David writes:
> On Sat, 21 Sep 2019 at 23:23, Jack Dangler wrote:
> > On 9/20/19 9:58 AM, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > > Jack Dangler wrote:
>
> > >> Wanted a utility for snipping youtube clips, recording skype, etc. and
> > >> someone suggested 'audi
On Sat, 21 Sep 2019 at 23:23, Jack Dangler wrote:
> On 9/20/19 9:58 AM, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > Jack Dangler wrote:
> >> Wanted a utility for snipping youtube clips, recording skype, etc. and
> >> someone suggested 'audio recorder' to me. I found some infor
On 9/21/19 10:36 AM, Dan Ritter wrote:
Jack Dangler wrote:
On 9/20/19 9:58 AM, Dan Ritter wrote:
Jack Dangler wrote:
Wanted a utility for snipping youtube clips, recording skype, etc. and
someone suggested 'audio recorder' to me. I found some information for it
here -
https://min
Jack Dangler wrote:
>
> On 9/20/19 9:58 AM, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > Jack Dangler wrote:
> > > Wanted a utility for snipping youtube clips, recording skype, etc. and
> > > someone suggested 'audio recorder' to me. I found some information for it
> > &
On 9/20/19 9:58 AM, Dan Ritter wrote:
Jack Dangler wrote:
Wanted a utility for snipping youtube clips, recording skype, etc. and
someone suggested 'audio recorder' to me. I found some information for it
here -
https://mintguide.org/audio/267-audio-recorder-capture-and-record-audi
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 09:06:56AM -0400, Jack Dangler wrote:
Wanted a utility for snipping youtube clips, recording skype,
etc.
...
audacity is simple to use and allows editing. Install also
"pavucontrol" (pulse audio volume control), which is a simple
graphical utility which allows you to se
Jack Dangler wrote:
> Wanted a utility for snipping youtube clips, recording skype, etc. and
> someone suggested 'audio recorder' to me. I found some information for it
> here -
> https://mintguide.org/audio/267-audio-recorder-capture-and-record-audio-from-any-dev
Wanted a utility for snipping youtube clips, recording skype, etc. and
someone suggested 'audio recorder' to me. I found some information for
it here -
https://mintguide.org/audio/267-audio-recorder-capture-and-record-audio-from-any-device-on-linux-mint.html
.
Adding the repo fo
> Scheduling an audio recording with sound-recorder failed on my etch
> box. Only about the first 3 hours were recorded, resulting in a file
> just 2.0 GB large. (This was a recording of an opera production, so
> it is difficult / impossible to predict suitable breaks in order to
> record smaller c
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:34:04 +0100
Johannes Wiedersich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is this for streaming audio or for recording from the audio-in of the
> sound card?
Both, although streaming to mplayer's internal dumpstream format uses
a lot less disk space for the internal format. Of course, y
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 04:54:03AM EST, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> Scheduling an audio recording with sound-recorder failed on my etch box.
> Only about the first 3 hours were recorded, resulting in a file just 2.0
> GB large. (This was a recording of an opera production, so it is
> difficult / i
Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
I record KUSC operas with mplayer. Evidently you have broadband, and I
do not.
I have... at work. This was a recording from a FM tuner via my usb sound
card...
But I just recorded 5 hours = 2.2GB without a problem. But I
have ext2. mplayer i
Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 10:54:03AM +0100, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
>> Is this a bug in sound recorder?
> regular wav files have a 2GB limit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wav#Limitations
So it's a 'bug' or better a design flaw of the wav format. I should have
kno
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> I record KUSC operas with mplayer. Evidently you have broadband, and I
> do not.
I have... at work. This was a recording from a FM tuner via my usb sound
card...
> But I just recorded 5 hours = 2.2GB without a problem. But I
> have ext2. mplayer is used with pure command
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 10:54:03AM +0100, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> Scheduling an audio recording with sound-recorder failed on my etch box.
> Only about the first 3 hours were recorded, resulting in a file just 2.0
> GB large. (This was a recording of an opera production, so it is
> difficult /
Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> Scheduling an audio recording with sound-recorder failed on my etch box.
> Only about the first 3 hours were recorded, resulting in a file just 2.0
> GB large.
PS: The resulting .wav file does not play / import with aplay,
play-sample, audacity, xmms -- kplayer was th
Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
Scheduling an audio recording with sound-recorder failed on my etch box.
Only about the first 3 hours were recorded, resulting in a file just 2.0
GB large. (This was a recording of an opera production, so it is
difficult / impossible to predict suitable breaks in order
Scheduling an audio recording with sound-recorder failed on my etch box.
Only about the first 3 hours were recorded, resulting in a file just 2.0
GB large. (This was a recording of an opera production, so it is
difficult / impossible to predict suitable breaks in order to record
smaller chunks.)
I
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:10:07 -0600
"Russell L. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> require good engineering and typically are expensive. Once in the
> digital realm, there is no major problem with integrity of the signal.
I remember reading an article in a German audiophile magazine about a
devi
* Bob McGowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070226 11:14]:
> Russell L. Harris wrote:
>
>> Within the past year or two there have become available a number of
>> alternatives to the computer sound card. These eliminate the
>> pitfalls (especially the electrical noise) associated with sound
>> cards, as wel
Russell L. Harris wrote:
Within the past year or two there have become available a number of
alternatives to the computer sound card. These eliminate the pitfalls
(especially the electrical noise) associated with sound cards, as well
as the problem of hardware and software obsolescence.
Som
Howard Eisenberger wrote:
On 2007-02-25, H.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I remember there is an application to record audio (mic or line-in) and
IIRC it had the X11 interface. What I also remember is the level meters
it had, they were two dials, one for each channel, and had needles
showing t
vehicle). But I can't remember the application's name. Can anyone
help?
thanks,
->HS
somewhat late:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache search audio recorder
ardour-gtk - digital audio workstation (graphical gtk interface)
bplay - Buffered audio file player/recorder
cdrecord - co
On 2007-02-25, H.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I remember there is an application to record audio (mic or line-in) and
> IIRC it had the X11 interface. What I also remember is the level meters
> it had, they were two dials, one for each channel, and had needles
> showing the levels (something
* H.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070224 19:14]:
>
> I remember there is an application to record audio (mic or line-in) and
> IIRC it had the X11 interface. What I also remember is the level meters
> it had, they were two dials, one for each channel, and had needles
> showing the levels (something l
I remember there is an application to record audio (mic or line-in) and
IIRC it had the X11 interface. What I also remember is the level meters
it had, they were two dials, one for each channel, and had needles
showing the levels (something like a speedometer on dashboards of a
vehicle). But
26 matches
Mail list logo
