On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, dman wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 06:52:07AM +0800, csj wrote:
| On 29 Jan 2002 11:03:07 -0800
| Dave Carrigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| Walter Tautz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| [...]
|
| Just curious to hear other people's opinions on this matter,
# grep -i devfs /boot/config-2.4.17-686
CONFIG_DEVFS_FS=y
# CONFIG_DEVFS_MOUNT is not set
# CONFIG_DEVFS_DEBUG is not set
Would it not be better to have CONFIG_DEVFS_FS=n
I am currently reading
/usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.17/Documentation/filesystems/devfs/README
to see what advantages there
Walter Tautz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Would it not be better to have CONFIG_DEVFS_FS=n
Why?
Anyone know how to create devfs?
mount -t devfs - /dev
apt-get install devfsd
cramfs: wrong magic
What is cramfs?
Compressed ramdisk filesystem. Useful for initrd's. The wrong magic
message
On 29 Jan 2002 11:03:07 -0800
Dave Carrigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Walter Tautz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Just curious to hear other people's opinions on this matter, i.e.
don't use devfs. It seems to me the debian kernel should have
CONFIG_DEVFS_FS=n.
Some people want
csj [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But, let's say I just want to play with devfs, could I still go back to
my old disk-based setup? Could I still boot my old devfsd-disabled
kernel after using a devfsd-enabled kernel?
Sure. Having devfs enabled in the kernel does not require you to use
devfs.
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 06:52:07AM +0800, csj wrote:
| On 29 Jan 2002 11:03:07 -0800
| Dave Carrigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| Walter Tautz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| [...]
|
| Just curious to hear other people's opinions on this matter, i.e.
| don't use devfs. It seems to me the
6 matches
Mail list logo
