Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
He downloaded kernel version 2.2.9.
It was my first time installing a kernel
and we read from various sources before he
became impatient. We then did the following:
tar xzf /usr/src/kernel...tar.gz
.
.
.
make menuconfig
make-kpkg
if everything necessary was compiled in,
could you just delete everything from /etc/modules?
-Original Message-
From: David Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 May 2000 16:35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: module loading problems
Quoting Dominic Blythe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
if everything necessary was compiled in,
could you just delete everything from /etc/modules?
Yes, though the comments there might indicate some advantage
in putting noauto. But I much prefer not compiling everything
in. (In fact, you can't if you
I was asked by a friend to help him install
debian onto one of his computers.He downloaded
the programs allowing him to install the base
system, which we did.
We used a cdrom I Got from the book Debian
GNU/linux 2.1 unleased, and installed the
packages that would allow us to compile a
new
Thus spake [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, May 21, 2000 at 02:00:11AM CDT
.
.
make menuconfig
make-kpkg clean
make-kpkg --revision=custom.1.0 kernel_image
dpkg -i ../kernel-image..deb
With the new kernel installed we get the following
messages:
Simple is best. I've never had any problems
I tried depmod -a and got
/lib/modules/2.2.9/fs/vfat.o:unresolved symbols
/lib/modules/2.2.9/fs/msdos.o
/lib/modules/2.2.9/fs/fat.o
/lib/modules/2.2.9/net/eepro100.o
/lib/modules/2.2.9/net/3c59x.o
/lib/modules/2.2.9/net/dummy
/lib/modules/2.2.9/net/bsd_comp.o
/lib/modules/2.2.9/net/ibmtr.o
etc
6 matches
Mail list logo
