Re: libc6: did it move from unstable to testing?

2003-03-11 Thread Rob Weir
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 07:30:11AM -0500, Kevin Coyner wrote: Sorry for the detailed and probably somewhat obvious question, but I switched over to Debian last summer, and am loving it. But this is the first time I've encountered this type of situation where a testing package upgrade (libc6)

Re: libc6: did it move from unstable to testing?

2003-03-11 Thread Walt Mankowski
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 09:48:06PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote: On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 07:30:11AM -0500, Kevin Coyner wrote: Sorry for the detailed and probably somewhat obvious question, but I switched over to Debian last summer, and am loving it. But this is the first time I've encountered

Re: libc6: did it move from unstable to testing?

2003-03-09 Thread Craig Dickson
Michael D. Schleif wrote: What am I missing? # apt-cache policy libc6 libc6: Installed: 2.2.5-14.3 Candidate: 2.2.5-14.3 Version Table: *** 2.2.5-14.3 0 500 ftp://ftp.debian.org testing/main Packages 500 ftp://ftp.us.debian.org testing/main Packages 500

Re: libc6: did it move from unstable to testing?

2003-03-09 Thread Kevin Coyner
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 02:11:51AM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote.. Michael D. Schleif wrote: What am I missing? # apt-cache policy libc6 libc6: Installed: 2.2.5-14.3 Candidate: 2.2.5-14.3 Version Table: Have you done an apt-get update today? Even if you have, try it

Re: libc6: did it move from unstable to testing?

2003-03-09 Thread W. Paul Mills
Kevin Coyner wrote: O.k., so it seems as if libc6 has moved to testing and that packages.d.o is just a bit behind. No problem. But I guess I'm still a bit surprised that this upgrade forced me to uninstall php4 (at least the forced uninstall is better than simply breaking it). Anyway, I

Re: libc6: did it move from unstable to testing?

2003-03-09 Thread Michael D. Schleif
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Also sprach Craig Dickson (Sun 09 Mar 02003 at 02:11:51AM -0800): Michael D. Schleif wrote: What am I missing? # apt-cache policy libc6 libc6: Installed: 2.2.5-14.3 Candidate: 2.2.5-14.3 Version Table: *** 2.2.5-14.3 0

Re: libc6: did it move from unstable to testing?

2003-03-09 Thread Greg Madden
On Saturday 08 March 2003 08:04 pm, Kevin Coyner wrote: I'm running a strictly testing box, and just a bit ago I did an apt-get update and apt-get dist upgrade, and before I knew it, the system was downloading 89 upgrades, one of which was libc6 ver 2.3.1-14. But when I go to

libc6: did it move from unstable to testing?

2003-03-08 Thread Kevin Coyner
I'm running a strictly testing box, and just a bit ago I did an apt-get update and apt-get dist upgrade, and before I knew it, the system was downloading 89 upgrades, one of which was libc6 ver 2.3.1-14. But when I go to packages.debian.org, and look at the libc6 debs in there, I see that it

Re: libc6: did it move from unstable to testing?

2003-03-08 Thread nate
Kevin Coyner said: So I'm a bit lost. Did I mess something up? Or was libc6 or something else moved from unstable to testing just a bit early? someone sent out an announcement to a buncha lists a couple days ago warning of the new packages I think .. or maybe that was for gcc..I don't run

Re: libc6: did it move from unstable to testing?

2003-03-08 Thread Craig Dickson
Kevin Coyner wrote: I'm running a strictly testing box, and just a bit ago I did an apt-get update and apt-get dist upgrade, and before I knew it, the system was downloading 89 upgrades, one of which was libc6 ver 2.3.1-14. But when I go to packages.debian.org, and look at the libc6 debs in

Re: libc6: did it move from unstable to testing?

2003-03-08 Thread Michael D. Schleif
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Also sprach Craig Dickson (Sat 08 Mar 02003 at 09:29:13PM -0800): Kevin Coyner wrote: I'm running a strictly testing box, and just a bit ago I did an apt-get update and apt-get dist upgrade, and before I knew it, the system was downloading 89