On Tue, Aug 10, 1999 at 03:32:26PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote
> > But if a user removes the S99xdm link in rc2.d then the next time xdm is
> > upgraded it will be added again. This issue of the package managment
> > tools over writing what the system administrator sets has been debated
> > before,
> "BS" == Brian Servis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BS> But if a user removes the S99xdm link in rc2.d then the next
BS> time xdm is upgraded it will be added again. This issue of the
BS> package managment tools over writing what the system
BS> administrator sets has been debated before
> But if a user removes the S99xdm link in rc2.d then the next time xdm is
> upgraded it will be added again. This issue of the package managment
> tools over writing what the system administrator sets has been debated
> before, in favor of the system administrator(Recall the /usr/doc/*.gz
> issue
*- On 10 Aug, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote about "Re: rc?.d policy?"
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> On Tue, 10 Aug 1999, Brian Servis wrote:
>
>> But if a user removes the S99xdm link in rc2.d then the next time xdm is
>> upgraded it will be added again. T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Tue, 10 Aug 1999, Brian Servis wrote:
> But if a user removes the S99xdm link in rc2.d then the next time xdm is
> upgraded it will be added again. This issue of the package managment
> tools over writing what the system administrator sets has been debated
>
*- On 10 Aug, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote about "Re: rc?.d policy?"
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Brian Servis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>No Debian has no policy about runlevels, which is pretty strange if
>>you ask me, they rejected a bug aga
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Brian Servis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>No Debian has no policy about runlevels, which is pretty strange if
>you ask me, they rejected a bug against policy on this issue. Nothing
>is stopping you from changing your own system around. But be aware that
>whenever yo
*- On 9 Aug, Gary L. Hennigan wrote about "rc?.d policy?"
> Is there any policy on which run level does what? Just looking at
> rc2.d and rc3.d they appear identical. Personally I like level 2 to
> boot non-X and level 3 to be exactly the same, but starts an X login
> man
Is there any policy on which run level does what? Just looking at
rc2.d and rc3.d they appear identical. Personally I like level 2 to
boot non-X and level 3 to be exactly the same, but starts an X login
manager, e.g., wdm or xdm. Is there any reason I shouldn't update the
rc2.d and rc3.d accordingl
9 matches
Mail list logo
