On Wed, 13 Jan 1999, Conrado Badenas wrote:
> Nevertheless, if you want to try version 19981211-1 you can do it
> although it has a very very small bug: it says that depends on timezone
> instead of timezones (bug #31706).
Importantly, it only recommends: timezones, which is the correct spelling.
Mark Wagnon wrote:
> Anyway, I went back to where I got my libc6 2.0.7v-1, and it's gone, and
> there is no libc-dev 2.0.7v-1 package either. The only 'non-stable'
> version of either is the 19981211 version. Does anyone happen to know
> where I can get the dev package?
Try at some secondary mirro
> I upgraded my libc6 to libc6 2.0.7v-1, which took me a while to locate.
> However my dev is still libc6 2.0.7t-1. I've been unable to compile the
> window maker sources, and it just dawned on me this evening that maybe
> having different versions of runtimes and dev files is a bad thing(?).
> An
Hi all,
I upgraded my libc6 to libc6 2.0.7v-1, which took me a while to locate.
However my dev is still libc6 2.0.7t-1. I've been unable to compile the
window maker sources, and it just dawned on me this evening that maybe
having different versions of runtimes and dev files is a bad thing(?).
Anyw
4 matches
Mail list logo
