Incoming from Hex Star:
[snip]
contain my full email address instead of it being obfuscated like on other
lists (e.g. they change email addresses in the archive to something like
user[at]domain[dot]com or user domain com, etc) it's fully displayed in its
original format making it perfect
gets harvested by even more spam bots...and btw, how could people not like gmails conversation model? :P I love it, especially for mailing lists because it makes following the postings really easy, just click the first post in the mailing list thread in the gmail webmail interface and then you get
s. keeling wrote:
Incoming from Hex Star:
[snip]
contain my full email address instead of it being obfuscated like on other
lists (e.g. they change email addresses in the archive to something like
user[at]domain[dot]com or user domain com, etc) it's fully displayed in its
original format
Incoming from Florian Kulzer:
s. keeling wrote:
Incoming from Hex Star:
[snip]
contain my full email address instead of it being obfuscated like on other
lists (e.g. they change email addresses in the archive to something like
Consider joining my (ad hoc) Poison The Well project
3) But since gmail's conversation view is not very convenient to read a
high volume mailing list such as d-u, pop the emails into your favorite
client such as thunderbird
Just out of curiosity, what do you find inconvenient about gmail's interface?
For me, gmail is the best interface I have
s. keeling wrote:
Incoming from Florian Kulzer:
s. keeling wrote:
Consider joining my (ad hoc) Poison The Well project:
http://www.spots.ab.ca/~keeling/emails.html
Maybe I misunderstand what you are doing, but aren't you increasing the
spam load for people whose real email
Kelly Clowers wrote:
3) But since gmail's conversation view is not very convenient to read a
high volume mailing list such as d-u, pop the emails into your favorite
client such as thunderbird
Just out of curiosity, what do you find inconvenient about gmail's interface?
For me, gmail is
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 12:13:44AM -0500, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
I might be acting a bit paranoid here but I am starting to feel
that
users are getting confused between multiple forms of support
available -
forums.debian.net and other mailing lists
Incoming from Håkon Alstadheim:
s. keeling wrote:
Incoming from Florian Kulzer:
s. keeling wrote:
Consider joining my (ad hoc) Poison The Well project:
http://www.spots.ab.ca/~keeling/emails.html
sender address by the spammers? How do you make sure not to include any
addresses of
Incoming from Willie Wonka:
Please trim extraneous text next time.
subscribing to it, thinking it was necessary to join/post on this list
(linux.debian.user)
This is the list -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
They are the gatekeepers of the Usenet _newsgroups_ linux.debian.*
(and perhaps others)
On 3/18/06, kamaraju kusumanchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Q: what's wrong with Gmail?]
For starters, it encourages the use of top posting by placing the cursor
at the begining of the message instead of placing the cursor at the end
of the message - like thunderbird does. Ideally they can give
Incoming from kamaraju kusumanchi:
Kelly Clowers wrote:
3) But since gmail's conversation view is not very convenient to read a
Just out of curiosity, what do you find inconvenient about gmail's
interface?
For me, gmail is the best interface I have found for reading d-u.
For starters,
Incoming from Kelly Clowers:
[?]:
3) But since gmail's conversation view is not very convenient to read a
Just out of curiosity, what do you find inconvenient about gmail's interface?
Based on your reply, it apparently encourages one to lose attributions.
--
Any technology
Hi,
On forums.debian.net, people should be redirected to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
when they don't get an answer there, because debian-user has more
'powerusers' than forums.debian.net. The audiences of both support
resources are reasonably separate, because people tend to either swear
by forums, or
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 03:51:20PM -0500, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
Thirdly, it also hides the email addresses from which I receive the
email. I always have to click on More options to see brief headers.
For some reason I like to see the email addresses (brief headers) from
which I receive
Hi all
I might be acting a bit paranoid here but I am starting to feel that
users are getting confused between multiple forms of support available -
forums.debian.net and other mailing lists such as debian-user for example.
For example, recently a post is made to debian-user
http
paranoid here but I am starting to feel thatusers are getting confused between multiple forms of support available -forums.debian.net and other mailing lists such as debian-user for example.
For example, recently a post is made to debian-userhttp://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2006/03/msg01447.htmland
to feel that
users are getting confused between multiple forms of support available -forums.debian.net and other mailing lists such as debian-user for example.For example, recently a post is made to debian-user
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2006/03/msg01447.htmland the same question is being
Hi, I've noticed that in the archive of this list, the posts I made publicly contain my full email address instead of it being obfuscated like on other lists (e.g. they change email addresses in the archive to something like user[at]domain[dot]com or user domain com, etc) it's fully displayed
all
I might be acting a bit paranoid here but I am starting to
feel that
users are getting confused between multiple forms of support
available -
forums.debian.net http://forums.debian.net and other mailing
lists such as debian-user for example.
It's not an issue in my
Hex Star wrote:
Hi, I've noticed that in the archive of this list, the posts I made
publicly contain my full email address instead of it being obfuscated
like on other lists (e.g. they change email addresses in the archive
to something like user[at]domain[dot]com or user domain com, etc) it's
Marc Shapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] said on Fri, 17 Mar 2006 22:40:14 -0800:
Hex Star wrote:
Hi, I've noticed that in the archive of this list, the posts I made
publicly contain my full email address instead of it being obfuscated
like on other lists (e.g. they change email addresses
instead of it being obfuscated
like on other lists (e.g. they change email addresses in the archive to something like user[at]domain[dot]com or user domain com, etc) it's fully displayed in its original format making it perfect for being
picked up by spam bots...shouldn't the emai addresses
paranoid here but I am starting to feel that users are getting confused between multiple forms of support available -
forums.debian.net http://forums.debian.net and other mailing lists such as debian-user for example.
It's not an issue in my mind.However you can get the best answers toyour questions
Hi,
Is there a way to subscribe to debian-* mailing lists with mail
delivery turned off?
Thanks,
Ritesh
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT -- http://www.researchut.com
Necessity is the mother of invention
Stealing logics from one person is plagiarism, stealing from many is
researchut
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 21:12:29 +0530
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to subscribe to debian-* mailing lists with mail
delivery turned off?
No, but you can post if you're not subscribed.
HTH,
Jacob
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
i certainly hope so
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jacek Kawa napisał.
Jak podają anonimowe źródła, przepowiedziano, że Mccullough Luann napisze:
badger verging on the Desert of Sahara; but she soon found out how matters
me that crowning service. Miss Mills accepted this trust, too; but
okay teapot for punishment because he wouldnt, that
Title: E-mail message content
Dear participant,
We have completed a study which utilized data from 3 Debian mailing lists (Kde, Mentors, Users) located at Debian list archives http://lists.debian.org/.
Our data extraction and analysis shows that you participated in these lists during
SkSowe wrote:
Dear participant,
We have completed a study which utilized data from 3 Debian mailing lists (Kde,
Mentors, Users) located at Debian list archives http://lists.debian.org/.
Our data extraction and analysis shows that you participated in these lists
during the period January 2001
Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
SkSowe wrote:
Dear participant,
We have completed a study which utilized data from 3 Debian mailing
lists (Kde, Mentors, Users) located at Debian list archives
http://lists.debian.org/.
Our data extraction and analysis shows that you participated in these
lists
Title: E-mail message content
Dear participant,
We have completed a study which utilized data from 3 Debian mailing lists (Kde, Mentors, Users) located at Debian list archives http://lists.debian.org/.
Our data extraction and analysis shows that you participated in these lists during
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 06:46:48PM +0100, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
SkSowe wrote:
Dear participant,
We have completed a study which utilized data from 3 Debian mailing
lists (Kde, Mentors, Users) located at Debian list archives
http://lists.debian.org/.
Our
On Tuesday, 17 January 2006 at 15:22:25 -0700, Paul E Condon wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 06:46:48PM +0100, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
[...]
I'm not too big a fan of too many surveys... but that's my personal
opinion.
Johannes
Actually, prior to OP message showing up on this
Mitch Wiedemann wanted us to know:
On the topic mentioned above, I find HTML e-mail useful sometimes, but I
wouldn't send it to an e-mail list unless it was a generally accepted
practice on the specific list.
Some people use text based MUAs that do not support html. Thus I think
we should be
Jon Dowland wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 01:29:23PM +0100, privacy.at Anonymous Remailer wrote:
And it has no place on this (or any other) mailing list.
E-mail should be sent in plain text only.
I don't agree, entirely. Email is a convenient transport mechanism for
many things other
, which is what I always prefer for high
volume lists anyway, since I prefer to Google Group such lists. I had a
quick try to find out how to do it in a Smartlist before vacation, but
my only results were: Smartlist uses X-Commands (simple additions to the
mail headers I supose) to interact
linux:
is it just me or is this mailing list useless?
It's probably not just you, but for the majority of subscribers it is
not useless. :)
i posted my question ages ago and have recieved nothing but heaps of
responses to other questions that i don't understand
are mailing lists meant
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 02:21:16PM +1000, linux wrote:
is it just me or is this mailing list useless? i posted my question
ages ago and have recieved nothing but heaps of responses to other
questions that i don't understand are mailing lists meant to work like
this? how do i get better
On Sunday 18 September 2005 09:21 pm, linux wrote:
is it just me or is this mailing list useless?
It's you.
i posted my question ages ago and have recieved nothing but heaps of
responses to other questions that i don't understand are mailing lists meant
to work like this?
Yes
Mailing lists are an inefficient way to get an answer to a single question
because you will get loads (I'm on 1,000 since I signed on here) of responses
to things that don't even remotely relate to your question. However, it is
also a GREAT way to really get into a subject. And, to get a good
2005/9/18, linux [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
is it just me or is this mailing list useless?
i posted my question ages ago and have recieved nothing but heaps of
responses to other questions that i don't understand
are mailing lists meant to work like this? how do i get better results
out
is it just me or is this mailing list useless?
i posted my question ages ago and have recieved nothing but heaps of
responses to other questions that i don't understand
are mailing lists meant to work like this? how do i get better results
out of this mailing list?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
--- linux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is it just me or is this mailing list useless?
i posted my question ages ago and have recieved
nothing but heaps of
responses to other questions that i don't understand
are mailing lists meant to work like this? how do i
get better results
out
Hallo,
ich habe einen Courier-IMAP Server mit Exim4 am laufen und würde gerne
meine Mailinglisten aus dem IMAP auslagern.
Dazu scheint sich das Paket Lists-Archives ganz gut zu eignen, denn die
bei der Debian Mailingliste benutzen es auch...
Ich komme leider mit der Konfiguration nicht
Browser name ADM1b for the workgroup ADM.
Unable to sync browse lists in this workgroup.
Me pueden decir por qué habilitando el servidor wins trata de sincronizar con
un domain master browser? Si explícitamente le pongo 'remote browse sync
= ' (que dicho sea de paso, es el valor por
Hola:
A Dissabte 23 Juliol 2005 13:50, Joan Alfonso va escriure:
Hola a tots.
M'acabe d'instal·lar la sarge i necessite què em digueu les sources per
posar-les al /etc/apt/sources-lists.
Jo tinc:
deb ftp://security.debian.org/debian-security sarge/updates main contrib
non-free
deb ftp
Hola a tots.
M'acabe d'instal·lar la sarge i necessite què em digueu les sources per
posar-les al /etc/apt/sources-lists.
Àu.
En/na Joan Alfonso ha escrit:
Hola a tots.
M'acabe d'instal·lar la sarge i necessite què em digueu les sources per
posar-les al /etc/apt/sources-lists.
Àu.
No se si estan bé o falta/sobra alguna, però jo tinc aquestes al meu
suurces.list (comentades ja que tinc testng/unstable
En/na Carles Muñoz Gorriz ha escrit:
En/na Joan Alfonso ha escrit:
Hola a tots.
M'acabe d'instal·lar la sarge i necessite què em digueu les sources per
posar-les al /etc/apt/sources-lists.
[...]
#
# Debian stable
#
deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ stable main contrib non-free
deb
On 2005-07-22 @ 00:13:38 (week 29) michael wrote:
I think it's a question of interpretation of the man pages. To me it
seems that '-x' *also* gives the runlevel info; and that '-t' gives all
entries *up to* a date (as opposed to since or on that date)
Here's the two relevant excerpts from
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 13:03 +, J.A. de Vries wrote:
On 2005-07-22 @ 00:13:38 (week 29) michael wrote:
I think it's a question of interpretation of the man pages. To me it
seems that '-x' *also* gives the runlevel info; and that '-t' gives all
entries *up to* a date (as opposed to
On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 23:03 +, J.A. de Vries wrote:
Hi,
For a monitor script I thought I'd use the -t switch of the last command
hoping to get only the latest entries from wtmp. Seems there's something
wrong there, since it will return all entries in wtmp regardless. Before
I submit a
this error:
Reading Package Lists... Error!
E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
E: Error occurred while processing pkcipe (NewVersion1)
E: Problem with MergeList
/var/lib/apt/lists/debian.yorku.ca_debian_dists_stable_main_binary-1386_Packages
E: The package lists or status file could not be parsed
On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 09:52:28AM -0400, Strake wrote:
E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
That should be solved by specifying the 'Cache-Limit' for
apt in /etc/apt/apt.conf, e.g. like this:
echo 'APT::Cache-Limit 2000;' /etc/apt/apt.conf
(Or edit that file manually.)
I'm running 3.0r5
Thx, it worked. I think I'll go download sarge now :D
On 6/11/05, Maurits van Rees [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 09:52:28AM -0400, Strake wrote:
E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
That should be solved by specifying the 'Cache-Limit' for
apt in /etc/apt/apt.conf, e.g. like
no,
and it gave me this error:
Reading Package Lists... Error!
E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
E: Error occurred while processing pkcipe (NewVersion1)
E: Problem with MergeList
/var/lib/apt/lists/debian.yorku.ca_debian_dists_stable_main_binary-1386_Packages
E: The package lists or status file could
Strake:
Thx, it worked. I think I'll go download sarge now :D
You don't need to download an installation CD and reinstall from
scratch. Just edit your /etc/apt/sources.list and change entries with
'woody' to 'sarge'. Then run 'aptitude update aptitude dist-upgrade'.
You might want to read the
, but those who actually manage said
lists aren't that dumb. There needs to be some pretty damning
evidence that's provably from you to hurt you. Alternatively, your
ISP could be so clueless as to let the situation get out of hand.
Generally, if your ISP is up front and responsible about killing
probably is to use a second email address for
mailing lists only.
I use [EMAIL PROTECTED] to subscribe to this list (and others),
and I have a procmail-based filter on my mail server, which
filters out all mails not coming over one of the mailing lists.
Most mailing lists insert a X-Mailing
Incoming from michael:
On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 13:23 +0200, Dennis Stosberg wrote:
Am Freitag, 13. Mai 2005 12:20 schrieb Nacho:
So I think it's very easy for anybody to automatically extract
all of the email addresses from the web archive.
It _is_ very easy and many spammers do
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 03:54:15PM -0600, s. keeling wrote:
Incoming from michael:
On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 13:23 +0200, Dennis Stosberg wrote:
Am Freitag, 13. Mai 2005 12:20 schrieb Nacho:
So I think it's very easy for anybody to automatically extract
all of the email addresses
Incoming from David Jardine:
What worries me is the spam that is sent out under my name. Just
I get bounces from clueless mail admins all the time. If they'd spend
two seconds scanning the original's Received: headers, they'd know I
had nothing to do with it. Blast it back to those fools
On 5/23/05, s. keeling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Incoming from David Jardine:
What worries me is the spam that is sent out under my name. Just
I get bounces from clueless mail admins all the time. If they'd spend
two seconds scanning the original's Received: headers, they'd know I
had
Incoming from Nick Price:
Part of the problem is that this list is also a widespread public usenet
group,
and many spammers harvest e-mails from them as well as post spam to
the group itself.
And some of us harvest spammers simply by posting to Usenet. How are
you going to get the chance
The ubiquity of spam has been ironically liberating - I no longer make
any attempt to hide my email address. I rely on spam filtering and
enjoy openness.
My own approach to spam has been to get very quick with the delete
key, and to have a lot of fun with the more bizarre or congenitally
stupid spam. I've done a moderate amount of 419 baiting (as Waldo
Bundersnuff, ferret rancher, or Louis Napoleon rightful heir to the
Empire of France, or Gomer
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 04:43:43PM -0600, s. keeling wrote:
Incoming from David Jardine:
What worries me is the spam that is sent out under my name. Just
I get bounces from clueless mail admins all the time. If they'd spend
two seconds scanning the original's Received: headers, they'd
Incoming from Larry Felton Johnson:
keep the folks in my work group
amused with a Spam of the Week posting, often involving the stream
I recently stumbled across a thread on my local user group list where
victims were holding dick wars over the highest SA scores they've
seen (mine's bigger
of spam, who else was getting them and
was I being put on blacklists by, well, clueless mail admins and
fools with idiotic mail-bots?
The clueless might report you, but those who actually manage said
lists aren't that dumb. There needs to be some pretty damning
evidence that's provably from you
for a third party interested in the status of the bug
to join the mailing list? I know there is a web archive of these
lists, but a push method would be preferable to pull.
Not for the BUG, but for the whole Source-Package.
Thanks,
Andreas
Greetings
Michelle
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux
.
Is there a way for a third party interested in the status of the bug
to join the mailing list? I know there is a web archive of these
lists, but a push method would be preferable to pull.
Not for the BUG, but for the whole Source-Package.
and you can find the necessary info for that in the following link
the mailing list? I know there is a web archive of these
lists, but a push method would be preferable to pull.
Thanks,
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 07:45:41AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
Not that munging helps in the least.
http://www.interhack.net/pubs/munging-harmful
Interesting link, thanks for it.
I have spam filters and so, and also my email address for this list
is just for this and for nothing more, I
Hi,
I've noticed that the email addresses in the archive of this list are not
hidden, I mean that in other archives of other lists if you want to see the
real email address of somebody you have to give your mail to receive it, or
simply you can send a message to him/her from the web...
So I
Am Freitag, 13. Mai 2005 12:20 schrieb Nacho:
So I think it's very easy for anybody to automatically extract
all of the email addresses from the web archive.
It _is_ very easy and many spammers do that.
Your best option probably is to use a second email address for
mailing lists only.
I
On Friday May 13 2005 3:20 am, Nacho wrote:
Hi,
I've noticed that the email addresses in the archive of this list
are not hidden, I mean that in other archives of other lists if you
want to see the real email address of somebody you have to give
your mail to receive it, or simply you can
On Friday May 13 2005 9:50 am, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
Report spam instead. Just hitting delete does nothing to solve
the problem.
Could you explain how you would do that?
Is it a lengthy process or just hitting a key or forwarding the
spam email to another address?
Depends on how
Incoming from Paul Johnson:
On Friday May 13 2005 9:50 am, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
Report spam instead. Just hitting delete does nothing to solve
the problem.
Could you explain how you would do that?
How can I be sure that reporting spam indeed works?
Experience. That part
On Dec 21 2004, Brian Nelson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 07:01:29PM -0500, Tom Allison wrote:
It certainly seems that mailman is the only way to go when it comes to
dong mailing lists these days.
p ezmlm-src
I have used DJB's ezmlm quite sucessfully for a looong time
in
Exchange,
and use the Linux mail server to reroute mail addressed to
the lists to
the appropriate group.
Ey, nice idea also. Though too much trouble at this time, I hope to get away
from POP3 with an MX record in about 2 weeks time and fetchmail will be
history then.
Thanks for more
Hello people,
I'm having a Debian Sarge box here running fetchmail, sendmail, spamass-milter.
Mail
retrieved by fetchmail from 2 multidrop POP accounts is delivered to local
sendmail (for
spam check) and then forwarded via mailertable to an Exchange server.
Everything on the
Debian box are
This is one of the interesting features of Fetchmail.
You say you are using Fetchmail with a multidrop mailbox. It may be
that Fetchmail is not looking for the correct header to determine the
address to deliver to. Look in the fetchmail man pages in the sections
on envelope and Header vs
,
and use the Linux mail server to reroute mail addressed to the lists to
the appropriate group.
--
Joe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the mailto directive is what's confusing things.
If I put it in replcomps, repl finds it but can't understand its meaning.
Of course, several lists I am on appear to use that header as the only
reliable header that could control the construction of the reply address.
Thanks for any useful ideas
suivants apparaissent :
-
Reading Package Lists..error !
Dynamic NMap ran out of room
Error occured while processing proftpd (NewVersion1)
Problem with MergeList /var/lib/apt/... (etc..)
--
Quand je retire la sarge, plus de pb.
Mais il me faut un paquet de sarge
Bonsoir, (correction)
j'ai mon routeur/proxy sous woody et je viens d'ajouter la
'deb ftp://ftp.belnet.be/packages/debian/ sarge main non-free contrib'
à ma sources.list.
Quand je fait maintenant un 'apt-get update'
les messages d'erreurs suivants apparaissent :
-
Reading Package Lists
:
-
Reading Package Lists..error !
Dynamic NMap ran out of room
Error occured while processing proftpd (NewVersion1)
Problem with MergeList /var/lib/apt/... (etc..)
--
Quand je retire la sarge, plus de pb.
Mais il me faut un paquet de sarge justement, peut-être
avec des dépendances
:
-
Reading Package Lists..error !
Dynamic NMap ran out of room
Error occured while processing proftpd (NewVersion1)
Problem with MergeList /var/lib/apt/... (etc..)
--
Quand je retire la sarge, plus de pb.
Mais il me faut un paquet de sarge justement, peut-être avec des
suivants apparaissent :
« -
« Reading Package Lists..error !
« Dynamic NMap ran out of room
« Error occured while processing proftpd (NewVersion1)
« Problem with MergeList /var/lib/apt/... (etc..)
« --
« Quand je retire la sarge, plus de pb.
« Mais il me faut un paquet de
update'
« les messages d'erreurs suivants apparaissent :
« -
« Reading Package Lists..error !
« Dynamic NMap ran out of room
« Error occured while processing proftpd (NewVersion1)
« Problem with MergeList /var/lib/apt/... (etc..)
« --
« Quand je retire la sarge, plus de pb
update'
les messages d'erreurs suivants apparaissent :
-
Reading Package Lists..error !
Dynamic NMap ran out of room
Error occured while processing proftpd (NewVersion1)
Problem with MergeList /var/lib/apt/... (etc..)
--
Quand je retire la sarge, plus de pb.
Mais il me faut
Bonsoir,
j'ai mon routeur/proxy sous woody et je viens d'ajouter la
'deb ftp//.. sarge binairie non free contrib ...'
à ma sources.list.
Quand je fait maintenant un 'apt-get update'
les messages d'erreurs suivants apparaissent :
-
Reading Package Lists
I often want to ask a question on a non-public Debian list but I don't
follow the list actively so I don't really want to continually get the
lists' mail.
Mailman lets you turn on or off mail delivery but Debian's SmartList
doesn't.
What can I do?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Incoming from Andrew Malcolmson:
I often want to ask a question on a non-public Debian list but I don't
follow the list actively so I don't really want to continually get the
lists' mail.
Mailman lets you turn on or off mail delivery but Debian's SmartList
doesn't.
What can I do?
Ask
On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 09:29:25AM -0600, s. keeling wrote:
Incoming from Andrew Malcolmson:
I often want to ask a question on a non-public Debian list but I don't
follow the list actively so I don't really want to continually get the
lists' mail.
Mailman lets you turn on or off mail
Kevin Mark wrote:
...
Hi Andy,
IIRC most debian lists do not require you to 'join' the list to post. (a
mixed blessing). And some folks use a newsreader thingy like gmame
(sp?). to follow their reply or just read the list.
Point your news reader to news.gmane.org - fantastic for reading
I've looked at the archives for AFPL and GNU Ghostscript, and it doesn't
seem like very many people are there, except for a couple here and there
exchanging patches on the AFPL list, and complete spam on the GNU list.
I'm looking at using GhostScript to convert PostScript to PCL for an Oce
PS372
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 07:17:03PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote:
} I've looked at the archives for AFPL and GNU Ghostscript, and it doesn't
} seem like very many people are there, except for a couple here and there
} exchanging patches on the AFPL list, and complete spam on the GNU list.
}
} I'm
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 11:25:44 -0400
Emma Jane Hogbin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
emma
PS Is there any way to have my second email account list-friendly
without having to receive all of the messages twice? I know that on
some systems it's possible to set an email account to nomail so that
you can
701 - 800 of 1368 matches
Mail list logo
