On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 4:16 AM, Long Wind wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> I finds today that it's really not jessie
> it's wheezy
>
> it seems that wheezy is not too old for me
Wheezy works good. Reliable piece of software. That's what's on my server.
Jessie's OK. One of my virtual
On 04/09/17 02:58, Long Wind wrote:
> i do not install security update
> and it not cause trouble for me
Hello. I am wondering: Why do you choose to not to install security
updates? There seems to be nothing to gain and much to lose with that
choice.
--
Do not eat animals; respect them as you
On 9/4/17, Long Wind wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 9/4/17, Felix Miata wrote:
>
>
>> Wheezy support is
>> scheduled to terminate less than 9 months from today.
>> Maybe
>> now is a good time to consider at
>>
> From: longwi...@yahoo.com
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>>On Mon, 9/4/17, Felix Miata wrote:
>
>> Wheezy support is scheduled to terminate less than 9 months from today.
>> Maybe now is a good time to consider at least Jessie if not Stretch, since
>> you"re
>>
On Mon, 9/4/17, Felix Miata wrote:
Wheezy support is
scheduled to terminate less than 9 months from today.
Maybe
now is a good time to consider at
least Jessie if not Stretch, since you're
installing fresh.
--
"The
Long Wind composed on 2017-09-04 04:16 (UTC):
> I finds today that it's really not jessieit's wheezy
> it seems that wheezy is not too old for me
Wheezy support is scheduled to terminate less than 9 months from today. Maybe
now is a good time to consider at least Jessie if not Stretch, since
On 9/3/17, songbird wrote:
> Long Wind wrote:
> ...
>> I have decided re-install jessie from scratch
>> Thanks to all those who reply!
>
> you're welcome. it's really the easiest way to
> go if you want quickest and easiest approach.
It's about the "cleanest" route. You
Long Wind wrote:
...
> I have decided re-install jessie from scratch
> Thanks to all those who reply!
you're welcome. it's really the easiest way to
go if you want quickest and easiest approach.
songbird
On 09/03/2017 03:56 AM, Long Wind wrote:
i had installed jessie a long time agotoday i run command "apt-get update"and
"apt-get install ..."a lot of packages upgraded
then I find that sources.list is pointed to stablewhich means stretchclearly
this is not the correct way to upgrade to
On Sun 03 Sep 2017 at 13:52:57 +, Long Wind wrote:
> I have decided re-install jessie from scratch
> Thanks to all those who reply!
Don't forget to put jessie (not stable) in the sources.list.
--
Brian.
On 03-09-17, Brian wrote:
> On Sun 03 Sep 2017 at 10:56:59 +, Long Wind wrote:
>
> > i had installed jessie a long time agotoday i run command "apt-get
> > update"and "apt-get install ..."a lot of packages upgraded then I find
> > that sources.list is pointed to stablewhich means
On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 10:56:59AM +, Long Wind wrote:
> i had installed jessie a long time agotoday i run command "apt-get update"and
> "apt-get install ..."a lot of packages upgraded
> then I find that sources.list is pointed to stablewhich means stretchclearly
> this is not the correct
Long Wind wrote:
...
> i had installed jessie a long time agotoday i run command "apt-get update"and
> "apt-get install ..."a lot of packages upgraded
> then I find that sources.list is pointed to stablewhich means stretchclearly
> this is not the correct way to upgrade to stretchand some
On Sun 03 Sep 2017 at 10:56:59 +, Long Wind wrote:
> i had installed jessie a long time agotoday i run command "apt-get
> update"and "apt-get install ..."a lot of packages upgraded then I find
> that sources.list is pointed to stablewhich means stretchclearly this
> is not the correct way to
14 matches
Mail list logo