Re: bind vs. bind9

2004-02-04 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 02:26:25PM -0500, Bernd Prager wrote: I assume the're still open dependecies with the old bind!? How do I find out what's wrong and fix that? Purge it instead of remove. 8:o) - -- .''`. Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]

bind vs. bind9

2004-02-02 Thread Bernd Prager
I just replaced bind with bind9: apt-get install bind9 and it told me that bind was removed and bind9 was installed. But bind is still listed in my package list. dpkg -l now reports: rc bind 8.3.3-2.0woody Internet Domain Name Server ii bind9 9.2.1-2.woody. Internet Domain

Re: bind vs. bind9

2004-02-02 Thread Adam Aube
On Monday 02 February 2004 02:26 pm, Bernd Prager wrote: I just replaced bind with bind9: apt-get install bind9 and it told me that bind was removed and bind9 was installed. But bind is still listed in my package list. dpkg -l now reports: rc bind 8.3.3-2.0woody Internet Domain