procmail solution against swen

2003-09-22 Thread Olav Lavell
If your internet provider lets you run procmail before getting the mail from their server, or if you run procmail yourself, the following recipe (to be put in your ~/.procmailrc or /etc/procmailrc) will effectively drop all swen-related stuff to the waste basket. I think it's a clever one, no

Re: procmail solution against swen

2003-09-22 Thread HdV
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Olav Lavell wrote: If your internet provider lets you run procmail before getting the mail from their server, or if you run procmail yourself, the following recipe (to be put in your ~/.procmailrc or /etc/procmailrc) will effectively drop all swen-related stuff to the

Re: procmail solution against swen

2003-09-22 Thread christophe barbe
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 11:08:39AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Olav Lavell wrote: If your internet provider lets you run procmail before getting the mail from their server, or if you run procmail yourself, the following recipe (to be put in your ~/.procmailrc or

Re: procmail solution against swen

2003-09-22 Thread Kevin Buhr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Credits to go Victor Duchovni. He posted it on the postfix-users list after some experiments with body_checks. It does do a very good job stopping these mails indeed. Um, credits go to Kevin Buhr on alt.sysadmin.recovery, thank you very much, unless Victor and I

Re: procmail solution against swen

2003-09-22 Thread Kevin Buhr
Kevin Buhr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Um, credits go to Kevin Buhr on alt.sysadmin.recovery, thank you very much, unless Victor and I happened to come up with exactly the same recipe down to the byte range and choice of Base64 line. ;) Okay, I found Victor's post, and it looks like Victor

Re: procmail solution against swen

2003-09-22 Thread HdV
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Kevin Buhr wrote: Kevin Buhr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Um, credits go to Kevin Buhr on alt.sysadmin.recovery, thank you very much, unless Victor and I happened to come up with exactly the same recipe down to the byte range and choice of Base64 line. ;) Knowing

Re: procmail solution against swen

2003-09-22 Thread HdV
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, christophe barbe wrote: It has the merit to be compact but the inconvenient to read the body. Which is about the only reliable way to filter it. I use the followings procmail rules: :0: * 10 *^subject: (undeliverable |undelivered |returned )*(mail|message)(:*

Re: procmail solution against swen

2003-09-22 Thread christophe barbe
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 12:16:34AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, christophe barbe wrote: It has the merit to be compact but the inconvenient to read the body. Which is about the only reliable way to filter it. ... Not reliable enough for my taste, too much chances