Re: mutt + seperate folder for lists

On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 10:40:26PM -0800, Charlie Yao wrote: > There doesnt seem to be any harm in declaring both 'lists' and > 'subscribe' in your muttrc. I reccomend you see Tom Gilbert's .muttrc > (lots of which I use) at http://linuxbrit.co.uk for a real nice setup. cool resource. thanks! --

Re: mutt + seperate folder for lists

>>"Vinod" == Vinod Kurup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Vinod> Like others have mentioned, procmail is the way to go. Here's Vinod> a nice intro to that tool. >> http://www.ii.com/internet/robots/procmail/qs/> And when you are ready to migrate from procmail to something way more powerf

Re: mutt + seperate folder for lists

On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 10:21:36AM +0100, Preben Randhol wrote: > will trillich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 03/02/2001 (10:12) : > > if he's using mutt, no munging of the reply-to field is > > necessary: > > > > to reply to the sender, use mutt's "r" key. that'll reply > > off-list to the sender,

Re: mutt + seperate folder for lists

will trillich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 03/02/2001 (10:12) : > if he's using mutt, no munging of the reply-to field is > necessary: > > to reply to the sender, use mutt's "r" key. that'll reply > off-list to the sender, and nobody else will be the wiser. > > to reply PUBLICLY to a list, use mu

Re: mutt + seperate folder for lists

There doesnt seem to be any harm in declaring both 'lists' and 'subscribe' in your muttrc. I reccomend you see Tom Gilbert's .muttrc (lots of which I use) at http://linuxbrit.co.uk for a real nice setup. * will trillich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 01:28:00PM -0600, Nathan

Re: mutt + seperate folder for lists

On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 01:28:00PM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote: > On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 01:12:55PM -0600, will trillich wrote: > > to reply PUBLICLY to a list, use mutt's "L" key. it looks for > > 'x-mailing-list' headers and uses that as the reply-to, but only > > *IF* you've set up your ~/.mut

Re: mutt + seperate folder for lists

On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 01:12:55PM -0600, will trillich wrote: > to reply PUBLICLY to a list, use mutt's "L" key. it looks for > 'x-mailing-list' headers and uses that as the reply-to, but only > *IF* you've set up your ~/.muttrc to recognize the list name: > > # ~/.muttrc > lists debi

Re: mutt + seperate folder for lists

On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 09:30:01AM +0100, Thomas Guettler wrote: > On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 07:36:50PM -0800, Charlie Yao wrote: > > Hi, i was wondering how to make all debian-user msgs appear > > in a seperate folder when i open mutt. Thanks in advance. > > You can use procmail. The relevant secti

Re: mutt + seperate folder for lists

On 2 Feb 2001, Nathan E Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The following works well for spam (thanks craig sanders)(season to > taste): > > ## Spam filters > :0 > * ^TO([EMAIL PROTECTED])|(free4u2.com) > Mail/SPAM/ I don't use procmail[1], so I don't know, but if it does rule processing in or

Re: mutt + seperate folder for lists

Quoting Marc A. Donges ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > But tell me, what happens if I send you mail with > "X-Mailing-List: ../@lists.debian.org" > in its headers? I honestly don't know what will happen... Exactly what you would expect. There's no rocket science here. If you add that header, and put in a

Re: mutt + seperate folder for lists

On Friday, February 02, 2001 at 10:07:41 (-0600), Nathan E Norman wrote: > Of course, there's more than one way to do it. If you're subscribed > to several debian lists, the following recipe is a winner: > > # Debian lists ... > :0 > * ^X-Mailing-List: .*[<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] > * ^X-Mailing-List

Re: mutt + seperate folder for lists

On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 07:36:50PM -0800, Charlie Yao wrote: > Hi, i was wondering how to make all debian-user msgs appear in a seperate > folder > when i open mutt. Thanks in advance. > Like others have mentioned, procmail is the way to go. Here's a nice intro to that tool.

Re: mutt + seperate folder for lists

On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 01:07:47PM +0100, Preben Randhol wrote: >:0 >* ^X-Loop: debian-user@lists.debian.org >Debian-User > > You can then add rules if you want to seperate other lists as well. Of course, there's more than one way to do it. If you're subscribed to several debian list

Re: mutt + seperate folder for lists

Thomas Guettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02/02/2001 (12:28) : > On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 07:36:50PM -0800, Charlie Yao wrote: > > Hi, i was wondering how to make all debian-user msgs appear in a seperate > > folder > > when i open mutt. Thanks in advance. > > You can use procmail. The relevant

Re: mutt + seperate folder for lists

On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 07:36:50PM -0800, Charlie Yao wrote: > Hi, i was wondering how to make all debian-user msgs appear in a seperate > folder > when i open mutt. Thanks in advance. You can use procmail. The relevant section in .procmail looks like this: :0: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] |formail -i "R

mutt + seperate folder for lists

Hi, i was wondering how to make all debian-user msgs appear in a seperate folder when i open mutt. Thanks in advance. Charlie Yao