Manoj:
On 9 Jan 1999, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
> Hmmm. Sorry to follow up my last posting so quickly, but I did
> notice that the man page mentions /usr/doc/kernel-package in the see
> also section.
>
> As I said, I have now included a reference in the files
> section as well.
>
Hi,
>>"Charles" == Charles Kaufman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Charles> Anyway I'm sure you get the idea. Persistence required.
Charles> In the FILES part of the man page you do mention the Problems.gz file-
Charles> why not mention the the README, too?
Hmmm. Sorry to follow up my las
Hi,
>>"Charles" == Charles Kaufman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Charles> Anyway I'm sure you get the idea. Persistence required.
Charles> In the FILES part of the man page you do mention the Problems.gz file-
Charles> why not mention the the README, too?
I have done so in my local sour
Manoj:
On 9 Jan 1999, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
> Well, the detailed manual is in /usr/doc/kernel-package/README.gz,
> where I think it does indicate that only the kernel_image target is
> required
>
Point well taken. I should have found it. Thanks for being so gentle.
On the other
Hi,
>>"Charles" == Charles Kaufman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Charles> That's a very valuable hint. When I saw the .deb packages
Charles> produced all but one did seem superfluous and I only
Charles> installed that one. man pages seem ritually diffident. Are
Charles> examples or suggestions f
On 8 Jan 1999, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,>
> May I suggest the kernel_image target for make-kpkg? For most
Yes you may-who better?
> people, the kernel-image-XXX-YYY package is the only one relevant;
> everything else is only there for completeness. And for personal use,
> you do n
Hi,
>>"Charles" == Charles Kaufman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Charles> I repeated the make-kpkg exactly as before, as far as I
Charles> could tell. This time it completed, except for the lack of
Charles> pgp, which is correct-I don't have it-and I presume not
Charles> critical. The tail of th
Manoj:
On 8 Jan 1999, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are you sure that the source tree was not somehow corrupted? I
> can't reproduce the problem here. I do have include/net/rosecall.h
>
> manoj
>
I repeated the make-kpkg exactly as before, as far as I could tell. This
time it
Manoj
Thanks for the quick reply. The output from du is exactly what you have.
But the directory is /usr/src/linux/include/net, not the one you have,
if that makes any difference.
The file sizes are 7924 Nov 15 13:33 rose.h
110 Jul 13 16:47 rosecall.h
I did a tar zxpv linux-
Hi,
Are you sure that the source tree was not somehow corrupted? I
can't reproduce the problem here. I do have include/net/rosecall.h
manoj
__> l /usr/src/kernel-source-2.0.36/include/net/
total 127
1 ./ 2 icmp.h 1 p8022.h 5 route.h
1 ../
This is the tail of the output from "make-kpkg build-package
modules" executed from /usr/src/linux.
That directory was the top of the tree resulting from "tar zxpvf
linux-2.0.36.tar.gz"
There is a kernel "vmlinux" in /usr/src/linux, dated about 7 minutes
before the make-kpkg command terminated.
11 matches
Mail list logo
