If your internet provider lets you run procmail before getting the mail
from their server, or if you run procmail yourself, the following recipe
(to be put in your ~/.procmailrc or /etc/procmailrc) will effectively
drop all swen-related stuff to the waste basket. I think it's a clever
one, no
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Olav Lavell wrote:
If your internet provider lets you run procmail before getting the mail
from their server, or if you run procmail yourself, the following recipe
(to be put in your ~/.procmailrc or /etc/procmailrc) will effectively
drop all swen-related stuff to the
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 11:08:39AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Olav Lavell wrote:
If your internet provider lets you run procmail before getting the mail
from their server, or if you run procmail yourself, the following recipe
(to be put in your ~/.procmailrc or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Credits to go Victor Duchovni. He posted it on the postfix-users list
after some experiments with body_checks. It does do a very good job
stopping these mails indeed.
Um, credits go to Kevin Buhr on alt.sysadmin.recovery, thank you very
much, unless Victor and I
Kevin Buhr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Um, credits go to Kevin Buhr on alt.sysadmin.recovery, thank you very
much, unless Victor and I happened to come up with exactly the same
recipe down to the byte range and choice of Base64 line. ;)
Okay, I found Victor's post, and it looks like Victor
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Kevin Buhr wrote:
Kevin Buhr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Um, credits go to Kevin Buhr on alt.sysadmin.recovery, thank you very
much, unless Victor and I happened to come up with exactly the same
recipe down to the byte range and choice of Base64 line. ;)
Knowing
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, christophe barbe wrote:
It has the merit to be compact but the inconvenient to read the body.
Which is about the only reliable way to filter it.
I use the followings procmail rules:
:0:
* 10
*^subject: (undeliverable |undelivered |returned )*(mail|message)(:*
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 12:16:34AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, christophe barbe wrote:
It has the merit to be compact but the inconvenient to read the body.
Which is about the only reliable way to filter it.
...
Not reliable enough for my taste, too much chances
8 matches
Mail list logo