-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 11:53:22AM +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Nested-Functions.html
>
> But my example code has no nested functions.
> The two functions are disjoint. The main
Hi,
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Nested-Functions.html
But my example code has no nested functions.
The two functions are disjoint. The main() function only contains
a type declaration by function prototype, not the function body.
I can change the code to plain K&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 11:35:59PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it seems that gcc just hates a static function declaration inside a function.
>
> This code (without any include)
>
> static int bla(int x)
> {
>return (x != 1);
> }
On 10/28/2017 02:30 PM, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 01:55:54PM -0700, Fred wrote:
Hi,
The source is at https://www.pastebin.com/X4a4p9U2
There are many similar lines with static keyword which the compiler didn't
complain about.
Except that every other line with the stati
Hi,
it seems that gcc just hates a static function declaration inside a function.
This code (without any include)
static int bla(int x)
{
return (x != 1);
}
int main()
{
static int bla(int x);
return(bla(0));
}
yields
t.c: In function ‘main’:
t.c:19:13: error: invalid
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 01:55:54PM -0700, Fred wrote:
> Hi,
> The source is at https://www.pastebin.com/X4a4p9U2
>
> There are many similar lines with static keyword which the compiler didn't
> complain about.
>
Except that every other line with the static keyword in that file is a
proper functi
On 10/28/2017 09:50 AM, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 09:29:16AM -0700, Fred wrote:
Hello,
I need to compile an older program and have a compile error. How can I
resolve this? Unfortunately I am not a C programmer although I do assembler
programming.
Here is the output of
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 09:29:16AM -0700, Fred wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I need to compile an older program and have a compile error. How can I
> resolve this? Unfortunately I am not a C programmer although I do assembler
> programming.
>
> Here is the output of make:
>
> making all in ./src...
> ma
Hello,
I need to compile an older program and have a compile error. How can I
resolve this? Unfortunately I am not a C programmer although I do
assembler programming.
Here is the output of make:
making all in ./src...
make[1]: Entering directory '/opt/pcb-1.6.3p/src'
gcc -m32 -g -O2 -fno-s
Hello!
I have a problem compiling samefile with clang on Wheezy. configure
gives the following error:
"checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error:
C compiler cannot create executables
See `config.log' for more details."
config.log says:
"configure:1683: checking for C
also sprach Murat Ugur EMINOGLU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.05.04.1144 +0100]:
> i compiled kernel on debian etch (two times). But i have a same problem
>
> No raid arrays. No Lvm
You have not provided any details, such as the configuration and
command line used, so we can't really help you.
> ALER
Dear all,
i compiled kernel on debian etch (two times). But i have a same problem
No raid arrays. No Lvm
compiled 2.6.21 , 2.6.25 same problem
Begin: Assembling all Md arrays
mdadm : No array found in config file on automatically
failure : failed to assemble all arrays
Check root=bootarg cat
Robert Jerrard wrote:
I am trying to enter the world of java applets but am having problems
compiling applet code. I downloaded an analog clock applet from the web
(which works) but want to modify it. However:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Java$ kaffe AnalogClockApplet
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: main
I am trying to enter the world of java applets but am having problems
compiling applet code. I downloaded an analog clock applet from the web
(which works) but want to modify it. However:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Java$ kaffe AnalogClockApplet
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: main
at java.lang.VMThrowabl
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 10:36:04PM +0100, Dirk wrote:
> which package containes ?
>
> MPlayer needs it for the vesa mode output...
apt-get install apt-file
apt-file update
apt-file search vbe.h
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Almut Behrens wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 10:36:04PM +0100, Dirk wrote:
>
>>which package containes ?
>>
>>MPlayer needs it for the vesa mode output...
>
>
> Just grepped in the mplayer sources for a reference of "vbe.h", but
> couldn't find anything -- so, not sure what exactly you need...
>
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 10:36:04PM +0100, Dirk wrote:
> which package containes ?
>
> MPlayer needs it for the vesa mode output...
Just grepped in the mplayer sources for a reference of "vbe.h", but
couldn't find anything -- so, not sure what exactly you need...
Normally, for the "true" VESA mo
which package containes ?
MPlayer needs it for the vesa mode output...
Thanks!
Dirk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 11/29/05, jpdrawneek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >do you have the kernel sources in your hd?
> >
> >
> >
> yes
>
> >the kernel sources should be in the /usr/src/kernel-source-2.6.8/
> >
> >
> >
> yes
>
> >if you dont have this sources, download the sources with aptitude:
> >
> >aptitude
do you have the kernel sources in your hd?
yes
the kernel sources should be in the /usr/src/kernel-source-2.6.8/
yes
if you dont have this sources, download the sources with aptitude:
aptitude install kernel-source-2.6.8
and unpack it: cd /usr/src/ ; tar jxvf kernel-source-2.6.8.
do you have the kernel sources in your hd?
the kernel sources should be in the /usr/src/kernel-source-2.6.8/
if you dont have this sources, download the sources with aptitude:
aptitude install kernel-source-2.6.8
and unpack it: cd /usr/src/ ; tar jxvf kernel-source-2.6.8.tar.bz2
copy the origi
Hi i am trying to compile alsa-1.0.10 on sarge 3.1 (r3 i think - its the
latest one) because i have a darla24 sound card which its drivers are
not included in 1.0.8.
the configure runs ok - its when make goes through i get this error
make -C /lib/modules/2.6.8-2-386/source
SUBDIRS=/home/studi
Russ Cook wrote:
David Clymer wrote:
On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 07:06, Russ Cook wrote:
The problem turned out to be the lack of module-init-tools on my
system. An additional problem was that module-init-tools conflicted
with modutils already installed. I had to upgrade modutils to most
cu
David Clymer wrote:
On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 07:06, Russ Cook wrote:
The problem turned out to be the lack of module-init-tools on my
system. An additional problem was that module-init-tools conflicted
with modutils already installed. I had to upgrade modutils to most
current version f
On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 07:06, Russ Cook wrote:
> >
> >
> The problem turned out to be the lack of module-init-tools on my
> system. An additional problem was that module-init-tools conflicted
> with modutils already installed. I had to upgrade modutils to most
> current version first, then in
ts into vmlinuz-2.6.8 just fine, and
my modules load, but I don't have a menu option for booting into the
previous kernel. I need to obtain another boot-menu.b somehow.
Anyway, thanks to all who provided suggestions to my compile problem.
Regards,
Russ
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
Joris Huizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm about sure this is unnecessary, but you *did* do `make mrproper`
> before compiling everything right?
Why would you ever want to do a 'make mrproper', since 'make mrproper'
removes all your changes (even your .config), before a compile?
if you just
On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 21:53, Russ Cook wrote:
> >>>
> >>David (and the list),
> >> In the hope that it might be useful, I've attached the config file.
> >> The last compiled files in the process before the error messages,
> >>according to the screen output, were in the sound section. If you h
Russ Cook wrote:
I'm running unstable on a Pentium 2 machine, kernel 2.4.18.
I downloaded the kernel-source-2.6.8 deb package today, updated my
config file, and
tried to compile the kernel. I got the following errors:
make[2] [modins_post] Error 1
make[1] [real_stamp_image] Error 2
Needless to s
On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 06:29, Russ Cook wrote:
> David Clymer wrote:
>
> >On Sun, 2004-10-17 at 19:16, Russ Cook wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I'm running unstable on a Pentium 2 machine, kernel 2.4.18.
> >>I downloaded the kernel-source-2.6.8 deb package today, updated my
> >>config file, and
> >>tried to
David Clymer wrote:
On Sun, 2004-10-17 at 19:16, Russ Cook wrote:
I'm running unstable on a Pentium 2 machine, kernel 2.4.18.
I downloaded the kernel-source-2.6.8 deb package today, updated my
config file, and
tried to compile the kernel. I got the following errors:
make[2] [modins_post] Error
On Sun, 2004-10-17 at 19:16, Russ Cook wrote:
> I'm running unstable on a Pentium 2 machine, kernel 2.4.18.
> I downloaded the kernel-source-2.6.8 deb package today, updated my
> config file, and
> tried to compile the kernel. I got the following errors:
> make[2] [modins_post] Error 1
> make[1]
I'm running unstable on a Pentium 2 machine, kernel 2.4.18.
I downloaded the kernel-source-2.6.8 deb package today, updated my
config file, and
tried to compile the kernel. I got the following errors:
make[2] [modins_post] Error 1
make[1] [real_stamp_image] Error 2
Needless to say, I did not get
If you are compiling a program like the following:
#include
int main()
{
printf("Hello Linux Adicts");
}
It will send you the error because you are declaring
that the main will return and int and you are not
returning anythig so the correct program should be:
#include
int main(){
printf("
Incoming from Wesley J Landaker:
> On Thursday, 09 September 2004 11:55, Paul Akkermans wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I am trying to compile the following program. But from the output I
> > get the feeling that not all links are made. I believe this is due to
> > the fact that not all libraries a
On Thursday, 09 September 2004 11:55, Paul Akkermans wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am trying to compile the following program. But from the output I
> get the feeling that not all links are made. I believe this is due to
> the fact that not all libraries are included during the compilation.
[ ... ]
Hi everyone,
I am trying to compile the following program. But
from the output I get the feeling that not all links are made. I believe this is
due to the fact that not all libraries are included during the compilation. The
problem is that I don't know what libraries to pass with my gcc tes
Thanks for the help,
I have checked the build depends and from what i can tell everything
is there...checked with apt-get build-dep pine as you pointed out.
Sorry for the somewhat large mail because of the log but this seemed
better than sending it as an attachment.
there seems to be a problem wi
This one time, at band camp, willem said:
> Hi,
>
> Using unstable here and i wanted to compile and install pine.
> However...i got a few errors and in the end no *.deb file and
> nothing installed
>
> What i did...
>
> apt-get install apt-src
>
> apt-src install -i pine
>
> The errors at the
Hi,
Using unstable here and i wanted to compile and install pine.
However...i got a few errors and in the end no *.deb file and
nothing installed
What i did...
apt-get install apt-src
apt-src install -i pine
The errors at the end of the build
make[3]: *** [mtest] Error 1
make [3]: Leaving dir
On Sat, 2002-12-28 at 05:07, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 02:51:07AM -0500, Ludwig wrote:
> > When trying to compile mod_perl-2.0 (actually 1.99_07) for apache2, make
> > fails with
> >
> > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lperl
> > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> > make[1]: *** [
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 02:51:07AM -0500, Ludwig wrote:
> When trying to compile mod_perl-2.0 (actually 1.99_07) for apache2, make
> fails with
>
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lperl
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[1]: *** [mod_perl.so] Error 1
>
> I have libperl5.6 and libperl-dev ins
When trying to compile mod_perl-2.0 (actually 1.99_07) for apache2, make
fails with
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lperl
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[1]: *** [mod_perl.so] Error 1
I have libperl5.6 and libperl-dev installed from the packages in
testing. Why can't ld find what it's lookin
"Anita Chawla Hasija" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
> I am trying to compile a linux driver module out of your rtl8139.c =
> source for my rtl8139 based cardbus NIC, but cannot succeed.
> The compile fails and giving error "pcmcia/driver_ops.h : no =
> such file or directory. " I
Hi,
I am trying to compile a linux
driver module out of your rtl8139.c source for my rtl8139 based cardbus NIC, but
cannot succeed.
The compile fails
and giving error "pcmcia/driver_ops.h : no such file or directory. " I am
working on slackware linux 2.0.30.I tried to find out
I beileve that one of my dselect runs upgraded xawtv a few days ago.
Now it won't capture images using the "g" key. Runing it from an xterm
reveals it's puting out the following error message:
link(snap-SPDV-20020318-010437-1.ppm.$$$,snap-SPDV-20020318-010437-1.ppm):
No such file or directory
L
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 11:24:22AM +, Alan James wrote:
> This may be a daft question but when you load modules are you using inmod or
Sorry I meant "insmod" there of course. Still modprobe is the one to use.
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 04:53:52PM -0600, Christopher M. Jones wrote:
> I'm compiling for a K7/Athlon/Duron system. As far as I can tell, -all-
> modules come up with unresolved symbols. In other words, any module I try to
> load comes up with unresolved symbols, whether part of the kernel, or
>
I'm compiling for a K7/Athlon/Duron system. As far as I can tell, -all-
modules come up with unresolved symbols. In other words, any module I try to
load comes up with unresolved symbols, whether part of the kernel, or
standalone. Clearly, I am doing something very wrong, though I haven't
chang
I am having a problem compiling from source 2.4.17 packaged for Debian. Using
make-kpkg kernel_image in the source dir, all my modules come up with
unresolved symbols.
What causes this? What am I doing wrong? What should I do to fix it?
Using gcc 2.95.4
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 12:18:45 +0800, csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Using a brute-force dpkg-buildpackage -b -rfakeroot on the lilypond
> source package results in a build failure. The last three lines of
> stdout show:
>
> bison -d parser.yy
> mv parser.yy.tab.h out/parser.hh
> make[2]: Leaving
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002 07:36:43 -0800
David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 12:18:45PM +0800, csj wrote:
> > Using a brute-force dpkg-buildpackage -b -rfakeroot on the lilypond
> > source package results in a build failure. The last three lines of
> > stdout show:
> >
> >
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 12:18:45PM +0800, csj wrote:
> Using a brute-force dpkg-buildpackage -b -rfakeroot on the lilypond
> source package results in a build failure. The last three lines of
> stdout show:
>
> bison -d parser.yy
> mv parser.yy.tab.h out/parser.hh
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/xa
Using a brute-force dpkg-buildpackage -b -rfakeroot on the lilypond
source package results in a build failure. The last three lines of
stdout show:
bison -d parser.yy
mv parser.yy.tab.h out/parser.hh
make[2]: Leaving directory `/xa/build/debian/lilypond-1.4.9/lily'
make[1]: Leaving directory `/xa/
There is a binutils problem, I download binutils, binutils-dev and modutils
Potato version and it's compile :D There are my version's:
ii binutils 2.9.5.0.37-1 The GNU assembler, linker and binary
utiliti
ii binutils-dev 2.9.5.0.37-1 The GNU binary utilities (BFD development
fi
ii m
First I tried compiling the 2.5.1 kernel, it compiled fine, but I got alot of
lock-ups when I rebooted.
So I downgraded my binutils, and compiled the 2.4.16, and am doing fine.
Thanks for the help.
John
Hans Ekbrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote ..
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 08:00:07PM -0600, [EM
On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 08:00:07PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm trying to compile 2.4.16 for my laptop. I do all the
>
> drivers/sound/sounddrivers.o(.data+0x274): undefined references to 'local
> symbols in discarded section .text.exit'
>
> make:*** [vmlinux] Error 1
>
>
> What's go
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Steve Kieu wrote:
>
> > drivers/sound/sounddrivers.o(.data+0x274): undefined
> > references to 'local symbols in discarded section
> > .text.exit'
> >
> > make:*** [vmlinux] Error 1
> >
>
> I got this problem when compiling the kernel
> 2.4.17-rc1 as well as 2.4.16. I aske
> drivers/sound/sounddrivers.o(.data+0x274): undefined
> references to 'local symbols in discarded section
> .text.exit'
>
> make:*** [vmlinux] Error 1
>
I got this problem when compiling the kernel
2.4.17-rc1 as well as 2.4.16. I asked one time in the
list and got not-useful info yet. By the w
Thus spake Marc Britten:
> make dep before making bzlilo
>
> also what version of gcc are you using? gcc --version
>
> On Sun, 2001-12-16 at 21:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I'm trying to compile 2.4.16 for my laptop. I do all the
> > make clean
> > make mrproper
> > make menuconfig
> >
> >
> make dep before making bzlilo
I did do make dep, after the make menuconfig.
> also what version of gcc are you using? gcc --version
2.95.4
I'm running woody, I have done kernel compiles on this machine before.
Right now it's running 2.4.3
John
Marc Britten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote ..
make dep before making bzlilo
also what version of gcc are you using? gcc --version
On Sun, 2001-12-16 at 21:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm trying to compile 2.4.16 for my laptop. I do all the
> make clean
> make mrproper
> make menuconfig
>
> all work fine, but when I do make bzImage,
> I
I'm trying to compile 2.4.16 for my laptop. I do all the
make clean
make mrproper
make menuconfig
all work fine, but when I do make bzImage,
I get
drivers/sound/sounddrivers.o(.data+0x274): undefined references to 'local
symbols in discarded section .text.exit'
make:*** [vmlinux] Error 1
Wha
On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 06:42:23AM -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 02:11:52PM +0800, Patrick Cheong Shu Yang wrote:
> > Another one of those release many and release quick again
> >
> > Uuughh...
> >
> > I remember someone once said regarding the impending release o
On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 08:53:51AM -0600, John Patton wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 02:11:52PM +0800, Patrick Cheong Shu Yang wrote:
> > Another one of those release many and release quick again
> >
> > Uuughh...
> >
> > I remember someone once said regarding the impending release of 2.4.0
On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 02:11:52PM +0800, Patrick Cheong Shu Yang wrote:
> Another one of those release many and release quick again
>
> Uuughh...
>
> I remember someone once said regarding the impending release of 2.4.0
> and why it was taking so long...that Linus just has much higher
> stan
On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 02:11:52PM +0800, Patrick Cheong Shu Yang wrote:
> Another one of those release many and release quick again
>
> Uuughh...
>
> I remember someone once said regarding the impending release of 2.4.0
> and why it was taking so long...that Linus just has much higher
> stan
Another one of those release many and release quick again
Uuughh...
I remember someone once said regarding the impending release of 2.4.0
and why it was taking so long...that Linus just has much higher
standards...oh oh...this is definitely not in the correct direction in
support of the previ
On Mon, 5 Nov 2001, James D Freels wrote:
> make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
>
> I suspect others will have the same problem. Any idea of a fix?
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> If you're using pgcc, try getting a real less-buggy compiler, like
> egcs1.1.2 or gcc-2.95.
--
Baloo
This is a kernel problem, nothing to do with Debian. It has been posted to
the linux-kernel list, but no fix has been posted yet. This may be another
case where they fix it and make another release in a SHORT period of time.
Commenting out the two references to the function and recompiling seem
I have just tried to compile a clean source (without any patches) of
v2.4.14. I did a straight "make oldconfig" of a working v2.4.13 .config.
I get the following error message at that last part of the make bzImage
when it is creating the final kernel image:
ld -m elf_i386 -T /usr/src/linux/arch/i
[EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> I know this is probably silly, but I had a lot of headaches with kernel
> compiling and installation until I ran across the kernel-package package.
> I just made a kernel debian package using the 'make-kpkg' which that package
> provi
Wayne Topa wrote:
> The above was the case when I had made the .config using 'make
> menuconfig'. I didn't find any real solution to the above on Google
> so decided to check the .config file by running xconfig, which I don't
> usually do. For some reason 'make dep' now works as usual and I can
I know this is probably silly, but I had a lot of headaches with kernel
compiling and installation until I ran across the kernel-package package.
I just made a kernel debian package using the 'make-kpkg' which that package
provides yesterday, and it came off like a charm (2.4.12, too).
Anyway, you
Wayne Topa([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> I have been compiling the 2.4.x series without problems until now.
> I am running woody, last updated today, and find that I am getting
> errors while doing make dep (?) of all things. Here is the error:
> make[2]: *** No rule to make targ
I have been compiling the 2.4.x series without problems until now.
I am running woody, last updated today, and find that I am getting
errors while doing make dep (?) of all things. Here is the error:
make[2]: *** No rule to make target
`/usr/src/linux/include/linux/autoconf.h', needed by
`/us
Just downloaded cheops and am trying to compile it. It fails with the
following:'
# make
gcc -g -O2 -Wall -DDEFAULT_PATH=\"/usr/local/share/cheops\"
-DLIB_PATH=\"/usr/local/lib/cheops\" -I/usr/include/gtk-1.2
-I/usr/include/glib-1.2 -I/usr/lib/glib/include -DHAS_GMODULE -c -o
domain.o domain.c
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 10:50:57AM +0200, pink panther wrote:
> hi!
>
> I tried to compile the kernel of my potato distro (kernel is quite old:
> 2.2.17) and I got the following error message:
> as86: command not found;
> or something like that. The main problem the as86 is seems to be missing
> hi!
>
> I tried to compile the kernel of my potato distro (kernel is quite old:
> 2.2.17) and I got the following error message:
> as86: command not found;
> or something like that. The main problem the as86 is seems to be missing from
> my machine.
> Does anyone some guess what the hell is th
hi!
I tried to compile the kernel of my potato distro (kernel is quite old:
2.2.17) and I got the following error message:
as86: command not found;
or something like that. The main problem the as86 is seems to be missing from
my machine.
Does anyone some guess what the hell is this? Or which
High,
On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Tao Liu wrote:
> When compile 2.4.9 kernel with gcc 3.0.2 :
>
> #make-kpkg clean
> #make-kpkg --append-to-version -tao3 kernel_image
>
> #make-kpkg clean
> #make-kpkg --append-to-version -tao4 kernel_image
>
> #make-kpkg clean
> #make-kpkg --append-to-version -tao5 ke
When compile 2.4.9 kernel with gcc 3.0.2 :
#make-kpkg clean
#make-kpkg --append-to-version -tao3 kernel_image
#make-kpkg clean
#make-kpkg --append-to-version -tao4 kernel_image
#make-kpkg clean
#make-kpkg --append-to-version -tao5 kernel_image
(install the three kernels)
#cd /boot
#ls -l
...
on Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 04:51:06PM -0500, Jay Latham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I was going to re-compile my kernel today to get rid of some of the
> things I don't need but when I got to the network card driver modules,
> mine was greyed out (Realtec 8139). This is on the 2.2.19pre17 kernel.
> I
I was going to re-compile my kernel today to get rid of some of
the things I don't need but when I got to the network card
driver modules, mine was greyed out (Realtec 8139). This is on
the 2.2.19pre17 kernel. I then went to the 2.2.19 kernel which
offered two drivers (rtl8139 and 8139too), but aga
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 11:44:55PM +0200, Erdmut Pfeifer wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 11:54:31PM -0700, Kenward Vaughan wrote:
>
> > I hope someone can give me clues about what's screwing up the compilation of
> > a molecular docking app I'm trying to assemble for my classes... It is
> > suppo
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 11:54:31PM -0700, Kenward Vaughan wrote:
> I hope someone can give me clues about what's screwing up the compilation of
> a molecular docking app I'm trying to assemble for my classes... It is
> supposed to compile on a number of *nix platforms including Linux, but my
> att
I hope someone can give me clues about what's screwing up the compilation of
a molecular docking app I'm trying to assemble for my classes... It is
supposed to compile on a number of *nix platforms including Linux, but my
attempts die at the linking stage.
I do not program (OK, I learned APL in hi
What packages are we talking about? (You can use `dpkg -S' to match a
particular file to its package).
Some of the larger emacs packages has the .el files in separate
packages in order not to needlessly swamp the system. This includes
emacs itself.
---+--
Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> I really doubt that any files are being deleted. Usually, .el
> files stay put in someplace like
>
> /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/
>
> and byte-compiled versions go in:
>
> /usr/share/emacs/19.34/site-lisp/
> /usr/share/emacs/20.6/site-lisp
Peter Mickle wrote:
> A few weeks ago, while upgrading from slink to potato, during the
> install process, I answered "yes" to a prompt to byte compile the
> newly installed files. Since then, whenever I have installed new
> packages (apt-get -install or apt-get -update -dist-upgrade) the
> files
On 02-Aug-2000 Peter Mickle wrote:
> A few weeks ago, while upgrading from slink to potato, during the
> install process, I answered "yes" to a prompt to byte compile the
> newly installed files. Since then, whenever I have installed new
> packages (apt-get -install or apt-get -update -dist-upgrad
A few weeks ago, while upgrading from slink to potato, during the
install process, I answered "yes" to a prompt to byte compile the
newly installed files. Since then, whenever I have installed new
packages (apt-get -install or apt-get -update -dist-upgrade) the
files are bytecompiled when installed
http://www.bitwizard.nl/sig11/
Matthew Simpson wrote:
>
> When I try to compile the kernel I get this error:
>
> gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11
>
When I try to compile the kernel I get this error:
gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11
The compile then exits. It does not seem to matter which kernel I try. I
tried both gcc 2.95.2 and 2.7.2. It gets this error in different places.
In the most recent (kernel 2.2.15) it
Jay Kelly wrote:
>
> I am having problems with recompiling my kernel. I had kernel 2.2.12 and
> recompiled it to thw same 2.2.12 but to include ip_masquerading. Now when I
> boot I see
>
> depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.2.12/ipv4/ip_masq_quake.o
> depmod: *** Unresolved symbols
I am having problems with recompiling my kernel. I had kernel 2.2.12 and
recompiled it to thw same 2.2.12 but to include ip_masquerading. Now when I
boot I see
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.2.12/ipv4/ip_masq_quake.o
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.2.12/ipv4/ip_m
Brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 10 Oct 1999, David Coe wrote:
> > See also bug #47054, which suggests a one-line additon to the...
> I got it to work by changing line 759 to the following...
Thanks!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 10 Oct 1999, David Coe wrote:
> See also bug #47054, which suggests a one-line additon to the
> kernel-package script that's probably a better fix to this problem
> (though I haven't tested it).
I got it to work by changing line 759 to the following:
stamp
See also bug #47054, which suggests a one-line additon to the
kernel-package script that's probably a better fix to this problem
(though I haven't tested it).
Jocke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> install: debian/changelog: No such file or directory
> make: *** [kernel-image-deb] Error 1
[...]
This is either a bug or feature in the latest kernel-package; I
suspect it's a bug, but don't know yet.
To work around it, you can create two new text files
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
