Re: debian/rules @variable@ syntax

2022-11-01 Thread nevivurn
On 11/1/22 22:59, The Wanderer wrote: > Can anyone advise me as to at least where I need to look to find out > about this syntax and how to understand it? Advice about how to actually > handle this dense and complicated control file (and its input > control.in) properly, rather than in whatever hac

Re: debian/rules @variable@ syntax

2022-11-01 Thread The Wanderer
On 2022-11-01 at 10:42, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 03:32:05PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote: > >> jeremy ardley (12022-11-01): >> >> > cmake has inbuilt support for deb packaging >> >> cmake can have all the features it wants, if Debian does not >> use it, then talking about it

Re: debian/rules @variable@ syntax

2022-11-01 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 03:32:05PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote: > jeremy ardley (12022-11-01): > > cmake has inbuilt support for deb packaging > > cmake can have all the features it wants, if Debian does not > use it, then talking about it is a waste of time. > > Do you have a source that shows

Re: debian/rules @variable@ syntax

2022-11-01 Thread Nicolas George
jeremy ardley (12022-11-01): > cmake has inbuilt support for deb packaging cmake can have all the features it wants, if Debian does not use it, then talking about it is a waste of time. Do you have a source that shows Debian uses cmake for its packaging? -- Nicolas George signature.asc Des

Re: debian/rules @variable@ syntax

2022-11-01 Thread jeremy ardley
On 1/11/22 22:20, The Wanderer wrote: This definitely isn't cmake. It's part of the Debian build system, and if that depended on cmake, I'm all but absolutely certain that I'd know it by now. Also, this has nothing to do with the build system for the software being packaged; it's entirely to d

Re: debian/rules @variable@ syntax

2022-11-01 Thread The Wanderer
On 2022-11-01 at 10:11, jeremy ardley wrote: > On 1/11/22 21:59, The Wanderer wrote: > >> However, in doing so I have run into a snag which I previously >> skipped over and ignored: I don't actually know what the @variable@ >> syntax means/does, or what parses it. It's not Makefile syntax, as >>

Re: debian/rules @variable@ syntax

2022-11-01 Thread Nicolas George
jeremy ardley (12022-11-01): > If it's not Makefile, it's quite possibly cmake I strongly doubt that Debian uses cmake for its packaging. Source? -- Nicolas George signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: debian/rules @variable@ syntax

2022-11-01 Thread jeremy ardley
On 1/11/22 22:11, jeremy ardley wrote: Search for some CMakeFiles.txt files to check if you need to explore cmake further. Wrong. My typing error. Look for CMakeLists.txt files. -- Jeremy

Re: debian/rules @variable@ syntax

2022-11-01 Thread jeremy ardley
On 1/11/22 21:59, The Wanderer wrote: However, in doing so I have run into a snag which I previously skipped over and ignored: I don't actually know what the @variable@ syntax means/does, or what parses it. It's not Makefile syntax, as far as I've been able to determine. I haven't thus far found

debian/rules @variable@ syntax

2022-11-01 Thread The Wanderer
As background: for reasons which I could explain but would probably take a lot of going into and/or go off on a lot of tangents that wouldn't help me reach my actual goal, I'm trying to build an older version of the firefox-esr package in such a way that the resulting binary packages have a differe