On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 08:54:11PM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 03:24:34 -0400 (EDT), Joel Roth wrote:
> >
> > I had a similar problem described here:
> >
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2010/10/msg00264.html
> >
> > Stephen Powell gave the same advice as above. :-)
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:26:13 -0400 (EDT), Hans Jespersen wrote:
>
> /etc/kernel-img.conf contained the line ramdisk = /usr/sbin/yaird
> I changed it to ramdisk = /usr/sbin/update-initramfs, and the installation
> continued without errors.
>
> I now have squeeze up and running. Tanks for helping
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 03:24:34 -0400 (EDT), Joel Roth wrote:
>
> I had a similar problem described here:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2010/10/msg00264.html
>
> Stephen Powell gave the same advice as above. :-) Following that,
> I tried this:
>
> # grep -r yaird /etc/*
/etc/kernel-img.conf contained the line ramdisk = /usr/sbin/yaird
I changed it to ramdisk = /usr/sbin/update-initramfs, and the installation
continued without errors.
I now have squeeze up and running. Tanks for helping me out on this.
Best regards, Hans
"Joel Roth" skrev i meddelelsen
news
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 09:22:18PM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 04:40:38 -0400 (EDT), Hans Jespersen wrote:
> > While upgrading from lenny to squeeze, i followed the installation
> > notes to the point where I install the new kernel image:
> >
> > apt-get install linux-image-
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 04:40:38 -0400 (EDT), Hans Jespersen wrote:
> While upgrading from lenny to squeeze, i followed the installation
> notes to the point where I install the new kernel image:
>
> apt-get install linux-image-2.6-686
>
> then I get the following error:
> ..
> Running depmod
While upgrading from lenny to squeeze, i followed the installation notes to
the point where I install the new kernel image:
apt-get install linux-image-2.6-686
then I get the following error:
..
Running depmod.
Running /usr/sbin/yaird.
yaird error: Unknown option: k
(fatal)
/usr/sbin/
Hi,
On 6/22/06, Sam Rosenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am using Debian Sarge with a 2.4.27 linux kernel. I have tried to
install a new kernel with: "aptitude install kernel-image-2.6-i686" but it
does not replace my old kernel (2.4.27), even after a cold start. I don't
feel entirely comfor
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 05:47:25PM -0400, Sam Rosenfeld wrote:
> I am using Debian Sarge with a 2.4.27 linux kernel. I have tried to
> install a new kernel with: "aptitude install kernel-image-2.6-i686" but it
> does not replace my old kernel (2.4.27), even after a cold start. I don't
> feel enti
I am using Debian Sarge with a 2.4.27 linux kernel. I have tried to
install a new kernel with: "aptitude install kernel-image-2.6-i686" but it
does not replace my old kernel (2.4.27), even after a cold start. I don't
feel entirely comfortable with Debian, so I'd appreciate any help.
I am includ
Clive Menzies wrote:
On (20/11/05 15:24), Rafael Alexandre Schmitt wrote:
* Clive Menzies ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On (20/11/05 10:31), Rafael Alexandre Schmitt wrote:
* Jeff Lucas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I am having problems after installing the kernel 2.6.14.2.
On (20/11/05 15:24), Rafael Alexandre Schmitt wrote:
> * Clive Menzies ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On (20/11/05 10:31), Rafael Alexandre Schmitt wrote:
> > > * Jeff Lucas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > > I am having problems after installing the kernel 2.6.14.2. it comes up
> > > > with a
>
* Clive Menzies ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On (20/11/05 10:31), Rafael Alexandre Schmitt wrote:
> > * Jeff Lucas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > I am having problems after installing the kernel 2.6.14.2. it comes up
> > > with a
> > > kernel panic and says something about not being able to bo
On (20/11/05 10:31), Rafael Alexandre Schmitt wrote:
> * Jeff Lucas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I am having problems after installing the kernel 2.6.14.2. it comes up
> > with a
> > kernel panic and says something about not being able to boot from the hard
> > drive. I'm a new linux user an
* Jeff Lucas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I am having problems after installing the kernel 2.6.14.2. it comes up with
> a
> kernel panic and says something about not being able to boot from the hard
> drive. I'm a new linux user and like it so far, but I'm having trouble
> getting things to w
Jeff Lucas wrote:
>I am having problems after installing the kernel 2.6.14.2. it comes up with a
>kernel panic and says something about not being able to boot from the hard
>drive. I'm a new linux user and like it so far, but I'm having trouble
>getting things to work for me.
>
>
This threa
I am having problems after installing the kernel 2.6.14.2. it comes up with a
kernel panic and says something about not being able to boot from the hard
drive. I'm a new linux user and like it so far, but I'm having trouble
getting things to work for me.
Another problem I'm having is installi
Does anybody know where i can get the driver ( module ) to install 3.1 onto
a scsi system with an advance scsi card.
I've been to the advansys web page and looked at the installation cd, but
they only have drivers for up to redhad5.2, and they are in zipped tar
format in .c and .h, but i haven't g
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 10:13:08AM -0700, Matthew Richardson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I installed with a minimal iso (woody_xfs_netinst.iso) from
> http://www.physik.tu-cottbus.de/~george/debian-xfs/. I then tried to isntall the
> 2.4.21-2 kernel image from the same site. The install went fine, but w
Matthew Richardson wrote:
> I installed with a minimal iso (woody_xfs_netinst.iso) from
> http://www.physik.tu-cottbus.de/~george/debian-xfs/. I then tried to
> isntall the 2.4.21-2 kernel image from the same site. The install went
> fine, but when trying to install the new kernel image I received
Hello,
I installed with a minimal iso (woody_xfs_netinst.iso) from
http://www.physik.tu-cottbus.de/~george/debian-xfs/. I then tried to isntall the
2.4.21-2 kernel image from the same site. The install went fine, but when trying to
install the new kernel image I received an error about Unresolv
Thanks, Andreas, it's working now.
--
Marc Shapiro "If you drink melomel every day you will live to be 150,
unless your wife shoots you first."
-- Dr. Ferenc Androci
-- (Winemaker, Little Hungary Farm Winery)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hello
Marc Shapiro (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I am running Sarge, and have been using kernel 2.4.18-bf2.4. I want
> to install a newer kernel and decided on 2.4.24-1-k7 (my box has an
> Athlon 2000+). After the install, however, I am unable to access the
> other box on my home LAN. The re
I am running Sarge, and have been using kernel 2.4.18-bf2.4. I want to
install a newer kernel and decided on 2.4.24-1-k7 (my box has an Athlon
2000+). After the install, however, I am unable to access the other box on my
home LAN. The relevent errors at boot (as far as I can tell) are:
Confi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've just compiled a kernel so that I could use my wireless card, now
that I try and install it I'm running in to some problems.
Here what I've done during the install.
==
Do you wish to set up Linux
"0debian user" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi I am running Debian unstable with kernel image 2.2.18
(! But I guess if you installed woody from a non-bf24 kernel and then
updated, you could legitimately have something this ancient.)
> 1) What kernel should I install (a 2.4.24 stable kernel or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 09:07:56AM -0500, 0debian user wrote:
> 1) What kernel should I install (a 2.4.24 stable kernel or a more risky
> 2.6.0)?
Go with 2.6.0. The water's fine. 8:o)
> 2) How does one install kernel image package in Debian? Do I
* 0debian user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040110 15:07]:
> 1) What kernel should I install (a 2.4.24 stable kernel or a more risky
> 2.6.0)?
Well I installed 2.6.0 three days ago, and it didn't crashed, and still
works on my workstation and my notebook.
However: I won't install any 2.6 Kernel on my p
Hi I am running Debian unstable with kernel image 2.2.18
Due to some root exploits I've read about I think I should install a newer
kernel.
I have some questions:
1) What kernel should I install (a 2.4.24 stable kernel or a more risky
2.6.0)?
2) How does one install kernel image package in De
On (06/01/04 14:33), Jan Albrecht wrote:
> after my debian is working without problems on my firewall for a few months,
> I have two more or less simple questions:
>
> #1
> While updating or installing a package the computer needs a lot of time. For
> example updating 2 packages took about 45 minu
"Jan Albrecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> after my debian is working without problems on my firewall for a few months,
> I have two more or less simple questions:
>
> #1
> While updating or installing a package the computer needs a lot of
> time. For example updating 2 packages took about 45 mi
Hi all,
after my debian is working without problems on my firewall for a few months,
I have two more or less simple questions:
#1
While updating or installing a package the computer needs a lot of time. For
example updating 2 packages took about 45 minutes. Okay, the computer is
only a P133 with
If you have installed the latest (1:22.5.8-8) LILO package, you can run
/usr/sbin/liloconfig and it will automatically add the images needed
including the initrd= tags for each kernel with its initrd.img file.
Sam Rosenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am having trouble installing a kernel ima
Sam Rosenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am having trouble installing a kernel image which seems to depend on
> initrd. The error message below is a verbatim message which follows the
> halting of the installation. For some reason after I add
> 'initrd=/initrd' I cannot run lilo. Do I need
I am having trouble installing a kernel image which seems to depend on
initrd. The error message below is a verbatim message which follows the
halting of the installation. For some reason after I add
'initrd=/initrd' I cannot run lilo. Do I need initrd? If so, how can
I satisfy the request from
I am trying to install Debian 3.0 r1 from the 7 CD set which I just
purchased on a Dell Inspiron 300m laptop. The PC boots from the first
CD and I get as far as partitioning my drive. When I try to "Install
Kernel and Driver Modules", the CDROM does not appear in the source
list, only floopy, hard
On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 01:06:01PM -0500, Jack Dodds said
> I'm installing Woody on a Pentium Pro. I've done a net install, but have
> not run tasksel yet.
>
> The net install leaves me with kernel 2.2. I'd like to have the 2.4
> kernel becasue I need the capability to mount a subdirectory, whi
I'm installing Woody on a Pentium Pro. I've done a net install, but have
not run tasksel yet.
The net install leaves me with kernel 2.2. I'd like to have the 2.4
kernel becasue I need the capability to mount a subdirectory, which
according to the man page is available in 2.4 but not 2.2.
Befo
Hi,
while executing a:
dpkg -i
alsa-modules-2.4.22-rc2_0.9.4-1+10.00.Custom_i3
386.deb
I've got the output inside errKernel-image...
So I have execute a
#depmod
Then I retry and I've got this output:
dpkg: error processing kernel-image-2.4.22-rc2
(--install):
subprocess post-installation scrip
Lourens replying to "Pattrick Hueper - proQrent GmbH"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> i am new to Debian, i used SuSE until now, but am sick of not
being able to
> upgrade...
>
Welcome, I too am a Debian-newbie_SuSE-refugee here.
I used the kernel s
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> The new warning reads:
> ==
> As a reminder, in order to configure lilo, you need to
> add an 'initrd=/initrd.img' to the image=/vmlinuz
> stanza of your /etc/lilo.conf
> ==
>>"Bill" == Bill Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bill> I think those are clear, now that the parts are making more
Bill> sense to me. It might be helpful to show the lilo line in the
Bill> first message box,
Well, the first message is spit out before we have determined
what boot
>>"Stan" == Stan Kaufman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stan> This was good; it pointed out which RTFM was germane. A note
Stan> that the new 2.4.x kernel images use initrd whereas the 2.2.x
Stan> kernels didn't would help those of us who don't follow kernel
Stan> development realize that there's
"Manoj" == Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> "Stan" == Stan Kaufman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Manoj> Any suggestions for improved wording? This is what is
Manoj> there now:
>> ==
>>
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Any suggestions for improved wording? This is what is there now:
> ==
> You are attempting to install an initrd kernel image (version $version)
> This will not work unless you have configured your
At 12:21 AM 02/28/02 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Any suggestions for improved wording? This is what is there now:
>==
>You are attempting to install an initrd kernel image (version $version)
>This will not work unless yo
>>"Stan" == Stan Kaufman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stan> Should be enough; the package maintainer's scripts clearly said
Stan> "Don't go any further until you've fixed your bootloader". It
Stan> would have been more helpful if there had been more explicit
Stan> info about how to do so, but t
"Bill Moseley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 12:04 PM 02/27/02 -0800, Stan Kaufman wrote:
> >I just installed 2.4.17 on a new woody box, which involved an
> >upgrade from the 2.2.14 potato system my floppy install disks
> >created. The kernel-image package provided clear notice during
> >install
At 12:04 PM 02/27/02 -0800, Stan Kaufman wrote:
>I just installed 2.4.17 on a new woody box, which involved an upgrade from the
>2.2.14 potato system my floppy install disks created. The kernel-image package
>provided clear notice during installation that the bootloader needs to be
>altered
>in or
#include
Bill Moseley wrote on Wed Feb 27, 2002 um 06:41:05AM:
> So, I'd like to avoid the kernel panic this time with the
> kernel-image-2.4.17-k7 package. What steps do I need to take to make sure
> I will end up with a bootable image? Someone mentioned that moving to the
> more modular 2.4 k
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Stan Kaufman wrote:
> Faheem Mitha wrote:
>
> > On 27 Feb 2002, Bill Moseley wrote:
> >
> > > So, I'd like to avoid the kernel panic this time with the
> > > kernel-image-2.4.17-k7 package. What steps do I need to take to make sure
> > > I will end up with a bootable image?
Faheem Mitha wrote:
> On 27 Feb 2002, Bill Moseley wrote:
>
> > So, I'd like to avoid the kernel panic this time with the
> > kernel-image-2.4.17-k7 package. What steps do I need to take to make sure
> > I will end up with a bootable image? Someone mentioned that moving to the
> > more modular 2
On 27 Feb 2002, Bill Moseley wrote:
> I had started the process of building a kernel yesterday before being so
> rudely interrupted by sleep.
>
> I'm currently running 2.2.20 but upgrading to 2.4.17. I had tried once
> before to use a kernel-image, but ended up with a kernel-panic that I never
I had started the process of building a kernel yesterday before being so
rudely interrupted by sleep.
I'm currently running 2.2.20 but upgrading to 2.4.17. I had tried once
before to use a kernel-image, but ended up with a kernel-panic that I never
followed up on. This system was installed Woody
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Hi Blars,
>as a matter of fact it was dselect under woody to automatically select and
>install the package modutils-2.4.10-3 when I asked for kernel-2.4.10.
>So, do you mean that there's something wrong under debian woody?
>
>Vittorio
>
>
Hi Blars,
as a matter of fact it was dselect under woody to automatically select and
install the package modutils-2.4.10-3 when I asked for kernel-2.4.10.
So, do you mean that there's something wrong under debian woody?
Vittorio
Blars Blarson [debian-user] <24/10/01 02:01 -0700>:
> In article
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>depmod: Unexpected value (20) in
>'/lib/modules/2.4.10-586/kernel/drivers/ieee1394/sbp2.o' for
>ieee1394_device_size
> It is likely that the kernel structure has changed, if so then
> you probably need a new version of modutils
I can't install kernel image 2.4.10 in woody properly.
Here's the script of
#apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.10-586
Sorry, kernel-image-2.4.10-586 is already the newest version
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 7 not upgraded.
1 packages not fully installed or removed.
Need
Joerg Johannes wrote:
>
> Hello list
>
> I have, in the last few weeks, compiled a lot of kernels (with
> make-kpkg)
> Well, I have installed these kernel-image-blah.deb's, but without
> removing the old ones. dpkg -l shows
>
> ii kernel-image-2. # <-- dpk -l does not show more of the package
>
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 01:37:09PM +0200, Joerg Johannes wrote:
> I have, in the last few weeks, compiled a lot of kernels (with
> make-kpkg)
> Well, I have installed these kernel-image-blah.deb's, but without
> removing the old ones. dpkg -l shows
>
> ii kernel-image-2. # <-- dpk -l does not show
Joerg,
Of course, it would be good if I had included the link too,
wouldnt it?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=105964&repeatmerged=yes
Regards,
Jor-el
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, Jor-el wrote:
> Joerg,
>
> By a coincidence, I had opened a bug yesterday on this very
>
Joerg,
By a coincidence, I had opened a bug yesterday on this very
topic. Here is the link which also contains the maintainer response.
Regards,
Jor-el
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, Joerg Johannes wrote:
> Hello list
>
> I have, in the last few weeks, compiled a lot of kernels (with
> make-kpkg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hello list
>
>I have, in the last few weeks, compiled a lot of kernels (with
>make-kpkg)
>Well, I have installed these kernel-image-blah.deb's, but without
>removing the old ones. dpkg -l shows
>
>ii kernel-image-2. # <-- dpk -l does not show more of the package
>version
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, Joerg Johannes wrote:
> Hello list
>
> I have, in the last few weeks, compiled a lot of kernels (with
> make-kpkg)
> Well, I have installed these kernel-image-blah.deb's, but without
> removing the old ones. dpkg -l shows
>
> ii kernel-image-2. # <-- dpk -l does not show mor
Hello list
I have, in the last few weeks, compiled a lot of kernels (with
make-kpkg)
Well, I have installed these kernel-image-blah.deb's, but without
removing the old ones. dpkg -l shows
ii kernel-image-2. # <-- dpk -l does not show more of the package
version
ii kernel-image-2.
ii kernel-image-
On 8 Nov 2000, Hubert Chan wrote:
>Kieren Diment <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I have a slightly obscure problem recompiling my potato
>> kernel-source-2.2.17 on a P100 laptop.
>>
>> I have a disk space problem and therefore tried to unpack the kernel
>> sources on my other part
Kieren Diment <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi there,
>
> I have a slightly obscure problem recompiling my potato
> kernel-source-2.2.17 on a P100 laptop.
>
> I have a disk space problem and therefore tried to unpack the kernel
> sources on my other partition, which is a now redundant vfat part
Hi there,
I have a slightly obscure problem recompiling my potato
kernel-source-2.2.17 on a P100 laptop.
I have a disk space problem and therefore tried to unpack the kernel
sources on my other partition, which is a now redundant vfat partition
that had win 95 on it.
When I extract the tarbal
"CHEONG, Shu Yang [Patrick]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >$tar xvf kernel-source-2.2.17
Nowadays it is: tar -xvIf kernel-source-2.2.17.tar.bz2 (note the `I'
in between, it is to unpack the bzipped archive).
Greetings,
joachim
Ray wrote:
>Does anyone out there have a step by step to install kernel
>sources on 2.2. Thanks very much
The other couple of replies referred to the more 'generic'
kernel compile instructions. If you want to do it the
'Debian way', I would recommend checking out the
2.2 install guide section 8
cls--colo spgs wrote:
> "S.Salman Ahmed" wrote:
>
> > >>>>> "RP" == Ray Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > RP> Does anyone out there have a step by step to install kernel
> > RP> sources on 2.2. Thanks ver
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 06:15:24PM -0600, Ray Percival wrote:
> Does anyone out there have a step by step to install kernel sources on 2.2.
> Thanks very much
>
o uname -a, to determine which kernel version you are currently running.
o apt-get install kernel-source-2.x.x, where x.x is determi
"S.Salman Ahmed" wrote:
> >>>>> "RP" == Ray Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> RP> Does anyone out there have a step by step to install kernel
> RP> sources on 2.2. Thanks very much
> RP>
>
> Installing kerne
e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit us at: http://www.astro.com.my
> -Original Message-
> From: Ray Percival [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 8:15 AM
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Installing kernel sources
>
> Does anyo
Does anyone out there have a step by step to install kernel sources on 2.2.
Thanks very much
.1)
> kernel-image-2.2.17 (version dell.0.2) is to be installed.
> dpkg: error processing kernel-image-2.2.17_dell.0.2_i386.deb
> (--install):
> conflicting packages - not installing kernel-image-2.2.17
> Errors were encountered while processing:
> kernel-image-2.2.1
-modules-2.2.17 conflicts with kernel-image-2.2.17 (>> dell.0.1)
kernel-image-2.2.17 (version dell.0.2) is to be installed.
dpkg: error processing kernel-image-2.2.17_dell.0.2_i386.deb
(--install):
conflicting packages - not installing kernel-image-2.2.17
Errors were encountered
To learn more about Linux. To make the kernel smaller so you have
shorter boot times. Those are a couple of reasons to do so. I bet I
could come up with more but I have to eat:)
kent
w trillich wrote:
>
> Corey Popelier wrote:
> >
> > Yep, everything I've read or heard suggests if your going
Corey Popelier wrote:
>
> Yep, everything I've read or heard suggests if your going to use 2.2, use
> 2.2.14+ kernels. I'm now running 2.2.15 (pre19-1) with no probs
> whatsoever.
i'm running 2.0.36 (slink kernel? with potato packages)
without any problems whatsoever.
until i run into problems a
> kernel panic: can't find init. try passing init= as kernel option.
> Init is sitting in /sbin/init, where it should. Anyway, even passing
> init= as kernel "command line" via lilo to the kernel doesn't make any
> difference.
I've had this happen to me on numerous occasions, even with 2.2.14
Yep, everything I've read or heard suggests if your going to use 2.2, use
2.2.14+ kernels. I'm now running 2.2.15 (pre19-1) with no probs
whatsoever.
Cheers,
Corey Popelier
http://members.dingoblue.net.au/~pancreas
Work Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 12 May 2000, Jens Guenther wrote:
> On F
On Fri, May 12, 2000 at 12:22:17PM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > Hi, I've been using debian slink and the 2.0.36 kernel for a while now,
> > and have just compiled the 2.2.4 kernel. I have my linux partition
Hi,
as far as I know there were some nasty problems in early 2.2.x kernels.
I thin
> btw: kernel 2.2.4 is not out yet - and won't be for the next three
> months, from what i've heard.
>
ehhhm - bullshit! i confused 2.4.0 with 2.2.4. *shame*
--
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!
--
Linux - the last service pack you'll ever need.
> Hi, I've been using debian slink and the 2.0.36 kernel for a while now,
> and have just compiled the 2.2.4 kernel. I have my linux partition
> (ext2fs) on hda2. When booting the new kernel, it tells me something
> like
> installed root fiesystem (ext. 2)
> kernel panic: can't find init. t
Hi, I've been using debian slink and the 2.0.36 kernel for a while now,
and have just compiled the 2.2.4 kernel. I have my linux partition
(ext2fs) on hda2. When booting the new kernel, it tells me something
like
installed root fiesystem (ext. 2)
kernel panic: can't find init. try passing
On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 21:17:32 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I just sent a message to debian-user@lists.debian.org, and it made it
> through to the list straight away, but I also go this reply from somewhere
> else.
>
> I SENT the message to and only to debian-user, it was not a reply or els
PROTECTED] -
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 20:56:45 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bcc:
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Hiba: error installing kernel source
Rem: _eZT_a_lEVELET_lATTAM_mAR
~
Uzenetet nem tudtuk tovabbitani!
Az On altal a
Hi,
I tried to unpack/install kernel 2.0.35 source tarball in /usr/src, and it gave
me the following error (with `tar zxvf linux-2.0.35.tar.gz'):
gzip: stdin: invalid compressed data--crc error
tar: Child returned status 1
tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors
though it has created linux/
: Hi,
:
: trying to install with special boot disk image-2.0.5-5 the
: Installation of Operating System Kernel failed with:
: "Error in archive format".
: It is the very same floppy from which the first steps went through.
ok, just cycled through kernels special_boot-[0-6].bin from
debi
Hi,
trying to install with special boot disk image-2.0.5-5 the
Installation of Operating System Kernel failed with:
"Error in archive format".
It is the very same floppy from which the first steps went through.
/dev/sda1 is set up as root fs, rex is copied to /dev/sda3 and
/dev/sda2 is a ha
In the installation step that installs the kernel I get an error: :error
in archive format". I've tried a couple of different floppies, downloaded
a new boot bin, and even tried loading a kernel image. I'm beginning to
think the problem is in one of the base disks, but which one? If I shell
out a
Hello!
I'm in need of a debian kernel compiled with the 21040 ethernet driver.
While being familiar with the overall installation and
configuration of Linux, I am woefully lacking in an understanding of how to
obtain a kernel compiled with a driver that does not appea
92 matches
Mail list logo
