On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Roberto Scattini a écrit :
> >
> > i just cant make it work.
> > all my outgoing packets keep going through the default gateway (even if
> > they have the correct IP address, from the other nic...).
> >
> > i think i need an explanation...
Roberto Scattini a écrit :
>
> i just cant make it work.
> all my outgoing packets keep going through the default gateway (even if
> they have the correct IP address, from the other nic...).
>
> i think i need an explanation... because i cant undestand how does the
> routing tables know that a p
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Tom Furie wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 07:54:25PM -0300, Roberto Scattini wrote:
>
> > ~# route -n
> > Kernel IP routing table
> > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
> > Iface
> > XX.220.XX.176 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 07:54:25PM -0300, Roberto Scattini wrote:
> ~# route -n
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
> Iface
> XX.220.XX.176 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH0 00 eth3
> YY.20.YY.0 0.0.0.0
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Tom Furie wrote:
>
>
> Possibly a silly question, but something you might have overloooked -
> what does your nat table look like? Are you forwarding the traffic from
> eth4 to your web server?
>
> Cheers,
> Tom
>
tom, yes, i have the same rules that i have for m
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 05:47:02PM -0300, Roberto Scattini wrote:
> i also tried a different approach, found somewhere with google, that is
> more in line with my understanding of the problem.
> basically, it marks the packets so they can be routed back to the same nic
> they came in:
>
> ip rout
hi again,
Dňa Wed, 23 Jan 2013 00:07:51 -0300 "Carlos Miranda Molina
> (Mstaaravin)" napísal:
>
> > :~# ip route add default scope global nexthop via XX.220.XX.177 dev
> > eth3 weight 1 nexthop via YY.20.YY.Y dev eth4 weight 1
> > :~# ip route add '127.0.0.0/8' dev lo table T1
> > :~# ip route ad
Hi,
in English, please!
Dňa Wed, 23 Jan 2013 00:07:51 -0300 "Carlos Miranda Molina
(Mstaaravin)" napísal:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Roberto Scattini <
> roberto.scatt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > 1. the second interface, in on same subnet as the first
> > interface? no, they are co
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Roberto Scattini <
roberto.scatt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1. the second interface, in on same subnet as the first interface?
> no, they are completely different
>
>
>> 2. the gateway for second interface is different as the first
>> interface?
>>
> yeah, bot
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 9:46 PM, Carlos Miranda Molina (Mstaaravin) <
mstaara...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
> 1. the second interface, in on same subnet as the first interface?
>
no, they are completely different
> 2. the gateway for second interface is different as the first
> interface?
>
10 matches
Mail list logo