That was it. I had run make clean, not make-kpkg clean.
Thanks. I'm now running a 2.2.14 kernel.
-Paul
>
>
> --hHWLQfXTYDoKhP50
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On Fri, Jan 07, 2000 at 06:12:27PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > On 7/1
On Fri, Jan 07, 2000 at 06:12:27PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On 7/1/2000 Paul Biciunas wrote:
>
> >I then ran the make-kpkg --rev eggplant.2 kernel-image
>
>
> that is supposed to be an underscore, so it should be kernel_image.
Actually, i
On 7/1/2000 Paul Biciunas wrote:
I then ran the make-kpkg --rev eggplant.2 kernel-image
that is supposed to be an underscore, so it should be kernel_image.
--
Ethan Benson
~~~
Greeting,
I'm running a 2.2.13 kernel, that I patched to
2.2.14. The patch processing went fine, no errors
were detected. ( I ran zcat patch_2.2.14.gz | patch
-s -p0 )
I then ran the make-kpkg --rev eggplant.2 kernel-image
command, and it generated no errors building the tree,
and no errors genera
Oliver Elphick wrote:
> The last line does not terminate with \, so the `if' construct is not
> terminated. All lines before the final `fi' need to end with \.
Sure enough. I edited the rules file and all is well. Does a bug report need
to be filed here or is the maintainer aware of this?
--
Shaleh wrote:
>Can someone point me to the problem here??
>if test -f debian/official -a -f debian/README.Debian ; then \
> install -p-o root -g root -m 644 debian/README.Debian \
>debian/tmp-source/usr/src/kernel-source-2.0.34/README.Debian
The last line does not ter
Can someone point me to the problem here??
(cd debian/tmp-source/usr/src/kernel-source-2.0.34; \
rm -f stamp-building stamp-build stamp-configure
stamp-source stamp-image stamp-headers stamp-src stamp-diff stamp-doc
stamp-buildpackage stamp-libc-kheaders)
(cd debian/tmp-sou
Hi,
Hmmm. Well, do you have the correct version of cpp installed?
If things look good, try purging and re-installing both cpp and gcc;
paying attention to installation errors. (I do not understand what
went wrong here).
manoj
--
One must be either the anvil or the hammer. --
>AUUgh! Bug! Bug, I say! this should be reported.
>
>Earlier in the build process, the architecture is set so:
>architecture:=$(shell dpkg --print-architecture)
>
>What does dpkg --print-architecture show?
The following:
dpkg: unexpected output from `gcc --print-libgcc-file-name':
`/
Hi,
>>"David" == David Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David> On 23 Sep 1997, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Well, there is no difference between arch//boot/bzImage and
>> arch/boot/bzImage, really, when it come to cp. I suspect that the
>> image did not build, for some reason.
David> Perhaps you'
On 23 Sep 1997, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Well, there is no difference between arch//boot/bzImage and
> arch/boot/bzImage, really, when it come to cp. I suspect that the
> image did not build, for some reason.
Perhaps you've overlooked the fact that, though the filename syntax might be
l
Hi,
Well, there is no difference between arch//boot/bzImage and
arch/boot/bzImage, really, when it come to cp. I suspect that the
image did not build, for some reason.
a) what do you see when you do ls -als arch/boot/bzImage?
b) What version of kernel-package are you using?
c) Are th
Hi,
Whilst recompiling my (2.0.30) kernel using make-kpkg as suggested in
the debian FAQ, the following thing happened towards what i guess would've
been the end:
cp arch//boot/bzImage \
debian/temp_image/boot/vmlinuz-2.0.30
cp: arch//boot/bzImage: No such file or directory
make: ***
Hi,
I am afraid that you have run into restrictions about the
version numbering scheme imposed by Debian Policy. Your revision
number is taken to have an upstream version (work) and a
debian-revision, which is the rest of the revision field. The
upstream version is not allowed to have
Hallo,
yesterday I successfully compiled kernel 2.0.29 at home. Today I tried
the same at work and it went wrong :( Both systems are equally configured
regarding the relevant packages (dpkg 1.4.0.8, dpkg-deb 1.4.0.8,
kernel-package 3.19, don't know about others).
I did:
make mrproper
make
15 matches
Mail list logo
