Re: modem/pppd troubles

2002-03-02 Thread John Hasler
Shaul Karl writes: > As far as I know chat + ppp can write enough information to the log files > in order to debug them. The problem is that many people (me included) do > not know how to interpret this information correctly. But I do. Post it. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dancing Horse Hill

Re: modem/pppd troubles

2002-03-02 Thread Shaul Karl
> also sprach Shaul Karl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.03.01.2308 +0100]: > > 1) Why do not you try to create a kernel for the desktop with=20 > > CONFIG_PPP_SYNC_TTY =3D m? > > but why? ppp_sync is not loaded on the laptop, and it's not needed for > pppd/modem communication, which is asynchronous. >

Re: modem/pppd troubles

2002-03-02 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Shaul Karl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.03.01.2308 +0100]: > 1) Why do not you try to create a kernel for the desktop with > CONFIG_PPP_SYNC_TTY = m? but why? ppp_sync is not loaded on the laptop, and it's not needed for pppd/modem communication, which is asynchronous. > 2) Can you dial

Re: modem/pppd troubles

2002-03-01 Thread Shaul Karl
I do not know what is the cause but trying to go by the elimination method: 1) Why do not you try to create a kernel for the desktop with CONFIG_PPP_SYNC_TTY = m? 2) Can you dial with minicom to your provider and stay connected until your provider disconnect you? Actually, what are the differen

modem/pppd troubles

2002-03-01 Thread martin f krafft
[please cc me on replies] high, i operate two machines, a laptop with a 56k pcmcia modem, and a desktop with an external 33.6k non-name modem. both run custom 2.4.17 kernels and pppd 2.4.1 from woody. i can't get the desktop to function like the laptop - it keeps losing the connection. a couple o

Re: pppd troubles

2001-07-01 Thread Cormac McGuinness
> > Jun 19 16:56:35 orange pppd[1408]: pppd 2.3.11 started by root, uid 0 > > Jun 19 16:56:35 orange pppd[1408]: Couldn't attach tty to PPP unit 0: > >Invalid argument > > Jun 19 16:56:35 orange pppd[1408]: tcsetattr: Invalid argument > > Jun 19 16:56:35 orange pppd[1408]: Exit. > > I brow

Re: pppd troubles

2001-06-20 Thread nestordi
times appear at local linux or computing magazines hope this gives you a clue yours sincerely nestor di we will always bel newbies On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, MaD dUCK wrote: > Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 00:16:30 +0200 > To: debian users > From: MaD dUCK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject:

Re: pppd troubles

2001-06-19 Thread Kevin Ross
>> One more thing. There's a 2.4.0 pppd compiled for potato w/kernel >> 2.4.x at: >> >> http://www.fs.tum.de/~bunk/kernel-24.html > >kevin, you rock!!! fixed it... >and thanks to adrian as well!!! Excellent! Glad to be of service. -- Kevin

Re: pppd troubles

2001-06-19 Thread MaD dUCK
also sprach Kevin Ross (on Tue, 19 Jun 2001 04:50:14PM -0700): > One more thing. There's a 2.4.0 pppd compiled for potato w/kernel > 2.4.x at: > > http://www.fs.tum.de/~bunk/kernel-24.html kevin, you rock!!! fixed it... and thanks to adrian as well!!! martin; (greetings from the he

Re: [users] Re: pppd troubles

2001-06-19 Thread MaD dUCK
also sprach Kevin Ross (on Tue, 19 Jun 2001 04:46:06PM -0700): > I browsed through the source code for pppd, and it looks like the > only way that error can be generated is if you're using kernel > 2.4.x. So the fact that you're using pppd version 2.3.11 tells me > you're using potato, but with a

Re: pppd troubles

2001-06-19 Thread Kevin Ross
>> Jun 19 16:56:35 orange pppd[1408]: pppd 2.3.11 started by root, uid 0 >> Jun 19 16:56:35 orange pppd[1408]: Couldn't attach tty to PPP unit 0: >>Invalid argument >> Jun 19 16:56:35 orange pppd[1408]: tcsetattr: Invalid argument >> Jun 19 16:56:35 orange pppd[1408]: Exit. > >I browsed thr

Re: pppd troubles

2001-06-19 Thread Kevin Ross
> Jun 19 16:56:35 orange pppd[1408]: pppd 2.3.11 started by root, uid 0 > Jun 19 16:56:35 orange pppd[1408]: Couldn't attach tty to PPP unit 0: >Invalid argument > Jun 19 16:56:35 orange pppd[1408]: tcsetattr: Invalid argument > Jun 19 16:56:35 orange pppd[1408]: Exit. I browsed through th

Re: pppd troubles

2001-06-19 Thread MaD dUCK
also sprach Jeremy (on Tue, 19 Jun 2001 07:42:32PM -0500): > My knowledge on this is limited, but have you made sure that you > have the domain and nameserver entries in the /etc/resolv.conf > file? I got this same sort of message when I was trying to dial > in with wvdial and I didn't have those

Re: pppd troubles

2001-06-19 Thread Jeremy
=== hey all, we are still failing to establish a connection with wvdial and pppd (on a potato system). wvdial looks all good, until we get to the login: --> Carrier detected. Waiting for prompt. login: --> Looks like a login p

pppd troubles

2001-06-19 Thread MaD dUCK
hey all, we are still failing to establish a connection with wvdial and pppd (on a potato system). wvdial looks all good, until we get to the login: --> Carrier detected. Waiting for prompt. login: --> Looks like a login prompt. --> Sending: heikkin heikkin Password: --> Looks like