Hello, list.
>>
>> Is there a way/program to guess gcc version used for compilation of some
>> debian package ?
>>
>
> I am not aware of any such program. But if all you wanted to know is the gcc
> version used, then you can take a look at the build logs provi
Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
> Hello, list.
>
> Is there a way/program to guess gcc version used for compilation of some
> debian package ?
>
I am not aware of any such program. But if all you wanted to know is the gcc
version used, then you can take a look at the build logs pro
Hello, list.
Is there a way/program to guess gcc version used for compilation of some
debian package ?
Best regards
Georgi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sunday 29 October 2006 02:09, Pollywog wrote:
> On Sunday 29 October 2006 02:01, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > > I believe the errors are due to incorrect gcc versions used to compile
> > > the module and the kernel. I am using
> >
> > Hmm, you have to be root to insmod the drivers.
>
> Shouldn'
On Saturday 28 October 2006 22:01, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 the mental interface of
>
> Kamaraju Kusumanchi told:
> > Hi all
> > How can I find the gcc version that was used to compile the kernel? I
> > am running debian testing (etch) with
On Sunday 29 October 2006 02:01, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > I believe the errors are due to incorrect gcc versions used to compile
> > the module and the kernel. I am using
>
> Hmm, you have to be root to insmod the drivers.
>
Shouldn't one use modprobe with current versions of Linux?
Of cours
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 the mental interface of
Kamaraju Kusumanchi told:
> Hi all
> How can I find the gcc version that was used to compile the kernel? I am
> running debian testing (etch) with
>
> $uname -a
> Linux kusumanchi 2.6.17-2-686 #1 SMP Wed Sep 13 16:34:10 UTC 2006
Hi all
How can I find the gcc version that was used to compile the kernel? I am
running debian testing (etch) with
$uname -a
Linux kusumanchi 2.6.17-2-686 #1 SMP Wed Sep 13 16:34:10 UTC 2006 i686
GNU/Linux
Why I need this:
I am trying to install madwifi drivers to get the wireless
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 06:28:04AM -0700, cam wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've just moved to debian in the last few days after several years of RH -
> usual reasons. Enjoying it very much so far. I installed woody with bf24 kernel
> from dl'd CD and just put on the most basic system. I used apt-get to
On Fri, 2004-07-30 at 07:28, cam wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've just moved to debian in the last few days after several years of RH -
> usual reasons. Enjoying it very much so far. I installed woody with bf24 kernel
> from dl'd CD and just put on the most basic system. I used apt-get to install
> x,
Hello all,
I've just moved to debian in the last few days after several years of RH -
usual reasons. Enjoying it very much so far. I installed woody with bf24 kernel
from dl'd CD and just put on the most basic system. I used apt-get to install
x, xfce, mozilla and a few other things.. I then decid
Please compile the following program by any of gcc version 3 and
by gcc version 2.95, and run the program as follows.
% gcc-3.3 -g -O0 -Wall this_program.c -o program_compiled_by_3.3
% program_compiled_by_3.3
First access
loop-C 1422606 = &C[0][0][0][1][0] -
I'm sure that
even with apt I'll find a way to screw it up. :o)
Thanks,
Krum
Hi Krum,
Did you try running 'make-kpkg clean' first? I think this may well be your problem.
I think GCC version may not be your problem.
For your reference, this is the procedure
had to install it three times already. I'm sure that
> even with apt I'll find a way to screw it up. :o)
>
> Thanks,
> Krum
Hi Krum,
Did you try running 'make-kpkg clean' first? I think this may well be your problem.
I think GCC version may not be your probl
Should I be using GCC 3.x for building kernels on Woody? I'm using 2.95
and I keep getting errors like undefined symbols and modules not being
built or installed. I've tried both 'make-kpkg kernel-image' and the
standard 'make dep && make clean && make bzImage && make modules && make
modules_inst
At Mon, 01 Sep 2003 22:28:56 +0200,
Mario Vukelic wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 22:10, Lukasz Hejnak wrote:
>
> > export/setenv CC=gcc-2.95
> > (select one, export or setenv, depending on your distro)
>
> rather, depending on your shell. setenv if you run csh or tcsh, export
> if you run bash
0, Mario Vukelic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał:
> On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 22:10, Lukasz Hejnak wrote:
> > export/setenv CC=gcc-2.95
> > (select one, export or setenv, depending on your distro)
> rather, depending on your shell. setenv if you run csh or tcsh, export
> if you run bash (highly probable)
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 22:10, Lukasz Hejnak wrote:
> export/setenv CC=gcc-2.95
> (select one, export or setenv, depending on your distro)
rather, depending on your shell. setenv if you run csh or tcsh, export
if you run bash (highly probable)
An easier way to set the compiler to s specific versio
27;s installscript and gcc-3.3.2.
> You can use this command (as root) to change your default gcc:
> ln -sf /usr/bin/gcc-version /usr/bin/gcc
better is to select the compiler right before compiling by setting the CC var
export/setenv CC=gcc-2.95
(select one, export or setenv, depending on your
so had problems with AfterStep2's installscript and gcc-3.3.2.
You can use this command (as root) to change your default gcc:
ln -sf /usr/bin/gcc-version /usr/bin/gcc
> --
> ZekeVarg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
I'm about to install nvidia-drivers and need to use gcc-2.95 since my
kernel in built with that. I checked an I have gcc-2.95 installed but
gcc-3.3.2 is default, how do I get my system to use 2.95?
I also had problems with AfterStep2's installscript and gcc-3.3.2.
--
ZekeVarg <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 16:44:04 +0200, Alfredo Valles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
<...>
> Hi all.
>
> I've trying to install the nvidia driver in my knoppix 3.2 but the
> installer complaing about the version of the gcc.
>
> How can I know the version of the gcc with which was compiled my
> kernel?
S
Go to: http://www.nvidia.com/object/linux.html and click on "Linux
discussion forum".
You will find the information there, just use their search util.
Zeke
On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 16:44, Alfredo Valles wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I've trying to install the nvidia driver in my knoppix 3.2 but the install
Thank to everybody. I exported the CC variable to "/usr/bin/gcc-2.95" and all
worked fine.
Alfredo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all.
I've trying to install the nvidia driver in my knoppix 3.2 but the installer
complaing about the version of the gcc.
This was the content of /var/log/nvidia-installer.log:
--
You appear to be compiling the NVIDIA
Marino Fernandez wrote:
Something unexpected happened to me.
I upgraded gcc to 3.3.3, and afterwards I was unable to compile the 2.4.21
kernel. I was still able to compile the 2.4.20 version.
However with gcc 3.2.3 and 2.95 I can compile the 2.4.21 kernel.
I do not remember the exact error mess
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 10:05:27PM +0200, Marino Fernandez wrote:
> Something unexpected happened to me.
>
> I upgraded gcc to 3.3.3, and afterwards I was unable to compile the 2.4.21
> kernel. I was still able to compile the 2.4.20 version.
>
> However with gcc 3.2.3 and 2.95 I can compile the
Something unexpected happened to me.
I upgraded gcc to 3.3.3, and afterwards I was unable to compile the 2.4.21
kernel. I was still able to compile the 2.4.20 version.
However with gcc 3.2.3 and 2.95 I can compile the 2.4.21 kernel.
I do not remember the exact error message, but it was at the v
building that, so you don't clutter
> up /usr/; plus, it's know to be buildable.
>
> -rob
>
Aha. Should've known that one :)
I found out what the problem is. The glibc version (2.2.4 or something I think) had a
bug that didn't allow this
gcc version to be built.
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 10:37:01PM +0100, Wim De Smet wrote:
> could it be that this is specific to my kernel or is it a configuration problem with
>my current locales?
> I hope this is not too specific, I could mail to the gcc people but I haven't had
>this problem under other
> systems so I fig
Hi,
I'm running woody with a 2.2.20 kernel. Recently I tried to install a newer gcc (3.2).
I used these commands:
mkdir /usr/gcc-3.2/
cd /usr/gcc-3.2/
/opt/gcc-3.2/configure --with-local-prefix=/usr/src/kernel-headers-2.2.20/include
--prefix=/usr
make (or make bootstrap, tried them both)
config
On 0, Gib Bogle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My Debian system is 2.4.18, which was built with gcc 2.95.4. I want to
> compile some software which apparently requires gcc 2.96 or later. What
> should I do? My first thought was simply to install a later version of
> gcc, but it occurs to me that
are
moving to 3.2. You can run the others by installing the right package and
invoking it as gcc-version, i.e. gcc-3.2.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My Debian system is 2.4.18, which was built with gcc 2.95.4. I want to
compile some software which apparently requires gcc 2.96 or later. What
should I do? My first thought was simply to install a later version of
gcc, but it occurs to me that this could create problems for me later,
for exampl
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 07:10:52AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Greetings:
|
| How is it that woody has gcc version 2.95.4 when the highest 2.x.y
| version I can find at ftp.gnu.org is 2.95.3?
http://packages.debian.org/testing/doc/gcc-2.95-doc.html
---
NOTE: This is not a
Greetings:
How is it that woody has gcc version 2.95.4 when the highest 2.x.y
version I can find at ftp.gnu.org is 2.95.3?
I am setting up a Solaris machine and I wanted it to have a matching
compiler version.
Thanks,
Mark
:: On Wed, 23 Aug 2000 17:13:07 -0700, Nate Amsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> there shouldn't be, the kernel team has been working hard to update the
> kernel to compile clean on all the newest compilers. earlier kernels(say
> before 2.2.10) were not as "fixed" to compile on these newer versions
there shouldn't be, the kernel team has been working hard to update the
kernel to compile clean on all the newest compilers. earlier kernels(say
before 2.2.10) were not as "fixed" to compile on these newer versions of
gcc.
my experience thus far in potato(also gcc 2.95.2) i have had no problems
co
Hello...
Did any woody users out there have any problems compiling kernels
with the gcc 2.95.2 (the version in woody)? Are there any issues?
That's the one I'm using...
Thanks,
J.
--
Jeronimo Pellegrini
Institute of Computing - Unicamp - Brazil
http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~jeronimo
mailto:
39 matches
Mail list logo
