Sid Arth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Im sorry if this isnt the best place to voice such a question, but I
Perfect place.
am a bit new to mailing lists and so on. I was wondering how to
reply to a message but in a way so everybody in the list gets it,
but without starting a whole new thread.
Hit
Eric d'Alibut wrote:
On 9/24/07, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gmail currently does not have a reply-to-list feature so replying (only)
to the list is a bit pain.
I just hit 'reply,' delete the poster's email, and then start to type
d-e-b and gmail pops up a list in
On 9/25/07, s. keeling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hit reply. If it's a new question, post to a new thread. Your new
question deserves its own thread. If you're replying to an existing
thread, reply ought to do it, barring serious breakage of standeards
by your newsreader. What newsreader
On 9/25/07, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Being super lazy by nature, I count the number of key strokes to achieve the
end result. If you are using knode all it takes is one key stroke - 'r'.
Comparing that to your method counts as a pain in my dictionary :-)
And I'm much too
Specially reduced price: $359
*** BONUS: Get the 3 lists below as a bonus when you order the MD data ***
American Hospitals
23,000 Admins in more than 7,000 hospitals {a $399 value]
List of US Dentists
597,000 dentists and dental services ( a $300 value!)
US Nursing Home List
includes over 31,589
Only until Sep 14 - Purchase the Physician List at the sale price and get
Hospital, Nursing Home and Dentist data at no charge
Licensed Physicians in the USA
788,994 in total 17,400 emails
Physicians in many different specialties
Sort by over a dozen different fields
Special
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 04:24:23PM +0200, Daniel Huhardeaux wrote:
La confiance est une notion qui se fonde sur la durée et non sur l'instant.
Donc signature non nécessaire. Les archives de la liste vous en seront
reconnaissantes
Personellement, je comprend la 1ere phrase comme disant que
Hugues LARRIVE a écrit :
[...]
C'est sympa: em..dez des centaines (milliers?) de personnes
simplement parceque l'on ne veut pas faire un petit effort. Et comment
veux tu prouver que tu as dis/pas dis? Et qui s'inquiète sur une liste
comme celle ci de savoir qui a dis ou pas dis?
Sur gmail les signatures sont la plupart du temps dans un fichier en pièce
jointe ( signature.asc )
++
PS : désolé Hugues pour l'envoi du mail en direct... mais c'est la seule
liste où un reply utilise l'adresse de l'expéditeur et j'oublie fréquemment
de la modifier.
Le 28/08/07, Hugues LARRIVE
Bonjour,
Je m'excuse par avance pour mon message un peu long et pour alimenter¹ encore
le troll du mois (le point Godwin étant passé depuis longtemps).
Le mardi 14 août 2007 15:21, Daniel Huhardeaux a écrit :
Plus simple: ne pas mettre de signature. Personne n'est intéressé sur la
liste de
Eric DECORNOD a écrit :
[...]
Ainsi je vous retourne vos arguments :
- le plus simple est de ne pas mettre de signature, personne n'est intéressé
sur la liste de savoir si on peux vous joindre par d'autres moyens que la
liste. Les pieds de la liste n'en seront que plus lisible, surtout sans
Le Monday 27 August 2007 19:43:22 Christophe Alonso, vous avez écrit :
[...]
Il serait bon d'en profiter pour redire encore une fois, qu'une
signature gpg sur une liste de diffusion ça n'a aucun intérêt et il
semble évident désormais que c'est même une source de problème. Ce n'est
pourtant pas
Gilles Mocellin a écrit :
Le Monday 27 August 2007 19:43:22 Christophe Alonso, vous avez écrit :
[...]
Il serait bon d'en profiter pour redire encore une fois, qu'une
signature gpg sur une liste de diffusion ça n'a aucun intérêt et il
semble évident désormais que c'est même une source de
Le Monday 27 August 2007 22:02:07 Daniel Huhardeaux, vous avez écrit :
Gilles Mocellin a écrit :
Le Monday 27 August 2007 19:43:22 Christophe Alonso, vous avez écrit :
[...]
Il serait bon d'en profiter pour redire encore une fois, qu'une
signature gpg sur une liste de diffusion ça n'a
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 10:02:07PM +0200, Daniel Huhardeaux wrote:
C'est sympa: em..dez des centaines (milliers?) de personnes
simplement parceque l'on ne veut pas faire un petit effort.
Heu, on parle bien d'un problème chez les _receveurs_ non?
Et comment veux tu prouver que tu as
Daniel Huhardeaux a écrit :
Gilles Mocellin a écrit :
Le Monday 27 August 2007 19:43:22 Christophe Alonso, vous avez écrit :
[...]
Il serait bon d'en profiter pour redire encore une fois, qu'une
signature gpg sur une liste de diffusion ça n'a aucun intérêt et il
semble évident désormais
I haven't seen mail from the list in over 6 hours despite
lists.d.o/d-u showing many mails in the archive. My last one was about
18:08 pacific, US, or 01:08 UTC Friday the 13th.
Anybody else?
better cc me just in case.
A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 12:23:18AM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
I haven't seen mail from the list in over 6 hours despite
lists.d.o/d-u showing many mails in the archive. My last one was about
18:08 pacific, US, or 01:08 UTC Friday the 13th.
Anybody else?
I think I am getting the
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
I haven't seen mail from the list in over 6 hours despite
lists.d.o/d-u showing many mails in the archive. My last one was about
18:08 pacific, US, or 01:08 UTC Friday the 13th.
Anybody else?
better cc me just in case.
A
Let's see... Friday the 13th!? That's
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 01:21:18PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 12:23:18AM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
I haven't seen mail from the list in over 6 hours despite
lists.d.o/d-u showing many mails in the archive. My last one was about
18:08 pacific, US, or 01:08
yeah. interesting. I got my own list mail back right away. THen
shortly thereafter I got one that had been processed by the list maybe
7 or 8 hours previously. Now I've got about 50 or so. The tubes must
have been clogged...
or something .. i know (raises hand)
they were all deported to cuba
Hakan COSKUN yazmış:
Cok Tesekkurler
Ayrıca bir sorum daha olucak maile cevap vermişssin
siz bende cevapla diyince sizin mail adresinize gore
cevapla diyor bu listeye gidermi yoksa baska bir
sekildemi cevaplamak gerekiyor.
Cok tesekkürler
iyi calısmalar
Hakan COSKUN
--- Atilla Duru [EMAIL
updat or install/remove package.
Thanks for your time
regerds
I am having similar problems while doing Etch or Testing updates.
ie
aptitude|apt-get downloads the package lists but some show up as
FAILED in /var/lib/apt/lists. A good download of the same package
turns out be the same size
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 09:45:04 +0800, Jed R. Mallen wrote:
But all I want is to update my /var/lib/apt/lists/* so that I can
download only pkgs that *need* to be downloaded (via apt-get -qq
--print-uris install pkg) when I want to install a certain package.
I guess there's no other way except
, but you have to have
an updated pkg list for this to work.
You can manually download the package files and stick them in
/var/lib/apt/lists. The easiest thing is of course to have a second
machine that is networked.
At the cost of burning a set of possibly as many as 15 CDs or 3 DVDs:
(1
But all I want is to update my /var/lib/apt/lists/* so that I can
download only pkgs that *need* to be downloaded (via apt-get -qq
--print-uris install pkg) when I want to install a certain package.
I guess there's no other way except downloading Packages.txts from the
Debian mirror sites (eg
Hello,
I have a non-networked debian box at home and a high-bandwidth XP box at work.
I want to upgrade my Debian box.
apt-zip says it can upgrade a non-networked box, but you have to have
an updated pkg list for this to work.
My problem is doing an update. Because the box has no internet
can manually download the package files and stick them in
/var/lib/apt/lists. The easiest thing is of course to have a second
machine that is networked.
/M
--
Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
Hocam merhaba,
ben sanki sizin mailing list yaziliminiz vardi diye hatirliyorum. Bunu sundan
soruyorum, bir urun vardi da memnun kalmadiniz mi ? Ben Mailman'i onerecegim.
Pyhton ile yazilmis kurulumu biraz kasar ancak her istediginizi yapabilirsiniz.
web arayuzu bulunmaktadir. Tek sorun
Tekrar selamlar,
daha once qmail+ldap+mailman ve postfix+ldap+mailman
postfix+dbmail+mailman+psql paketlerini kullanarak uc farkli mail sunucu kurup
test etmistim. en cok ta postfix+psql+mailman uclusunde oldukca iyi sonuclar
aldim. sistemde sadece python olmasi yeterli aslinda ama aix icin
Arkadaşlar büyük bir sistem için mail listesi oluşturmak istiyoruz. Çeşitli
konularda gruplar olacak. Ama sizin tavsiye edebileceğiniz bir mail list
manager var mı? Çeşitli örnekler var ama kullanıyor olupta önerebileceğiniz
varsa sevinirim iyi çalışmalar
odtu'de mailman ve http://www.openinfo.co.uk/mm/index.html sayfasindan
indirilen yamalari kullaniyoruz, memnunuz.
kolay gelsin
altay ozaygen
funkypunky drunky wrote:
Arkadaşlar büyük bir sistem için mail listesi oluşturmak istiyoruz.
Çeşitli konularda gruplar olacak. Ama sizin tavsiye
Selamlar;
qmail kullaniyorsaniz ezmlm yi kullanmalisiniz.
Asagidaki adresten ilgili bilgileri ogrenebilirsiniz.
http://www.inter7.com/?page=qmail
iyi calismalar
Afsin Taskiran
On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 16:48 +0200, funkypunky drunky wrote:
Arkadaşlar büyük bir sistem için mail listesi
mess-mate a écrit :
Bonjour,
Bonsoir,
je viens de upgrader de sarge vers etch.
cela c'est fait après plusieurs tentatives.
cependant, maintenant que je veux faire un apt-get update, j'ai le
message suivant pour TOUS les deb's dans ma source.list:
/var/lib/apt/lists
Douglas Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 09:12:26PM +0100, mess-mate wrote:
| Hi
| after a upgrade from sarge to etch (done yet);
| and a new apt-get update, these are the errors i received from all
| my deb's in my sources.list :
|
(/var/lib/apt/lists
Bonjour,
je viens de upgrader de sarge vers etch.
cela c'est fait après plusieurs tentatives.
cependant, maintenant que je veux faire un apt-get update, j'ai le
message suivant pour TOUS les deb's dans ma source.list:
/var/lib/apt/lists/security.debian.org_dists_etch_updates_main_binary
,
^^
Vous voulez dire 'apt-get upgrade'?
/var/lib/apt/lists/security.debian.org_dists_etch_updates_main_bin
ary-i386_Packages) - stat (2 No such file or directory)
Le contenu de ce répertoire est mis à jour par 'apt-get update'.
Essayez de supprimer l'entrée correspondant
à
apt-get update,
| ^^
|
| Vous voulez dire 'apt-get upgrade'?
Non, l'upgrade est déjà fait et la machine tourne.
|
| /var/lib/apt/lists/security.debian.org_dists_etch_updates_main_bin
| ary-i386_Packages) - stat (2 No such file or directory
Bonjour,
Le mardi 07 novembre 2006, mess-mate a écrit...
/var/lib/apt/lists/security.debian.org_dists_etch_updates_main_binary-i386_Packages)
- stat (2 No such file or directory)
Chez moi ce fichier existe et est vide. Crée le avec la commande magique
`touch`.
--
jm
A.E.L. Sarl
Hi
after a upgrade from sarge to etch (done yet);
and a new apt-get update, these are the errors i received from all
my deb's in my sources.list :
(/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.debian.skynet.be_ftp_debian_dists_etch_main_binary-i386_Packages)
- stat (2 No such file or directory)
Any help would be very
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 09:12:26PM +0100, mess-mate wrote:
Hi
after a upgrade from sarge to etch (done yet);
and a new apt-get update, these are the errors i received from all
my deb's in my sources.list :
(/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.debian.skynet.be_ftp_debian_dists_etch_main_binary
Hello all,
As you all gmail users on the list are aware, you can't receive your
own posts through the list if you post using gmail (web interface or
smtp), because gmail siletly drops them as being identical (though
they're not) to the sent mail. To me it is very annoying if I don't see
my own
consideration, for such an individual(s) in charge
of the Debian Project Web site, FTP, OR the e-mail lists. I don't think
accountability hinders, it helps with transparency.
I used FWIW as I'm not a Debian developer, merely a satisfied user.
That shouldn't matter though eh ? ;)
P.S. The delayed
On Monday, September 25, 2006 8:08 PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
IIRC, the Debian lists are powered by mailman. Have they just
disabled this functionality, or is it a technical/political issue?
If they use Mailman, there is a feature to allow users to determine
whether they receive list
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 03:35:27AM +0100 or thereabouts, Andrew Saunders wrote:
On 9/24/06, Stephen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why don't such things ever get submitted for a vote, to see exactly
where the membership stands on this ?
I would guess that the vast majority of those who post
On 9/26/06, Stephen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's a non-issue.
I agree. However much you might wish it, list policy is not determined
by plebiscite.
--
Andrew Saunders
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 03:21:14PM +0100 or thereabouts, Andrew Saunders wrote:
On 9/26/06, Stephen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's a non-issue.
I agree. However much you might wish it, list policy is not determined
by plebiscite.
Hi Andrew:
Thanks for your comments.
It should be, pretty
On 9/26/06, Stephen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It should be, pretty much everything else in the Debian Project calls
for votes in order for a consensus.
Heh - not quite. :-) The Constitution [1] spells out the
organisational structure for formal decision-making within the
Project. Have a read;
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 06:05:10PM +0100 or thereabouts, Andrew Saunders wrote:
On 9/26/06, Stephen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It should be, pretty much everything else in the Debian Project calls
for votes in order for a consensus.
Heh - not quite. :-) The Constitution [1] spells out the
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 07:53:21PM -0500, Seth Goodman wrote:
[...]
I think the following would make Debian lists better for everyone:
[...]
3) allow users to temporarily turn off list mail
Once you've got used to how a mailing list works, which the above
users presumably have, it's
On 9/26/06, Stephen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This appears only relevant to assets and The Debian project as a whole.
How so? Personally, I'd say that the listmasters are clearly
individual Developer(s) working on a particular task who may make
any technical or nontechnical decision with
On Tuesday, September 26, 2006 1:17 PM -0500, David Jardine wrote:
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 07:53:21PM -0500, Seth Goodman wrote:
[...]
I think the following would make Debian lists better for everyone:
[...]
3) allow users to temporarily turn off list mail
Once you've got used
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:51:08 -0400, Stephen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It should be, pretty much everything else in the Debian Project
calls for votes in order for a consensus.
Wrong. Most of the decisions made in the project are
technical -- and we never vote on technical issues
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 05:35:07PM -0500 or thereabouts, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:51:08 -0400, Stephen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It should be, pretty much everything else in the Debian Project
calls for votes in order for a consensus.
Wrong. Most of the
Stephen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 03:21:14PM +0100 or thereabouts, Andrew Saunders wr=
ote:
On 9/26/06, Stephen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's a non-issue.
I agree. However much you might wish it, list policy is not determined
by plebiscite.
It should be,
of spam coming from Debian mailing lists to which
they've subscribed. I think it's a trivial issue but others may not
have managed to come up with solutions I've discovered to mitigate the
problem. The problem of spam on debian lists is trivial for me.
I really don't see it as a big deal
that for an
occasional poster to a high volume list, it is a burden to require them
to receive all list traffic. It's not a problem when the list allows
subscribing for posting only (i.e. majordomo 'nomail', Mailman 'set
delivery off'). Debian lists don't provide this feature. It would also
be helpful
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 07:53:21PM -0500, Seth Goodman wrote:
I think the following would make Debian lists better for everyone:
1) allow users to subscribe for posting only,
IIRC, the Debian lists are powered by mailman. Have they just disabled
this functionality, or is it a technical
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 07:53:21PM -0500 or thereabouts, Seth Goodman wrote:
I think the following would make Debian lists better for everyone:
1) allow users to subscribe for posting only,
2) require users to subscribe before posting and
3) allow users to temporarily turn off list mail
On 9/24/06, Stephen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why don't such things ever get submitted for a vote, to see exactly
where the membership stands on this ?
I would guess that the vast majority of those who post without being
subscribed don't follow the list except to monitor follow-ups to their
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 01:22:30PM -0500 or thereabouts, Seth Goodman wrote:
You are right in saying there is no apparent way to subscribe without
getting all the list traffic. Without this feature, it is impractical
to require that posters first confirm their email address.
Why ? I don't
On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 09:34 -0400, Stephen wrote:
One can endlessly debate the issue, but at the end of the day, if the
majority wish this to be implemented, then it should be done. The views of a
few, should never outweigh those of the majority, and it doesn't in the
slightest prevent
On Friday, September 22, 2006 12:15 PM -0500, Andrei Popescu wrote:
Seth Goodman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday, September 21, 2006 3:38 PM -0500, Andrei Popescu
wrote:
It's not nice to require *everybody* to receive 100-150
mails/day just for a simple answer.
There's no
Seth Goodman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday, September 21, 2006 3:38 PM -0500, Andrei Popescu wrote:
It's not nice to require *everybody* to receive 100-150 mails/day
just for a simple answer.
There's no reason you have to receive list traffic. You can already do
this if you
On 9/22/06, Andrei Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seth Goodman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday, September 21, 2006 3:38 PM -0500, Andrei Popescu wrote:
It's not nice to require *everybody* to receive 100-150 mails/day
just for a simple answer.
There's no reason you have to
to debian to subscribe --
Subscribing to e-mail lists is done pretty much everywhere, so it's an
expected task, by pretty much anyone using them.
I have already seen spammer subscribed to the mailing list just to push the
spam into it. We may expect more, as lists will become more closed. I don't
think
that step. I don't buy the argument that it's too
much of a hurdle to expect a newbie to debian to subscribe --
Subscribing to e-mail lists is done pretty much everywhere, so it's an
expected task, by pretty much anyone using them.
I have already seen spammer subscribed to the mailing list
On Thursday, September 21, 2006 1:44 PM -0500, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
I don't think that closing mailing lists is the right way to fight
against spam.
The question is whether requiring a user to answer one confirmation
message before posting is any real burden. You have to send mail
Seth Goodman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday, September 21, 2006 1:44 PM -0500, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
I don't think that closing mailing lists is the right way to fight
against spam.
The question is whether requiring a user to answer one confirmation
message before posting
On Thursday, September 21, 2006 3:38 PM -0500, Andrei Popescu wrote:
It's not nice to require *everybody* to receive 100-150 mails/day
just for a simple answer.
There's no reason you have to receive list traffic. You can already do
this if you subscribe via email. There is no reason the web
Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When I send from thunderbird from any machine, it works as it is
connecting directly to santiago. If I use mutt on santiago, it works
fine there as well since it is running an instance of Postfix which can
be reached from the public internet. My
Kevin Buhr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The final alternative is to employ ugly per-MUA hacks, like the
use_from Mutt option that Andrew mentioned.
Whoops... It looks like Andrew's descriptions were a little mixed up.
According to the Mutt manual, it isn't use_from that does this, it's
) - Internet
Now, miami runs postfix, but it is not accessible from the outside.
Now, when I am using mutt on miami, sending a message to the Sourceforge
mailing lists generates a reply like this to santiago (which acts as the
smarthost) since the Return-Path is set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Aug 7 20
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 01:06:04PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
what does your From header look like? Is it supposed to show a
return address of [EMAIL PROTECTED] I would assume not, that it
should show a return address of [EMAIL PROTECTED] The point is, are
you setting your From
.
Now, when I am using mutt on miami, sending a message to the Sourceforge
mailing lists generates a reply like this to santiago (which acts as the
smarthost) since the Return-Path is set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Aug 7 20:28:50 santiago postfix/smtp[11711]: 778272403E:
to=courier-imap
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 05:40:12PM -0400, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
But not everyone has the resources to run a dedicated mail server and
maintain
it. Many people use webmail such as gmail, yahoo, hotmail etc., What about
them? They should suffer by exposing their email address to the
problems with d-u. But I am having problems with other mailing lists like vim
where I had to approve the new from addresses manually. More details at
http://forums.bluebottle.com/index.php?showtopic=221
But this inconvenience is minor compared to going through hundreds of emails
in gmail's spam
Rodolfo Medina wrote:
In my experience, it is possible to read and send messages to debian lists
in at least three ways: e.g., the present one:
via `debian-user' mailing list; through `linux.debian.user' newsgroup;
through `gmane.linux.debian.user' newsgroup.
Now, I realised
On Wed, 24 May 2006 22:39:47 +0200, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
Different mail to news gateways. The gmane.* heirarchy is generally
the best mail to news gateways.
T [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2nd to that.
Sorry, what do you mean with `2nd to that'? (My English is not
On Sun, 21 May 2006 10:11:28 -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Sunday 21 May 2006 09:18, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
Now, I realised that `gmane.linux.debian.user' preserves the message's
original headers, whereas `linux.debian.user' changes the Message ID
into a different value.
Different mail to
Hi, all.
In my experience, it is possible to read and send messages to debian lists
in at least three ways: e.g., the present one:
via `debian-user' mailing list; through `linux.debian.user' newsgroup;
through `gmane.linux.debian.user' newsgroup.
Now, I realised that `gmane.linux.debian.user
On Sunday 21 May 2006 09:18, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
Now, I realised that `gmane.linux.debian.user' preserves the message's
original headers, whereas `linux.debian.user' changes the Message ID
into a different value.
Different mail to news gateways. The gmane.* heirarchy is generally the best
I'm pretty sure you can post via news, at least on gmane.org, and am
testing it with this very message.
--
Christopher Nelson -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 04:20:08PM -0500, Daniel L. McGrew wrote:
Thanks,
I appreciate the help, but that didn't work... it's not
Thanks,
I appreciate the help, but that didn't work... it's not
lists.debian.org or linux.debian.user...
I'll keep trying...
Most sincerely,
Love is very patient and kind, never jealous or envious, never boastful or
proud, never haughty
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 04:20:08PM -0500, Daniel L. McGrew wrote:
Thanks,
I appreciate the help, but that didn't work... it's not
lists.debian.org or linux.debian.user...
I'll keep trying...
Most sincerely,
with all due respect, you must
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
with all due respect, you must not send such lengthy signatures in
your emails to this list.
Andrew, you should also quote and trim properly when replying to list
email ;)
--
Martin A. Brooks | http://www.antibodymx.net/ | Anti-spam anti-virus
Consultant
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 11:34:33PM +0200, Martin A. Brooks wrote:
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
with all due respect, you must not send such lengthy signatures in
your emails to this list.
Andrew, you should also quote and trim properly when replying to list
email ;)
point well taken,
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 04:20:08PM -0500, Daniel L. McGrew wrote:
Thanks,
I appreciate the help, but that didn't work... it's not
lists.debian.org or linux.debian.user...
I'll keep trying...
If you're doing gmane.org, it's gmane.linux.debian.user
Once you attempt your first
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Sackville-West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 4:32 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: View Debian mailing lists in a news reader
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 04:20:08PM -0500, Daniel L. McGrew wrote
Daniel L. McGrew wrote:
Here is a smaller sig... sorry... I didn't mean to annoy anyone...
Most sincerely,
For GOD so LOVED the world that he gave his only begotten son, that
whosoever should believe in him should not perish but have everlasting live
-
Hi all
My actual problem is to forward the messages that appear in news groups
http://groups.google.com/group/cornell.marketplace/
http://groups.google.com/group/ithaca.marketplace/
http://groups.google.com/group/ithaca.general/
etc., to a mailing list
s. keeling wrote:
Incoming from Florian Kulzer:
[...]
generated garbage addresses. I recall seeing quite sophisticated
implementations of this, in which an invisible (for normal users) link
on a webpage leads email harvesting robots into a maze of dynamically
generated bogus pages full of
s. keeling wrote:
Incoming from Florian Kulzer:
s. keeling wrote:
[...]
Consider joining my (ad hoc) Poison The Well project:
http://www.spots.ab.ca/~keeling/emails.html
Maybe I misunderstand what you are doing, but aren't you increasing the
spam load for people whose real email
goes,
munging, or otherwise hiding your email address, is essentially
pointless. I've been posting to mailing lists and Usenet using my
real email address since about 1996. I don't hide from spammers. I'm
a living honeypot, if you will. My real email address used in mailing
list and Usenet posts
to
feel that
users are getting confused between multiple forms of support
available -
forums.debian.net http://forums.debian.net and other mailing
lists such as debian-user for example.
It's not an issue in my mind. However you can get the best answers to
your
PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all
I might be acting a bit paranoid here but I am starting to feel that users are getting confused between multiple forms of support available -
forums.debian.net http://forums.debian.net and other mailing lists such as debian-user
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 12:13:44AM -0500, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
I might be acting a bit paranoid here but I am starting to feel that
users are getting confused between multiple forms of support available -
forums.debian.net and other mailing lists such as debian-user for example
Hex Star wrote:
Hi, I've noticed that in the archive of this list, the posts I made
publicly contain my full email address instead of it being obfuscated
like on other lists (e.g. they change email addresses in the archive
to something like user[at]domain[dot]com or user domain com, etc) it's
Incoming from Hex Star:
[snip]
contain my full email address instead of it being obfuscated like on other
lists (e.g. they change email addresses in the archive to something like
user[at]domain[dot]com or user domain com, etc) it's fully displayed in its
original format making it perfect
gets harvested by even more spam bots...and btw, how could people not like gmails conversation model? :P I love it, especially for mailing lists because it makes following the postings really easy, just click the first post in the mailing list thread in the gmail webmail interface and then you get
601 - 700 of 1366 matches
Mail list logo
