On 01/06/09 03:06, Steve Lamb wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
You've got to be doing something wrong...
Installed Thunderbird, installed Enigmail, downloaded reply-to-list, both
versions, installed them, neither work. Can't mess than up Ron, even for me.
My User-Agent string is a lot more
On 01/06/09 05:06, Micha Feigin wrote:
[snip]
I also like to process my mail with fetchmail/procmail and store it in a Mail
directory in mh format, something that thunderbird and evolution don't
support, don't know about kmail (I don't use kde apps, they spawn too many
Have procmail drop it
Ron Johnson wrote:
My User-Agent string is a lot more rich than yours. Are you
purposefully minimizing it, or could it be a co-symptom of what
ever is the real reason why r-t-l doesn't work for you?
Probably not. This one better? Still no r-t-l here.
--
Steve C. Lamb
Ron Johnson wrote:
My User-Agent string is a lot more rich than yours. Are you
purposefully minimizing it, or could it be a co-symptom of what
ever is the real reason why r-t-l doesn't work for you?
Yours seems to be inflated for some reason.
Here's yours:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11;
On 01/06/09 07:52, Steve Lamb wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
My User-Agent string is a lot more rich than yours. Are you
purposefully minimizing it, or could it be a co-symptom of what
ever is the real reason why r-t-l doesn't work for you?
Probably not. This one better? Still no r-t-l
On 01/06/09 08:02, Steve Lamb wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
My User-Agent string is a lot more rich than yours. Are you
purposefully minimizing it, or could it be a co-symptom of what
ever is the real reason why r-t-l doesn't work for you?
Yours seems to be inflated for some reason.
Here's
Steve Lamb wrote:
I have RTL 0.2.0 on there from a suggestion you made a while back about
0.3.1 not playing nice with IMAP while the older version did.
Older versions needed either Mnenhy(which you have) or Enigmail(which I
have) to work. 0.3.0 does not need either. But here's the
On Jan 6, 2009, at 6:37 AM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
On Tue January 6 2009, Michelle Konzack wrote:
I am using mutt since 9 years now and currently I have open four
XTerm
running mutt. There is nothing which does not work on it.
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
I used pine 20 years
On Tue January 6 2009, Ron Johnson wrote:
Mine is the same that Debian Iceweasel has always been, but with
Mnenhy and Reply To List add-ons.
--
where do you get this add-on?? google search wasn't too helpful.
--
Paul Cartwright
Registered Linux user # 367800
Registered Ubuntu User #12459
On Tue January 6 2009, hose wrote:
These days people seem to enjoy posting their config files online with
screenshots, so you can see what you get. It's usually a good
starting place. I suppose this is why people call mutt a frontend to
a config file.
http://wiki.mutt.org/?ConfigList
On Jan 6, 2009, at 12:30 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
On Tue January 6 2009, hose wrote:
These days people seem to enjoy posting their config files online
with
screenshots, so you can see what you get. It's usually a good
starting place. I suppose this is why people call mutt a frontend to
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 01:01:18PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2009-01-05 18:13:32, schrieb hose:
Just use the least sucky client out there (mutt). It has sane reply,
reply-to, and reply-to-list commands, is extremely fast, and can bend
to your will if needed, no matter how wrong
On 01/06/09 12:36, hose wrote:
On Jan 6, 2009, at 12:30 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
[snip]
yeah, I can see that.. in kmail I have over 200 filters.. that will be
the
hardest part...
[snip]
I've never done email filtering in mutt though, so I can't speak to
that. I use procmail
On 01/06/09 08:09, Steve Lamb wrote:
Steve Lamb wrote:
I have RTL 0.2.0 on there from a suggestion you made a while back about
0.3.1 not playing nice with IMAP while the older version did.
Older versions needed either Mnenhy(which you have) or Enigmail(which I
have) to work. 0.3.0
On Jan 6, 2009, at 1:07 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 01/06/09 12:36, hose wrote:
On Jan 6, 2009, at 12:30 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
[snip]
yeah, I can see that.. in kmail I have over 200 filters.. that
will be the
hardest part...
[snip]
I've never done email filtering in mutt though, so I
On 01/06/09 11:51, Paul Cartwright wrote:
On Tue January 6 2009, Ron Johnson wrote:
Mine is the same that Debian Iceweasel has always been, but with
Mnenhy and Reply To List add-ons.
--
where do you get this add-on??
There are two addons which claim to do the same thing. I use the
one
On Tuesday 2009 January 06 13:07:16 Ron Johnson wrote:
I use procmail.
maildrop is what you want.
I prefer a sieve, the standard language for server-side mail filtering,
implementation on my IMAP (and managesieve) server.
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =.
On 01/06/09 13:44, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On Tuesday 2009 January 06 13:07:16 Ron Johnson wrote:
I use procmail.
maildrop is what you want.
I prefer a sieve, the standard language for server-side mail filtering,
implementation on my IMAP (and managesieve) server.
Google doesn't
Hi,
Am 2009-01-06 12:09:24, schrieb hose:
I used to use pine too - loved it. I switched to mutt shortly after
college at the encouragement of a number of coworkers. It was
unfortunately terrible for the first couple hours. Then someone gave
me their .muttrc and it was like the whole
Hello Ron?
Am 2009-01-06 13:07:16, schrieb Ron Johnson:
maildrop is what you want. *Much* more rational than procmail.
(But then, I like Python...)
flamewar=start
Maildrop is the last thing one would install... The
same for Sieve. If you try to konfigure those blobs
you will get knots and
Ron Johnson wrote:
Are you using stock Tbird, or Iceweasel? (I/w has certain patches
needed by r-t-l.)
Stock from Ubuntu/Debian packaging respectively. Both of which have
had the patch as part of the Debian version for close to 2 years now (I think).
--
Steve C. Lamb |
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
I prefer a sieve, the standard language for server-side mail filtering,
implementation on my IMAP (and managesieve) server.
If only mail clients would incorporate sieve into their normal filtering.
IE, my dad probably can't write sieve filters but he can use
Michelle Konzack wrote:
flamewar=start
Maildrop is the last thing one would install... The
same for Sieve. If you try to konfigure those blobs
you will get knots and cancer in your brain.
/flamewar
Glad to see you're as rational as ever.
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who
On 01/06/09 18:53, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hello Ron?
Am 2009-01-06 13:07:16, schrieb Ron Johnson:
maildrop is what you want. *Much* more rational than procmail.
(But then, I like Python...)
flamewar=start
Maildrop is the last thing one would install... The
same for Sieve. If you try to
On 01/06/09 21:48, Steve Lamb wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
Are you using stock Tbird, or Iceweasel? (I/w has certain patches
needed by r-t-l.)
Stock from Ubuntu/Debian packaging respectively. Both of which have
had the patch as part of the Debian version for close to 2 years now (I think).
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 10:27:46PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 01/06/09 21:48, Steve Lamb wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
Are you using stock Tbird, or Iceweasel? (I/w has certain patches
needed by r-t-l.)
Stock from Ubuntu/Debian packaging respectively. Both of which have
had the patch as
On 01/06/09 22:37, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 10:27:46PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 01/06/09 21:48, Steve Lamb wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
Are you using stock Tbird, or Iceweasel? (I/w has certain patches
needed by r-t-l.)
Stock from Ubuntu/Debian packaging
Ron Johnson wrote:
God must not love you.
Being an Atheist I'm used to it.
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who can decide what they dream
PGP Key: 1FC01004 | and dream I do
---+-
On Tuesday 06 January 2009, Steve Lamb g...@dmiyu.org wrote about 'Re:
[OT] mailing lists versus usenet / reply to list, reply-to, reply':
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
I prefer a sieve, the standard language for server-side mail filtering,
implementation on my IMAP (and managesieve) server
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
I agree and there has been work on that. However, I've yet to see a good
UI for composing sieve scripts. I think one of the webmail packages
SquirelMail(?) or RoundCube(?) has the beginning of a UI.
Squirrelmail, with the appropriate addon activated.
--
Ken Teague wrote:
Is Kmail available for Win32? I'm at work on my laptop and don't have
the luxury of Linux all day.
http://windows.kde.org/
I also stated in my previous post that the reply-to field was missing
from the SMTP header. I can manually add it from my MUA (as I did with
this
Ron Johnson wrote:
Install the Reply To List add-on, v0.2.1 or v0.3.0, depending on whether
you access IMAP or not. Works perfectly.
For you... Still not working here. :P
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 01/06/09 02:46, Steve Lamb wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
Install the Reply To List add-on, v0.2.1 or v0.3.0, depending on whether
you access IMAP or not. Works perfectly.
For you... Still not working here. :P
You've got to be doing something wrong...
--
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA
(Apologies to Boyd, been a while since I replied to D-U, got out of the habit
of reply-to-all and trim. ;)
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
See, I just think you guys should stop using bad clients. ;) Kmail replies
to the list (and only to the list) by default. (Which, actually, appears to
Ron Johnson wrote:
You've got to be doing something wrong...
Installed Thunderbird, installed Enigmail, downloaded reply-to-list, both
versions, installed them, neither work. Can't mess than up Ron, even for me.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:27:44 -0800
Ken Teague ktea...@pobox.com wrote:
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
See, I just think you guys should stop using bad clients. ;) Kmail
replies to the list (and only to the list) by default. (Which, actually,
appears to be a violation on the relevant
-Version: 1.0
Subject: [OT] mailing lists versus usenet / reply to list, reply-to, reply
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Df-Seen-By: ms
Message-ID: cbodnejrpkrqg__unz2dnuvz_uedn...@giganews.com
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace:
sv3
On Monday 2009 January 05 16:20:14 Moderation Robot wrote:
From: Ken Teague kteague at pobox dot com@giganews.com
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
I believe the (quite valid) suggestion to ditch Gmail is because it
does not have a 'reply to list function'. Well, there are several
other reasons,
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
See, I just think you guys should stop using bad clients. ;) Kmail replies
to the list (and only to the list) by default. (Which, actually, appears to
be a violation on the relevant standards. :P)
Is Kmail available for Win32? I'm at work on my laptop and
...@iguanasuicide.net ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/
[1] That doesn't prevent other mailing lists and list software from doing it,
but it is bad practice. It's arguably dangerous because
On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:27:44 -0800
Ken Teague ktea...@pobox.com wrote:
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
See, I just think you guys should stop using bad clients. ;) Kmail
replies
to the list (and only to the list) by default. (Which, actually, appears
to
be a violation on the
On Jan 5, 2009, at 5:58 PM, Celejar wrote:
On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:27:44 -0800
Ken Teague ktea...@pobox.com wrote:
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
See, I just think you guys should stop using bad clients. ;)
Kmail replies
to the list (and only to the list) by default. (Which, actually,
On Monday 05 January 2009, hose subscripti...@bluemaggottowel.com wrote
about 'Re: [OT] mailing lists versus usenet / reply to list, reply-to,
reply':
On Jan 5, 2009, at 5:58 PM, Celejar wrote:
On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:27:44 -0800
Ken Teague ktea...@pobox.com wrote:
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:33:09 -0600
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. b...@iguanasuicide.net wrote:
...
Does it work outside of a terminal, yet? :) Seriously though, mutt *is* a
very high-quality MUA. Even if you normally prefer X applications, mutt
is worth a look.
Although I have only dabbled with
On 01/05/09 17:27, Ken Teague wrote:
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
See, I just think you guys should stop using bad clients. ;) Kmail replies
to the list (and only to the list) by default. (Which, actually, appears to
be a violation on the relevant standards. :P)
Is Kmail available for
Dear Debian-user:
I'd be interested to know of mailing lists which would be
appropriate for customizing the way the shell works,
customizing Gnome, the right directories for plug-ins, etc.
For example, I'd like to shorten the prompt in the bash shell:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/TESTS_C_LANG/factoring
On Sun,07.Sep.08, 11:31:38, David Bernier wrote:
Dear Debian-user:
I'd be interested to know of mailing lists which would be
appropriate for customizing the way the shell works,
customizing Gnome, the right directories for plug-ins, etc.
What's wrong with this list? :D If you are running
Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Sun,07.Sep.08, 11:31:38, David Bernier wrote:
Dear Debian-user:
I'd be interested to know of mailing lists which would be
appropriate for customizing the way the shell works,
customizing Gnome, the right directories for plug-ins, etc.
What's wrong with this list
avec un
Bien vu, j'avais pas remarqué :)
je ne connais pas exim, mais si tu peux bloquer uniquement si la réponse
est de la forme 127.0.0.*, alors ça pourra éviter les déconvenues...
Tu peux développer pourquoi tu refuses d'utiliser les black lists?
Dialogue sur cette liste avec Stephane
On 2008-08-14 21:27:58 +0200, François Boisson wrote:
Oui mais maintenant, Free bloque le port 25, il y a beaucoup moins
de freeboxs relayant des spams.
C'est pour ça que j'ai enlevé ma blacklist.
Mais je pense que ça n'est pas raisonnable de faire un SMTP avec une
machine ne tenant pas l'IP
Le 14105ième jour après Epoch,
François Boisson écrivait:
Le Thu, 14 Aug 2008 09:14:49 +0200
François Boisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit:
Si tu utilises la Freebox, tu peux récupérer les DNS sur
/var/lib/dhcp3/dhclient.eth0.leases
(si eth0 est l'interface connectée)
$ grep
, j'avais pas remarqué :)
Tu peux développer pourquoi tu refuses d'utiliser les black lists?
Dialogue sur cette liste avec Stephane Bortzmeyer au démarrage qui m'avait
renvoyé sur ces docs:
http://boisson.homeip.net/Blacklists_Resultats.pdf
et
http://boisson.homeip.net/Blacklists_FAQ.pdf
ces
Le Thu, 14 Aug 2008 09:14:49 +0200
François Boisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit:
Enfin ne pas utiliser de listes noires n'a pas augmenté le nombre de spams de
manière réellement sensible et permet à mon spamassassin de s'éduquer.
Par contre j'utilise une liste grise perso assez efficace
F.B
--
Le Thu, 14 Aug 2008 09:14:49 +0200
François Boisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit:
Si tu utilises la Freebox, tu peux récupérer les DNS sur
/var/lib/dhcp3/dhclient.eth0.leases
(si eth0 est l'interface connectée)
$ grep domain-name-servers /var/lib/dhcp3/dhclient.eth0.leases | tail -n 1 |
\ sed
Bonjour,
François Boisson a écrit, jeudi 14 août 2008, à 09:14 :
[...]
Si tu utilises la Freebox, tu peux récupérer les DNS sur
/var/lib/dhcp3/dhclient.eth0.leases
(si eth0 est l'interface connectée)
$ grep domain-name-servers /var/lib/dhcp3/dhclient.eth0.leases | tail -n 1 | \
sed -e 's/.*
On 2008-08-14 09:14:49 +0200, François Boisson wrote:
Dialogue sur cette liste avec Stephane Bortzmeyer au démarrage qui m'avait
renvoyé sur ces docs:
http://boisson.homeip.net/Blacklists_Resultats.pdf
et
http://boisson.homeip.net/Blacklists_FAQ.pdf
ces dialogues avec Free:
L
http://boisson.homeip.net/Blacklists_Resultats.pdf
et
http://boisson.homeip.net/Blacklists_FAQ.pdf
ces dialogues avec Free:
http://boisson.homeip.net/FreeSMTP.pdf
et avec DUL
http://boisson.homeip.net/DulSMTP.pdf
Nerim indique dans les informations whois les plages qui ne
On 2008-08-14 15:41:56 +0200, François Boisson wrote:
Free aussi, lis bien le dialogue avec la DUF, ça fait 3 ans que je
les relance sans arrêt...
Effectivement. Et je me rappelle maintenant qu'on avait justement
discuté de Free vs mail-abuse.org lorsque j'étais au Loria.
Maintenant, sur mon
Le Thu, 14 Aug 2008 17:53:15 +0200
Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit:
Maintenant, sur mon serveur, j'avais à un moment donné moi-même
blacklisté toutes les Freebox parce que Free ne prenait pas en
compte mes plaintes à abuse: la même machine renvoyait du spam
quelques jours plus tard.
Salut.
Depuis hier vers 18h, et jusqu'à ce que je m'en rende compte vers 1h00
ce matin, mon serveur Exim4 sur ma Debian stable a rejeté la
quasi-totalité des mails.
La raison en est que chacune des IP voulant me transmettre un mail
était marquée dans un quelconque RBL, XBL ou autre BL que
Le Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:51:50 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (François TOURDE) a écrit:
2008-08-13 01:08:03 H=(smtp7-g19.free.fr) [212.27.42.64] F=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rejected RCPT [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 212.27.42.64 is listed at
dnsbl.njabl.org (213.228.63.58: ) 2008-08-13 01:08:04 H=(smtp7-g19.free.fr)
Le 14104ième jour après Epoch,
François Boisson écrivait:
J'ai remarqué que l'adresse de tes listes noires (que je refuse d'utiliser)
est toujours la même 213.228.63.58, cette IP donne avec un
Bien vu, j'avais pas remarqué :)
Tu peux développer pourquoi tu refuses d'utiliser les black lists
On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 12:48 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/28/08 11:38, Shachar Or wrote:
On Monday 28 July 2008 19:34, Frank Charles Gallacher wrote:
Greetings,
I am running Evolution 2.6.3 on etch kernel 2.6.18-6-686.
I trying to
Greetings,
I am running Evolution 2.6.3 on etch kernel 2.6.18-6-686.
I trying to import a list of email adresses in .CSV format.
The import works OK, but I'm having trouble creating a contact list.
I can select all the emails, but doing a drag and drop just does not
want to work...
Can anyone
On Monday 28 July 2008 19:34, Frank Charles Gallacher wrote:
Greetings,
I am running Evolution 2.6.3 on etch kernel 2.6.18-6-686.
I trying to import a list of email adresses in .CSV format.
The import works OK, but I'm having trouble creating a contact list.
I can select all the emails, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/28/08 11:38, Shachar Or wrote:
On Monday 28 July 2008 19:34, Frank Charles Gallacher wrote:
Greetings,
I am running Evolution 2.6.3 on etch kernel 2.6.18-6-686.
I trying to import a list of email adresses in .CSV format.
The import works
On Monday 28 July 2008 20:48, Ron Johnson wrote:
Do KDE apps mesh well with GNOME apps?
I've almost never tried GNOME...
The KDE PIM suite is the the free PIM suite with the most features and
integration.
--
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Kittens give Morbo gas. In lighter news, the
I have copied /var/lib/apt/lists/partial/* to another machine, but try
as I might, I cannot get apt to apply those files to ../*Packages. Apt
bombs out if it cannot connect to the network. Yes I will connect it
to the network, but not today.
How can I trick apt into thinking that it has just
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:45:49PM -0500, Mitchell Laks wrote:
Hi,
I just installed the mutt-patches package in order to get the sidebar to
show what mailing subdirectories have new mail.
I use the Mail directory format. I have about 10 different subdirectories.
For some reason only one
Hi,
I just installed the mutt-patches package in order to get the sidebar to
show what mailing subdirectories have new mail.
I use the Mail directory format. I have about 10 different subdirectories.
For some reason only one (an inactive old one) is showing in the sidebar.
Is this a bug? If
most mailing lists doesn't show your own post to the
list is that the setting in the mailing list is not to send a copy of
your own mail to yourself.
What mailing list are you talking about? All debian lists send a copy of
your e-mail by default and all other mailing lists I have ever been
On Fri December 28 2007, Andrei Popescu wrote:
AFAIR the mail would show up in Inbox, but I couldn't download it. Maybe
things changed?
This is what I meant too. It is in the inbox in gmail's web interface.
What mailing list are you talking about? All debian lists send a copy of
your e-mail
list are you talking about? All debian lists send a copy of
your e-mail by default and all other mailing lists I have ever been on.
None of the debian list does this for me. I can only see replies to my posts
by others and new posts (and replies to these) created by others (in both
gmail web
Hi,
Anyone seeing mail???
Jack
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone seeing mail???
:-)
Pol
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just saw yours.
-Original Message-
From: Pol Hallen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 11:53 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Cc: Jack Schneider
Subject: Re: NO mail from Debian lists..
Anyone seeing mail???
:-)
Pol
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
[EMAIL
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 01:11:32AM -0400, Eric d'Alibut wrote:
And I'm much too lazy to bother using a newsreader for anything other
news. What is it with you guys and newsreaders? Ick.
You are going to have to try harder than that to get the Gnus users to
bite. :-)
--
Chris.
==
--
Sid Arth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ahh you will have to excuse me, but what exactly is top posting and
what do you mean by trimming?
Ill try to fix it myself if I can.
On 9/26/07, Andrei Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 06:12:50PM -0500, Sid Arth wrote:
or any
Sid Arth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ahh you will have to excuse me, but what exactly is top posting and
what do you mean by trimming?
Ill try to fix it myself if I can.
On 9/26/07, Andrei Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 06:12:50PM -0500, Sid Arth wrote:
or any
Sid Arth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ahh you will have to excuse me, but what exactly is top posting and
what do you mean by trimming?
Ill try to fix it myself if I can.
On 9/26/07, Andrei Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 06:12:50PM -0500, Sid Arth wrote:
or any
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 06:12:50PM -0500, Sid Arth wrote:
or any other email client. Those two do everything I need them to do.
Apparently they don't do any automatic proper email formating (no
top-posting and proper trimming). You still have to do that yourself!
Regards,
Andrei
P.S. Sorry
Ahh you will have to excuse me, but what exactly is top posting and
what do you mean by trimming?
Ill try to fix it myself if I can.
On 9/26/07, Andrei Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 06:12:50PM -0500, Sid Arth wrote:
or any other email client. Those two do everything
Sid Arth wrote:
Ahh you will have to excuse me, but what exactly is top posting and
what do you mean by trimming?
Ill try to fix it myself if I can.
On 9/26/07, Andrei Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 06:12:50PM -0500, Sid Arth wrote:
or any other email
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 05:59:12PM -0500, Sid Arth wrote:
Ahh you will have to excuse me, but what exactly is top posting and
what do you mean by trimming?
Ill try to fix it myself if I can.
It's easy to get over it. Just look at the top posted and bottom
posted messages here and see for
Kumar Appaiah wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 05:59:12PM -0500, Sid Arth wrote:
Ahh you will have to excuse me, but what exactly is top posting and
what do you mean by trimming?
Ill try to fix it myself if I can.
It's easy to get over it. Just look at the top posted and bottom
posted
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 07:50:06PM -0400, Nick Lidakis wrote:
I think trimming means keeping sideburns at an acceptably trimmed level
until lamb chops are back in style, for males. Females shall keep their
runways appropriately devoid of any shoulder dandelion weeds.
If that's a joke I
On 9/24/07, Andrei Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 03:48:37PM -0500, Sid Arth wrote:
I was wondering how to reply to a message but in a way so everybody in
the list gets it, but without starting a whole new thread.
As far as I know (I don't use the web interface) the
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 00:07:19 -0400
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric d'Alibut wrote:
On 9/24/07, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gmail currently does not have a reply-to-list feature so replying (only)
to the list is a bit pain.
I just hit
On 9/25/07, Celejar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you're able to run client software (i.e. you're on your own system,
not on some possibly locked down public one), why not just use your
favorite proper email client?
For me, it's a matter of all clients sucking. Gmail gives me the
google search
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 09:38:29 -0400
Michael Marsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/25/07, Celejar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you're able to run client software (i.e. you're on your own system,
not on some possibly locked down public one), why not just use your
favorite proper email client?
On 9/25/07, Celejar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 09:38:29 -0400
Michael Marsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For me, it's a matter of all clients sucking. Gmail gives me the
google search algorithm over my mailbox, google talk in the sidebar
(not used often, but very handy on
from mailing lists whose archives are available on
the net, emails from mailing lists which are not archived/archives not
available publicly. There are still more categories but those are
unnecessary here :-)
d-u falls under the category of mailing list whose archives are available on
the net. So
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 10:06:38 -0400
Michael Marsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/25/07, Celejar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 09:38:29 -0400
Michael Marsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For me, it's a matter of all clients sucking. Gmail gives me the
google search algorithm
I still use gmail because I can access it everywhere, and if I use it
with google reader, I have no need for a something such as thunderbird
or any other email client. Those two do everything I need them to do.
On 9/25/07, Celejar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 10:06:38 -0400
Im sorry if this isnt the best place to voice such a question, but I
am a bit new to mailing lists and so on.
I was wondering how to reply to a message but in a way so everybody in
the list gets it, but without starting a whole new thread.
I am a gmail user so if this question makes no sense, I
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 03:48:37PM -0500, Sid Arth wrote:
Im sorry if this isnt the best place to voice such a question, but I
am a bit new to mailing lists and so on.
I was wondering how to reply to a message but in a way so everybody in
the list gets it, but without starting a whole new
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 00:18:03 +0300
Andrei Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 03:48:37PM -0500, Sid Arth wrote:
Im sorry if this isnt the best place to voice such a question, but I
am a bit new to mailing lists and so on.
I was wondering how to reply to a message
to mailing lists and so on.
I was wondering how to reply to a message but in a way so everybody in
the list gets it, but without starting a whole new thread.
I am a gmail user so if this question makes no sense, I apoligize, but
those of you who do use it probably have noticed how gmail
Sid Arth wrote:
Im sorry if this isnt the best place to voice such a question, but I
am a bit new to mailing lists and so on.
I was wondering how to reply to a message but in a way so everybody in
the list gets it, but without starting a whole new thread.
I am a gmail user so
On 9/24/07, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gmail currently does not have a reply-to-list feature so replying (only) to
the list is a bit pain.
I just hit 'reply,' delete the poster's email, and then start to type
d-e-b and gmail pops up a list in which I select
[EMAIL
501 - 600 of 1366 matches
Mail list logo
