On 06.09.2015 19:40, Stephen Powell wrote:
> The OP said that what he included in this problem report came from
> another problem report, because it scrolled off the screen too fast
> for him to give actual data.
True, but it was pretty damn close (lots of 0xffs)
> (Perhaps he doesn't know
David Wright wrote on 07/27/2015 12:12 AM:
Quoting Dennis Wicks (w...@mgssub.com):
Frequently when I run a command in a terminal window (Debian 8.1
Xfce) I get a bunch of errors.
/bin/bash: _parse_usage: line 16: syntax error near unexpected token `('
/bin/bash: _parse_usage: line 16
On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 23:40:10 -0400
Gary Dale garyd...@torfree.net wrote:
On 27/07/15 10:08 PM, Celejar wrote:
Hi,
I have a fairly new external USB disk that frequently throws errors.
When these occur, the disk becomes partially or totally inaccessible.
Even worse, when I try to umount
Hi,
I have a fairly new external USB disk that frequently throws errors.
When these occur, the disk becomes partially or totally inaccessible.
Even worse, when I try to umount it, the umount hangs indefinitely,
using 100% of one of my cpu cores. I haven't yet found any way to
recover short
On 27/07/15 10:08 PM, Celejar wrote:
Hi,
I have a fairly new external USB disk that frequently throws errors.
When these occur, the disk becomes partially or totally inaccessible.
Even worse, when I try to umount it, the umount hangs indefinitely,
using 100% of one of my cpu cores. I haven't
Mark Neyhart wrote on 07/23/2015 02:10 PM:
On 07/23/2015 08:45 AM, Dennis Wicks wrote:
Greetings,
Frequently when I run a command in a terminal window (Debian 8.1 Xfce)
I get a bunch of errors.
/bin/bash: _parse_usage: line 16: syntax error near unexpected token
`('
This will happen if you
Quoting Dennis Wicks (w...@mgssub.com):
Frequently when I run a command in a terminal window (Debian 8.1
Xfce) I get a bunch of errors.
/bin/bash: _parse_usage: line 16: syntax error near unexpected token `('
/bin/bash: _parse_usage: line 16: ` -?(\[)+([a-zA-Z0-9?]))'
/bin/bash: error
On 07/23/2015 08:45 AM, Dennis Wicks wrote:
Greetings,
Frequently when I run a command in a terminal window (Debian 8.1 Xfce)
I get a bunch of errors.
/bin/bash: _parse_usage: line 16: syntax error near unexpected token
`('
This will happen if you are running a command with an unescaped
Greetings,
Frequently when I run a command in a terminal window (Debian
8.1 Xfce) I get a bunch of errors.
/bin/bash: _parse_usage: line 16: syntax error near unexpected token `('
/bin/bash: _parse_usage: line 16: ` -?(\[)+([a-zA-Z0-9?]))'
/bin/bash: error importing function definition
Le Fri, 10 Jul 2015 06:30:02 +0200, Stéphane GARGOLY a écrit :
Moi, ce qui m'interpelle surtout, c'est de se retrouver avec un fichier
'.xsession-errors' de plus de... 200 Gio (soit plus de 200 000 Mio ou
encore plus de 200 000 000 kio). o_O
Je me demande comment cela est possible
On 10/07/2015 08:38, moi-meme wrote:
surtout que ce n'est pas une maladie du DD.
C'est la deuxième fois que cela se produit.
Juste par curiosité, tu peux publier un extrait ?
--
Fabien
--
Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question :
http://wiki.debian.org/fr/FrenchLists
Pour
Le Fri, 10 Jul 2015 09:30:01 +0200, Fabien R a écrit :
C'est la deuxième fois que cela se produit.
Juste par curiosité, tu peux publier un extrait ?
--
tu le veux les 220G en totalité ? :-)
Non poubelle mais à la fin du fichier il disait en boucle qu'il ne
trouvait pas un fichier, je ne
pour éviter que le fichier explose ?
(limiter sa taille)
Moi, ce qui m'interpelle surtout, c'est de se retrouver avec un fichier
'.xsession-errors' de plus de... 200 Gio (soit plus de 200 000 Mio ou encore
plus de 200 000 000 kio). o_O
Je me demande comment cela est possible.
Cordialement et
un peu gros et ça ne laisse pas de place pour travailler :-(
Suite à petit problème X ça m'a tout bloqué.
Effacé le fichier : c'est reparti.
Mais comment faire pour éviter que le fichier explose ?
(limiter sa taille)
--
Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question :
Hello.
After returning to this computer after a couple of hours, and
switching to the terminal session, I found this;
r
root@bret-apc01-debian6:~#
Message from syslogd@bret-apc01-debian6 at Jun 29 02:32:30 ...
kernel:[ 5453.781521] Oops: [#1] SMP
Message from syslogd@bret-apc01-debian6
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 05:09:09 +0800
Bret Busby bret.bu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello.
After returning to this computer after a couple of hours, and
switching to the terminal session, I found this;
r
root@bret-apc01-debian6:~#
Message from syslogd@bret-apc01-debian6 at Jun 29 02:32:30 ...
On Sun, 2015-06-28 at 15:07 -0700, bri...@aracnet.com wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 05:09:09 +0800
Bret Busby bret.bu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello.
After returning to this computer after a couple of hours, and
switching to the terminal session, I found this;
r
David Wright wrote:
Quoting Bob Proulx (b...@proulx.com):
When the program looks up the ftp.us.debian.org name it will get all
three of the above in some order. If your system is IPv6 capable it
...
Thanks for that clear exposition. I myself have had no problem with
these differences
On Sat, 16 May 2015, Brian wrote:
A comparison of the outputs from 'apt-config dump' on both laptops might
give something.
alas no!
after copying the /etc/apt directory from laptop2 to my laptop, the only
difference is
== diff apt-config_dump.ch8 apt-config_dump.mynb
132c132
On Fri 15 May 2015 at 22:03:59 -0500, David Wright wrote:
Quoting Bob Proulx (b...@proulx.com):
When the program looks up the ftp.us.debian.org name it will get all
three of the above in some order. If your system is IPv6 capable it
will prefer the IPv6 address and always use it. If
On Thu, 14 May 2015, David Wright wrote:
. . .
$ wget http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie/main/binary-amd64/Packages
--2015-05-14 11:28:30--
http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie/main/binary-amd64/Packages
Resolving ftp.us.debian.org (ftp.us.debian.org)... 128.61.240.89,
Brian wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
You are currently using:
deb http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian jessie main
That is okay. Good! But for the purpose of this task change that to
a different but still valid mirror. This would be a good time to try
out the new http redirector which
Quoting Pierre Frenkiel (pierre.frenk...@gmail.com):
hi David,
At least for that problem I found the explanation, and was able to
reproduce it on
my personal web server. I imported the index.html from the us and fr sites,
and the
3 files, Just try
wget
David Wright wrote:
I noticed that on repeating the former, I got a very different file,
and this might be because ftp.us.debian.org had resolved to a different
IPv4 address (but IPv6 was the same).
$ host ftp.us.debian.org
ftp.us.debian.org has address 128.61.240.89
ftp.us.debian.org
Quoting Bob Proulx (b...@proulx.com):
When the program looks up the ftp.us.debian.org name it will get all
three of the above in some order. If your system is IPv6 capable it
will prefer the IPv6 address and always use it. If not then it will
select one of the two IPv4 addresses and use it.
On Thu, 14 May 2015, Brian wrote:
Do we assume the problem laptop and laptop2 have the same versions of
apt? 'dpkg -l apt' for that.
yes: 0.9.7.9+deb7u7
It's the 1st thing I checked when I found this difference of behaviuor.
I may-be forgot to say that the problem occurs with apt-get
On Wed 13 May 2015 at 12:55:16 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
You are currently using:
deb http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian jessie main
That is okay. Good! But for the purpose of this task change that to
a different but still valid mirror. This would be a good time to try
out the new http
Quoting Pierre Frenkiel (pierre.frenk...@gmail.com):
On Wed, 13 May 2015, David Wright wrote:
What happens if you perform this sort of conversation:
. . .
~ $ wget
http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie/main/binary-amd64/Packages
~ $ md5sum Packages
~ $ wget
On Thu 14 May 2015 at 14:33:49 +0200, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2015, Brian wrote:
Do we assume the problem laptop and laptop2 have the same versions of
apt? 'dpkg -l apt' for that.
yes: 0.9.7.9+deb7u7
It's the 1st thing I checked when I found this difference of
Quoting Pierre Frenkiel (pierre.frenk...@gmail.com):
On Wed, 13 May 2015, David Wright wrote:
What happens if you perform this sort of conversation:
. . .
~ $ wget
http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie/main/binary-amd64/Packages
~ $ md5sum Packages
~ $ wget
On Thu 14 May 2015 at 08:54:00 +0200, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2015, Bob Proulx wrote:
That is okay. Good! But for the purpose of this task change that to
a different but still valid mirror. This would be a good time to try
out the new http redirector which has just recently
On Wed, 13 May 2015, Bob Proulx wrote:
That is okay. Good! But for the purpose of this task change that to
a different but still valid mirror. This would be a good time to try
out the new http redirector which has just recently become an official
Debian resource.[1]
deb
On Thursday 14 May 2015 00:51:38 Paul E Condon wrote:
On 20150513_2054+0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Wednesday 13 May 2015 19:55:16 Bob Proulx wrote:
Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
I have still the same problem with Hash Sum mismatch
Do you have any idea on how to fix it?
Is your
On Thu 14 May 2015 at 00:24:19 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Thursday 14 May 2015 00:05:44 Brian wrote:
To clarify my second comment:
choose-mirror (2.62) unstable; urgency=medium
* Update Mirrors.masterlist
* This update includes adding httpredir.debian.org, which replaces
On Thursday 14 May 2015 10:20:23 Brian wrote:
On Thu 14 May 2015 at 00:24:19 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Thursday 14 May 2015 00:05:44 Brian wrote:
To clarify my second comment:
choose-mirror (2.62) unstable; urgency=medium
* Update Mirrors.masterlist
* This update
On Thu, 14 May 2015, Lisi Reisz wrote:
. . .
Good point. If the redirector is not permanently available, what is the point
of it? One is surely better off with a fast, near, high availability mirror?
I suppose the answer is that newer mirrors might be even faster.
But it might be worth
On Wed, 13 May 2015, David Wright wrote:
What happens if you perform this sort of conversation:
. . .
~ $ wget http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie/main/binary-amd64/Packages
~ $ md5sum Packages
~ $ wget http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie/InRelease
~ $ grep
On Tue, 12 May 2015, Bob Proulx wrote:
Check for additional configuration files in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/*
which I expect you to find a file referencing linux.dropbox.com
wheezy.
At a guess I expect that file to be owned by a package. *If* there is a
file there *then* this will say what
Quoting Pierre Frenkiel (pierre.frenk...@gmail.com):
Anyway, I removed them, and after that the reference to wheezy in
apt-get update disappeared, but I have still the same problem
with Hash Sum mismatch
Do you have any idea on how to fix it?
After you've tried the usual things like
Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
I have still the same problem with Hash Sum mismatch
Do you have any idea on how to fix it?
Is your system behind a proxy cache of some sort? This problem is one
sometimes seen when files of different ages are cached and served
causing the entire set of files to be
Quoting Pierre Frenkiel (pierre.frenk...@gmail.com):
On Wed, 13 May 2015, David Wright wrote:
After you've tried the usual things like clearing /var/lib/apt/lists
and trying, say, ftp.uk.debian.org in your sources.list, I'd be
interested whether you still get the problem if you substitute
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/13/2015 05:15 AM, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
[snip]
Anyway, I removed them, and after that the reference to wheezy in
apt-get update disappeared, but I have still the same problem with
Hash Sum mismatch Do you have any idea on how to fix it?
On Wed 13 May 2015 at 20:54:52 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Wednesday 13 May 2015 19:55:16 Bob Proulx wrote:
Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
I have still the same problem with Hash Sum mismatch
Do you have any idea on how to fix it?
Is your system behind a proxy cache of some sort? This
On Wednesday 13 May 2015 23:15:36 Brian wrote:
On Wed 13 May 2015 at 20:54:52 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
We need to be offered this during a netinstall. I did a netinstall
yesterday, and as usual was offered my bhoice of mirror in the UK. I
chose my usual because over the years it has been
Quoting Brian (a...@cityscape.co.uk):
On Wed 13 May 2015 at 20:54:52 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
We need to be offered this during a netinstall. I did a netinstall
yesterday,
and as usual was offered my bhoice of mirror in the UK. I chose my usual
because over the years it has been
On 20150513_2054+0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Wednesday 13 May 2015 19:55:16 Bob Proulx wrote:
Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
I have still the same problem with Hash Sum mismatch
Do you have any idea on how to fix it?
Is your system behind a proxy cache of some sort? This problem is one
On Wed 13 May 2015 at 23:30:27 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Wednesday 13 May 2015 23:15:36 Brian wrote:
On Wed 13 May 2015 at 20:54:52 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
We need to be offered this during a netinstall. I did a netinstall
yesterday, and as usual was offered my bhoice of mirror in
On Thursday 14 May 2015 00:05:44 Brian wrote:
On Wed 13 May 2015 at 23:30:27 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Wednesday 13 May 2015 23:15:36 Brian wrote:
On Wed 13 May 2015 at 20:54:52 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
We need to be offered this during a netinstall. I did a netinstall
yesterday,
On Wed, 13 May 2015, David Wright wrote:
After you've tried the usual things like clearing /var/lib/apt/lists
and trying, say, ftp.uk.debian.org in your sources.list, I'd be
interested whether you still get the problem if you substitute
http: ftp: in sources.list.
I already tried all the
On Wednesday 13 May 2015 19:55:16 Bob Proulx wrote:
Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
I have still the same problem with Hash Sum mismatch
Do you have any idea on how to fix it?
Is your system behind a proxy cache of some sort? This problem is one
sometimes seen when files of different ages are
Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
Get: 11 http://linux.dropbox.com wheezy/main i386 Packages [1,150 B]
why these references to wheezy?
Check for additional configuration files in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/*
which I expect you to find a file referencing linux.dropbox.com
wheezy.
At a guess I expect that
On Mon, 11 May 2015, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
(unless the problem
comes from my laptop config, but I don't see how, as I have no problem with
the Wheezy sources.list)
It seems I was wrong, as I tried apt-get update with a jessie sources.list
on an other amd64 laptop, and I got no error.
hi everybody,
I tried to upgrade my amd64 laptop to jessie, and still have the same problem
already reported 1 month ago.
I expected that it will be fixed when Jessie became the stable release (unless
the problem
comes from my laptop config, but I don't see how, as I have no problem with the
with this errors.
I searched web, but found no mention of this error, except very old Red Hat bug.
What could be wrong?
System is Debian 7.8 with vanilla kernel 3.14 with grsecurity and have
turned on some options related to filesystem hoping could resolve this,
but didn't help.
Best regards
--
http
On the Debian bug reporting page it said that I should ask here if I wasn't
sure where to report a bug.
The problem is that the file /usr/share/hunspell/nl.aff (part of the
myspell-nl package) gives errors if you construct a ispell Dictionary with
it in PostgreSQL as follow:
CREATE TEXT SEARCH
On 10/22/2014 07:10 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
The faulty package is system-config-printer which linterally creates
millions of files in /tmp [1].
As as side-effect, you'll see that rebooting your system can take ages,
when /tmp is being cleaned up [2] and you likely see output like this:
a
Hello All,
As of a few days ago I keep getting errors similar to the following when
running aptitude upgrade:
dpkg: error processing archive
/var/cache/apt/archives/cups-server-common_1.7.5-5_all.deb (--unpack):
unable to create
`/usr/share/cups/templates/ru/set-printer-options
John Bleichert syb...@earthlink.net wrote:
As of a few days ago I keep getting errors similar to the following when
running aptitude upgrade:
dpkg: error processing archive
/var/cache/apt/archives/cups-server-common_1.7.5-5_all.deb (--unpack):
unable to create
`/usr/share/cups
On 22/10/14 19:49, John Bleichert wrote:
Hello All,
As of a few days ago I keep getting errors similar to the following
when running aptitude upgrade:
dpkg: error processing archive
/var/cache/apt/archives/cups-server-common_1.7.5-5_all.deb (--unpack):
unable to create
`/usr/share
On 10/22/2014 03:01 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
John Bleichert syb...@earthlink.net wrote:
As of a few days ago I keep getting errors similar to the following when
running aptitude upgrade:
dpkg: error processing archive
/var/cache/apt/archives/cups-server-common_1.7.5-5_all.deb (--unpack
Doug dmcgarr...@optonline.net wrote:
On 10/22/2014 03:01 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
John Bleichert syb...@earthlink.net wrote:
As of a few days ago I keep getting errors similar to the following when
running aptitude upgrade:
dpkg: error processing archive
/var/cache/apt/archives/cups
On 10/22/2014 03:00 PM, Iain M Conochie wrote:
snip
Try a df -i You may have run out of inodes
Cheers
Iain
Iain: Bingo - I was down to a single-digit number of inodes on / ...
The box became unusable and had to be reset. Upon booting the OS
cleaned up temporary files and now I'm back
On Mi, 22 oct 14, 15:45:58, John Bleichert wrote:
This is the second time this has happened, so something is eating up inodes
on /. I am going to run some aptitude tests and see what happens.
Any idea what the OS is doing during boot to clean up temporary space? Is it
something I can run
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014, John Bleichert wrote:
Try a df -i You may have run out of inodes
Iain: Bingo - I was down to a single-digit number of inodes on / ...
The box became unusable and had to be reset. Upon booting the OS
cleaned up temporary files and now I'm back to an IUse% of 4%
(which
On 10/22/2014 03:53 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
There is some buggy software (cups?) creating a lot of symlinks in /tmp
or so.
Kind regards,
Andrei
Interesting that you mention that - cups did kick the bucket this
morning and become unusable. I will watch out for it in the future - thanks!
On 10/22/2014 03:55 PM, Peter Palfrader wrote:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014, John Bleichert wrote:
Try a df -i You may have run out of inodes
Iain: Bingo - I was down to a single-digit number of inodes on / ...
The box became unusable and had to be reset. Upon booting the OS
cleaned up temporary
Am 22.10.2014 um 21:53 schrieb Andrei POPESCU:
On Mi, 22 oct 14, 15:45:58, John Bleichert wrote:
This is the second time this has happened, so something is eating up inodes
on /. I am going to run some aptitude tests and see what happens.
Any idea what the OS is doing during boot to clean up
thanks
Hi,
Valery Mamonov valerymamo...@gmail.com writes:
2014-10-01 3:30 GMT+04:00 Ansgar Burchardt ans...@43-1.org:
Valery Mamonov valerymamo...@gmail.com writes:
I'm experiencing some troubles with updating my debian machine.
After aptitude update i'm having multiple errors like
multiple errors like these:
W: GPG error: http://deb.ianod.es unstable InRelease: The following
signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available:
NO_PUBKEY 498F1DF0598C5C38
Hmm, all the keys APT complains about come from /etc/apt/trusted.gpg?
What happens if you move
with updating my debian machine.
After aptitude update i'm having multiple errors like these:
W: GPG error: http://deb.ianod.es unstable InRelease: The following
signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not
available:
NO_PUBKEY 498F1DF0598C5C38
Hmm, all the keys
On Vi, 26 sep 14, 18:06:15, Russell Jones wrote:
I've seen several posts about this Bash upgrade issue, but no real answers
on how to get past it. Any assistance would be appreciated, thank you!
apt-get install bash
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state
.org:
Valery Mamonov valerymamo...@gmail.com writes:
I'm experiencing some troubles with updating my debian machine.
After aptitude update i'm having multiple errors like these:
W: GPG error: http://deb.ianod.es unstable InRelease: The following
signatures couldn't be verified because the public
2014-09-27 18:10 GMT+04:00 Valery Mamonov valerymamo...@gmail.com:
NO_PUBKEY 54422A4B98AB5139
removing contents of /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/*.gpg, /etc/apt/trusted.gpg and
manual adding missing keys didn't work.
Only third-party repositories are affected.
--
Best regards,
Valery Mamonov.
On Tuesday 30 September 2014 11:14:52 Valery Mamonov wrote:
Only third-party repositories are affected.
You have added the third party keys?
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
2014-09-30 14:24 GMT+04:00 Lisi Reisz lisi.re...@gmail.com:
On Tuesday 30 September 2014 11:14:52 Valery Mamonov wrote:
Only third-party repositories are affected.
You have added the third party keys?
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Chris Bannister wrote:
John Aten wrote:
Err http://http.us.debian.org wheezy/non-free i386 Packages 404 Not
^
Wow!! How long ago did you last update this laptop? IIRC, that url/mirror
is no longer in use.
That alias is still alive and active and should be okay
Valery Mamonov valerymamo...@gmail.com writes:
I'm experiencing some troubles with updating my debian machine.
After aptitude update i'm having multiple errors like these:
W: GPG error: http://deb.ianod.es unstable InRelease: The following
signatures couldn't be verified because the public
2014-10-01 3:30 GMT+04:00 Ansgar Burchardt ans...@43-1.org:
Valery Mamonov valerymamo...@gmail.com writes:
I'm experiencing some troubles with updating my debian machine.
After aptitude update i'm having multiple errors like these:
W: GPG error: http://deb.ianod.es unstable InRelease
Hi all,
I recently installed Debian Wheezy on an old Dell Inspiron laptop. It's working
pretty well, aside from a few hiccups. One of these happens when updating.
apt-get update returns the following errors:
Err http://http.us.debian.org wheezy/non-free i386 Packages
404 Not Found [IP
On Mon 29 Sep 2014 at 14:20:04 -0500, John Aten wrote:
I recently installed Debian Wheezy on an old Dell Inspiron laptop.
It's working pretty well, aside from a few hiccups. One of these
happens when updating. apt-get update returns the following errors:
[Snip]
Is there anything I can do
On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 14:20:04 -0500
John Aten welcome.to.eye.o.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I recently installed Debian Wheezy on an old Dell Inspiron laptop.
It's working pretty well, aside from a few hiccups. One of these
happens when updating. apt-get update returns the following errors
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 02:20:04PM -0500, John Aten wrote:
Hi all,
I recently installed Debian Wheezy on an old Dell Inspiron laptop. It's
working pretty well, aside from a few hiccups. One of these happens when
updating. apt-get update returns the following errors:
Err http
Hi Don,
Thanks for the help! It looks like the diversion does exist, so doesn't
look like that's the issue:
local diversion of /bin/sh to /bin/sh.distrib
I am not wanting to change the default shell, just trying to upgrade
bash to close the Shellshock vulnerability. Any further ideas on
on squeeze, running into errors
Hi Don,
Thanks for the help! It looks like the diversion does exist, so doesn't
look like that's the issue:
local diversion of /bin/sh to /bin/sh.distrib
I am not wanting to change the default shell, just trying to upgrade
bash to close the Shellshock
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 02:20:04PM -0500, John Aten wrote:
Hi all,
Hi.
I recently installed Debian Wheezy on an old Dell Inspiron laptop.
It's working pretty well, aside from a few hiccups. One of these
happens when updating. apt-get update returns the following errors:
Err http
On Mon, 29 Sep 2014, Russell Jones wrote:
On 9/26/2014 6:43 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014, Russell Jones wrote:
I've seen several posts about this Bash upgrade issue, but no real
answers on how to get past it. Any assistance would be appreciated,
thank you!
This looks like the
Please reply to the list only.
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 09:56:09PM -0500, John Aten wrote:
Wow!! How long ago did you last update this laptop? IIRC, that
url/mirror is no longer in use.
I installed Wheezy on the Dell less than a week ago. I selected
debian.uchicago.edu, but there was
Hi!
I'm experiencing some troubles with updating my debian machine.
After aptitude update i'm having multiple errors like these:
W: GPG error: http://deb.ianod.es unstable InRelease: The following
signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available:
NO_PUBKEY 498F1DF0598C5C38
.
Processing triggers for man-db ...
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/bash_4.1-3+deb6u2_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
history -a
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014, Russell Jones wrote:
I've seen several posts about this Bash upgrade issue, but no real
answers on how to get past it. Any assistance would be appreciated,
thank you!
This looks like the diversions for /bin/sh got removed or otherwise
improperly modified at some point in
On 15/09/2014, Chen Wei weichen...@icloud.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 03:29:04PM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
.xsession-errors, which is currently sitting at about 740MB, and has
been growing in the last hour.
entries from before the current boot session) entries, so as to reduce
the file
On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 15:07:48 +0800
Bret Busby bret.bu...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15/09/2014, Chen Wei weichen...@icloud.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 03:29:04PM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
.xsession-errors, which is currently sitting at about 740MB, and
has been growing in the last hour
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 03:29:04PM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
.xsession-errors, which is currently sitting at about 740MB, and has
been growing in the last hour.
entries from before the current boot session) entries, so as to reduce
the file size to content that is necessary to retain
the computer?
So you are saying that with the .xsession-errors at zero size hasn't
reclaimed the disk space?
What does df -h show?
I think that the problem has now been disappeared.
A number of things have happened since (I think that it is since) I
last posted about this problem, which, I
-errors'
might produce lines like
xterm 2237 busbyenator 1w REG 8,1 0 359981
/home/busbyenator/.xsession-errors (deleted)
xterm 2237 busbyenator 2w REG 8,1 0 359981
/home/busbyenator/.xsession-errors (deleted)
the second field is the pid. the fourth field is the file descriptor
-errors'
might produce lines like
xterm 2237 busbyenator 1w REG 8,1 0 359981
/home/busbyenator/.xsession-errors (deleted)
xterm 2237 busbyenator 2w REG 8,1 0 359981
/home/busbyenator/.xsession-errors (deleted)
the second field is the pid. the fourth field is the file descriptor
(in this case
Bret Busby bret.bu...@gmail.com writes:
I note that, with that file that is being accessed by Nautilus,
assuming that the number 1169162 , is the size of the file, I have
tried, but, apparently, can not reduce that to zero, as that number
does not change, with my attempts.
On a side note:
Bret Busby bret.bu...@gmail.com writes:
So, I believe (unttil and unless, advised otherwise) that the
deleteing the file (which did not free up the disc space, in itself),
and then, renaming the xsystem-errors.old file, to xsystem-errors,
appears to have disappeared the problem, which, if I
Hello.
In trying to work out why my disk space gets progressively consumed so
that I repeatedly run out of disc space without any known reason, in
examining my hidden files in my home directory, I found the file
.xsession-errors, which is currently sitting at about 740MB, and has
been growing
that is necessary to retain for debugging?
xsession-errors should be re-created when a new session starts (see
/etc/X11/Xsession for the details). Long-running X session can produce
annoyingly large .xsession-errors indeed.
The solution to this problem comes in the form of logrotate:
$ cat /etc
401 - 500 of 3254 matches
Mail list logo
