On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:45:51 +0300
Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 10:19:01AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:02:22 +0300
> > Reco wrote:
...
> > > Indeed. Switch back to fetchmail, because the less you're depending on
> > > python and the software that
Hi.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 01:20:17PM -0400, songbird wrote:
> Reco wrote:
> ...
> > Because python. Be it python 2 or python 3 - it's (in)famous for one
> > thing - lack of backwards compatibility. Sooner or later they replace
> > python 3.8 (current sid) with, say, python 3.9 - and the
Reco wrote:
...
> Because python. Be it python 2 or python 3 - it's (in)famous for one
> thing - lack of backwards compatibility. Sooner or later they replace
> python 3.8 (current sid) with, say, python 3.9 - and the things will
> break again.
> Because they did on 3.7->3.8 transition, did before
On 10/27/20, Reco wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 10:45:23AM -0400, songbird wrote:
>> Reco wrote:
>> ...
>> > Indeed. Switch back to fetchmail, because the less you're depending on
>> > python and the software that uses it - the better ;)
>>
>> i never used fetchmail so that wouldn't be a
>>
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 10:45:23AM -0400, songbird wrote:
> Reco wrote:
> ...
> > Indeed. Switch back to fetchmail, because the less you're depending on
> > python and the software that uses it - the better ;)
>
> i never used fetchmail so that wouldn't be a
> "switching back" and since i
Hi.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 10:19:01AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:02:22 +0300
> Reco wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 01:31:19PM +, mick crane wrote:
> > > > this was just a quick heads-up for those who are stuck
> > > > on getmail like i
Reco wrote:
...
> Indeed. Switch back to fetchmail, because the less you're depending on
> python and the software that uses it - the better ;)
i never used fetchmail so that wouldn't be a
"switching back" and since i already have my setup
working as i want for getmail6 why would i bother
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:02:22 +0300
Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 01:31:19PM +, mick crane wrote:
> > > this was just a quick heads-up for those who are stuck
> > > on getmail like i am (and quite happy with it). :)
> > >
> >
> > as far as getmail goes maintainer
Hi.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 01:31:19PM +, mick crane wrote:
> > this was just a quick heads-up for those who are stuck
> > on getmail like i am (and quite happy with it). :)
> >
>
> as far as getmail goes maintainer thinks is an unnecessary panic.
>
> ""getmail goes out of
mick crane wrote:
...
> as far as getmail goes maintainer thinks is an unnecessary panic.
>
> ""getmail goes out of official support by my distro" may be a
> theoretical
> problem, or a philosophical one, but it it certainly is not a
> significant
> practical problem. Keep a Python 2 binary
On 2020-10-27 13:08, songbird wrote:
well, yesterday finally became the day when i tried to
see if i could get the old getmail to be left alone, but
nope, none of the options worked.
the good news, is that getmail6 is in unstable and was
a drop in replacement for getmail. there's a bit of an
well, yesterday finally became the day when i tried to
see if i could get the old getmail to be left alone, but
nope, none of the options worked.
the good news, is that getmail6 is in unstable and was
a drop in replacement for getmail. there's a bit of an
odd message coming out of it but
12 matches
Mail list logo
