Hi,
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 01:32:01PM -0300, Tiago Saboga wrote:
> Freddy Freeloader writes:
> > Thorny wrote:
> >> On Sun, 17 May 2009 12:31:05 -0700, Freddy Freeloader posted:
> >>> In my mind there is no good reason for this fix to go into Sid
> >>> and then sit there until the dependencies
Freddy Freeloader writes:
> Thorny wrote:
>> On Sun, 17 May 2009 12:31:05 -0700, Freddy Freeloader posted:
>>> In my mind there is no good reason for this fix to go into Sid
>>> and then sit there until the dependencies are satisfied for that version
>>> number.
>>>
>>
>> Well, that is the s
On Seg, 18 Mai 2009, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
It is also standard flow to fix bugs that are found in testing, not
to always wait until a new version comes down from Sid.
No, that's not the Debian flow.
That's the purpose for which testing exists. Those bugs not found
while a package is in
Thorny wrote:
On Sun, 17 May 2009 12:31:05 -0700, Freddy Freeloader posted:
[...]
I have to ask why. Why is this left up every user of testing to fix
this problem themselves when the fix is so simple?
[...]
One possible answer to this question would be that users of "testing" are
sup
On Sun, 17 May 2009 12:31:05 -0700, Freddy Freeloader posted:
[...]
>
> I have to ask why. Why is this left up every user of testing to fix
> this problem themselves when the fix is so simple?
>[...]
One possible answer to this question would be that users of "testing" are
supposed to be able t
On Mon,18.May.09, 00:48:44, Matteo Riva wrote:
> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Javier Barroso wrote:
>
> > It seems resolved in unstable,
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=525183
>
> I have rebuilt the package from source as suggested by a user in that
> bug report, but now
Matteo Riva wrote:
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Javier Barroso wrote:
It seems resolved in unstable,
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=525183
I have rebuilt the package from source as suggested by a user in that
bug report, but now the update manager flags gnome-vo
Javier Barroso wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
I'd like to point this bug out as it has been around now for 3 1/2 months
with no official resolution. What's worse is that this bug was caused by
the Debian gnome-volume-manager maintainer. Nobody else is
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Javier Barroso wrote:
> It seems resolved in unstable,
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=525183
I have rebuilt the package from source as suggested by a user in that
bug report, but now the update manager flags gnome-volume-manager as
needing an
Hi,
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> I'd like to point this bug out as it has been around now for 3 1/2 months
> with no official resolution. What's worse is that this bug was caused by
> the Debian gnome-volume-manager maintainer. Nobody else is responsible for
> it.
I'd like to point this bug out as it has been around now for 3 1/2
months with no official resolution. What's worse is that this bug was
caused by the Debian gnome-volume-manager maintainer. Nobody else is
responsible for it. He disabled automount when he compiled the
gnome-volume-manager pa
11 matches
Mail list logo
