Re: locking the console

1999-12-11 Thread Riku Saikkonen
Rob Mahurin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >So I could scan /dev/tty[1-9]* to make sure nobody has typed anything >recently, then run this from the background. Or something. If nobody >else has written it I'll do it over Christmas. A possibly slightly easier and more complete way to check for conso

Re: locking the console

1999-12-09 Thread Joe Block
Rob Mahurin wrote: > Yeah, screen is a pretty rad program. I was looking for something > with a timeout, though, so my dumb self could go away and not have to > worry about mischeif happening. install idled and remove the console from the exempt ttys in /etc/idled.conf jpb -- Joe Block <[EMAIL

Re: locking the console

1999-12-09 Thread Ethan Benson
On 8/12/99 Rob Mahurin wrote: Yeah, screen is a pretty rad program. I was looking for something with a timeout, though, so my dumb self could go away and not have to worry about mischeif happening. This is really not a major security issue, just an idle thought. just another random thought..

Re: locking the console

1999-12-09 Thread Rob Mahurin
On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 07:41:59AM -0800, aphro wrote: > I find it useful to just run stuff in screen, then detach & logout when/if > I need the machine secured. frees up the box for other people to use and > at the same time keeps my process(s)( running. could leave for a month and > they'd still

Re: locking the console

1999-12-08 Thread aphro
I find it useful to just run stuff in screen, then detach & logout when/if I need the machine secured. frees up the box for other people to use and at the same time keeps my process(s)( running. could leave for a month and they'd still be going:/ nate On Wed, 8 Dec 1999, Rob Mahurin wrote: robm

Re: locking the console

1999-12-08 Thread Rob Mahurin
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 08:22:35PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote: > On 7/12/99 Rob Mahurin wrote: > > >vlock' (which is not > >really useful without the -a). > > which is annoying since -a is not very multiuser friendly, granted > this is often not to big a problem since usually there is only one >

Re: locking the console

1999-12-08 Thread Ethan Benson
On 7/12/99 Rob Mahurin wrote: vlock' (which is not really useful without the -a). which is annoying since -a is not very multiuser friendly, granted this is often not to big a problem since usually there is only one person at a time using the console. (or preferably only trusted users...)

Re: locking the console

1999-12-08 Thread Rob Mahurin
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 05:32:05PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote: > On 7/12/99 Rob Mahurin wrote: > > > > >Is there a program that will lock my text consoles for me if I'm idle > >for a while? Something like: > > > >while !KeyboardInterrupt /* nobody's typing */ > > sleep 5m /* OK, they're really

Re: locking the console

1999-12-08 Thread Ethan Benson
On 7/12/99 Rob Mahurin wrote: Is there a program that will lock my text consoles for me if I'm idle for a while? Something like: while !KeyboardInterrupt /* nobody's typing */ sleep 5m /* OK, they're really gone forever */ clear vlock --all Or something. xlock with t

locking the console

1999-12-08 Thread Rob Mahurin
Is there a program that will lock my text consoles for me if I'm idle for a while? Something like: while !KeyboardInterrupt /* nobody's typing */ sleep 5m /* OK, they're really gone forever */ clear vlock --all Or something. xlock with the timer but without the X. Rob