answer my own question for the search engines.
Yes it works fine. apache-sslctl blacklists mod_ssl and doesn't allow
it to be added to /etc/apache-ssl/modules.conf via the apache-modconf
mechanism (lame). Copy modules.conf to modules.conf.custom. change the
Include in your httpd.conf t
I'm using the apache 1.3 packages. How can I use apache-modconf to
disable apache_ssl and enable mod_ssl in the apache-ssl package? Will
it work? I noticed that when installing the libapache-mod-ssl package
that it automatically updated my /etc/apache/modules.conf
and /etc/apache
309:usbcore: registered new driver wacom
310:drivers/usb/input/wacom.c: v1.30:USB Wacom Graphire and Wacom
Intuos tablet driver
and
'lsmod' gives me
wacom13024 0
So it's there, but it doesn't work. The cursor winds up stuck on
the edge of the screen.
However, if
On Tuesday 14 September 2004 06:35, Eric Dickner wrote:
> --
> Incidentally, if you didn't build your kernel the
> Debian way, did you
> specifically make the modules? If you didn't, you
> won't have modules
> to
> load, even if you specified them in the config.
>
> Justin Guer
--
Incidentally, if you didn't build your kernel the
Debian way, did you
specifically make the modules? If you didn't, you
won't have modules
to
load, even if you specified them in the config.
Justin Guerin
No, I didn't. I just followed th
t; few modules installed that make the cdrom work
> properly and the floppy work. There are many modules
> available from the "modconf" program that are not
> loaded.
>
> In the new kernel, none of that is there; no modules
> are loaded and the only one that "modconf&q
installed that make the cdrom work
properly and the floppy work. There are many modules
available from the "modconf" program that are not
loaded.
In the new kernel, none of that is there; no modules
are loaded and the only one that "modconf" can see is
a "dummy" one in t
dt wrote:
Hello,I've just compiled a custom kernel (installed new HD) and i have a
mystery with modprobe which tells me:
modprobe *
modprobe: Can't locate module vmlinuz.old
I've never heard of using a wildcard with modprobe.
modprobe -l *
[no results]
in /lib/modules/[nameofkernel] i have n
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 06:41:00PM -0500, Kent West wrote:
> I've never heard of using a wildcard with modprobe.
> dt wrote:
> >modprobe -l *
> >[no results]
Heck, I'm stupid and I can get this one.
Try modprobe -l '*'.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
Hello,I've just compiled a custom kernel (installed new HD) and i have a
mystery with modprobe which tells me:
modprobe *
modprobe: Can't locate module vmlinuz.old
modprobe -l *
[no results]
in /lib/modules/[nameofkernel] i have nice looking modules...
hmm, have i just been staring at the machi
I've just installed the 2.6.3 kernel image from testing, and notice a
peculiar problem in modconf. When I hit enter on the kernel/drivers/net
line, instead of seeing a list of network drivers, I am dumped back in
the main module list...I'm pretty sure that in 2.4 there was a list o
Greg Madden wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 04 March 2004 07:53 am, Kent West wrote:
What is the canonical way to set up hardware now-a-days? Am I still
supposed to add modules manually, or is there some automagic way of
doing it now? Perhaps this is a feature o
; 2.4.22 kernel.
>
> I thought "discover" was the new-and-coming thing that would
> automagically find that the box has a USB subsystem and a USB mouse,
> but yet "lsmod" and "dmesg" don't show any USB modules/activity until
> I manually (either using &q
subsystem and a USB mouse, but
yet "lsmod" and "dmesg" don't show any USB modules/activity until I
manually (either using "modconf" or "modprobe") add USB-related modules.
Am I misunderstanding what "discover" does?
What is the canonical way
- Original Message -
From: "Peter A. Cole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 10:02 PM
Subject: Debian Sarge Modconf and update-modules Clarification Needed
> Hi all,
>
> Hopefully just a quick one...
>
>
Hi all,
Hopefully just a quick one...
If I run modconf, then remove all the modules I don't need (like every
single IDE driver known to the kernel), then I run update-modules, is this
supposed to reload all the modules I just removed at the next reboot?
If my guess at the working of th
Mariano Kamp wrote:
Hi,
I just installed 2.6 and to my surprise it came up nicely on first try. When
trying to install modules though, modconf didn't show any? Is there another
tool to be used.
I've also seen this bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=192232
On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 07:53:36PM +0100, Mariano Kamp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just installed 2.6 and to my surprise it came up nicely on first try. When
> trying to install modules though, modconf didn't show any? Is there another
> tool to be used.
>
I don't k
Hi,
I just installed 2.6 and to my surprise it came up nicely on first try. When
trying to install modules though, modconf didn't show any? Is there another
tool to be used.
I've also seen this bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=192232
Would that mean tha
#include
* Naitik Shah [Wed, Oct 08 2003, 02:28:59PM]:
> You can apt-get nvidia-source , which will give you a tar.gz in /usr/src
> which when untarred will give you a /usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel.
> After that, its simple, just jump into your /usr/src/linux-2.4.x
> directory, and run:
>
> mak
Hello
Frederico Rodrigues Abraham (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I currently have 2 kernels installed on my machine. 2.2.20-idepci
> (default on debian cd) and a compiled 2.4.22 from www.kernel.org
> I've tried to install the NVIDIA driver from www.nvidia.com from
> http://www.nvidia.co
On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 13:10:54 -0300
Frederico Rodrigues Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
> I currently have 2 kernels installed on my machine. 2.2.20-idepci
>
> (default on debian cd) and a compiled 2.4.22 from www.kernel.org
> I've tried to install the NVIDIA driver fr
Hi.
I currently have 2 kernels installed on my machine. 2.2.20-idepci
(default on debian cd) and a compiled 2.4.22 from www.kernel.org
I've tried to install the NVIDIA driver from www.nvidia.com from
http://www.nvidia.com/object/linux_display_ia32_1.0-4496.html and
installed it for m
> > http://kolrabi.de/files/modconf-linux2.6.0-patch.gz
Great!!! Thanx Nick :)
--
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s+: a-- C++ UL P+ L+++ E W+++ N++ o K- w---
O M- V- PS+ PE- Y- PGP--- t--- 5 X+ R* tv-- b- DI D++
G++ e++ h! r-- y-
--END GEEK CODE
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 05:55:46PM +0200, Bjoern Paetzel wrote:
> Nick Hastings wrote:
>
> >>I have been unable to get modconf to work under 2.6.0-test2 or -test4.
> >>The program runs, but shows only the "exit" option, with no modules
> >>displayed fo
On Wed, 2003-10-01 at 17:55, Bjoern Paetzel wrote:
> > Modconf doesn't work with kernels > 2.5. Just use modprobe.
>
> There is a patch for modconf to work with Linux 2.6.0 available at:
>
> http://kolrabi.de/files/modconf-linux2.6.0-patch.gz
>
> HTH :)
>
U
Nick Hastings wrote:
>>I have been unable to get modconf to work under 2.6.0-test2 or -test4.
>>The program runs, but shows only the "exit" option, with no modules
>>displayed for selecting. Has anyone else seen this sort of problem,and
>>if, any suggestions?
* Neal Lippman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030922 07:55]:
> I have been unable to get modconf to work under 2.6.0-test2 or -test4.
> The program runs, but shows only the "exit" option, with no modules
> displayed for selecting. Has anyone else seen this sort of problem,and
> i
I have been unable to get modconf to work under 2.6.0-test2 or -test4.
The program runs, but shows only the "exit" option, with no modules
displayed for selecting. Has anyone else seen this sort of problem,and
if, any suggestions?
nl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
Thanks again to those who have offered great advice on getting
2.6.0-test2 up and running. I have a bootable system, got sound working
with relatively little trouble,so I'm continuing to work down myproblem
list.
Would appreciate thoughts on two more problems:
1) modconf doesn't find a
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 06:49, Nick Hastings wrote:
> * CaT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030909 09:41]:
> > On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 07:07:26PM +0530, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Is there a modconf for the 2.6 kenel. The earlier one doesn'
* CaT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030909 09:41]:
> On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 07:07:26PM +0530, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there a modconf for the 2.6 kenel. The earlier one doesn't work for the
> > newer kernel.
>
> Yup. sid has it.
>
&
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 07:07:26PM +0530, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a modconf for the 2.6 kenel. The earlier one doesn't work for the
> newer kernel.
Yup. sid has it.
apt-get -b source module-init-tools
--
"How can I not love the Americans? They help
Hi,
Is there a modconf for the 2.6 kenel. The earlier one doesn't work for the
newer kernel.
Regards,
Siddhesh Poyarekar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi guys,
after deciding to muck around with compiling and
installing a new kernel (from 2.4.18-bf2.4 to 2.4.21) from
source, I've managed to lose all the modules that
I had before ie using modconf shows only one entry
and that's a dummy network driver.
Going back to the old kernel im
Yildiz, Murat wrote:
Oh sorry ,
of course I did "make modules_install"But I remember somethinlike
"nothing found" and "leaving directory".
As I said the directory 2.4.19 was created under /lib/modules but still I
cannot see any drivers info within modconf.
Oh sorry ,
of course I did "make modules_install"But I remember somethinlike
"nothing found" and "leaving directory".
As I said the directory 2.4.19 was created under /lib/modules but still I
cannot see any drivers info within modconf.
Murat
-Ursprünglic
Yildiz, Murat wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 01:33:16PM +0100, Yildiz, Murat wrote:
I have woody 3.0 with kernel 2.4.19 self-compiled and now want to load a
kernel module but when I run modconf no package is being shown.
I have checked /lib/modules/2.4.19 , it exist.Where does modconf read
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 19. Februar 2003 03:46
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: modconf doesn't show drivers
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 01:33:16PM +0100, Yildiz, Murat wrote:
> I have woody 3.0 with kernel 2.4.19 self-compiled and now want to load a
> kernel module but w
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 01:33:16PM +0100, Yildiz, Murat wrote:
> I have woody 3.0 with kernel 2.4.19 self-compiled and now want to load a
> kernel module but when I run modconf no package is being shown.
> I have checked /lib/modules/2.4.19 , it exist.Where does modconf read
> avail
Hello,
I have woody 3.0 with kernel 2.4.19 self-compiled and now want to load a
kernel module but when I run modconf no package is being shown.
I have checked /lib/modules/2.4.19 , it exist.Where does modconf read
available modules information?
Murat
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Hi,
When i run modconf, it just runs and executes without printing
any results at all (ver 0.2.44 from testing). IIRC, it's an
ncurses gui.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry about the vague question/statement:
Modconf appears to have changed at some point. All my boxes run woody,
but some run 2.2 and some run 2.4 kernels. The ones with 2.4 have a
different looking modconf screen - IMHO, harder to use. The tree is
wider (more per screen), and shows full
Hi,
I recently had a conflict between my webcam (Logitech 3000 Pro), and my
SB 128 sound card. I wonder if i should file a bug report against modconf
(i am using Debian Woody) because of it.
The trouble was that i had no sound at all, even if i asked the right modules
to load.
After some
Hello!
Sorry about replying to my own posts, but changing a PCI slot helped...
Anyway I suppose it shouldn't have happened in the first place. Anyone
has a clue why it acutally did? Or if there's a way to change/fix it
without PCI slot swapping?
Regards,
--
Marcin Fusinski qrchaque(at)master(
: Assigned IRQ 4 for device 00:0b.0
emu10k1: IO space in use
I suspect it might be related to recent modconf upgrade but I'm not
positive (sound stopped working after reboot and it was the first one
for quite some time...).
Loading emu10k1 module with modprobe emu10k1 gives error message:
/lib
On 10 Mar 2002, Bill Moseley wrote:
> Is there a good summary document that explains modconf and /etc/modules.conf
> in Debian?
>
> I'm trying to get my sound working, but figured it would be a good reason to
> get a better understanding of modules. I'm going to soun
At 02:25 PM 3/10/2002 +0100, Matijs van Zuijlen wrote:
>> This seems counter intuitive to me. Can someone explain why it works that
>> way?
>To me this makes perfect sense. The K's tell you what you don't want in
>a runlevel, the S's tell you what you do want. In your interpretation,
>if level
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 05:38:42PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> Is there a good summary document that explains modconf and /etc/modules.conf
> in Debian?
>
> [snip about modules]
Sorry, I'm working in the blind there myself ... but:
> My wife just gave me a blank stare w
Is there a good summary document that explains modconf and /etc/modules.conf
in Debian?
I'm trying to get my sound working, but figured it would be a good reason to
get a better understanding of modules. I'm going to sound clueless here, so
you might as well assume that I am. ;)
16:51:36 +0100 (MET)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Roberto Pereyra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: modconf ; etc/modules and loading modules at boot up (fwd)
>
> Hi
>
> Try with -f option
>
>
> insmod -f module
>
> insmod -f 8139too
>
>
> Thi
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: modconf ; etc/modules and loading modules at boot up
Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 09:28:37 -0300 (ARST)
Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> #include
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon Feb 11, 2002 um 02:28:34PM:
>
&
> #include
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon Feb 11, 2002 um 02:28:34PM:
>
> > # /etc/modules : Kernel modules to load at boot time.
> > #
> > # This file should contain the name of kernel modules that are
> > # to be loaded at boot time, one per line.
> > 8139too.o
> >
> > Ok.
>
> Not okay. T
> #include
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon Feb 11, 2002 um 02:28:34PM:
>
> > # /etc/modules : Kernel modules to load at boot time.
> > #
> > # This file should contain the name of kernel modules that are
> > # to be loaded at boot time, one per line.
> > 8139too.o
> >
> > Ok.
>
> Not okay. T
#include
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon Feb 11, 2002 um 02:28:34PM:
> # /etc/modules : Kernel modules to load at boot time.
> #
> # This file should contain the name of kernel modules that are
> # to be loaded at boot time, one per line.
> 8139too.o
>
> Ok.
Not okay. Try without .o.
Gruss/Re
Hi.
It´s me again.
I ve got another problem with my modconf and my /etc/modules.
I ve compiled the 2.4.17 Kernel.
One of my modules which have to be insmod at boot up is the 8139too.o modul.
If put it manually in the /etc/modules so it looks like this:
# /etc/modules : Kernel modules to load at
my custom kernel after a make menuconfig, and am now at the
| > | part where I'm suppose to run /usr/sbin/modconf to setup what modules I
| > | want to have loaded on boot. But when I tried to run it as root without
| > | any arguments (to go into GUI mode), all it does is dump me ba
ere I'm suppose to run /usr/sbin/modconf to setup what modules I
> | want to have loaded on boot. But when I tried to run it as root without
> | any arguments (to go into GUI mode), all it does is dump me back to the
> | shell prompt, and turn the background blue and remove my cursor. Scre
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 01:39:56PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| I'm following the online FAQ on building my own kernel, so far I've dpkg
| --install'd my custom kernel after a make menuconfig, and am now at the
| part where I'm suppose to run /usr/sbin/modconf to setup w
I'm following the online FAQ on building my own kernel, so far I've dpkg
--install'd my custom kernel after a make menuconfig, and am now at the
part where I'm suppose to run /usr/sbin/modconf to setup what modules I
want to have loaded on boot. But when I tried to run it
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 08:30:54AM -0800, John wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 09:32:49AM -0800, John wrote:
> > When I run modconf:
> >
> > zork:/# modconf
> > zork:/#
> >
> > This is on sid with:
> > Linux zork 2.4.9 #1 Sat Sep 8 10:29:35 PDT 2001
On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 09:32:49AM -0800, John wrote:
> When I run modconf:
>
> zork:/# modconf
> zork:/#
>
> This is on sid with:
> Linux zork 2.4.9 #1 Sat Sep 8 10:29:35 PDT 2001 i586 unknown
>
> Not sure what more info you need. I do have a strace file at:
>
When I run modconf:
zork:/# modconf
zork:/#
This is on sid with:
Linux zork 2.4.9 #1 Sat Sep 8 10:29:35 PDT 2001 i586 unknown
Not sure what more info you need. I do have a strace file at:
www.bagdanoff.com
John
PS:
Viewing the modconf.txt works with mozilla & konqueror, but not on
nets
t of dmesg with respect to the rest of the
> message varies according to the position of "3c59x" in the file
> /ect/modules... is that ok/normal?
Yep. They get loaded from the top down, but that shouldn't matter.
> Eitherway, with or without the extra line in /etc/module
sg with respect to the rest of the
> message varies according to the position of "3c59x" in the file
> /ect/modules... is that ok/normal?
yes yes it's ok ... well done
>
> Eitherway, with or without the extra line in /etc/modules neither lsmod nor
> modconf tell me
.(?)
>
> Also, the position of the eth0 part of dmesg with respect to the rest of the
>
> message varies according to the position of "3c59x" in the file
> /ect/modules... is that ok/normal?
>
> Eitherway, with or without the extra line in /etc/modules neither lsm
ect to the rest of the
message varies according to the position of "3c59x" in the file
/ect/modules... is that ok/normal?
Eitherway, with or without the extra line in /etc/modules neither lsmod nor
modconf tell me about eth0. So how do I know all is working?
Surely there is a better
SORRY here is mistake:
> *then copy your new kenel image from /usr/src/arch/i386/boot/bzImage into
> /boot/bzImage
it should be /usr/src/kernel-2.4./arch/i386/
--
I am Martin Kacerovsky, student of the Faculty of Mathematics and Physics
at the Charles University in Prague, i
> Hello again Martin,
>
>
> I have done as you suggested. Once I reboot, I can't find 3c59x neither with
> "lsmod|more" or with "modconf"...
>
>
> the funny thing is that the card/driver shows up at boot time and the is not
> there anymore.
have in /etc/rcS.d file as : @S20)>modutils (e.g @S20modutils)
'@' means it is a symlink (to /etc/init.d/modutils ) if you
haven't...reinstall modutils
Hello again Martin,
I have done as you suggested. Once I reboot, I can't find 3c59x neither with
"lsmod|more&q
>
>
Hi Gianguido
> Hi,
>
> I have recently installed Linux for the 1st time...
> I have also managed to figure out that my ethernet card (3Com fast etherLink
> XL 10/100MB 3c905-TX) needs the following driver: 3c59x.o
>
> Hopefully I got this one right
>
Hi,
I have recently installed Linux for the 1st time...
I have also managed to figure out that my ethernet card (3Com fast etherLink
XL 10/100MB 3c905-TX) needs the following driver: 3c59x.o
Hopefully I got this one right
I tried running modconf and adding that module. When i select it
Hello,
I ran modconf, I gave it a non valid option and
the installation of the module (sb) failed.
How can I delete the previous option with modconf ?
i.e. without editing /etc/modutils/sb and /etc/modules.conf ?
TIA
--
Gerard
Go to:
http://www.debian.org/News/2001/20010415
for what you need with running potato and 2.4
Jamie Strandboge
--
"The goal of Computer Science is to build something that will last at
least until we've finished building it." -- Author unknown
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG/PGP
n other modules won't load in
> an X environment. I've got no plans to recompile the kernel as it'll make the
> (big) kernel already bigger. How do i workaround this? do i need to upgrade
> modconf or modutils? if so, how do i do it without "woodying" my sys
nel as it'll make the (big)
kernel already bigger. How do i workaround this? do i need to upgrade modconf
or modutils? if so, how do i do it without "woodying" my system? I'm only using
a pc with dial-up connection so i can't easily make a dist-upgrade without
eating lots
> Cirrus Logic 1MB Video Card
> Western Digital 8013, ISA (SMC Chipset)
>
> The NIC is jumpered to IRQ-10, IO=0X300
>
> modconf fails no matter what I try and do with this NIC, and yes, I have
> tried a second NIC I know works forsure.
>
How was it setup under redhat?
Did they use isapnp?
Is pnp (os = winxxx) on in the bios?
> Cirrus Logic 1MB Video Card
> Western Digital 8013, ISA (SMC Chipset)
>
> The NIC is jumpered to IRQ-10, IO=0X300
>
> modconf fails no matter what I try and do with this NIC, and yes, I have
> tried a second NIC I know works forsure.
Fails how? What module are you trying to
.
Here's a low-down on the box
P-166MMX
Microstar MS-5156 mainboard
128 MB of RAM
Adaptec 29160 SCSI adapter
Quantum Hard Drive - Atlas
USR ISA Internal Modem
Cirrus Logic 1MB Video Card
Western Digital 8013, ISA (SMC Chipset)
The NIC is jumpered to IRQ-10, IO=0X300
modconf fails no matter
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 09:06:30PM -, john smith wrote:
|Hi,
|
|I have recompiled my kernel with kerneld support and some modules
|(sound,vfat,etc) then rebooted, executed depmod -a but when I run
|modconf..there is no modules to select from? I have checked in syslog and
|there are no
Hi,
I have recompiled my kernel with kerneld support and some modules
(sound,vfat,etc) then rebooted, executed depmod -a but when I run
modconf..there is no modules to select from? I have checked in syslog and
there are no unresolved symbols, system map is correct...
what am I missing?
TIA
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 06:17:00PM -0700, John Galt wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Don Seiler wrote:
> >
> > >hullo.
> > >
> > >I'm having trouble getting my Intel EtherExpress card online. Usin
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 06:17:00PM -0700, John Galt wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Don Seiler wrote:
>
> >hullo.
> >
> >I'm having trouble getting my Intel EtherExpress card online. Using
> >modconf, when I try at add the "eexpress" module, i
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Don Seiler wrote:
>hullo.
>
>I'm having trouble getting my Intel EtherExpress card online. Using
>modconf, when I try at add the "eexpress" module, it first does an
>autoprobe and returns this:
>eexpress
>
>io = 0x300
>irq
hullo.
I'm having trouble getting my Intel EtherExpress card online. Using
modconf, when I try at add the "eexpress" module, it first does an
autoprobe and returns this:
eexpress
io = 0x300
irq = 0 (IRQ value read from EEPROM)
So I assume I need to specify the irq.
Just one tiny correction. After figuring out what modconf actually
does, I've easily managed to manually install all kernel modules I
need with insmod.
I guess that the gui hasn't been updated to understand 2.4.1
directories, but the other utilities work fine.
No big deal really...
er and play around with it for a while.
#
# However, I'm really confused by one last issue. When I run modconf, it
# doesn't think I have any modules available. However, the rest of the
# module utilities seem to work ok. For example:
I imagine it's just that 'modconf' hasn&#
y confused by one last issue. When I run modconf, it
doesn't think I have any modules available. However, the rest of the
module utilities seem to work ok. For example:
# lsmod
Module Size Used by
tulip 34064 1
# modprobe -l
/lib/modules/2.4.1/kernel/dri
use insmod
with each module, guessing the dependencies from the error msgs.
Then I upgrade modconf to reconfigure the modules; it fails to
detect my modules giving lots of error and then a empty list of
available modules.
Any hint on how to correct this?
Thanks,
Mar
> > Hello,I am very new to Debian,I was wondering,when I did the
install did I have
> > to specify the modules for my network card and soundblaster live?
Also,how do I
> You can specify them during the install. The installer calls
'modconf'
> which lets you pick t
Scott Patterson wrote:
>
> I recently compiled and installed a 2.4.x kernel using the debian
> kernel-installer package. Everything seems fine except that when I run
> modconf,
> no modules appear. I was hoping to browse my modules this way, but no luck. I
> should mention
I recently compiled and installed a 2.4.x kernel using the debian
kernel-installer package. Everything seems fine except that when I run modconf,
no modules appear. I was hoping to browse my modules this way, but no luck. I
should mention that my modules do work fine, just modconf seems broken
How about modconf?
I have the following modconf installed:
modconf0.2.27
My modutils is not as recent as yours:
modutils 2.3.14-3
I am running the 2.4.0-test8 kernel.
--
Andrew
> Pollywog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On 17-Sep-2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> It seems to me that modconf isn't compatible with the
> >> 2.4.0-testX modules. Is there a way to fix that?
> >
> >How would I know I have a problem in this regar
Pollywog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 17-Sep-2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> It seems to me that modconf isn't compatible with the
>> 2.4.0-testX modules. Is there a way to fix that?
>
>How would I know I have a problem in this regard. I did have to upgrad
On 17-Sep-2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi there ...
>
> It seems to me that modconf isn't compatible with the
> 2.4.0-testX modules. Is there a way to fix that?
How would I know I have a problem in this regard. I did have to upgrade
modutils to the Woody version. Other
Hi there ...
It seems to me that modconf isn't compatible with the
2.4.0-testX modules. Is there a way to fix that?
--
with friendly regards
jens luedicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Support the Theory of Evolution;
400 Billion Amphibians can't be wrong!
Q: What i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
I have installed the latest 2.4 test kernel on a couple of my potato
systems, which seems to run just fine. After upgrading modutils via an
apt-get source from woody I can load the modules using modprobe without
any trouble.
However, modconf isn't findin
Hello All,
I wanted to use modconf to add printer support to my potato box,
but when I run it all that is in there is net options. How do
I add more module options ? Is this down though the kernel ?
And if so what do I need add to the kernel for printer support ?
Thanks Guys
--
It feels so
The last time I installed Potato, I was able to
install Soundblaster support using modconf. I have two
systems with SB16 and Sb AWE 32 cards in them. Which
drivers do I use to get these going and how can I
install the drivers without having to recompile the
Kernel?
Thanks in advance.
-Dinesh
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
