Re: DNS on minimal new installation

On Fri 25 Oct 2024 at 11:45:18 (-0400), eben@¹ wrote: > On 10/25/24 07:35, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 09:33:24 +0100, Joe wrote: > > > I was assuming someone setting up a server of some kind would not be > > > running a DHCP client, which of course can be done with a reservati

Re: DNS on minimal new installation

On 10/25/24 07:35, Greg Wooledge wrote: On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 09:33:24 +0100, Joe wrote: I was assuming someone setting up a server of some kind would not be running a DHCP client, which of course can be done with a reservation, but it's another potential point of failure that a fixed address

Re: DNS on minimal new installation

On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 09:33:24 +0100, Joe wrote: > I was assuming someone setting up a server of some kind would not be > running a DHCP client, which of course can be done with a reservation, > but it's another potential point of failure that a fixed address > configuration doesn't have. I've s

Re: DNS on minimal new installation

On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 09:36:20AM +0100, Joe wrote: > On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 08:03:43 +0100 > Chris Green wrote: > > > > Yes, OP here again, that's why I said in my original post "(I know > > they're not quite the same thing, but the result works OK)" > > I think (on Ubuntu it did anyway) that sys

Re: DNS on minimal new installation

On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 16:31:18 -0400 Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 21:24:17 +0100, Joe wrote: > > In an installation not using a DHCP client, you would be expected to > > make your own DNS and gateway arrangements along with the IP > > address. > > OK. I'm guessing that's not r

Re: DNS on minimal new installation

to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > [-- text/plain, size 1.2K, charset utf-8, 34 lines, encoding quoted-printable > --] > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 04:31:18PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 21:24:17 +0100, Joe wrote: > > > In an installation not using a DHCP client, you would be ex

Re: DNS on minimal new installation

Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 21:24:17 +0100, Joe wrote: > > In an installation not using a DHCP client, you would be expected to > > make your own DNS and gateway arrangements along with the IP address. > > OK. I'm guessing that's not relevant here, though. > > > If > > you're

Re: DNS on minimal new installation

On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 20:16:30 +0100 Chris Green wrote: > I have just installed Debian Bookworm on my backup server which is a > Fujitsu Esprimo Q556 with an 8TB external USB drive for backup. I was > previously running xubuntu there. > > It has all gone very straightforwrdly, the actual installa

Re: DNS on minimal new installation

On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 04:31:18PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 21:24:17 +0100, Joe wrote: > > In an installation not using a DHCP client, you would be expected to > > make your own DNS and gateway arrangements along with the IP address. > > OK. I'm guessing that's not re

DNS on minimal new installation

I have just installed Debian Bookworm on my backup server which is a Fujitsu Esprimo Q556 with an 8TB external USB drive for backup. I was previously running xubuntu there. It has all gone very straightforwrdly, the actual installation only took half an hour or so and configuring things not much

Re: DNS on minimal new installation

Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 20:16:30 +0100, Chris Green wrote: > > It works fine though. The /etc/resolv.conf is:- > > > > domain zbmc.eu > > search zbmc.eu > > nameserver 192.168.1.1 > > > > which simply means all DNS gets passed to my LAN's DNS server. Is that >

Re: DNS on minimal new installation

On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 21:24:17 +0100, Joe wrote: > In an installation not using a DHCP client, you would be expected to > make your own DNS and gateway arrangements along with the IP address. OK. I'm guessing that's not relevant here, though. > If > you're not running Network Manager nor a res

Re: DNS on minimal new installation

On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 20:16:30 +0100, Chris Green wrote: > It works fine though. The /etc/resolv.conf is:- > > domain zbmc.eu > search zbmc.eu > nameserver 192.168.1.1 > > which simply means all DNS gets passed to my LAN's DNS server. Is that > what one gets on a minimal installati

Re: Strange New Installation Behavior

On 4/22/24 06:00, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: I am running Bookworm and cleaned up a couple of files too many resulting in a messed up Xfce Desktop. I decided that this would be a good time to reinstall the Bullseye. I made a backup of my /home/comp directory using Deja-dup. I downloaded and ran

Re: Strange New Installation Behavior

On 04/22/2024 11:03 AM, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote: Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d...@ewoof.net> wrote: On 22 Apr 2024 09:00 -0400, from s.mol...@sbcglobal.net (Stephen P. Molnar): I downloaded and ran the 512 check sum on a copy of Debian-12.5.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso and ran the Graphical Inst

Re: Strange New Installation Behavior

On 22 Apr 2024 16:03 +0100, from debian-u...@howorth.org.uk: > He said he wanted to revert to Bullseye rather than Bookworm, so it's > to be expected that there will be older kernels, if that's really what > he meant and what he did. But as you say, without a clear statement of > the intent and the

Re: Strange New Installation Behavior

Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d...@ewoof.net> wrote: > On 22 Apr 2024 09:00 -0400, from s.mol...@sbcglobal.net (Stephen P. > Molnar): > > I downloaded and ran the 512 check sum on a copy of > > Debian-12.5.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso and ran the Graphical Install mode on > > the 1.0 TD SSD on my Computer. The in

Re: Strange New Installation Behavior

On 22 Apr 2024 09:00 -0400, from s.mol...@sbcglobal.net (Stephen P. Molnar): > I downloaded and ran the 512 check sum on a copy of > Debian-12.5.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso and ran the Graphical Install mode on the 1.0 > TD SSD on my Computer. The installation went smoothly without any warning or > error mes

Strange New Installation Behavior

I am running Bookworm and cleaned up a couple of files too many resulting in a messed up Xfce Desktop. I decided that this would be a good time to reinstall the Bullseye. I made a backup of my /home/comp directory using Deja-dup. I downloaded and ran the 512 check sum on a copy of Debian-12.5

Reusing ssh keys on a new installation, was Re: OpenSSH: cause of random kex_exchange_identification errors?

On Wed 02 Feb 2022 at 14:28:40 (-0500), Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 02:21:08PM -0500, gene heskett wrote: > > When I change something, like rebooting the rpi4 running my big Sheldon > > lathe, from debian buster to debian bullseye, the keyfile changes, and I > > get an explicit

new installation unable to use

Hi Guys! I need your help! I have just installed Debian 10.3 on my computer but is unusable. In the beginning, everything is OK but when I hover over the mouse on my name in the login screen it stopped for a second. When I logged in, everything is OK again, until opening any application. After tha

Re: new installation preserving /home partition

On Sat, September 8, 2012 5:28 am, Lisi wrote: > On Saturday 08 September 2012 12:05:32 Weaver wrote: >> That's with reinstalling with the stable disc of the time, then >> upgrading >> all the way back up to unstable. >> No back up. >> Nothing! > > Ouch!! You obviously enjoy playing Russian roule

Re: new installation preserving /home partition

Am Samstag, 8. September 2012 schrieb Mauricio Calvao: > Hi > > I currrently have a desktop running old Debian 5 (lenny). I myself > installed some programs outside apt management, both > because there were no deb packages for them and because I need some > more recent versions. Thus, I have final

Re: new installation preserving /home partition

On Fri, 07 Sep 2012 21:33:15 -0300, Mauricio Calvao wrote: > I currrently have a desktop running old Debian 5 (lenny). I myself > installed some programs outside apt management, both because there were > no deb packages for them and because I need some more recent versions. > Thus, I have finally

Re: new installation preserving /home partition

On Saturday 08 September 2012 12:05:32 Weaver wrote: > That's with reinstalling with the stable disc of the time, then upgrading > all the way back up to unstable. > No back up. > Nothing! Ouch!! You obviously enjoy playing Russian roulette! Lisi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ..

Re: new installation preserving /home partition

there along with the choice to preserve the data on it. >> >> I usually install a /, swap and /home partition. >> If I nuke an install, replacing the root partition only and merely >> specifying the other two works. > > It's saver to use a "fake" home durin

Re: new installation preserving /home partition

/home partition. > If I nuke an install, replacing the root partition only and merely > specifying the other two works. It's saver to use a "fake" home during installing and then switch over to the real one once the new installation works. I rather have the installer not tou

Re: new installation preserving /home partition

Mauricio Calvao writes: > Hi > > I currrently have a desktop running old Debian 5 (lenny). I myself > installed some programs outside apt management, both > because there were no deb packages for them and because I need some > more recent versions. It might still be possible to just upgrade, esp

Re: new installation preserving /home partition

On Fri, September 7, 2012 5:33 pm, Mauricio Calvao wrote: > Hi > > I currrently have a desktop running old Debian 5 (lenny). I myself > installed some programs outside apt management, both > because there were no deb packages for them and because I need some > more recent versions. Thus, I have fin

Re: new installation preserving /home partition

On Fri, 07 Sep 2012 21:33:15 -0300, Mauricio Calvao wrote: > I would like however to preserve my /home partition. Is that > **advisable** or should I delete this partition as well? Depending on how much version dependant stuff you put there. I personally never put any version dependant tools in

new installation preserving /home partition

Hi I currrently have a desktop running old Debian 5 (lenny). I myself installed some programs outside apt management, both because there were no deb packages for them and because I need some more recent versions. Thus, I have finally decided to move on to Debian 6 (squeeze) and then possibly even

Re: Problems with flashplayer on a new installation of Squeeze.

nd if I were to purge flashplugin-nonfree, what could I install that > > would actually work to play flash? > > > > Would I do better to scrap, what is a very new installation of Squeeze - > > this was part of the installation process - and reinstall? > > > >

Re: Problems with flashplayer on a new installation of Squeeze.

? Would I do better to scrap, what is a very new installation of Squeeze - this was part of the installation process - and reinstall? I get the same thing, but flashplugin-nonfree installs. So I then run 'update-flashplugin-nonfree --install' and it installs the latest versi

Problems with flashplayer on a new installation of Squeeze.

better to scrap, what is a very new installation of Squeeze - this was part of the installation process - and reinstall? Thanks, Lisi root@Squeeze:/home/john# aptitude install flashplugin-nonfree The following NEW packages will be installed: flashplugin-nonfree 0 packages upgraded, 1 newly

Re: Boot issue, new installation of Lenny with mirrored /boot and mirrored lvm2

Hi Franklin, On Fri, July 3, 2009 4:36 pm, Frank Lin PIAT wrote: > Your problem is probably inside your /boot/initrd... file > > You might want to "rebuild" it, using update-initramfs Tried that, multiple ways: update-initramfs -u -k all update-initramfs -n -k all > Also, did you read /usr/shar

Re: Boot issue, new installation of Lenny with mirrored /boot and mirrored lvm2

Hi, On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 12:53 +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote: > > I have 2x IBM xSeries 346 servers, one has a RAID card (let's call this > machine "346a") and the other only has onboard SCSI (346b). > > [..] it stops at a > special initramfs sh after giving up on the lvm volume group (not fo

Boot issue, new installation of Lenny with mirrored /boot and mirrored lvm2

Hi, I have 2x IBM xSeries 346 servers, one has a RAID card (let's call this machine "346a") and the other only has onboard SCSI (346b). Both have two RAID1 software mirrors -- one for /boot (/dev/md0) and the other for lvm2 use (/dev/md1). Both are running the same amd64 Debian release (Len

Re: New installation can only boot to command line as root

Thanks for everyone's suggestions. I installed Ubuntu right on top and it worked immediately. Issue closed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: New installation can only boot to command line as root

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Didn't the installer offer to create user accounts right after it did root? I use netinst exclusively, and it always does for me. OTOH, it also always installs only the CL interface. So I log in as root, run aptitude, and install "xserver-xorg" and "

Re: New installation can only boot to command line as root

On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 11:12:11AM -0600, Ray Lozano wrote: > Thanks, Umarzuki, but I still got the same result: no X windows. In root, why not run "depmod -a" to generate modules.dep and map files. I hit similar bug. I do not know where it came from but this fixed it. What system are you runn

Re: New installation can only boot to command line as root

Thanks, Juha, I ran the commands you suggested and this is what /root/xorg.conf.new contains. I don't see any error messages, but I do see my graphics card. Still no X windows. Section "ServerLayout" Identifier "X.org Configured" Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0 InputDevice"Mouse0"

Re: New installation can only boot to command line as root

Thanks, Umarzuki, but I still got the same result: no X windows. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: New installation can only boot to command line as root

Ray Lozano wrote: > ... > I discovered after booting into the "single user" mode, that I can log > in to the command line as root. After I exit root, the machine then > hangs just like it did upon reboot as described above with a blank monitor. > ... In single user mode try to let Xorg to do the

Re: Re: New installation can only boot to command line as root

2009/3/6 Ray Lozano > Thanks for the suggestion, Robert. > > I downloaded the complete CD 1 and re-installed but I got the exact same > result. Even after "dpkg-reconfigure -phigh xserver-xorg"? I don't know if this will solve the drive stopping problem but give it a shot anyway. > > > Ray > >

Re: Re: New installation can only boot to command line as root

Thanks for the suggestion, Robert. I downloaded the complete CD 1 and re-installed but I got the exact same result. Ray -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: New installation can only boot to command line as root

> The graphic installation from small CD went well but could not boot into > the graphic login afterward. I just get a blank monitor and the hard > drive stops activity. > > I re-installed a couple of times, hoping that something would change. No > luck. Is the "small CD" the netinst? I tried sev

New installation can only boot to command line as root

Hello Everyone: I installed Lenny for a normal workstation: Pent 4 2.40 GHz 1 GB RAM 2 WDC WD400JB-00ENA0 hard drives (used to be mirrored drives on an XP machine; I installed on the master drive) Radeon 7000 display adapter Intel Pro/100 net card ASUS CD-5520/A Sony Multiscan 17sf II monitor The

Re: New installation: Volume Group not found [solved]

Celejar writes: > On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 16:34:44 + (UTC) > Memnon Anon wrote: >> , >> | Volume group "BlackPearl" not found >> | Volume group "BlackPearl" not found >> | Enter passphrase to unlock the disk /dev/hda2 (hda2_crypt): >> ` >> > Setting down LVM groups failed. Can't deactiva

Re: New installation: Volume Group not found

oup "BlackPearl"... > > I found some Problems regardings this with gmane and google, but > they all did not result after a new installation, but after some kind of > data migration from one hd to another. > > Is it because of the mixed case Name? What did I do wrong?

New installation: Volume Group not found

k the disk /dev/hda2 (hda2_crypt): ` and one of the last messages displayed when shutting down: > Setting down LVM groups failed. Can't deactivate VolumeGroup "BlackPearl"... I found some Problems regardings this with gmane and google, but they all did not result after a new ins

Re: New installation - cannot increase the screen resolution

Hi Johannes, Thanks for your info - I did follow your guide and BINGO ! The screen now looks nice & sharp as it's drawing 1280x1024. I didn't know that it's X config related, as I thought it's GNOME issue - turns out GNOME is based on X stuffs - I'm completely newbie to Debian

Re: New installation - cannot increase the screen resolution

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chan Lee wrote: > Hi, > > I just installed Debian using DVD set from CheapBytes > into a new HP Pavilion Slimline s3020n desktop. It has > Nvidia GeForce 6150LE graphics adaptor driving 1280x1024 > resolution. > > Thrying to increase

New installation - cannot increase the screen resolution

Hi, I just installed Debian using DVD set from CheapBytes into a new HP Pavilion Slimline s3020n desktop. It has Nvidia GeForce 6150LE graphics adaptor driving 1280x1024 resolution. Thrying to increase the screen resolution using the Screen resoultion preference tool, however, I

Re: new installation : cannot login

Joe Hart wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 andy wrote: Hi all I have just installed Deb Etch onto my wife's computer, preserving her pre-existing /home directory. The installation was flawless until I went to go and login as her and am being denied access at the gdm logi

Re: new installation : cannot login

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 andy wrote: > Hi all > > I have just installed Deb Etch onto my wife's computer, preserving her > pre-existing /home directory. > > The installation was flawless until I went to go and login as her and am > being denied access at the gdm login screen

new installation : cannot login

Hi all I have just installed Deb Etch onto my wife's computer, preserving her pre-existing /home directory. The installation was flawless until I went to go and login as her and am being denied access at the gdm login screen. The messages refer to the $HOME/.dmrc saying that it will be ignor

Re: new installation not finding large memory

Thanks VERY much! And... Karl Goetz wrote: - any idea why the installer only gives the -386 kernel as a choice? if you do an expert install it will give a choice afaik. Actually, fyi, it doesn't. The only choices it gives are between a 2.4 and a 2.6 kernel for -386. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, e

Re: new installation not finding large memory

Miles Fidelman wrote: Jeff D wrote: Miles Fidelman wrote: On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Gilles Mocellin wrote: Le jeudi 20 juillet 2006 22:26, Miles Fidelman a écrit : Hi Folks, I know I must be doing something very silly, but my brand new installation is only finding 1gig of the 4gig of ram

Re: new installation not finding large memory

Jeff D wrote: Miles Fidelman wrote: On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Gilles Mocellin wrote: Le jeudi 20 juillet 2006 22:26, Miles Fidelman a écrit : Hi Folks, I know I must be doing something very silly, but my brand new installation is only finding 1gig of the 4gig of ram installed in my brand

Re: new installation not finding large memory

Le jeudi 20 juillet 2006 23:22, Miles Fidelman a écrit : > On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Gilles Mocellin wrote: > > Le jeudi 20 juillet 2006 22:26, Miles Fidelman a écrit : > > > Hi Folks, > > > > > > I know I must be doing something very silly, but my brand new > &

Re: new installation not finding large memory

Miles Fidelman wrote: On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Gilles Mocellin wrote: Le jeudi 20 juillet 2006 22:26, Miles Fidelman a écrit : Hi Folks, I know I must be doing something very silly, but my brand new installation is only finding 1gig of the 4gig of ram installed in my brand new server

Re: new installation not finding large memory

On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Gilles Mocellin wrote: > Le jeudi 20 juillet 2006 22:26, Miles Fidelman a écrit : > > Hi Folks, > > > > I know I must be doing something very silly, but my brand new installation > > is only finding 1gig of the 4gig of ram installed in my brand ne

Re: new installation not finding large memory

Miles Fidelman wrote: Hi Folks, I know I must be doing something very silly, but my brand new installation is only finding 1gig of the 4gig of ram installed in my brand new server. Even if I stick a "mem=4096m" line as a boot option, it's still not showing up. (the only

Re: new installation not finding large memory

Le jeudi 20 juillet 2006 22:26, Miles Fidelman a écrit : > Hi Folks, > > I know I must be doing something very silly, but my brand new installation > is only finding 1gig of the 4gig of ram installed in my brand new server. > > Even if I stick a "mem=4096m" line as a

new installation not finding large memory

Hi Folks, I know I must be doing something very silly, but my brand new installation is only finding 1gig of the 4gig of ram installed in my brand new server. Even if I stick a "mem=4096m" line as a boot option, it's still not showing up. (the only suggestion I've s

Re: bootloaders selecting wrong video adapter [was: GRUB doesn't come up in new installation]

Out of necessity to have a working system ASAP, I installed Ubuntu which has the same problem, but does all the installation from the blue screen which I can see. Now when I boot up, the screen goes blank when GRUB should appear, and stays blank until the graphical part of the boot-up. I will try

Re: bootloaders selecting wrong video adapter [was: GRUB doesn't come up in new installation]

Levi Waldron wrote: [...] I ran the "stable" install disc again, specifying "linux vga=ask" at the boot prompt. It offered me the choice to scan all available vesa modes, and *nothing* showed up on my screen during the scan. This seems to be equivalent to a bug that has been reported and resolv

Re: bootloaders selecting wrong video adapter [was: GRUB doesn't come up in new installation]

On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 23:00:20 + "Levi Waldron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2006/3/24, Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > it probably is booting. you've got the wrong video mode for your setup. you > > should probably specify vga=ask in the kernel line of your boot also, this > >

Re: bootloaders selecting wrong video adapter [was: GRUB doesn't come up in new installation]

2006/3/24, Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > it probably is booting. you've got the wrong video mode for your setup. you > should probably specify vga=ask in the kernel line of your boot also, this > seemed appropriate: > > http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:iz_Ho_51kzoJ:www.linux-mag

Re: bootloaders selecting wrong video adapter [was: GRUB doesn't come up in new installation]

On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 18:26:39 + "Levi Waldron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At least, I think that's what the problem is after installing lilo on > on the the HD partitions, by booting a live CD then using chroot. > liloconfig gave me the following warning: > > Warning: Unable to determine vi

bootloaders selecting wrong video adapter [was: GRUB doesn't come up in new installation]

At least, I think that's what the problem is after installing lilo on on the the HD partitions, by booting a live CD then using chroot. liloconfig gave me the following warning: Warning: Unable to determine video adapter in use in the present system. (nb. I wasn't actually able to follow through

Re: GRUB doesn't come up in new installation

Levi Waldron wrote: By the way, I just tried re-installing grub from a chroot environment within the liveCD environment, then comparing the new MBR with the one that I couldn't boot from. They're identical, so I don't think the bios is overwriting my MBR. I wish I'd read that before going afte

Re: GRUB doesn't come up in new installation

I've also noticed that the hard drive light goes on for a while after the screen goes black when GRUB should have appeared, so I wonder if the OS is booting but there's a problem with the video card? I don't know why the video could work fine for everything including liveCDs and installation discs

Re: GRUB doesn't come up in new installation

By the way, I just tried re-installing grub from a chroot environment within the liveCD environment, then comparing the new MBR with the one that I couldn't boot from. They're identical, so I don't think the bios is overwriting my MBR. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo mount /dev/hda1 /mnt [EMAIL PROTECT

GRUB doesn't come up in new installation

I'm trying to install Debian on a fairly new machine, a Celeron 2GHz, ASUS P4S800 mainboard with SiS 648FX chipset, onboard NVidia Geforce video card, Award BIOS. It worked fine with the proprietary OS it had when I bought it. I just ran the Debian stable business card iso install disc, and re-pa

RE: Error when starting apache2 (new installation)

Title: RE: Error when starting apache2 (new installation) Hi, I just do apache start in /etc/init.d/ Mod_python is enabled, in mods-enabled i have Mod_python.load Grtz, Philippe

Re: Error when starting apache2 (new installation)

Philippe Dhont (Sea-ro) wrote: Hello, I installed apache2 wit apt-get and i get: [Fri Dec 16 14:17:57 2005] [notice] mod_python: Creating 20 session mutexes based on 20 max processes and 0 max threads. [Fri Dec 16 14:17:57 2005] [error] (38)Function not implemented: mod_python: Failed to c

Error when starting apache2 (new installation)

Title: Error when starting apache2 (new installation) Hello, I installed apache2 wit apt-get and i get: [Fri Dec 16 14:17:57 2005] [notice] mod_python: Creating 20 session mutexes based on 20 max processes and 0 max threads. [Fri Dec 16 14:17:57 2005] [error] (38)Function not

New installation hangs on "REAL TIME CLOCK DRIVER v1.12"

Hello, I am installing a new system and after the first install when i reboot to go on with the debian configuration, it hangs on "real time clock driver v1.12" Anybody an idea ? Grtz, Phil. Disclaimer : This e-mail is intended for the exclusive use by the person(s) mentioned as recipient

Re: Debian's javac vs Sun's new installation of j2sdk

On Friday 09 July 2004 14:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The following url for a forum thread on Java's site probably has the > answer for your error. I was getting the same error and used the unpack > rt.jar method mentioned on the following thread. > > http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jsp?forum=

Re: Debian's javac vs Sun's new installation of j2sdk

On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 12:39:35PM -0400, H. S. wrote: > Apparently, _Michael B Allen_, on 07/09/04 04:50,typed: > > > > >Note a good way to setup the shell environment in X so you can run java > >and javac on the commandline is to start the session manager through a > >login shell by changing: >

Re: Debian's javac vs Sun's new installation of j2sdk

Apparently, _Michael B Allen_, on 07/09/04 04:50,typed: Note a good way to setup the shell environment in X so you can run java and javac on the commandline is to start the session manager through a login shell by changing: /etc/X11/Xsession.d/99xfree86-common_start to read: exec -l $SHELL -c "$

Re: Debian's javac vs Sun's new installation of j2sdk

On Fri, 9 Jul 2004 10:32:57 +0300 David Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Netbeans would try to execute and kick me off X. Reinstalled > everything, tried everyting. Now I only get: > # java > Error occurred during initialization of VM > java/lang/NoClassDefFoundError: java/lang/Object The fol

Re: Debian's javac vs Sun's new installation of j2sdk

On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 00:37:25 -0400 "H. S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > /usr/local/ and export JAVA_HOME=/usr/local/java and > > PATH=$PATH:${JAVA_HOME}/bin? > > This is what I did. I extracted the version of the Java in > /usr/local/java. Then made links > /usr/local/j2sdk -> /usr/local/java/j

Re: Debian's javac vs Sun's new installation of j2sdk

On Fri, 9 Jul 2004 10:32:57 +0300 David Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The update alternatives will let you choose between the java's. It does > not pickup the javac from Sun (must be manually put in there. Java must be > > manually put into alternatives as well if not done using a proper .de

Re: Debian's javac vs Sun's new installation of j2sdk

On Friday 09 July 2004 05:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > You should go to . Get j2se-package, convert your > > JRE to a deb, download the matching *debian-deb for your Java version, > > and install both the downloaded package and the converted JRE. The > > package manageme

Re: Debian's javac vs Sun's new installation of j2sdk

Hello Michael B Allen (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: > Andreas Janssen said: >> You should go to . Get j2se-package, convert >> your JRE to a deb, download the matching *debian-deb for your Java >> version, and install both the downloaded package and the converted >> JRE. The

Re: Debian's javac vs Sun's new installation of j2sdk

Apparently, _Michael B Allen_, on 07/08/04 21:24,typed: Andreas Janssen said: You should go to . Get j2se-package, convert your JRE to a deb, download the matching *debian-deb for your Java version, and install both the downloaded package and the converted JRE. The package ma

Re: Debian's javac vs Sun's new installation of j2sdk

Andreas Janssen said: > You should go to . Get j2se-package, convert your > JRE to a deb, download the matching *debian-deb for your Java version, > and install both the downloaded package and the converted JRE. The > package management will take care of the symlinks in /etc/

Re: Debian's javac vs Sun's new installation of j2sdk

e javac already (new > >>install a couple of months back). Earlier I used to download Sun's > >>j2sdk and install that. Now that I already have javac (probably > >>provided by Debian), in what way would the new installation of j2skd > >>be affected by it? &

Re: Debian's javac vs Sun's new installation of j2sdk

(new >>> install a couple of months back). Earlier I used to download Sun's >>> j2sdk and install that. Now that I already have javac (probably >>> provided by Debian), in what way would the new installation of j2skd >>> be affected by it? >> >

Re: Debian's javac vs Sun's new installation of j2sdk

stribution, I noticed that I have javac already (new > > > >>install a couple of months back). Earlier I used to download Sun's > >>j2sdk and install that. Now that I already have javac (probably > >>provided by Debian), in what way would the new installation of

Re: Debian's javac vs Sun's new installation of j2sdk

tall that. Now that I already have javac (probably provided by Debian), in what way would the new installation of j2skd be affected by it? Have you done an "ls -l" on javac? Last I checked, it was just a symlink to /etc/default/javac or something, which in turn pointed to a nonexistent filenam

Re: Debian's javac vs Sun's new installation of j2sdk

ave javac (probably > provided by Debian), in what way would the new installation of j2skd > be affected by it? Have you done an "ls -l" on javac? Last I checked, it was just a symlink to /etc/default/javac or something, which in turn pointed to a nonexistent filename. After I install

Debian's javac vs Sun's new installation of j2sdk

In my Testing distribution, I noticed that I have javac already (new install a couple of months back). Earlier I used to download Sun's j2sdk and install that. Now that I already have javac (probably provided by Debian), in what way would the new installation of j2skd be affected by it?

Re: New installation has no GUI [was: Unidentified subject!]

On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 07:52:16PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: > --- Pigeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > You haven't installed the GUI. Run tasksel (as root) and select "X > > Window System" and probably you'll want "Desktop Environment" as well. > > ... which is bad advice since it will insta

Re: New installation has no GUI [was: Unidentified subject!]

--- Pigeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You haven't installed the GUI. Run tasksel (as root) and select "X > Window System" and probably you'll want "Desktop Environment" as well. ... which is bad advice since it will instal; *both* KDE and GNOME. So, somthing a little better is to do the follow

Re: New installation has no GUI [was: Unidentified subject!]

On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 09:11:04PM +0100, JOHN WALL wrote: > could some one help please. Have installed debian GNU v3.0r2(non us) > Everything seemed to go in fine, except for some seek errors which I > assume is normal. Got to user name and password OK. then nothing, > I was expecting some format

Re: Re : problems with using dpkg on new installation

Hello, Siward, I finally installed a different version of debootstrap, and everything started to work. Maybe the first version I tried installing (twice) did not install all that was necessary to get the base system installed. I got hung up on installing the kernel, however, but I found out tha

Re : problems with using dpkg on new installation

Hi Alasso, you wrote : > Seem to get a lot of circular dependencies that won't resolve. apt depends on libc6, libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2, libdb2 libc6 depends on dpkg you didnt post a try to install dpkg apt is smarter than dpkg, but it uses dpkg to do the install work. if you do run int

  1   2   >