pinepgp depends on pgp and i went to ftp.de.debian.org and i found pgp_i
and pgp_us. Which one shoud i pick? in any case i think that dpkg will
complain.
If you are inside the U.S. you must use pgp-us. Otherwise, use pgp-i.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word
On Tue, 27 Jan 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> pinepgp depends on pgp and i went to ftp.de.debian.org and i found pgp_i
> and pgp_us. Which one shoud i pick? in any case i think that dpkg will
> complain.
You mean if you pick the "other one"? No, it will not. Since you
pinepgp depends on pgp and i went to ftp.de.debian.org and i found pgp_i
and pgp_us. Which one shoud i pick? in any case i think that dpkg will
complain.
Thanks in advance.
__
Felipe Alvarez Harnecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Telefono: 691
Hello all..
I just downloaded and installed pgp 5.0 from MIT. (I figured I
might as well upgrade from the 2.6.2
version I was using) Anyway, everything seemed to go OK during the
install, except when I try to do
anything with pgp I get an error message "cannot open
~/root/pgp/.pg
Be paranoic with your secret key!
Using pgp is an annoyance needed to get trust, but being annoyed
without the advantages is much worse.
Fabrizio
--
| [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Pluto Leader - Debian Developer & Happy Debian 1.3.1 User - vi-holic
| 6F7267F5
| On Tuesday, 13 January 98, at 12:14:19 PM
| Smorrill wrote about "Debian & Pgp question..."
> I have used Pgp for quite awhile with Win95, and thus have already made
> my secret key & id number, etc. I would like to get pgp set up with
> Linux as I would like to move
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Tue, 13 Jan 1998, Scott Ellis wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jan 1998, smorrill wrote:
> > I have used Pgp for quite awhile with Win95, and thus have already made
> > my secret key & id number, etc. I would like to get pgp set up with
> > Linu
On Tue, 13 Jan 1998, smorrill wrote:
> I have used Pgp for quite awhile with Win95, and thus have already made
> my secret key & id number, etc. I would like to get pgp set up with
> Linux as I would like to move to using Debian exclusively. Anybody out
> there familiar with thi
I have used Pgp for quite awhile with Win95, and thus have already made
my secret key & id number, etc. I would like to get pgp set up with
Linux as I would like to move to using Debian exclusively. Anybody out
there familiar with this issue of how I would use my same 1028 bit key
(created u
We changed the settings accordingly.
: On Mon, Jan 12, 1998 at 06:21:40PM +0100, Alex de Joode wrote:
: > We mirror ftp.de.debian.org/debian-non-us/
:
: Please change your mirror settings then. The hostname "nonUS.debian.org" is
: preferred, and the link is /debian-non-US, US in capitals. So, pl
On Mon, Jan 12, 1998 at 06:21:40PM +0100, Alex de Joode wrote:
> We mirror ftp.de.debian.org/debian-non-us/
Please change your mirror settings then. The hostname "nonUS.debian.org" is
preferred, and the link is /debian-non-US, US in capitals. So, please use
ftp://nonUS.debian.org/debian-non-US/
A
Alex Yukhimets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > find /usr/bin/pgp. Now I have pointed dselect both at ftp.debian.org
> > and at ftp.de.debian.org (which I thought was outside the U.S.), but I
> > found no package that would give me a pgp executable usable by elm.
> >
We mirror ftp.de.debian.org/debian-non-us/
:
:
: Hi Ray,
: You are right. I was trying to download file from ftp.replay.com.
: So which file should I download to use? Do I use pgp-i_2.6.3a-1.deb
: as joey suggested? Please let me know.
: Thanks,
: Jimmy
:
: > On Mon, Jan 12, 1998 at 01
On Mon, Jan 12, 1998 at 10:22:47PM +0800, Jimmy Lu wrote:
> I was trying to download file from ftp.replay.com. So which file should I
> download to use? Do I use pgp-i_2.6.3a-1.deb as joey suggested? Please
> let me know.
pgp-i_2.6.3a-1.deb is the one to use with stable (1.3.1); i
Hi Ray,
You are right. I was trying to download file from ftp.replay.com.
So which file should I download to use? Do I use pgp-i_2.6.3a-1.deb
as joey suggested? Please let me know.
Thanks,
Jimmy
> On Mon, Jan 12, 1998 at 01:58:07PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Apart from that the
On Mon, Jan 12, 1998 at 01:58:07PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Apart from that there should only be _one_ pgp-i package for each
> architecture.
I suspect Jimmy is using the ftp.replay.com/pub/crypto/debian mirror, which
does keep old versions, for reasons unknown to me. I'm Cc-ing
On Mon, Jan 12, 1998 at 11:15:57AM +0800, Jimmy Lu wrote:
> I want to install the pgp debian package for international user but
> I don't know which one(s) listed below I should use.
> pgp-i_2.6.3-1_i386.deb
> pgp-i_2.6.3a-1.deb
> pgp-i_2.6.3-2.deb
>
Hi All,
I want to install the pgp debian package for international user but
I don't know which one(s) listed below I should use.
pgp-i_2.6.3-1_i386.deb
pgp-i_2.6.3a-1.deb
pgp-i_2.6.3-2.deb
pgp-i_2.6.3-3.deb
Please advice. Thanks.
Jimmy Lu
--
TO UNSUBS
> find /usr/bin/pgp. Now I have pointed dselect both at ftp.debian.org
> and at ftp.de.debian.org (which I thought was outside the U.S.), but I
> found no package that would give me a pgp executable usable by elm.
>
> What is the solution? It seems a bit strange to provide a pa
I have recently installed Debian 1.3.1 on my Pentium-133 machine.
I have used dselect to install via FTP the elm package. I am very
familiar with elm, but the standard Debian elm package appears to
be modified to support PGP. What bothers me is that occasionally a
message on the debian-user
fact that signing a message
> not only authenticates the author (assuming your signature, or public
> key, is available for someone to use for this purpose) of a message or
> piece of code, but it also allows one to authenicate the content of the
> message or code. Public key encryption like P
or someone to use for this purpose) of a message or
> piece of code, but it also allows one to authenicate the content of the
> message or code.
This too is used by the developers: when packages are uploaded to
master.debian.org, they are accompanied by PGP-signed .changes files; the
.change
ssuming your signature, or public
key, is available for someone to use for this purpose) of a message or
piece of code, but it also allows one to authenicate the content of the
message or code. Public key encryption like PGP would allow the same
thing to a limited number of users for an encrypted mess
f there's a bug, or if it
releases some horrible plague on your computer, you can get ahold of me.
:)
Newsgroups which are moderated (you can't post directly to them -- someone
makes sure that the post is relevant) usually have the moderators pgp-sign
the posts to insure they've b
Hi,
I've installed pgp-i, to see what it's about. I've noticed many people
have pgp signatures in their messages, and some offer the signature via
finger.
I know why you would want to use it to send encrypted messages, but why do
you want to sign your messages?
I read that it
On Thu, 4 Dec 1997, Curt Howland wrote:
> I notice that MIT now has a Linux build for PGP5.0
> US version. I know that there is a PGP Debian package
> available internationally, but not on the US site.
> Anyone know if a U.S. PGP package for Debian will be
> created?
You can f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Regarding "Re: PGP" of 03:37 PM -0800 1997-12-04, Pete Harlan wrote:
>Sorry for the off-topic. I hope nobody bothers to package this up for
>Debian unless source is released. There, now it's on-topic.
>
>And please correct me if
Addendum: They DO have the PGP signature for the Linux
binary. I agree that the source should be made available
too
Curt-
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Pete Harlan wrote:
>
> > I notice that MIT now has a Linux build for PGP5.0
> > US version. I know that there is a PGP Debian package
>
> Does anyone know what's up with Phil, anyway? How can he, of all
> people, expect anyone to trust cryptography without source?
> I notice that MIT now has a Linux build for PGP5.0
> US version. I know that there is a PGP Debian package
Does anyone know what's up with Phil, anyway? How can he, of all
people, expect anyone to trust cryptography without source?
Sorry for the off-topic. I hope nobody bothers
I notice that MIT now has a Linux build for PGP5.0
US version. I know that there is a PGP Debian package
available internationally, but not on the US site.
Anyone know if a U.S. PGP package for Debian will be
created?
Curt-
--
---
Curt Howland [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.Priss.com
&quo
Since you live in Florida, I say, pgp-us is the way to go; not
only you will have peace of mind for not breaking the law if you not
licensed, but you will might also save some hard disk space in the
long run -- some packages might install the mit libraries anyway.
Both pgp
I have downloaded both pgp-i_2.6.3a-1.deb and pgp-us_2.6.3a-1.deb
from nonus.debian.org. The documentation indicates that the
international version is somewhat better than the US version, but
isn't properly licensed for use in the US. Is the encryption obtained
by the two ver
clif smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was downloading some files from Debian's FTP site and when I looked in
> the packages file I saw pgp-us.deb listed but I can't find it on the site.
> I realize that there is a securtity issue about distributeing PGP but is
>
I was downloading some files from Debian's FTP site and when I looked in
the packages file I saw pgp-us.deb listed but I can't find it on the site.
I realize that there is a securtity issue about distributeing PGP but is
there a way to get the .deb package of PGP?
The package I sa
The pgp package is one of those software items to comes under the U.S. Govt's
Defense Export Restrictions as thus is not available on any U.S. debian or
debina mirror site.
Two files in debian/ README.non-US and README.pgp both tell where and how to
get the pgp package.
Note that the
I wanted to become a Debian contributor, yet I did not find pgp as
part of the dselectable tree.
--
Terrence Brannon * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://quake.usc.edu/~brannon
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail
On Thu, Oct 16, 1997 at 11:39:17AM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Does this mutt-84-package support PGP?
As of 0.68-1, mutt was moved from non-US to main following a policy decision
that hooks to crypto don't prevent a package to go into the main
distribution. The mutt package is the nor
> manual processing. I've put a copy at
> ftp://ftp.wi.leidenuniv.nl/pub/linux/devel-ray/
>
> Ray
Does this mutt-84-package support PGP?
--
Yours,
On Sat, 30 Aug 1997 12:46:50 -0400, Gonzalo A. Diethelm wrote:
>
>Should I get pgp-us or pgp-i? I'm living in Chile, if that makes any
>difference.
Which ever one your government says you can't use.
-
http:
"Gonzalo A. Diethelm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Should I get pgp-us or pgp-i? I'm living in Chile, if that makes any
> difference.
>
> >From the looks of it, I'd say pgp-i, but just want to make sure...
pgp-i is better for those outside the US. It&#
Should I get pgp-us or pgp-i? I'm living in Chile, if that makes any
difference.
>From the looks of it, I'd say pgp-i, but just want to make sure...
--
Gonzalo A. Diethelm G.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe&qu
On Thu, Aug 28, 1997 at 01:24:27AM -0500, Walter L. Preuninger II wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> I have enabled pine to use the alternate editor hack, but was wondering
> what mail client is primarily used? I have some friends that use mutt, and
> if I use pine to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
I have enabled pine to use the alternate editor hack, but was wondering
what mail client is primarily used? I have some friends that use mutt, and
if I use pine to send encrypted mail to them... all they see is the
encrypted data (Something to do with the mime
On Aug 6, George Bonser wrote
> On Wed, 6 Aug 1997, Paul Miller wrote:
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > When you delete a message, doesn't Eudora delete the attachment? I've
> > never used Eudora before, Net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
When you delete a message, doesn't Eudora delete the attachment? I've
never used Eudora before, Netscape handles them real well.
- -Paul
On Thu, 7 Aug 1997, Adam Shand wrote:
> >> Also, does anyone know how to attach a [si
>> Also, does anyone know how to attach a [signiture] file to an outgoing
>> message? (I want the signiture to be attached instead of part of the
>> message)
Just a comment. I *hate* it when people attach PGP signatures. I often
use Eudora to read my mail and it means
Hello Paul! :)
On Tue, 5 Aug 1997, Paul Miller wrote:
> PGP 5.0 for Linux is available.. anyhow, I'm tring to edit the pinepgp
> files to work w/ 5.0.. if anyone has already done this, please let me
> know.
Awesome! :) Can't wait to see PGP 5.0 on Linux! :) I was re
PGP 5.0 for Linux is available.. anyhow, I'm tring to edit the pinepgp
files to work w/ 5.0.. if anyone has already done this, please let me
know.
Also, does anyone know how to attach a [signiture] file to an outgoing
message? (I want the signiture to be attached instead of part of the
me
Manoj Srivastava writes:
> I had the same problem, until I tried @localhost. So now,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] gives all the information, but fingering srivasta
> does not. What am I missing?
Err
finger joey
calls /usr/bin/finger wwhich is a user program, comes from netbase or
netstd
Plan:
:To program anything that is programmable is obsession.
:Acquire a house with pre-installed fibre to every room
:PGP Public Key:
:Type Bits/KeyIDDate User ID
:pub 1024/C7261095 1996/07/31 Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: Manoj Srivastava <[EMA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Is it possible to finger the sender's address if their key isn't on the
local keyring? and/or finger a key server..?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv
iQB1AwUBM+cvk/MRUhbnJu3lAQH0rwMAi4anXuhauQPEDw+DKrVeoS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Everything is set right in the configuration file and there are no errors
in the log file. I also set the program to mode 2755 with the group being
'www-data' (I set the home dirs readable/executable to that group for
apache)... it still do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Mon, 4 Aug 1997, Paul Miller wrote:
> ===
> Key matching expected Key ID E726EDE5 not found in file
> '/home/wildfire/.pgp/pubring.pgp'.
> Enter public key filen
;t be a problem...
:what could be? -- try fingering [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:
:-Paul
:
:On Mon, 4 Aug 1997, Martin Schulze wrote:
:
:> On Aug 4, Paul Miller wrote
:>
:> > How can I set up my system so people can finger for pgp keys? I have no
:> > idea where to start, but there
Take a look at the cfingerd package
--
Nathan Norman
MidcoNet
410 South Phillips Avenue
Sioux Falls, SD 57104
Voice: (605) 334-4454 Fax: (605) 335-1173
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 4 Aug 1997, Paul Miller wrote:
:How can I set up my system so people can finger for pgp
it as root, so access shouldn't be a problem...
> what could be? -- try fingering [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> - -Paul
>
> On Mon, 4 Aug 1997, Martin Schulze wrote:
>
> > On Aug 4, Paul Miller wrote
> >
> > > How can I set up my system so people can finger for p
On Aug 4, Paul Miller wrote
> How can I set up my system so people can finger for pgp keys? I have no
> idea where to start, but there must be a template file somewhere.
Very easy. Install cfingerd and extract you pgp key into ~/.pgpkey
(don't forget to chmod 644 it)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
How can I set up my system so people can finger for pgp keys? I have no
idea where to start, but there must be a template file somewhere.
- -Paul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv
iQB1AwUBM+Xv5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Mon, 4 Aug 1997, Paul Miller wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> How can I set up my system so people can finger for pgp keys? I have no
> idea where to start, but there must be a template file somewhere.
>
> - -Paul
do
pg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Ok.. I installed cfinger and created the .pgpkey file. When I finger it
shows a different output (because of cfinger -- its working) but it
doesn't show whats in the .plan or .pgpkey, only user's real name. In the
/etc/inetd.conf it runs it as root,
Paul Miller wrote
> I noticed that almost everyone on this list uses pgp.. I installed the
> debian package and I'm wondering how do auto-encrypt/decrypt all my mail.
>
> I use pine (pinepgp package) and netscape communicator 4.01b6
For pine, set
display-filters=_BEGI
On Thu, 31 Jul 1997, Paul Miller wrote:
> I noticed that almost everyone on this list uses pgp.. I installed the
> debian package and I'm wondering how do auto-encrypt/decrypt all my mail.
>
> I use pine (pinepgp package) and netscape communicator 4.01b6
Don't know how to
I noticed that almost everyone on this list uses pgp.. I installed the
debian package and I'm wondering how do auto-encrypt/decrypt all my mail.
I use pine (pinepgp package) and netscape communicator 4.01b6
-Paul
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe&
Paul McDermott wrote:
>
> hi folks, I am trying to install pine-pgp package and it depends on the
> package pgp. Does anyone know where it is? I have looked in contrib,
> stable, non-free, unstable, hamm. Can some one help me please.
> Paul
>
> --
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE F
hi folks, I am trying to install pine-pgp package and it depends on the
package pgp. Does anyone know where it is? I have looked in contrib,
stable, non-free, unstable, hamm. Can some one help me please.
Paul
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Christian
>
> ---
>
>Part 1.2 Type: application/pgp-signature
Does anyone know of a netscape plugin or something which can automatically
check pgp si
>The subject says it all. It's not in the debian package, couldn't
>find anything in the FAQ's. So, where is it?
Or look at the debian package finder at
http://larry.earthlight.co.nz/debian/finder.cgi
Adam.
- Earthlight Communications Limited
P.O. Box 5301
On Apr 28, Rick Jones wrote
:
: Look in the Debian ftp directory. There are symlinks the guid you along.
Or:
ftp://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/pub/debian-non-US
Heiko
--
email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp : A1 7D F6 7B 69 73 48 35 E1 DE 21 A7 A8 9A 77 92
Look in the Debian ftp directory. There are symlinks the guid you along.
On Mon, 28 Apr 1997, Joop Stakenborg wrote:
> The subject says it all. It's not in the debian package, couldn't
> find anything in the FAQ's. So, where is it?
>
> +++
>
This is one of the sites that has the pgp package:
site=ftp.lh.umu.se
remote_dir=/pub/linux/debian-non-US/binary-i386
There is a file called READEM.pgp at all debian mirrors that lists
more sites, and is located at the top tree directory of the debian
distribution.
--
Ioannis
The subject says it all. It's not in the debian package, couldn't
find anything in the FAQ's. So, where is it?
+++
Joop Stakenborg
Department of Hyperthermia
Dr. Daniel den Hoed Ca
On Sun, 20 Apr 1997, Ron Murray wrote:
>I don't know how the average Linux mailer handles these, but I use
> Windows 95 (no, don't bother flaming) in my main machine, with Eudora as my
> mailer. I'm getting a little tired of my attachment directory filling up
>
Just a comment...
I am trialing the new IE4 in my position as admin and as supplied it
appears to recognise the PGP messages but is unable to decode them. (Not
implemented.. not installed maybe??)
The point is, at this time, all I can do is just delete these messages :-(
Other mailers appear
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
At 22:30 19/04/97 -0400, you wrote:
>...apparently under the impression
>> that we're all going to take the time to check whether or not it was really
>> you who sent that embarrassing message.
>
>Not at all. The point of PGP/MIME (
On Apr 20, Ron Murray wrote
>It seems a few of you are using a mail agent that's capable of
> generating a detached PGP certificate of your message and including it as a
> MIME type of application/pgp-signature, apparently under the impression
> that we're all going to
It seems a few of you are using a mail agent that's capable of
generating a detached PGP certificate of your message and including it as a
MIME type of application/pgp-signature, apparently under the impression
that we're all going to take the time to check whether or not it was real
>
>I found the pgp packages on one of the debian-non-us sites.
>The 2 pgp packages (pgp-i & pgp-us) have exactly the same
>package information, but the sizes and names are different.
>Why ?
>From the PGP 2.6.3i readme.1st file
" (2) It uses PRZ's MPILIB inste
Thus spake Matthew Tebbens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I don't see a debian PGP package, just scripts...etc. Do I get it from
> one of the main PGP sites ? I would like to use it with PINE
Hi Matthew,
due to the export limitations on cryptographic software in the US the PGP
and ssh p
Ok, I don't get it...
I found the pgp packages on one of the debian-non-us sites.
The 2 pgp packages (pgp-i & pgp-us) have exactly the same
package information, but the sizes and names are different.
Why ?
Matthew
I don't see a debian PGP package, just scripts...etc. Do I get it from
one of the main PGP sites ? I would like to use it with PINE
Matthew
Hi.
This is a known problem in the PGP 2.6.2 distribution. In order to
compile it for Linux/ELF, you will need to make a change to the
sources. The quick change is to add "ASMDEF=-DSYSV" to the Linux make
rule in the makefile. However this will not allow it to compile under
Linux/a.o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Wed, 2 Apr 1997, Rick wrote:
> I D/L'd PGP 2.6 a few nights ago [ ... ]
If I remember well, PGP 2.6 was not ELF-ready yet. Please, use PGP 2.6.3.
Follow the README.PGP symlink on the Debian archives.
Thanks.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version
On 02-Apr-97 Paul Nelson wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
>On Wed, 2 Apr 1997, Rick wrote:
>
>> Well...more than one error. Anyway. This is what happened. I made
no
>> mod's to the files. I'm sure it's some linux source I'm m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Wed, 2 Apr 1997, Rick wrote:
> Well...more than one error. Anyway. This is what happened. I made
> no
> mod's to the files. I'm sure it's some linux source I'm missing or
> something.
> Can anyone tell
To All:
This is also being sent to the Debian mailing list in case someone there can hel
p with this.
I D/L'd PGP 2.6 a few nights ago and got an error while trying to 'make linux'.
Beginning...
error starts here...
gcc -o pgp pgp.o crypto.o keymgmt.o fileio.o mdfile.o more.o a
> That was one of the first things I tried.
Got me, then. Sorry.
> Try typing your passphrase and hitting Enter. You may be
> experiencing a problem with the visibility of the dialog window (it
> may be off the edge of the screen).
That was one of the first things I tried.
As far as I can tell, PGP is never actually run. It seems that X or
FVWM2 b
Try typing your passphrase and hitting Enter. You may be experiencing a
problem with the visibility of the dialog window (it may be off the edge of
the screen).
When I try to PGP-sign a message before sending it in Exmh, everything
under X (exmh, fvwm2) completely locks up until I switch to another
terminal and kill the xterm that's trying to run PGP. The xterm with
PGP never actually gets displayed, and I can't do _anything_ in X.
This is not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
This may not be the most appropriate place to ask this question but since
debian was the reason I started using pgp, I thought that someone here may
have some suggestions.
Stupidly when I first started using pgp, I made a key pair and uploaded it
to the public
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 26 Mar 1997, Ted Okada wrote:
> package installed.. I searched for a pgp package that worked like the
> netscape package where the setup asks you where the binary you compiled
> was located but none was found... How does one trigger a correc
Hello...
I just compiled pgp-i and installed it, it runs well... However, when I
tried dselect to install pinepgp, dselect said that there was no pgp
package installed.. I searched for a pgp package that worked like the
netscape package where the setup asks you where the binary you compiled
Oops... apparently that is a FAQ. Sorry;
I just couldn't find it in the Packages lists (neither can dselect).
--
Dr A.R. (Tom) Peters
Wittgensteinlaan 149tel.020-4080204
NL-1062 KD Amsterdam e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Santiago Vila Doncel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [ Yes, we should add a symlink README.PGP -> README.non-US. ]
Yes, I did it yesterday, so mirrors are seeing it now.
I estimate that will cut the volume of debian-user by 50%.
Guy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Sun, 9 Mar 1997, A.R.(Tom)Peters wrote:
> Whatever happened to the Debian pgp package? [ ... ]
In the Debian mirrors there is a file named README.non-US.
Please, read it. Thanks.
[ Yes, we should add a symlink README.PGP -> README.non-US. ]
-BEG
Whatever happened to the Debian pgp package? I got one last summer
(Debian-1.1 section non-free) which was made by a Brit and contained
pgp-2.6.2 (i and us). I would like to upgrade if possible (2.6.3 is around,
maybe higher). But a Debian package for pgp is nowhere to be found.
Any clues
In your email to me, Dennis Gesker, you wrote:
>
>
> Is there a .deb for pgp similar to the .rpm for pgp on Redhat.
>
>
sun10:~ftp/pub/Linux/debian> more README.non-US
US laws place restrictions on the export of defense articles, which
includes some types of cryptographic
Is there a .deb for pgp similar to the .rpm for pgp on Redhat.
On Sat, 1 Mar 1997, Bjoern Starke wrote:
> Is it possible to use my old PGP keyrings (generated under DOS) under
> Linux?
Yes. Put it all in the directory ~/.pgp
Vadik.
--
Vadim Vygonets [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sysadmin? Me?! Naah...
I think that I shall never see a poem as lovely as a
701 - 800 of 881 matches
Mail list logo
