David Wright writes:
> On Tue 29 Sep 2020 at 15:50:35 (+0200), Albretch Mueller wrote:
>> But how could you have some assurance that that data relates to what
>> their users thought of to be?
>
> You can't. That's not what CRCs are for. They're not cryptographic,
> so they are useless for any
On Ma, 29 sep 20, 16:20:10, Albretch Mueller wrote:
>
> I don't know of a single "secure"/"private" OS, software stack or any
> such approaches being taken seriously. Do you?
Tails: https://tails.boum.org/
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
signature.asc
David Wright wrote:
> On Tue 29 Sep 2020 at 15:50:35 (+0200), Albretch Mueller wrote:
> > On 9/24/20, Reco wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 05:50:16PM +0200, Albretch Mueller wrote:
> > >> >> How do I get all packages to be locally installed using dpkg from a
> > >> >> public Windows
On Tue 29 Sep 2020 at 15:50:35 (+0200), Albretch Mueller wrote:
> On 9/24/20, Reco wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 05:50:16PM +0200, Albretch Mueller wrote:
> >> >> How do I get all packages to be locally installed using dpkg from a
> >> >> public Windows machine?
> >> >
> >> > I'm not sure I
Hi.
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 03:50:35PM +0200, Albretch Mueller wrote:
> On 9/24/20, Reco wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 05:50:16PM +0200, Albretch Mueller wrote:
> >> >> How do I get all packages to be locally installed using dpkg from a
> >> >> public Windows machine?
> >> >
> >> >
> If you want to defend against on-disk corruption, use ZFS.
> If you want to be alerted to every change to a set of files, use
> tripwire or aide. Both are packaged for Debian.
> ...
Really?!? Well, I would say that is only part of the story and not
even the most interesting one. I am amazed
On 9/25/20, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 05:58:49PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
>>I can't believe the answer is as simple as visiting
>>https://packages.debian.org/index
>>and downloading the packages you want (in binary mode).
>
> Plus (possibly several) iterations of
On 9/24/20, Reco wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 05:50:16PM +0200, Albretch Mueller wrote:
>> >> How do I get all packages to be locally installed using dpkg from a
>> >> public Windows machine?
>> >
>> > I'm not sure I understand this question or how it relates to the
>> > previous one.
>>
>>
On 9/26/20, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 02:11:30PM +0200, Albretch Mueller wrote:
>>On 9/25/20, Michael Stone wrote:
>>> Just one would be good enough (pick the sha256sum). What you're doing is
>>> a waste of time. If you want to future proof then use sha3, via the
>>> rhash
On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 02:11:30PM +0200, Albretch Mueller wrote:
On 9/25/20, Michael Stone wrote:
Just one would be good enough (pick the sha256sum). What you're doing is
a waste of time. If you want to future proof then use sha3, via the
rhash package.
Something that I have noticed is that
mick crane wrote:
>
> When all this internet kicked off I thought anybody could have a go but
> apparently you need to be with a provider.
If you have enough money, skill, and time you can be your own
ISP.
The nature of "ISP" is in the first word, "Internet". It
requires you to be connected to
On 9/25/20, Michael Stone wrote:
> Just one would be good enough (pick the sha256sum). What you're doing is
> a waste of time. If you want to future proof then use sha3, via the
> rhash package.
Something that I have noticed is that texts are too close to people's
hearts to expect for people to
On Fri 25 Sep 2020 at 10:33:51 (+0100), Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 05:58:49PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> > On Thu 24 Sep 2020 at 17:50:16 (+0200), Albretch Mueller wrote:
> > > >> How do I get all packages to be locally installed using dpkg from a
> > > >> public Windows
On 2020-09-25 23:42, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Friday 25 September 2020 18:10:42 Stefan Monnier wrote:
> He may have changed it, but at the time I first started using it on
> a "pc" it had to be registered before it would access the 2nd port.
I don't understand what you're referring to:
- What
>> I don't understand what you're referring to:
>> - What is the "it" that had to be registered?
> That edition of dd-wrt.
Oooo! You were running DD-wrt on a pc??
Indeed, OpenWRT also supports running on a PC, but it would never have
occurred to me to do that. I'd just use Debian instead:
On Friday 25 September 2020 18:10:42 Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > He may have changed it, but at the time I first started using it on
> > a "pc" it had to be registered before it would access the 2nd port.
>
> I don't understand what you're referring to:
> - What is the "it" that had to be
>> BTW, depending on what you expect from an "ARM board" and what you
>> consider "affordable", you could go for an actual router (many of
>> which are based on ARM nowadays).
> It has to run Debian or a Debian derivative.
I can't see any reason why you couldn't install Debian on a "Brume".
The
Stefan writes:
> BTW, depending on what you expect from an "ARM board" and what you
> consider "affordable", you could go for an actual router (many of
> which are based on ARM nowadays).
It has to run Debian or a Debian derivative.
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
> He may have changed it, but at the time I first started using it on
> a "pc" it had to be registered before it would access the 2nd port.
I don't understand what you're referring to:
- What is the "it" that had to be registered?
- With whom/what did it have to be registered?
- What 2nd port of
> I have an Espressobin. It isn't stable due to some sort of power supply
> problem (and the available schematics are incorrect). I tried three
> different units: it's a design problem. I may go back to messing with
> it and try clocking is down, but I don't trust it now. Too bad, because
> the
> I have an Espressobin. It isn't stable due to some sort of power supply
> problem (and the available schematics are incorrect). I tried three
> different units: it's a design problem. I may go back to messing with
> it and try clocking is down, but I don't trust it now. Too bad, because
>
On Fri 25 Sep 2020 at 17:21:03 +0100, Tixy wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-09-25 at 18:07 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Vi, 25 sep 20, 10:23:43, Michael Stone wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 09:01:26AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > >
> [...]
> > > > such a setup in a router running dd-wrt.
Stefan writes:
> I assume you mean tho ethernet NICs (many boards have two NICs in the
> form of ethernet + wifi).
Yes, of course. I don't want WiFi on a router and I want real NICs, not
ones faked via USB.
> I know of the BPI-R1 and BPI-R2 and the espressobin, but hopefully
> there's more.
I
On Friday 25 September 2020 12:06:07 John Hasler wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Same here, though I use a pc running Debian as a router.
>
> Gene writes:
> > ...I found I didn't have to register the router...
>
> Don't know what you mean by that.
He may have changed it, but at the time I first started
On Fri, 2020-09-25 at 18:07 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Vi, 25 sep 20, 10:23:43, Michael Stone wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 09:01:26AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > >
[...]
> > > such a setup in a router running dd-wrt. In nearly 2 decades, no one has
> > > come into my systems from
> Will be replaced as soon as I find an affordable ARM board with
> two NICs.
Ah, yes, that. I assume you mean tho ethernet NICs (many boards have
two NICs in the form of ethernet + wifi).
I know of the BPI-R1 and BPI-R2 and the espressobin, but hopefully
there's more.
FWIW, I use a Banana Pi
I wrote:
> Same here, though I use a pc running Debian as a router.
Gene writes:
> ...I found I didn't have to register the router...
Don't know what you mean by that. My DSL modem is in bridge mode, of
course, and pppoe on the pc just works. The old Dell I use has been
running for about ten
>>I usually give the OP credit for not clicking on the links he runs across
>>that aren't on the up and up. I dunno, but the odor about them seems to
>>be warning enough for me.
> That's simply not true. Compromised web sites are a thing, among
> other issues.
Yup. The widespread existence of
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 10:56:56AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
I usually give the OP credit for not clicking on the links he runs across
that aren't on the up and up. I dunno, but the odor about them seems to
be warning enough for me.
That's simply not true. Compromised web sites are a thing,
On Vi, 25 sep 20, 10:23:43, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 09:01:26AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Your paranoia is excessive. I have 5 machines online ATM, but they are
> > all on a local network in the 1902.168.xx.xx block, which is NOT
> > routable from the internet but are
On Friday 25 September 2020 10:23:43 Michael Stone wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 09:01:26AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >Your paranoia is excessive. I have 5 machines online ATM, but they
> > are all on a local network in the 1902.168.xx.xx block, which is NOT
> > routable from the internet
On Vi, 25 sep 20, 13:49:25, Albretch Mueller wrote:
>
> My thinking may (once again) be a bit unhinged, but I would use,
> e.g., crc because it internatlly used by rsync, which I also use in my
> code.
Just for the archives, rsync is using MD5, and only if you specify the
--checksum option.
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 09:01:26AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
Your paranoia is excessive. I have 5 machines online ATM, but they are
all on a local network in the 1902.168.xx.xx block, which is NOT
routable from the internet but are NAT'd to my net address by having
such a setup in a router
On Friday 25 September 2020 09:25:20 John Hasler wrote:
> Gene writes:
> > No you are not the only one, but you are a minority that does not
> > always want to understand how to use the internet and be safe at the
> > same time. It can be done, I'm doing it. And I've been doing it
> > since the
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 01:49:25PM +0200, Albretch Mueller wrote:
I have losts of (not necessarily all) text files (say in the 10 of
thousands) in various directories which I need to process in a batch,
but before I do that I want to make sure that I get a baseline of the
source files. I use:
Gene writes:
> No you are not the only one, but you are a minority that does not
> always want to understand how to use the internet and be safe at the
> same time. It can be done, I'm doing it. And I've been doing it
> since the later 90's.
Same here, though I use a pc running Debian as a
On Friday 25 September 2020 07:54:54 Albretch Mueller wrote:
> On 9/25/20, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 05:58:49PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> >> On Thu 24 Sep 2020 at 17:50:16 (+0200), Albretch Mueller wrote:
> >> > >> How do I get all packages to be locally installed using
Albretch Mueller wrote:
> On 9/24/20, Sven Hartge wrote:
>
> > Why do you think you need to do this? What do you hope to achieve by
> > doing this?
>
> I have losts of (not necessarily all) text files (say in the 10 of
> thousands) in various directories which I need to process in a batch,
>
On 9/25/20, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 05:58:49PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
>> On Thu 24 Sep 2020 at 17:50:16 (+0200), Albretch Mueller wrote:
>> > >> How do I get all packages to be locally installed using dpkg from a
>> > >> public Windows machine?
>
>> > Why do you think
On 9/24/20, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Why do you think you need to do this? What do you hope to achieve by
> doing this?
I have losts of (not necessarily all) text files (say in the 10 of
thousands) in various directories which I need to process in a batch,
but before I do that I want to make sure
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 05:58:49PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Thu 24 Sep 2020 at 17:50:16 (+0200), Albretch Mueller wrote:
> > >> How do I get all packages to be locally installed using dpkg from a
> > >> public Windows machine?
> > Why do you think you need to do this? What do you hope to
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 05:58:49PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
I can't believe the answer is as simple as visiting
https://packages.debian.org/index
and downloading the packages you want (in binary mode).
Plus (possibly several) iterations of downloading the dependencies,
and their
On Thu 24 Sep 2020 at 17:50:16 (+0200), Albretch Mueller wrote:
> >> How do I get all packages to be locally installed using dpkg from a
> >> public Windows machine?
> >
> > I'm not sure I understand this question or how it relates to the
> > previous one.
>
> How do I get the deb files in order
Albretch Mueller wrote:
>>> How do I get all packages to be locally installed using dpkg from a
>>> public Windows machine?
>>
>> I'm not sure I understand this question or how it relates to the
>> previous one.
> How do I get the deb files in order to install locally (via dpkg
> --install) the
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 05:50:16PM +0200, Albretch Mueller wrote:
> >> How do I get all packages to be locally installed using dpkg from a
> >> public Windows machine?
> >
> > I'm not sure I understand this question or how it relates to the
> > previous one.
>
> How do I get the deb files in
Albretch Mueller wrote:
> How do I get the deb files in order to install locally (via dpkg
> --install) the necessary utilities to run CRC32 and/or CRC64
Hmm, the 'necessary utilities' might be jacksum, if it can calculate the
CRCs you are after, and what Debian release you are on.
How to get
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 05:50:16PM +0200, Albretch Mueller wrote:
> >> How do I get all packages to be locally installed using dpkg from a
> >> public Windows machine?
> >
> > I'm not sure I understand this question or how it relates to the
> > previous one.
>
> How do I get the deb files in
>> How do I get all packages to be locally installed using dpkg from a
>> public Windows machine?
>
> I'm not sure I understand this question or how it relates to the
> previous one.
How do I get the deb files in order to install locally (via dpkg
--install) the necessary utilities to run CRC32
Albretch Mueller wrote:
> rsync uses crc for its data integrity checks. Why is it you can't use
> it like any other OS utility?
The code for CRC is so small and simple that virtually all applications
choose to implement it directly, rather than use a library or an
external application for it.
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 03:09:05PM +0200, Albretch Mueller wrote:
> rsync uses crc for its data integrity checks. Why is it you can't use
> it like any other OS utility?
>
> $ date; which crc
> Thu Sep 24 07:54:55 CEST 2020
>
CRC is a family of checksum algorithms. They're generally considered
rsync uses crc for its data integrity checks. Why is it you can't use
it like any other OS utility?
$ date; which crc
Thu Sep 24 07:54:55 CEST 2020
$ date; which rsync
Thu Sep 24 07:54:59 CEST 2020
/usr/bin/rsync
$ rsync --version
rsync version 3.1.2 protocol version 31
Copyright (C)
51 matches
Mail list logo
