age listings properly.
> I really need 2.2.2-4 version. Versions 2.1 and bellow are too old.
>
> > On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 06:07:50PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Hello.
> > >
> > > I'm in a desparate need of kmail_2.2.2-4_i386.deb
> > >
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 11:16:28PM +1000, Peter Good wrote:
> As being on holidays for the last week or so, can everyone tell me what the
> fuss is with kmail?? And what bugs everyone has been strikin, seems to be
> working here fine, with 2.2.2-6 installed.
I'm having the signal 4 error describ
old.
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 06:07:50PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > I'm in a desparate need of kmail_2.2.2-4_i386.deb
> > Anyone has it ?
> > I checked the ftp/http sites and there are previous versions.
> >
> > Both 2
500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > I'm in a desparate need of kmail_2.2.2-4_i386.deb
> > Anyone has it ?
> > I checked the ftp/http sites and there are previous versions.
> >
> > Both 2.2.2-5 and 2.2.2-6 have bugs which prevent me from running
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 06:07:50PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'm in a desparate need of kmail_2.2.2-4_i386.deb
> Anyone has it ?
> I checked the ftp/http sites and there are previous versions.
>
> Both 2.2.2-5 and 2.2.2-6 have bugs which prevent me
Hello.
I'm in a desparate need of kmail_2.2.2-4_i386.deb
Anyone has it ?
I checked the ftp/http sites and there are previous versions.
Both 2.2.2-5 and 2.2.2-6 have bugs which prevent me from running kmail.
6 matches
Mail list logo