Hello
Can someone please advise on the best way to handle the following
situation of unmet dependencies:
$ sudo apt-get install xfce4-systemload-plugin xfce4-goodies
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 16:00:53 +0200
Benjamí Villoslada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --
>
> $ apt-cache policy xulrunner
> xulrunner:
> Instal·lat: (cap)
> Candidat: 1.8.1.13-1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 16:00:53 +0200
Benjamí Villoslada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --
>
> $ apt-cache policy xulrunner
> xulrunner:
> Instal·lat: (cap)
> Candidat: 1.8.1.13-1
e xgnokii zlib1g
zlib1g-dev
31 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 1 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 47.4MB of archives. After unpacking 102kB will be used.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
sun-java6-plugin: Depends: xulrunner-1.9 which is a virtual package.
Resolving dep
Hold on! I have it installed on my i386. Its working fine.
On Monday, 07 April 2008 1:13 am, Tim Rühsen wrote:
>
> It should come soon. sun-java6-bin has been available for amd64 but not for
> i386. Maybe it was just a package maintainers mistake...
>
>
> Mit freundlichem Gruß
>
> Tim Rühse
El Dilluns 07 Abril 2008, Tim Rühsen va escriure:
> It should come soon. sun-java6-bin has been available for amd64 but not for
> i386. Maybe it was just a package maintainers mistake...
Thanks for the feedback Frank and Tim. Is not a local problem of my box :)
Java5 have a problem too: sun-jav
Am Sonntag, 6. April 2008 schrieb Benjamí Villoslada:
> Hi,
>
> Someone with sun-java6 packages dependencies problems too?
>
> Installed i my Debian Sid:
>
> sun-java6-bin 6-04-2
> sun-java6-jre 6-04-2
> sun-java6-plugin 6-04-2
>
> In order to install this I'
On Sun, 06 Apr 2008 17:41:27 +0200
Benjamí Villoslada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Someone with sun-java6 packages dependencies problems too?
>
> Installed i my Debian Sid:
>
> sun-java6-bin 6-04-2
> sun-java6-jre 6-04-2
> sun-java6-plugin 6-04-2
>
> In o
Hi,
Someone with sun-java6 packages dependencies problems too?
Installed i my Debian Sid:
sun-java6-bin 6-04-2
sun-java6-jre 6-04-2
sun-java6-plugin 6-04-2
In order to install this I've added this repository:
deb http://snapshot.debian.net/archive pool sun-java6
And every dist-upgr
On 03/24/2008 03:53 PM, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> I apologize for taking so long to get back to you.
No Problem :-)
> I asked whether you were running etch because the unstable/testing
> version of mediawiki doesn't have dependencies that would pull in the
> stuff you'r
aries etc.
I apologize for taking so long to get back to you.
I asked whether you were running etch because the unstable/testing
version of mediawiki doesn't have dependencies that would pull in the
stuff you're talking about. I've taken a brief look at the stable
version, and
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 09:45:29PM +0100, Simon Jolle sjolle wrote:
> On 03/23/2008 08:49 PM, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > It is usual for upstream developers not to support the debian packages.
> > If you have troubles you should contact the maintainer/file a bug.
>
> Generally or for web applicat
On 03/23/2008 08:49 PM, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> It is usual for upstream developers not to support the debian packages.
> If you have troubles you should contact the maintainer/file a bug.
Generally or for web applications? Why?
cheers
Simon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 02:28:40PM +0100, Simon Jolle sjolle wrote:
> On 03/21/2008 09:20 PM, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > I don't think so. Run 'aptitude keep-all', 'aptitude update' and retry.
> > Do you get the same thing? I'm guessing you tried to install some task
> > and aptitude still remembe
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 02:33:49PM +0100, Simon Jolle sjolle wrote:
> I posted the same topic on Mediawiki admins mailinglist. A Mediawiki
> developer[0] told that the Debian package is unsupported third-party and
> they receive a lot of complaints about it.
It is usual for upstream developers not
I posted the same topic on Mediawiki admins mailinglist. A Mediawiki
developer[0] told that the Debian package is unsupported third-party and
they receive a lot of complaints about it.
So will install myself. The only downside that I need to care myself
about security patches.
cheers
Simon
[0] h
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 02:28:40PM +0100, Simon Jolle sjolle wrote:
> On 03/21/2008 09:20 PM, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > I don't think so. Run 'aptitude keep-all', 'aptitude update' and retry.
> > Do you get the same thing? I'm guessing you tried to install some task
> > and aptitude still remembe
On 03/21/2008 09:20 PM, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> I don't think so. Run 'aptitude keep-all', 'aptitude update' and retry.
> Do you get the same thing? I'm guessing you tried to install some task
> and aptitude still remembers it.
Hi Andrei
No success.
Need to get 257MB/262MB of archives. After u
On 03/21/2008 10:20 PM, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> Which version of Debian are you running? etch?
Yes I am running Etch.
> What do you get if you add "-D" to the aptitude install line?
Sorry for such a long Copypasta.
# aptitude -D install mediawiki mediawiki-extensions
Reading package lists.
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 07:38:36PM +0100, Simon Jolle sjolle <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> I have here VDS with minimal Debian installation. Why Debian wish to
> install me Firefox, Gnome/GTK+ components, X11 components, Latex, Sound
> server, portmap, quite enough libraries etc.
Whic
etc.
>
> Does MediaWiki really have that much dependencies?
>
> Do I really need 671 MB wasted diskspace for a PHP/MySQL web application?
I don't think so. Run 'aptitude keep-all', 'aptitude update' and retry.
Do you get the same thing? I'm guessing you tr
Hi Debian users
I have here VDS with minimal Debian installation. Why Debian wish to
install me Firefox, Gnome/GTK+ components, X11 components, Latex, Sound
server, portmap, quite enough libraries etc.
Does MediaWiki really have that much dependencies?
Do I really need 671 MB wasted diskspace
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:32:00AM +1100, Rich Healey wrote:
>> I can't upgrade a lot of packages (perl for one) because apt says that:
>>
>> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:32:00AM +1100, Rich Healey wrote:
> I can't upgrade a lot of packages (perl for one) because apt says that:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> libgconf2-4: Depends: gconf2-common (>= 2.22) but it is not goi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I can't upgrade a lot of packages (perl for one) because apt says that:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libgconf2-4: Depends: gconf2-common (>= 2.22) but it is not going to
be installed
Depends: gconf2-common
; > > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > > xlibmesa-gl: Depends: xfree86-common but it is not installable
> > >Conflicts: libgl1 which is a virtual package.
> > > xlibmesa-glu: Depends: xfree86-common but it is not install
rge
packages and I update.
>
> > aptitude dist-upgrade
> >
> > which unfortunately gives me these errors:
>
> [...]
>
> > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > xlibmesa-gl: Depends: xfree86-common but it is
> not install
.6, I
> update my sources.list (change sarge to stable, so I
> get etch) and I run aptitude upgrade. Then ...
Do you run "aptitude update" before that?
> aptitude dist-upgrade
>
> which unfortunately gives me these errors:
[...]
> The following packages have unmet dependenc
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 10:41:11PM +, Dimitrios Daskalakis wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to upgrade my distribution from sarge to
> etch.
>
> Having upgraded successfully the 2.4 kernel to 2.6, I
> update my sources.list (change sarge to stable, so I
> get etch) and I run aptitude upgrade. Then .
Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree
Reading extended state information
Initializing package states... Done
Reading task descriptions... Done
Some packages had unmet dependencies. This may mean
that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using
the unstable
distribution
for me, broken SDL to resolv dependencies.
I recommend uninstalling libSDL, compiling it and installing it as
described above.
>
> How can I force apt(itude) to ignore certain dependencies?
I don't think it's a good idea, but you can always use equivs (aptitude
show equivs).
Hi,
I had to compile libSDL myself after adding glFinish() into a certain
place to stop the mouse lag I got since I upgraded to a better GFX card.
Now... how do I stop apt(itude) from breaking it? It insists to install
the, for me, broken SDL to resolv dependencies.
How can I force apt(itude) to
Hi,
I had to compile libSDL myself after adding glFinish() into a certain
place to stop the mouse lag I got since I upgraded to a better GFX card.
Now... how do I stop apt(itude) from breaking it? It insists to install
the, for me, broken SDL to resolv dependencies.
How can I force apt(itude) to
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 08:14:12PM +0530, Amogh Hooshdar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> Why this difference? Why two blocks of output for the same package in
> apt-cache show. I have included the full outputs of both the tools
> below.
aptitude only shows the current/latest version of
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 08:14:12PM +0530, Amogh Hooshdar wrote:
> Why this difference? Why two blocks of output for the same package in
> apt-cache show. I have included the full outputs of both the tools
> below.
Because you have 2 apt line for binary package (testing and unstable or
so).
aptitu
I always use the aptitude package manager. I never use the apt-get
package manager.
Today, I noticed that apt-cache show and aptitude show are reporting
different dependencies for the package:- linux-image-2.6-486. If you
see the aptitude output, it clearly shows:-
Depends: linux-image-2.6.22-3
ve:
> #apt-get install libc6-dev
> ...
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> libc6-dev: Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.6.ds1-13etch2) but 2.6.1-3
> is to be installed
> E: Broken packages
>
> My sources.list is:
>
> deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 r1 _Etch_ -
Hi,
I'm sure this is pretty simple, but I can't get it to work...
Can somebody explain how I can install libc6-dev ?
I keep getting an error message from apt-get, which I do not know how to
solve:
#apt-get install libc6-dev
...
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libc6-de
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 04:30:43PM -0700, Jeff Grossman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> How come such a difference? I don't want to install all of that other
> stuff. I just want to install mercurial and what is required to run that
> program.
I guess that a lot of that is being pul
Nate Duehr wrote:
On Oct 29, 2007, at 5:30 PM, Jeff Grossman wrote:
I want to install Mercurial. If I use aptitude install mercurial I
get the following:
The following NEW packages will be installed:
dbus dbus-x11 esound-clients esound-common fam fontconfig
hicolor-icon-theme jackd kdelibs-
On Oct 29, 2007, at 5:30 PM, Jeff Grossman wrote:
I want to install Mercurial. If I use aptitude install mercurial I
get the following:
The following NEW packages will be installed:
dbus dbus-x11 esound-clients esound-common fam fontconfig
hicolor-icon-theme jackd kdelibs-data kdelibs4c2a k
I want to install Mercurial. If I use aptitude install mercurial I get
the following:
The following NEW packages will be installed:
dbus dbus-x11 esound-clients esound-common fam fontconfig
hicolor-icon-theme jackd kdelibs-data kdelibs4c2a kdiff3 libakode2
libart-2.0-2 libarts1-akode libarts
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 10:41:15 +0200, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>> When I try to install the package msynctool_0.22-2_i386.deb with `dpkg -i
>> msynctool_0.22-2_i386.deb', Debian Etch complains that the version of libc6
>> is
>> too low for that package. But, when I installed that package (in anoth
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 10:41:15AM +0200, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>
> When I try to install the package msynctool_0.22-2_i386.deb with `dpkg -i
> msynctool_0.22-2_i386.deb',
Where did you get the actual deb file?
Debian Etch complains that the version of libc6 is
> too low for that package. But,
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 10:41:15 +0200, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> When I try to install the package msynctool_0.22-2_i386.deb with `dpkg -i
> msynctool_0.22-2_i386.deb', Debian Etch complains that the version of libc6 is
> too low for that package. But, when I installed that package (in
Hi all.
When I try to install the package msynctool_0.22-2_i386.deb with `dpkg -i
msynctool_0.22-2_i386.deb', Debian Etch complains that the version of libc6 is
too low for that package. But, when I installed that package (in another
partition of my PC) with `apt-get install msynctool' and the fo
I'm currently using kubuntu 7.04 64-bit (Deb was my first choice, but couldn't
get it to install).
My question is really about a utility written for debian based systems:
see
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=474790#9
I was sent this link as a possible solution for some problems installin
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 01:55:05PM -0500, cothrige wrote:
>
> I have a feeling this is a dumb question. It seems like something that
> should be relatively easy, but searching through man pages and google
> has not helped me so far. Say I have a package, 'pkgx-1.0,' installed.
> Is there a way t
Ralph Katz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 10/05/2007 02:59 PM, Kevin Mark wrote:
>
> And apt-cache rdepends . $ man apt-cache
> Look at deborphan as well.
>
> Regards,
> Ralph
Awesome. Now I have several tools to look into. Isn't that just the
way it is, so often when it seems hard to do som
Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 01:55:05PM -0500, cothrige wrote:
>
> 'debfoster' is a neat program to find cruft and remove it.
> If pkgx is install and has dependencies a, b and c, then 'debfoster'
> will show you this
d easy
>> way to find out what I have which is using one or another package.
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> Patrick
> 'debfoster' is a neat program to find cruft and remove it.
> If pkgx is install and has dependencies a, b and c, then 'debfoster
e or another package.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Patrick
'debfoster' is a neat program to find cruft and remove it.
If pkgx is install and has dependencies a, b and c, then 'debfoster'
will show you this and ask you if you want to delete all of them. Read
the man pages an
I have a feeling this is a dumb question. It seems like something that
should be relatively easy, but searching through man pages and google
has not helped me so far. Say I have a package, 'pkgx-1.0,' installed.
Is there a way that I can list other installed packages which have that
first one, i
On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 02:57:29PM -0700, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 13:05:48 -0700, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
>
> > This is total FUBAR! I figured out that there is no ls command under /
> > bin !
> > Trying to scp over from another server only leads to an error message
> > that I
On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 13:05:48 -0700, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
> This is total FUBAR! I figured out that there is no ls command under /
> bin !
> Trying to scp over from another server only leads to an error message
> that I don't have the proper permissions, although I am root. BTW, I
> have trie
On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 13:02:12 -0700, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 21:56:12 +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 11:00:10 -0700, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
[...]
> >> I ran apt-get -f install which yielded:
> >>
> >> Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.6.ds1-13 (using
On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 21:56:12 +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 11:00:10 -0700, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
>> I was updating an etch server when I ran into the following error:
>>
>> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>> libc6-dev: Depends:
This is total FUBAR! I figured out that there is no ls command under /
bin !
Trying to scp over from another server only leads to an error message
that I don't have the proper permissions, although I am root. BTW, I
have tried to do it from this server as well as from another server.
What's g
On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 11:00:10 -0700, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
> I was updating an etch server when I ran into the following error:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> libc6-dev: Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.6.ds1-13etch2) but 2.3.6.ds1-13 is
> installed
>
> I r
I was updating an etch server when I ran into the following error:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libc6-dev: Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.6.ds1-13etch2) but 2.3.6.ds1-13
is installed
I ran apt-get -f install which yielded:
Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.6.ds1-13 (using
think
someone took the dependencies thing too far. Once you get the libpq
library, you've covered everything as a client to the database.
Bacula has the libpq library. Unless the client also requires
sqlite, there's no reason for it if you've picked postgresql as the
database to use for the backup data.
El dom, 23-09-2007 a las 14:35 -0400, Tom Allison escribió:
> I was trying to install bacula on my server and ran into some
> dependency problems that didn't seem to fit:
>
> postgres 8.1
> sqlite.
>
>
> My intention was to install this and use my existing postgres 8.2
> database since that
I was trying to install bacula on my server and ran into some
dependency problems that didn't seem to fit:
postgres 8.1
sqlite.
My intention was to install this and use my existing postgres 8.2
database since that already has all the settings tuned for
performance and reliability.
The met
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 08:38:13PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> I don't know how the TeX team are managing their transition offhand.
> A start would be to figure out which packages are forcing the upgrade of
> tetex-extra -- you could find this out by, e.g., going into the
> interactive inter
latex2html, although ocamlweb also shows up.
> I was planning to file a support bug report to [EMAIL PROTECTED], now
> I'm thinking, I should file a separate bug report on the package
> dependencies, because all I've been using was tetex, and it is only
> because some package
tex-base tetex-bin tetex-extra
. . .
Resolving dependencies...
The following actions will resolve these dependencies:
Remove the following packages:
. . .
tetex-base
tetex-bin
tetex-extra
> if they get dragged in by dependencies anyway. aptitude holds don't
> prevent versioned dependenci
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 05:29:40PM +0200, Klaas Gadeyne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > I notice that aptitude isn't actually installing apache -- it looks
> >like something is dragging in libapache-mod-php4, which depends on
> >apache-common.
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 12:19:34PM +, "Douglas A. Tutty" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 12:34:32PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 05:29:40PM +0200, Klaas Gadeyne wrote:
>
> > > So one of the recommends must be depending on or recomme
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 12:34:32PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 05:29:40PM +0200, Klaas Gadeyne wrote:
> > So one of the recommends must be depending on or recommending apache
> > 1.3, right? I've played a bit around with apt-cache --recurse depends
> > but I couldn't f
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 05:29:40PM +0200, Klaas Gadeyne wrote:
>> Do you get different results if you pass --without-recommends as a
>> command-line option?
>
> Yes, that seems to do the trick!
[...]
> So one of the recommends must be depending on or recommending apache
> 1.3, right? I've play
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 10:13:32AM +0200, Klaas Gadeyne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
aptitude install horde3
[...]
The following NEW packages will be automatically installed:
apache-common fontconfig-config libapache-mod-php4 libfontconfig
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 10:13:32AM +0200, Klaas Gadeyne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ #
> aptitude install horde3
> [...]
> The following NEW packages will be automatically installed:
> apache-common f
On Aug 22, 2007, at 2:59 PM, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 08:29:16PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
As per Debian policy, recommends should be installed "in all but
unusual
installations".
My base plus carefully selected packages PII X client currently
takes 653 MB. If I
> default. You could start aptitude in interactive mode and after pressing
> the first 'g' you can have a look at the chain of
> recommends/dependencies.
You can also select the desired behaviour in the options menu.
>
> As per Debian policy, recommends should be installe
;g' you can have a look at the chain of
recommends/dependencies.
As per Debian policy, recommends should be installed "in all but unusual
installations". If you think some recommends shouldn't be there please
report this as a (minor or whishlist) bug, because starting 1.Oct
Hi,
while trying to install horde3 on a etch server that already has
apache2 installed, aptitude (0.4.4-4) insists on installing apache
(1.3) instead of using the installed apache2 version. To be sure, I
manually installed other dependencies. No succes...
OTOH, apt deals fine with the
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 19:05:50 +0200, Hans Vogelsberger wrote:
[...]
> The word 'testing' was chosen by Debian maintainers to show what they think
> Testing was and is good for them. I should prefer a name like 'desktop' to
> show what I think Testing was and is good for me. Servers need stab
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 07:05:50PM +0200, Hans Vogelsberger wrote:
> The word 'testing' was chosen by Debian maintainers to show what they think
> Testing was and is good for them. I should prefer a name like 'desktop' to
> show what I think Testing was and is good for me. Servers need stable, b
Florian Kulzer schrieb:
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 17:45:18 +0200, Hans Vogelsberger wrote:
>> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
>
> dpkg --force-overwrite -i
/var/cache/apt/archives/libc6-i386_2.6-2_amd64.deb
>
> followed by
>
> apt-get install -f
>
> should fix this.
This
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 17:45:18 +0200, Hans Vogelsberger wrote:
> Since one week or so apt-get is broken because of unmet dependencies on my
> → AMD64, Aspire 4200, Debian, mirror http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/
> → testing.
>
> There should be a bug report, but I do not know a
Since one week or so apt-get is broken because of unmet dependencies on my
→ AMD64, Aspire 4200, Debian, mirror http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/
→ testing.
There should be a bug report, but I do not know against which of the
five packages apt-get, gcc-4.2-base, lib32stdc++6, glibc-2.6.1, or
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 16:08 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Dallas Clement wrote:
> > The output of dpkg -l on my target system is:
> > ii libc6-i3862.3.6
> > Hence, I can see that the package 'libc6-i386' is indeed installed.
>
> It does look like it.
>
> > The subsequent attempt to install busy
Dallas Clement wrote:
> The output of dpkg -l on my target system is:
> ii libc6-i3862.3.6
> Hence, I can see that the package 'libc6-i386' is indeed installed.
It does look like it.
> The subsequent attempt to install busybox, e2fsprogs or any other
> package that depends on libc6-i386 fai
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 15:30 -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> What is the output of
>
> dpkg -l e2fsprogs
The output of dpkg -l on my target system is:
Name Version
+++-=-==
ii libc6-i3862.3.6
Hence, I can see that the package 'libc6-i386' is indeed
Dallas Clement wrote:
> dpkg: package e2fsprogs depends on libc6-i386, which is not installed or
> flagged to be installed
What is the output of
dpkg -l e2fsprogs
If it is not installed, install it before compiling busybox. You can install
all the necessary dependencies by doing
apt-get
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 11:55 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Dallas Clement wrote:
> > Package: libc6
>
> libc6 is not the same as libc6-386
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/packages/glibc$ dpkg --info libc6-i386.deb
> > Package: libc6
>
> Same here. libc6 is not the same as libc6-386
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECT
Dallas Clement wrote:
> Package: libc6
libc6 is not the same as libc6-386
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/packages/glibc$ dpkg --info libc6-i386.deb
> Package: libc6
Same here. libc6 is not the same as libc6-386
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/packages$ dpkg --info busybox_1.6.0-1_i386.deb
> Depends: libc6-i386
Hello All,
I'm having some trouble installing a busybox debian package which I
built on my Debian system. I previously built and installed a glibc
binary debian package successfully. The busybox package installation is
failing complaining that the libc6-i386 package which it depends on is
not in
ot always be shown under the one-liner description: it has
to
> make sense on its own. All of this is available at:
>
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Description
>
>
>> 2.i need to add depends: kdetheme and some how to make it
>> install it if
make it install it
> if it isn't allready installed:
> i understand that i need to use preinst script could you please
> provide an example for example if i have foo dependency how would my
> preinst will be ?
That is not the purpose of a preinst script. The package does
Howdy,..
i've started reading
[URL="http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html"]this
manual[/URL] to understand how to create better packages for debian so
i have created a small package that i call
[URL="http://downloads.sourceforge.net/scex/klthemes_1.0_all.deb?use_mirror=
Hi Everybody,
Thanks for replying, and sorry for the late reply from my
end.
Actually, after reading your suggestions, I decided to
try again from scratch on another Debian system (rather,
Debian based Ubuntu 7.04). Strangely enough, I could not
reproduce the problem. After I installed lighttpd
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 07:40:40PM +0530, Santanu Chatterjee wrote:
> Hi Everybody,
>
> I was trying to install mediawiki1.7 using aptitude. This
> package has 'apache | httpd' as one of its dependencies.
> I don't want to install apache. lighttpd seems to provid
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 19:40:40 +0530, Santanu Chatterjee wrote:
> Hi Everybody,
>
> I was trying to install mediawiki1.7 using aptitude. This
> package has 'apache | httpd' as one of its dependencies.
> I don't want to install apache. lighttpd seems to provid
Þann 2007-04-20, 19:40:40 (+0530) skrifaði Santanu Chatterjee:
> Hi Everybody,
>
> I was trying to install mediawiki1.7 using aptitude. This
> package has 'apache | httpd' as one of its dependencies.
> I don't want to install apache. lighttpd seems to provid
Hi Everybody,
I was trying to install mediawiki1.7 using aptitude. This
package has 'apache | httpd' as one of its dependencies.
I don't want to install apache. lighttpd seems to provide
httpd. So I installed that.
Now, when I tried to install mediawiki1.7, it still tries to
Greg Folkert wrote:
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 14:02 +0800, Bob wrote:
8< snip why do libx11-6: and x11-common in come with php5-gd & imagemagick
It comes down to the fact that imagemagick is built with support for the
X picture formats for flexibility. This requires the some X libs. Not
the WHO
> jhead zip unzip php4-mysql php4-gd imagemagick
> and I'm updating that command for etch so now I'll run
> apt-get install -s -V apache php5 mysql-server-5.0 netpbm ffmpeg dcraw
> jhead zip unzip php5-mysql php5-gd imagemagick libapache-mod-php5
> (I like apache 1) but I saw
pdating that command for etch so now I'll run
apt-get install -s -V apache php5 mysql-server-5.0 netpbm ffmpeg dcraw
jhead zip unzip php5-mysql php5-gd imagemagick libapache-mod-php5
(I like apache 1) but I saw in the dependencies x11-common which is
being pulled in by libx11-6 which on etch is
On 4/10/07, Tom Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I tried to uprade a dev server to etch today. The upgrade erred out on mysql
upgrades. I'm told I might want to run 'apt-get -f install'. I've played with
the force option before with bad results. Why are the libs that mysql depends
on not upg
601 - 700 of 1353 matches
Mail list logo
