-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 03:49:35PM -0400, stan wrote:
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these:
>
> Could some kind soul tell me how to fix this?
Umm, apt just
On Fri, 30 May 2003 17:54:21 -0400
Travis Crump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Chris Metzler wrote:
>> .. . .which are not depended on by anything in testing. I don't know
>> why libparted1.4 and libparted1.6 are both in testing right now,
>> because libparted1.4 looks like it isn't used by anything
Chris Metzler wrote:
.. . .which are not depended on by anything in testing. I don't know
why libparted1.4 and libparted1.6 are both in testing right now,
because libparted1.4 looks like it isn't used by anything in testing,
and actually conflicts with the version of parted that's currently
in tes
On Fri, 30 May 2003 15:49:35 -0400
stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> dpkg: regarding .../libparted1.6-0_1.6.5-1_i386.deb containing
> libparted1.6-0:
> libparted1.6-0 conflicts with libparted
> libparted1.4 provides libparted and is installed.
> dpkg: error processing
> /var/cache/apt/archives/li
I was trying to get around the current problems with the "tsting" version
by apt-get install by hand, since I can't run apt-get dist-upgrade or
dselect.
On 4 of the 6 machines I've go I didn't screw anything up doing this.
However on my wifes amchine (naturaaly :-(). I did:
dpkg: regarding .../li
5 matches
Mail list logo
