven't seen any benchmark data for full SSDs. I imagine that it will have much flatter performance curves up to very full on an SSD. It would super awesome if

Re: apt-get update: unnecessary use of disk space

Andrei POPESCU wrote: Bob Proulx wrote: Of course now with SSDs that standard thinking needs to be thought out again. I haven't seen any benchmark data for full SSDs. I imagine that it will have much flatter performance curves up to very full on an SSD. It would super awesome if

Re: apt-get update: unnecessary use of disk space

B a écrit : Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote: What do you mean when you say these blocks won't be free ... without defragmenting? Please explain. If you have references to share that explained the details that would be great. Just think about this: * HD original = 1000 * HD

Re: apt-get update: unnecessary use of disk space

On Sun, 22 Jun 2014 23:24:32 -0600 Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote: What do you mean when you say these blocks won't be free ... without defragmenting? Please explain. If you have references to share that explained the details that would be great. Just think about this: * HD original =

apt-get update upgrade = zfsonlinux broken

debian-user: This morning, I did: # apt-get update # apt-get upgrade After rebooting, my ZFS on Linux pool and file systems no longer work: # zpool list no pools available # zfs list no datasets available I believe the ZFS kernel module is loaded: # dmesg

Re: apt-get update upgrade = zfsonlinux broken

debian-user: I filed an issue report on GitHub: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/pkg-zfs/issues/116 David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Re: apt-get update: unnecessary use of disk space

B wrote: Bob Proulx wrote: completely out of disk space. For that the reasonable amount of disk space reserved is an absolute value that a system might need on that partitions. That part really shouldn't be a percentage of the disk but should be a finite reserved amount. It isn't

Re: apt-get update: unnecessary use of disk space

Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote: If you are interested in retrieving some disk space on this partition, I would suggest to reduce the percentage of diskspace which may only be allocated by privileged processes. It is normally 5% of the diskspace of a partition. In your case this makes ca. 1.8 GB. To

Re: apt-get update: unnecessary use of disk space

On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 18:54:45 -0600 Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote: completely out of disk space. For that the reasonable amount of disk space reserved is an absolute value that a system might need on that partitions. That part really shouldn't be a percentage of the disk but should be a

Re: apt-get update: unnecessary use of disk space

Chris Bannister wrote, on 06/16/2014 00:27: On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 11:04:14PM +0200, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote: ... For the ext family of file systems this can be done on the running system. The suspense is killing me. Is it a secret? Of course it's not, we're dealing with FOSS ;-) The tool

apt-get update: unnecessary use of disk space

Hi, Does this seem necessary? root@tal:~# apt-get clean root@tal:~# df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda536G 34G 266M 100% / [...] root@tal:~# apt-get update Hit http://ftp.debian.org jessie InRelease Hit http://security.debian.org jessie/updates InRelease

Re: apt-get update: unnecessary use of disk space

Am Montag, 16. Juni 2014, 05:59:20 schrieb Chris Bannister: Hi, Hi Chris, Does this seem necessary? root@tal:~# apt-get clean root@tal:~# df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda536G 34G 266M 100% / [...] root@tal:~# apt-get update Hit http

Re: apt-get update: unnecessary use of disk space

On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 05:59:20AM +1200, Chris Bannister wrote: Hi, Does this seem necessary? root@tal:~# apt-get clean root@tal:~# df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda536G 34G 266M 100% / [...] root@tal:~# apt-get update Hit http

Re: apt-get update: unnecessary use of disk space

On 2014-06-15 19:59 +0200, Chris Bannister wrote: Does this seem necessary? root@tal:~# apt-get clean root@tal:~# df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda536G 34G 266M 100% / root@tal:~# apt-get update [...] root@tal:~# df -h Filesystem Size Used

Re: apt-get update: unnecessary use of disk space

!, that seems about right, I've noticed a 40M difference, so I guess you have deb-src entries in your sources.list, whereas I don't have any. strace -e open on apt-get update open(/var/cache/apt/pkgcache.bin.MkBOW1, O_RDWR|O_CREAT|O_EXCL, 0600) = 5 [...] As to how much it makes sense to have a cache

Re: apt-get update: unnecessary use of disk space

If you are interested in retrieving some disk space on this partition, I would suggest to reduce the percentage of diskspace which may only be allocated by privileged processes. It is normally 5% of the diskspace of a partition. In your case this makes ca. 1.8 GB. To me this seems more than ever

Re: apt-get update: unnecessary use of disk space

On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 11:04:14PM +0200, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote: If you are interested in retrieving some disk space on this partition, I would suggest to reduce the percentage of diskspace which may only be allocated by privileged processes. It is normally 5% of the diskspace of a

Another apt-get update: Hash Sum mismatch

-get update' fails consitently with those messages. However, if I point /etc/apt/sources.list to the same external mirror the local mirror updates from (ftp.us.debian.org), the update succeeds just fine. So, no matter what, 'apt-get update' on the testing VM fails against the local mirror, and I am

Re: Another apt-get update: Hash Sum mismatch

On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Craig L. cr...@gtek.biz wrote: Hello all, I have a local mirror of stable, and last night I added the testing repository and apparently successfully mirrored it. On another system, I have a VM running stable, and another running testing. The stable VM has

Re: Another apt-get update: Hash Sum mismatch

On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 01:02:55PM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote: On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Craig L. cr...@gtek.biz wrote: On another system, I have a VM running stable, and another running testing. The stable VM has been around for over a year and makes use of the local mirror

apt-get update: Hash Sum mismatch!

Hi people! when I run apt-get update, I always receive a bunch of error messages, as well if I want to install something through aptitude, debian isn't capable to install packages, because those are not on the server. And ideas what I might of doing right ?! for a short response telling me what

Re: apt-get update: Hash Sum mismatch!

On 28/03/14 13:51, Tamer Higazi wrote: Hi people! when I run apt-get update, I always receive a bunch of error messages, as well if I want to install something through aptitude, debian isn't capable to install packages, because those are not on the server. And ideas what I might of doing

Re: apt-get update: Hash Sum mismatch!

Hey, I did! It works all nice now! Thanks, Tamer Am 28.03.2014 04:25, schrieb Scott Ferguson: On 28/03/14 13:51, Tamer Higazi wrote: Hi people! when I run apt-get update, I always receive a bunch of error messages, as well if I want to install something through aptitude, debian isn't

Re: rare lijst van apt-get update, of toch niet?

Diederik de Haas schreef op ma 23-12-2013 om 08:50 [+0100]: On Sunday 22 December 2013 22:20:26 familie Voncken wrote: Het mogelijk rare is het vele i386 pakketten in de lijst terwijl ik 64bits laptop heb. Waarschijnlijk is dat een overblijfsel van het icaclient pakket dat daarvan

Re: rare lijst van apt-get update, of toch niet?

dpkg: error: unable to create new file '/var/lib/dpkg/arch-new': Toegang geweigerd familie@Voncken:~$ su Wachtwoord: root@Voncken:/home/familie# dpkg --remove-architecture i386 root@Voncken:/home/familie# apt-get update Geraakt http://ftp.nl.debian.org wheezy Release.gpg Geraakt http

Re: rare lijst van apt-get update, of toch niet?

On Monday 23 December 2013 21:10:52 familie Voncken wrote: familie@Voncken:~$ dpkg --remove-architecture i386 dpkg: error: cannot remove architecture 'i386' currently in use by the database Heb je dat commando wel als root uitgevoerd? Kennelijk heb ik nog meer programma's die daarvan

Re: rare lijst van apt-get update, of toch niet?

On Monday 23 December 2013 22:11:19 Diederik de Haas wrote: aptitude search '?narrow(~i,~ri386' dat moet uiteraard aptitude search '?narrow(~i,~ri386)' zijn of aptitude search '?narrow(~i, ?architecture(foreign) (~r = ?architecture) -- GPG: 0x138E41915C7EFED6 signature.asc Description: This is

Re: rare lijst van apt-get update, of toch niet?

Op 2013-12-22 om 22:00 schreef familie Voncken: Beste Debian-liefhebbers, Ik wil graag jullie mijn lijst zien die apt-get update genereert. Eerst mijn sources.list: # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux wheezy-DI-a1 _Wheezy_ - Official Snapshot amd64 N$ #deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux wheezy-DI-a1

Re: apt-get update fails after wheezy update

Steven G. Johnson wrote: Jochen Spieker wrote: Very strange. Did you try changing to another mirror, just to see if that helps? Did you set a proxy in /etc/apt/apt.conf{,.d}? That was the problem: we had previously been using the approx proxy server, and there was an Acquire::http::proxy

apt-get update fails after wheezy update

A few days ago I did an apt-get update apt-get dist-upgrade on our amd64 Debian system to update it to wheezy. Things went mostly okay (although it got stuck once on a php update and I had to kill and restart apt-get). However, ever since then apt-get update has failed. I am not behind

Re: apt-get update fails after wheezy update

sometimes, the commands below works for me: sudo rm /var/lib/apt/lists/* -vf sudo apt-get clean sudo apt-get update On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Steven G. Johnson stev...@alum.mit.eduwrote: A few days ago I did an apt-get update apt-get dist-upgrade on our amd64 Debian system

Re: apt-get update fails after wheezy update

On 10/10/13 3:54 PM, Danilo Sampaio wrote: sometimes, the commands below works for me: sudo rm /var/lib/apt/lists/* -vf sudo apt-get clean sudo apt-get update Unfortunately, this doesn't seem to help. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >