Le 20/06/2021 16:12:48, Frederic Zulian a écrit :
> J'ai une série de schémas en .vsd et .jpeg à réactualiser.
> L'utilisation de Dia ne me semble pas pratique dans ce cas.
> Des idées ?
inkscape pour les .vsd ?
Pour les images matricielles, tout dépend de ce que tu as à faire.
Peut-ê
Bonjour,
J'ai une série de schémas en .vsd et .jpeg à réactualiser.
L'utilisation de Dia ne me semble pas pratique dans ce cas.
Des idées ?
Frédéric ZULIAN
gt; C'est tout à fait cela, en fait ; en tout cas, c'est ce que j'ai
> compris de la demande de Bernard : tesseract ne mangerait pas le jpeg
> en entrée (pas vérifié ; j'utilise toujours du pnm).
>
> A+
Comme dit, le logiciel OCR tesseract semble fonctionner correctement.
C'est plus l
de la demande de Bernard : tesseract ne mangerait pas le jpeg
en entrée (pas vérifié ; j'utilise toujours du pnm).
A+
--
JFS.
; On 05/04/2017 15:32, Jean Bernon wrote:
> > Perso j'utilise les outils graphiques essentiellement sous Gnome. Mon
> > menu imagemagick n'a jamais marché. Quelqu'un a-t-il une idée sur ce
> point ?
> > Sinon la conversion de jpeg à tiff se fait en quelques clics avec Gimp :
&g
.@laposte.net> a écrit :
>
>
> On 05/04/2017 15:32, Jean Bernon wrote:
> > Perso j'utilise les outils graphiques essentiellement sous Gnome. Mon
> > menu imagemagick n'a jamais marché. Quelqu'un a-t-il une idée sur ce
> point ?
> > Sinon la conversion de jpeg à tiff se fa
On 05/04/2017 15:32, Jean Bernon wrote:
> Perso j'utilise les outils graphiques essentiellement sous Gnome. Mon
> menu imagemagick n'a jamais marché. Quelqu'un a-t-il une idée sur ce point ?
> Sinon la conversion de jpeg à tiff se fait en quelques clics avec Gimp :
> ouvrir le
Perso j'utilise les outils graphiques essentiellement sous Gnome. Mon menu
imagemagick n'a jamais marché. Quelqu'un a-t-il une idée sur ce point ?
Sinon la conversion de jpeg à tiff se fait en quelques clics avec Gimp : ouvrir
le fichier jpeg, choisir "fichier" "export as...&quo
Le 04/04/2017 à 18:24, JF Straeten a écrit :
> Re,
>
> On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 05:56:23PM +0200, G2PC wrote:
>
> [...]
>> tesseract image.tif sortie -l fra
>> Tesseract Open Source OCR Engine v3.04.01 with Leptonica
>> Error opening data file /usr/share/tesseract-ocr/tessdata/fra.traineddata
>>
Re,
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 04:42:00AM +0200, Haricophile wrote:
> On peut aussi utiliser en graphique gscan2pdf, ou un autre front-end
> à tesseract. Ça n'enlève rien au fait d'installer les fichiers de
> langues ad'hoc
Bien sûr.
Sauf que si g2p se vautre, c'est une autre histoire pour
Le Tue, 4 Apr 2017 18:24:22 +0200,
"JF Straeten" a écrit :
> faut installer tesseract-ocr-fra qui contient les fichiers de langue
> spécifiques au français...
>
> Ou alors procéder sans le '-l fra' ; parfois ça suffit...
On peut aussi utiliser en graphique gscan2pdf, ou
Re,
On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 05:56:23PM +0200, G2PC wrote:
[...]
> tesseract image.tif sortie -l fra
> Tesseract Open Source OCR Engine v3.04.01 with Leptonica
> Error opening data file /usr/share/tesseract-ocr/tessdata/fra.traineddata
> Please make sure the TESSDATA_PREFIX environment variable
Le 04/04/2017 à 17:32, JF Straeten a écrit :
> tesseract sortie -l fra
image.jpg au depart. (Article de journal, sur fond beige.)
convert image.jpg image.tif
tesseract image.tif sortie -l fra
Tesseract Open Source OCR Engine v3.04.01 with Leptonica
Error opening data file
aussi regarder alors du côté de 'jpegtopnm' ; c'est
peut-être une piste supplémentaire pour passer à tesseract.
Essaie peut-être aussi d'enlever la couleur du jpeg s'il est en
couleurs...
Hih,
--
JFS.
Le 04/04/2017 à 17:07, bernard.schoenac...@free.fr a écrit :
>
> - Mail original -
> De: "JF Straeten" <jfstrae...@scarlet.be>
> À: debian-user-french@lists.debian.org
> Envoyé: Mardi 4 Avril 2017 17:05:49
> Objet: Re: convertir une image jpeg en tiff
>
bernard.schoenac...@free.fr wrote on Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 05:01:45PM +0200
> bonjour,
>
> cf sujet et comment faire avec imagemagick
$ convert UneImege.jpg LaMeme.tiff
Convert du paquet imagemagick
--
- Mail original -
De: "JF Straeten" <jfstrae...@scarlet.be>
À: debian-user-french@lists.debian.org
Envoyé: Mardi 4 Avril 2017 17:05:49
Objet: Re: convertir une image jpeg en tiff
Hello,
On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 05:01:45PM +0200, bernard.schoenac...@free.fr wrote:
>
Hello,
On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 05:01:45PM +0200, bernard.schoenac...@free.fr wrote:
> cf sujet et comment faire avec imagemagick
Basiquement :
convert image.jpeg image.tiff
Mais il faudra peut-être ajuster l'algo de compression avec -compress 'XXX'
convert image.jpeg -compress 'XXX'
bonjour,
cf sujet et comment faire avec imagemagick
merci
slt
bernard
On 27/12/2016 15:09, MERLIN Philippe wrote:
Bonjour,
J'ai des difficultés à lire et surtout à entendre son très faible des fichiers
vidéos MP4 H264 with AAC audio image jpeg, avec d'autres fichiers vidéo .avi je
n'ai aucun problème ni sur l'image ni sur le son. Il me semble que j'ai tous
les
Le mardi 27 décembre 2016, 18:00:25 CET didier gaumet a écrit :
> le plus simple serait probablement d'installer la version Qt ou gtk de
> easymp3gain pour augmenter le gain des fichiers audio ou vidéo qui te
Merci pour la suggestion, je l'ai solutionné autrement ce n'est peut être pas
très
le plus simple serait probablement d'installer la version Qt ou gtk de
easymp3gain pour augmenter le gain des fichiers audio ou vidéo qui te
semblent inaudibles, sans toucher au volume, quel que soit le logiciel
utilisé pour la lecture.
sinon tu peux aussi jouer avec l'égaliseur audio de vlc
Le mardi 27 décembre 2016, 15:26:43 CET Alain Rpnpif a écrit :
> Bonjour,
>
> Le 27 décembre 2016, MERLIN Philippe a écrit :
> > Bonjour,
> > J'ai des difficultés à lire et surtout à entendre son très faible des
> > fichiers vidéos MP4 H264 with AAC audio image jpeg,
Bonjour,
Le 27 décembre 2016, MERLIN Philippe a écrit :
> Bonjour,
> J'ai des difficultés à lire et surtout à entendre son très faible des
> fichiers
> vidéos MP4 H264 with AAC audio image jpeg, avec d'autres fichiers vidéo .avi
> je
> n'ai aucun problème ni sur l'image ni
Bonjour,
J'ai des difficultés à lire et surtout à entendre son très faible des fichiers
vidéos MP4 H264 with AAC audio image jpeg, avec d'autres fichiers vidéo .avi je
n'ai aucun problème ni sur l'image ni sur le son. Il me semble que j'ai tous
les codecs nécessaire avez vous rencontré ce
Emanuel Berg embe8...@student.uu.se writes:
This zsh works most of the time: then print the PDF.
I say most of the time as sometimes the image gets
cut in the edges - I don't know why ...
This hack still hasn't failed me. First, I do a PDF
that is A5 (i.e., smaller than A4). Then I print it
This zsh works most of the time: then print the PDF.
I say most of the time as sometimes the image gets
cut in the edges - I don't know why.
jpeg2pdf () {
local pic=$1
local pdf=${pic:r}.pdf
gs -sDEVICE=pdfwrite \
-sPAPERSIZE=a4 \
-o $pdf
I wrote this zsh wrapper to `convert' to do it.
With the 72 PPI resolution, the image get smaller!
With the 200 PPI resolution, the image gets bigger,
and it looks good when viewed with feh, but when
I print (with lpr) the increased-size image gets split
up in two parts on the paper with a black
On 2015-01-30, Lisi Reisz lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
What about the Japanese?
Sorry. What I read was restricted to anglophones.
What about illiterates?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On 2015-01-30, Curt cu...@free.fr wrote:
On 2015-01-30, Lisi Reisz lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
What about the Japanese?
Sorry. What I read was restricted to anglophones.
Well, let's say American Study using empirical evidence gathered in
the good old USA applicable to, well, not the
On 2015-01-30, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
Doesn't X documents this as Mouse-1 and Mouse-3? Clicking Mouse-1 is
the primary mouse button. No need to stress left or right and no need
for confusing non-dominant mouse button either. :-) I would go
with mouse-1.
Have we taken the
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 11:24:32 +
Lisi Reisz lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
What about the Japanese?
not to mention the Israelis, Farsis, Urdus, and the Muslims ?
Cheers,
Ron.
--
A pessimist is an optimist
in full possession of the facts.
On Friday 30 January 2015 10:23:18 Curt wrote:
I once read
that flipping through magazines from back to front (a habit of mine, as
the interesting stuff is always in the back) is the sign of a left-handed
individual who has been deprived in infancy of his natural impulse
towards
On Thursday 29 January 2015 14:52:53 Bret Busby wrote:
There is this bug report:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734519
That just gives me a web page that displays
Redirecting you to
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734519;
that goes nowhere.
problem with GIMP plugin file-jpeg
To: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Hello.
I have, in the last hour, tried to open a JPEG file, to crop it, using the GIMP.
I was unable to open that file.
I now can not open JPEG files with the GIMP.
The error message returned, includes
GIMP Message
Plug
On 2015-01-29, Bret Busby bret.bu...@gmail.com wrote:
I was unable to open that file.
I now can not open JPEG files with the GIMP.
The error message returned, includes
GIMP Message
Plug-in crashed: file-jpeg
(/usr/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins/file-jpeg)
The dying plug-in may have messed up
On 29/01/2015, Curt cu...@free.fr wrote:
Thank you, Curt, for your quick response.
On 2015-01-29, Bret Busby bret.bu...@gmail.com wrote:
I was unable to open that file.
I now can not open JPEG files with the GIMP.
The error message returned, includes
GIMP Message
Plug-in crashed
On 2015-01-29, Bret Busby bret.bu...@gmail.com wrote:
There is this bug report:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734519
That just gives me a web page that displays
Redirecting you to https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734519;
that goes nowhere.
Looks like
, whilst it refers to the same error
message, relates to a different version of Debian; that bug report
refers to Debian 7.1.
As indicated, I am using Debian 6.x LTS.
As I said, I successfully open jpeg files from the console
(gimp file.jpeg), as well as from inside the gimp (using gimp's internal
On Thursday 29 January 2015 08:49:14 Curt did opine
And Gene did reply:
On 2015-01-29, Bret Busby bret.bu...@gmail.com wrote:
There is this bug report:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734519
That just gives me a web page that displays
Redirecting you to
On Thursday 29 January 2015 13:55:55 Gene Heskett wrote:
On Thursday 29 January 2015 08:49:14 Curt did opine
And Gene did reply:
On 2015-01-29, Bret Busby bret.bu...@gmail.com wrote:
There is this bug report:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734519
That just
, or, Debian 7.x (or, yet another version of Debian)?
If you are not also using Debian 6.x LTS, then you might not have the
same problem.
If you try to open a JPEG file with the GIMP, using the same procedure
as me; using the File Manager to open the file with the GIMP, are you
successful
, relates to a different version of Debian; that bug report
refers to Debian 7.1.
As indicated, I am using Debian 6.x LTS.
As I said, I successfully open jpeg files from the console
(gimp file.jpeg), as well as from inside the gimp (using gimp's internal
file manager).
Once again, like you, I
On 2015-01-29, Bret Busby bret.bu...@gmail.com wrote:
As I said, I successfully open jpeg files from the console
(gimp file.jpeg), as well as from inside the gimp (using gimp's internal
file manager).
Then, in the absence of information to the contrary, I assume that you
also are not able
On 30/01/2015, Curt cu...@free.fr wrote:
On 2015-01-29, Bret Busby bret.bu...@gmail.com wrote:
As I said, I successfully open jpeg files from the console
(gimp file.jpeg), as well as from inside the gimp (using gimp's
internal
file manager).
Then, in the absence of information
Lisi writes:
Makes sense - but it needs the explanation. :-/ Right click is less
confusing, and can always be translated.
It certainly does need explanation. Non-dominant mouse button makes
no sense at all to me. None of the four buttons on my trackball are
dominant.
--
John Hasler
Bret Busby wrote:
I try to consistently use the term non-dominant mouse button rather
than right-clicking, to allow for people who use left handed mice,
as well as right-handed mice. My wife, who is a software developer,
uses mice and pointing devices (she sometimes uses trackball things),
On Thursday 29 January 2015 19:52:21 Bret Busby wrote:
I try to consistently use the term non-dominant mouse button rather
than right-clicking, to allow for people who use left handed mice,
as well as right-handed mice. My wife, who is a software developer,
uses mice and pointing devices (she
On 09/30/2014 06:20 AM, Chris Bannister wrote:
As you can see I'm using mpv and it plays perfectly, it even mentions
the attached picture. Try mpv, I use it for everything.
So whether xine has a bug, I don't know, but if you can play it using
mpv, then I'd report the bug against xine saying
Well, I know that an mp3 is not a JPEG file. But why does it matter to
xine (or libav or whatever).
This is what I get on stdout when trying to play some random downloaded
podcast using xine.
[...]
[mp3 @ 0xa660260] max_analyze_duration reached
[mp3 @ 0xa660260] Estimating duration from
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 01:06:41AM +0200, Johann Klammer wrote:
Well, I know that an mp3 is not a JPEG file. But why does it matter to xine
(or libav or whatever).
This is what I get on stdout when trying to play some random downloaded
podcast using xine.
[...]
[mp3 @ 0xa660260
, encasquetou que
só o Windows Internet explorer do wine pode abrir arquivos jpeg.
O botão direito-abrir com-imagemagick funciona corretamente mas a
questão é que mesmo usando Menu de Aplicações-Configurações-Editar
MIME type e trocar o aplicativo vinculado a jpeg, o xfve torna a
escolher o
Olá,
O Thunar (1.6.3) na minha instalação do xfce (4.10) em um debian
testing totalmente atualizado quase sem nada de GNOME, encasquetou que
só o Windows Internet explorer do wine pode abrir arquivos jpeg.
O botão direito-abrir com-imagemagick funciona corretamente mas a
questão é que mesmo
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:25:48 -0500, Jack Schneider wrote:
I have two jpeg files on my desktop. Both show correct file sizes in
Properties. Running Debian Squeeze Up2date. Printer is Lexmark C540
Xl, printer properties shows connected to printer. via my local network.
Using Gthumb to print
Hi, All
I have two jpeg files on my desktop. Both show correct file sizes in
Properties. Running Debian Squeeze Up2date. Printer is Lexmark C540
Xl, printer properties shows connected to printer. via my local network.
Using Gthumb to print, it sends to queue and hangs... never prints...
Lexmark
Hi,
I have always noticed that when my HP laserjet 1200 postscript printer
is printing images, it goes very very slowly.
i use Foomatic/pxlmono (recommended) driver.
However for some reason,
at work the windows printers are very fast.
What is wrong. What am i doing wrong?
Is true of any
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Mitchell Laks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have always noticed that when my HP laserjet 1200 postscript printer
is printing images, it goes very very slowly.
i use Foomatic/pxlmono (recommended) driver.
However for some reason,
at work the
Is there such a utility that can convert a scaned image
(saved in jpeg) to a pdf format?
-ishwar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 08:35:18PM -0500, ISHWAR RATTAN wrote:
Is there such a utility that can convert a scaned image
(saved in jpeg) to a pdf format?
I suppose it depends on what you're doing. I don't know of a
command-line tool that will take foo.jpg and turn it into foo.pdf.
However
ISHWAR RATTAN wrote:
Is there such a utility that can convert a scaned image
(saved in jpeg) to a pdf format?
try `convert' from the imagemagick suite.
For eg:
convert source.jpg dest.pdf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Is there such a utility that can convert a scaned image (saved in
jpeg) to a pdf format?
As far as I know sam2p [1] is one of the best for that kind of jobs.
s.
[1] http://www.inf.bme.hu/~pts/sam2p
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
El Dimecres 05 Setembre 2007, Florian Kulzer va escriure:
$ identify -verbose The-Horse-in-Motion.jpg | grep Quality
Quality: 85
Thanks, Florian and Oscar. Identify works fine :)
--
Benjamí
http://blog.bitassa.cat
.
Hi,
Anyone knows what command line program can display the compression info from
JPEG files? Thanks!
Regards,
--
Benjamí
http://blog.bitassa.cat
.
You can try with: identify -verbose image.jpeg
Regards,
Óscar Díaz.
On 9/5/07, Benjamí Villoslada [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Anyone knows what command line program can display the compression info
from
JPEG files? Thanks!
Regards,
--
Benjamí
http://blog.bitassa.cat
.
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 15:46:52 +0200, Benjamí Villoslada wrote:
Hi,
Anyone knows what command line program can display the compression info from
JPEG files? Thanks!
One possibility is using the identify command from the imagemagick
package:
$ identify -verbose The-Horse-in-Motion.jpg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/05/07 09:28, Oscar Diaz Fernandez wrote:
You can try with: identify -verbose image.jpeg
I'm not sure that JPEG images store compression level like zip
files do.
On 9/5/07, *Benjamí Villoslada * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL
Try with this program:
http://sign-el-soft.hu/cgi/ng-xim.en.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I have scanned document images that are jpeg files.
But I want to print them so that they fill the whole printed page.
It doesn't seem to work :-(
The images are 1204x1644. With Imagemagick or feh they show up
fullscreen, but when I print them they keep filling about a quarter
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hi,
I have scanned document images that are jpeg files.
But I want to print them so that they fill the whole printed page.
It doesn't seem to work :-(
The images are 1204x1644. With Imagemagick or feh they show up
fullscreen, but when I print them they keep filling
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 11:12:47AM -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Anybody know how to make a jpeg image fill the entire printed page and
print it as such?
I manage it in a ridiculous way: I display them with:
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/web/wordpress
and adjust the size
Am 2006-05-31 20:17:34, schrieb H.S.:
That was really great help. Thank a ton. The problem of identifying an
image as progressive or not is solved.
I use the netpbm package and its tools.
The problem left is to convert all my current jpegs into progressive
ones. jpegtran did the job (the
Wayne Topa wrote:
All of the inages on our web site are converted with the 'quality 25'
option. I find a lot of sites with images that are 100K or more just
take too long to load. There are still a lot of us that live in the
sticks and don't have access to anything but slow POT lines.
H.S.([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
Hi Wayne,
I tried your way and converted all the image with quality 25. You are
right, I couldn't notice any perceptual difference at normal size. The
different is noticable only if you magnify the image.
I had a total of 14 images of size
jpeg and if it says Plane it is.
That was really great help. Thank a ton. The problem of identifying an
image as progressive or not is solved.
To convert from basic to progressive use convert infile.jpg -interlace
Plane outfile.jpg
The problem left is to convert all my current jpegs
Wayne Topa wrote:
Having never heard of a progressive jpeg I was interested in your
query, and the answer you received.
I tried out the conversion to progressive on some of my large jpegs
to see if it would help (as I have the same problem you have, dialup).
I used the suggested
H.S.([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
Wayne Topa wrote:
But converting a jpeg to progressive somehow has the effect that the
progressive jpeg file is slightly smaller than the non-progressive one,
but the client then uses up more RAM to reconstruct the image
, it boils down to decreasing the quality of the jpeg file
while maintaining the perceptual quality reasonably well.
I am still playing around to decide what size (in pixels) images to
upload for others to view and how much quality to encode the jpegs with.
In any case, I am planning to upload
Hello,
I have searched google but haven't found an answer I was looking for. I
want to upload some family pics to share among relatives. Some have
dialup connections. To facilitate image downloads in their browsers, I
want to upload progressive jpegs. How do I find out if the jpegs I
already
filename.jpg and search for the Interlace line and if it says
None then it isnt a progressive jpeg and if it says Plane it is.
To convert from basic to progressive use convert infile.jpg -interlace
Plane outfile.jpg
HTH
Oli
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Olafur Jens Sigurdsson wrote:
Imagemagick does the trick for you.
To see if your files are interlaced or not you can use identify
-verbose filename.jpg and search for the Interlace line and if it says
None then it isnt a progressive jpeg and if it says Plane it is.
That was really great
Liebe Ostergemeinde,
seit einiger Zeit ist gwenview (ein KDE-Bilderanzeiger) beim Rotieren von
Bildern unheimlich langsam geworden. Ich benutze es gerne, weil es
verlustloses Rotieren von JPEG-Bildern unterstützt. Andere Programme haben
aus meinen schönen 3 MB großen Digitalkamera-Fotos eine
Christoph Haas schrieb:
seit einiger Zeit ist gwenview (ein KDE-Bilderanzeiger) beim Rotieren
von Bildern unheimlich langsam geworden. Ich benutze es gerne, weil es
(...)
Hat jemand eine Idee oder ähnliche Erfahrungen?
Kann ich nicht bestätigen (Sid ohne xorg7):
$ apt-cache policy
linux un logiciel permettant de réduire la qualité d'une
photo jpeg, c'est évidemment pour réduire la taille du fichier jpeg.
J'ai regardé les commandes convert et mogrify , mais il y a tellement de
possibilités que je n'arrive pas à savoir laquelle me rendra ce service.
Probablement l'option
Bonjour,
Je cherche sous linux un logiciel permettant de réduire la qualité d'une photo
jpeg, c'est évidemment pour réduire la taille du fichier jpeg.
J'ai regardé les commandes convert et mogrify , mais il y a tellement de
possibilités que je n'arrive pas à savoir laquelle me rendra ce service
* Philippe Merlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-01-31 15:18] :
Bonjour,
Je cherche sous linux un logiciel permettant de réduire la qualité d'une
photo
jpeg, c'est évidemment pour réduire la taille du fichier jpeg.
J'ai regardé les commandes convert et mogrify , mais il y a tellement de
Am 2006-01-25 11:35:31, schrieb Lubos Vrbka:
Michelle Konzack napsal(a):
for X in *.bmp ; do
bmptopnm $X |pnmtojpeg -quality 100 `basename .bmp`.jpg
done
probably no need to install netpbm
But with my solution you do not need to install imagemagic. :-P
Greetings
Michelle Konzack
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 04:05:42PM +1100, Star King of the Grape Trees wrote:
I can't be bothered to consult the man page, but it will be something like:
for $f in `ls *.bmp`; do convert $f --to-jpeg; done
Because I like to add little bits of efficiency where
necessary, I'll note that the `ls
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 10:56:03AM -0500, Stephen R Laniel wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 04:05:42PM +1100, Star King of the Grape Trees wrote:
I can't be bothered to consult the man page, but it will be something like:
for $f in `ls *.bmp`; do convert $f --to-jpeg; done
Because I like
Michelle Konzack napsal(a):
Am 2006-01-14 20:55:34, schrieb Serena Cantor:
I 100 bmp files. I installed gimp and imagemagik, but
can't find the way to convert 100 bmp files to jpeg in
batch fashion. Do you know the command? Thanks!
apt-get install netpbm
for X in *.bmp ; do
bmptopnm $X
Am 2006-01-14 20:55:34, schrieb Serena Cantor:
I 100 bmp files. I installed gimp and imagemagik, but
can't find the way to convert 100 bmp files to jpeg in
batch fashion. Do you know the command? Thanks!
apt-get install netpbm
for X in *.bmp ; do
bmptopnm $X |pnmtojpeg -quality 100
Am 2006-01-14 21:27:11, schrieb Serena Cantor:
Thank Brad Sawatzky,
Star King of the Grape Trees,
and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does Linux have to be so hard to use?(The user has to
What is Hard? - You get all tools for free and do what you want.
On proprietary software you mustr work hard for
On Sat, 14 Jan 2006, Serena Cantor wrote:
Thank Brad Sawatzky,
Star King of the Grape Trees,
and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No problem. I'm glad I could help.
Does Linux have to be so hard to use?(The user has to
be able to program in shell script or C or other)
Without Brad, I'd rather
Star King of the Grape Trees [EMAIL PROTECTED] said on Sun, 15 Jan 2006
16:05:42 +1100:
Serena Cantor wrote:
I 100 bmp files. I installed gimp and imagemagik, but
can't find the way to convert 100 bmp files to jpeg in
batch fashion. Do you know the command? Thanks!
I can't
On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 08:40 +1100, Tim Connors wrote:
Star King of the Grape Trees [EMAIL PROTECTED] said on Sun, 15 Jan 2006
16:05:42 +1100:
Serena Cantor wrote:
I 100 bmp files. I installed gimp and imagemagik, but
can't find the way to convert 100 bmp files to jpeg in
batch
NOT tested this.
Try googling for
useless use of cat awards for another redundant construct that
people love to use.
for f in *.bmp ; do convert $f --to-jpeg ; done
But even better than the above is just:
mogrify -format jpg *.bmp
You can probably also (untested):
convert --to-jpeg *.bmp
Star King of the Grape Trees [EMAIL PROTECTED] said on Mon, 16 Jan 2006
10:47:03 +1100:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 08:40 +1100, Tim Connors wrote:
snip
Why on earth would you want to put ls in backticks? I wonder who
originated this rather redundant and fragile (what
Tim Connors wrote:
Nope -- heaps of people have done this before you. Did you pick this
technique up from someone else?
It'd be nice if the technique would kindly stop propogating :)
Well, I believe I got this from some advanced bash guide, or a man
page or two.
snip
I don't think
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 12:10:21PM +1100, Tim Connors wrote:
Star King of the Grape Trees [EMAIL PROTECTED] said on Mon, 16 Jan 2006
10:47:03 +1100:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 08:40 +1100, Tim Connors wrote:
snip
Why on earth would you want to put ls in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim Connors wrote:
Nope.
#mkdir tmp
#cd tmp
#for i in `seq 1 1` ; do touch blah $i ; done
#for f in `ls *`; do ls -lA $f; done
ls: blah: No such file or directory
ls: 1: No such file or directory
ls: blah: No such file or directory
ls:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said on Sun, 15 Jan 2006 21:26:16 -0500:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 12:10:21PM +1100, Tim Connors wrote:
I don't think there is a fixed limit glob buffer. Are you sure you
are not confusing this with the amount of space bash is allowed to
allocate for arguments for spawned
1 - 100 of 255 matches
Mail list logo