Chris Lale wrote:
>
> There was a long discussion about this, as you recall. The results are
> summarised on the NewbieDOC wiki [1]. Basically, you run
>
> # aptitude install -sf
>
> to see whether Aptitude is confused. If so, run a fix. The global fix is
>
> # aptitude keep-all
>
> [1]
>
http
Andrew Malcolmson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 12:42:50PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
>> On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 02:20:12 -0400
>> Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > I like synaptic's GUI much better than aptitude's ncurses interface. If
>> > I want to see all the packages whose
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 12:42:50PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 02:20:12 -0400
> Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I like synaptic's GUI much better than aptitude's ncurses interface. If I
> > want to see all the packages whose names start with vim, In synapti
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 02:20:12 -0400
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Celejar wrote:
>
> >
> > It's more powerful and can do anything that apt-get can
>
> What are the aptitude equivalents of
>
> sudo apt-get build-dep texmacs
Interesting point. Google found this:
http://p12
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> Sometime before, I read on this list that it is unwise to mix apt-get and
> aptitude. By mix, I mean using apt-get one time and aptitude another time.
> The reason given was that both of them use different databases. Is this
> true for synaptic and aptitude as well? C
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 07:28:26 +0200
Joe Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Atis wrote:
> >> You can use both, but you will confuse aptitude in the process.
> >> Aptitude keeps a database so that it knows which packages it pulled in
> >> as depende
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> Celejar wrote:
>
>> It's more powerful and can do anything that apt-get can
>
> What are the aptitude equivalents of
>
> sudo apt-get build-dep texmacs
> apt-get source grep
>
>
Good question.
>> , and in my exper
Celejar wrote:
>
> It's more powerful and can do anything that apt-get can
What are the aptitude equivalents of
sudo apt-get build-dep texmacs
apt-get source grep
> , and in my experience, Synaptic's
> GUI doesn't add much value, and you can use aptitude in interactive
> mode.
>
I like sy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Atis wrote:
>> You can use both, but you will confuse aptitude in the process.
>> Aptitude keeps a database so that it knows which packages it pulled in
>> as dependencies so it can remove them when you remove a package (so long
>> as no other package
You can use both, but you will confuse aptitude in the process.
Aptitude keeps a database so that it knows which packages it pulled in
as dependencies so it can remove them when you remove a package (so long
as no other package is using them). If you pull things in with any
other package manager,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> Sometime before, I read on this list that it is unwise to mix apt-get and
> aptitude. By mix, I mean using apt-get one time and aptitude another time.
> The reason given was that both of them use different databases. Is t
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sometime before, I read on this list that it is unwise to mix apt-get
> and aptitude. By mix, I mean using apt-get one time and aptitude
> another time. The reason given was that both of them use different
> databases. Is this true for synaptic an
Sometime before, I read on this list that it is unwise to mix apt-get and
aptitude. By mix, I mean using apt-get one time and aptitude another time.
The reason given was that both of them use different databases. Is this
true for synaptic and aptitude as well? Can I use synaptic sometimes and
aptit
13 matches
Mail list logo
