On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 04:15:48AM -0400, Brian Sammon wrote:
> dpkg-buildpackage definitely doesn't have (at least, I don't see it in the
> manpage) anything as simple and straightforward as sbuild's "--binNMU"
> option. But I'd be interested in hearing recipes for doing this with
> dpkg-buildpac
On Mon, 07 Jul 2014 21:08:32 +0200
Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2014-07-07 20:51 +0200, Brian Sammon wrote:
>
> > So I would have to install/learn "sbuild".
>
> If you just want to rebuild packages locally, this is not really
> necessary.
Are you saying there's another way to do what I want to do?
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014 20:39:06 +0100
Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 02:51:40PM -0400, Brian Sammon wrote:
> > So I would have to install/learn "sbuild".
>
> sbuild can be used to do it, but you don't need sbuild. I think
> dpkg-buildpackage would be sufficient,
dpkg-buildpackag
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 02:51:40PM -0400, Brian Sammon wrote:
> So I would have to install/learn "sbuild".
sbuild can be used to do it, but you don't need sbuild. I think
dpkg-buildpackage would be sufficient, but you'd ideally do it in a chroot of
some sort, which sbuild manages. Another tool to
On 2014-07-07 20:51 +0200, Brian Sammon wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jul 2014 15:55:22 +0100
> Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>
>> Packages in the archive with a "+bN" version suffix, such as "+b1", have be
>> 'binNMUd': essentially rebuilt without any source changes because the
>> environment has changed (such a
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014 15:55:22 +0100
Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> Packages in the archive with a "+bN" version suffix, such as "+b1", have be
> 'binNMUd': essentially rebuilt without any source changes because the
> environment has changed (such as a version bump of a library dependency).
Ah! Thank y
Packages in the archive with a "+bN" version suffix, such as "+b1", have been
'binNMUd': essentially rebuilt without any source changes because the
environment has changed (such as a version bump of a library dependency).
In your case it would be worthwhile documenting the fact your package differ
Hi
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 01:37:17AM -0400, Brian Sammon wrote:
> I want to re-build a package for personal use, and have a special version
> number for my custom build.
>
> Since I'm not planning on customizing the source or the debian control files,
> I think the ideal choice is to build a b
I want to re-build a package for personal use, and have a special version
number for my custom build.
Since I'm not planning on customizing the source or the debian control files, I
think the ideal choice is to build a binary package with a suffix like "+b1" or
"+local" on the end.
An example
9 matches
Mail list logo