Re: kmail_2.2.2-4_i386.deb

2001-12-19 Thread csj
age listings properly. > I really need 2.2.2-4 version. Versions 2.1 and bellow are too old. > > > On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 06:07:50PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Hello. > > > > > > I'm in a desparate need of kmail_2.2.2-4_i386.deb > > >

Re: kmail_2.2.2-4_i386.deb

2001-12-19 Thread list3
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 11:16:28PM +1000, Peter Good wrote: > As being on holidays for the last week or so, can everyone tell me what the > fuss is with kmail?? And what bugs everyone has been strikin, seems to be > working here fine, with 2.2.2-6 installed. I'm having the signal 4 error describ

Re: kmail_2.2.2-4_i386.deb

2001-12-19 Thread list3
old. > On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 06:07:50PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hello. > > > > I'm in a desparate need of kmail_2.2.2-4_i386.deb > > Anyone has it ? > > I checked the ftp/http sites and there are previous versions. > > > > Both 2

Re: kmail_2.2.2-4_i386.deb

2001-12-19 Thread Peter Good
500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hello. > > > > I'm in a desparate need of kmail_2.2.2-4_i386.deb > > Anyone has it ? > > I checked the ftp/http sites and there are previous versions. > > > > Both 2.2.2-5 and 2.2.2-6 have bugs which prevent me from running

Re: kmail_2.2.2-4_i386.deb

2001-12-19 Thread Hans Ekbrand
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 06:07:50PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello. > > I'm in a desparate need of kmail_2.2.2-4_i386.deb > Anyone has it ? > I checked the ftp/http sites and there are previous versions. > > Both 2.2.2-5 and 2.2.2-6 have bugs which prevent me

kmail_2.2.2-4_i386.deb

2001-12-18 Thread list3
Hello. I'm in a desparate need of kmail_2.2.2-4_i386.deb Anyone has it ? I checked the ftp/http sites and there are previous versions. Both 2.2.2-5 and 2.2.2-6 have bugs which prevent me from running kmail.