>> Why are WinModems not supported by Linux,
>> Besides the fact that they suck. Since they are the most used in
Laptops,
>> wouldn't it be advantageous to make Linux drivers for them?
>//
>
>isn't it that the winmodem mfg's don't release the
>specs, so it would be extremely difficult to write
>
Wayne Sitton writes:
> Why doesn't the linux community push for these specs. I read all the
> time about going after the video chip manufactures to provide specs, Why
> aren't modems looked at in the same fashion?
They are. However, the winmodem manufactuers buy the DSP software in their
drivers
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 1:46 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: network
Wayne Sitton writes:
> Why doesn't the linux community push for these specs. I read all the
> time about going after the video chip manufactures to
"Wayne Sitton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does anyone know how to get either a UMAX 250TX 10/100 pcmcia network card
> or a 3COM 3CCFE574BT pcmcia network adapter to work in debian?
>
> And just for my own knowledge, Why are WinModems not supported by Linux,
> Besides the fact that they suck.
On Fri, Mar 24, 2000 at 12:38:14PM -0800, Beavis wrote:
> how do i reconfigure my network
> change my ip, dns, gateway, etc.
depending on your Debian version:
slink (or upgraded slink to potato):
edit /etc/init.d/network
pure potato:
edit /etc/network/interfaces
For any of them, edit /etc/
On Fri, Mar 24, 2000 at 12:38:14PM -0800, Beavis wrote:
> how do i reconfigure my network
> change my ip, dns, gateway, etc.
>
> thankx
Edit the following files in /etc/
resolv.conf
hosts
networks
/etc/init.d/network
All should work easily. No need to reboot like Windows.
--
Patrick Kirk
Diplo
>
>I am able to ping from the W2K-machine to the Debian-machine and vice-versa.
>
>After this I did apt-get install ipmasq, what seems to go right.
>
>The configuratio of the W2K-machine is the same as I had before when I was
>running Mandrake,
>static ip 192.168.0.253, gateway 192.168.0.1 and the
I haven't got answers...only more questions. I am trying to do the same,
but am not able to ping my win98 pc. I have internal IPs assigned and my
PCs can ping each other...but there's some hangup with the linux box.
There are 2 in it, one external (works fine) and an internal (not able to
ping o
On Monday 01 October 2001 05:48 pm, Rory O'Connor wrote:
> I haven't got answers...only more questions. I am trying to do the same,
> but am not able to ping my win98 pc. I have internal IPs assigned and my
> PCs can ping each other...but there's some hangup with the linux box.
>
> There are 2 in
From: "Jason Boxman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I like to check /var/log/dmesg and syslog. The card that cannot ping or
be
> pinged may actually be experiencing a hardware issue. I had a card once
that
> I was able to assign an IP to, but it failed to function. It turns out it
> was an IRQ conflict.
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 11:12:49PM +, Hans Steinraht wrote:
I just tried make menuconfig but make (very nice to install on Debian) didn't
recognized
the option menuconfig.
I'am going to look how to compile a kernel (I knew that once the first time
should come).
What I do not understand
Thus spake Hans Steinraht:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 11:12:49PM +, Hans Steinraht wrote:
>
>
>
> I just tried make menuconfig but make (very nice to install on Debian) didn't
> recognized
> the option menuconfig.
>
> I'am going to look how to compile a kernel (I knew that once the first t
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Stephen Gran wrote:
SG> you have t be in the directory /usr/src/linux when you make menuconfig
SG> or make xconfig. Also, Ip masquerading is something that is usually an
SG> optional thing compiled in - if you're running a vanilla kernel, it's
SG> probably not.
2.2.18pre21 fr
I installed "compact" from floppy's, so maybe it's not compiled in this kernel,
I let you
know when I find it out.
Another thing, I'm trying to do make meuconfig and make xconfig in the dir
/usr/src/linux, as root
and as normal user, but both my Mandrake an Debian machine it says:
make: *
>Another thing, I'm trying to do make meuconfig and make xconfig in the dir
>/usr/src/linux, as root
>and as normal user, but both my Mandrake an Debian machine it says:
>make: *** No rule to make target `menuconfig'. Stop.
>
>Do I mis something?
>
>Hans
>
>
>
You have to check that bib86 a
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 06:38:27PM +, Hans Steinraht wrote:
| Another thing, I'm trying to do make meuconfig and make xconfig in
| the dir /usr/src/linux, as root and as normal user, but both my
| Mandrake an Debian machine it says:
| make: *** No rule to make target `menuconfig'. Stop.
|
$ dpkg -S /etc/init.d/network\*
netbase: /etc/init.d/networking
Do you have netbase installed?
My interfaces are described in /etc/network/interfaces
~mark
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Grover" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian"
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 7:01 PM
Subject: netw
I do have a /etc/network/interfaces file
But it just has local host defined in it.
Can some one show me one with eth0 in it?
thanks, mike
Mark Lanett wrote:
>
> $ dpkg -S /etc/init.d/network\*
> netbase: /etc/init.d/networking
>
> Do you have netbase installed?
>
> My interfaces are describe
man 5 interfaces
(the sample is missing the gateway line)
~mark
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Grover" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Cc:
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 7:51 PM
Subject: Re: network
>
> I do have a /etc/network/interfaces file
> But it just
Hello Zheng
What does the dmesg command say? Did it see the card and
load the driver at boot time?
If so, what does ifconfig say?
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Zheng Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: Wednesday, October 07, 1998 9:04 AM
Subject: network
>
> Hi,
> I installed the debian but the network part does not work. I have a 3Com
> Ethernet XL NIC adaptor (3c905b-tx). Does somebody have experience with
> this kind of network problem. Thanks.
>
I recently mailed to this list about my problems with exactly the same
card. The problem is in t
Hi, Peter,
I checked the dmesg and only saw "network is not reachable" is related to
network. I suspect whether linux support this network adaptor (3c905b-tx).
I went to 3com product category. It seems that this adaptor is made for
window or NT. Actually, my machine is installed NT. It works fine w
Hi Zheng,
That is the same card that I have. I does indeed work under Linux.
The advice I can offer from personal experience is that when you are
either doing a fresh install and you are told to install modules into
the kernel, or when you configuring the kernel to compile it, you
need
Hi, David,
Thanks for the advice. I am doing a fresh install. My CD is on the way to
my place, so I only download the 1440resc.bin, 1440driv.bin and those
base*.bins. When I was asked to configure the module, I could not find
anything with NIC or "Vortex/Boomerang" among the choice list. I am usin
Hi, David, Thanks for you mail. I just got my CD. Actually it is 2.0.34.
But I don't know why it works. In the network configure step, the Vortex
did not stack as it used to be. But I have further more question for you
or other users that can help me.
1. When I tried to install other packages from
iquest wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm fairly new in setup network. I'd like to know is there
> any document that describe how to setup a network that has
> Linux, Windows/NT boxes. I think
>
> I'd like to be able to share files, printers, CDROM, etc on
> all these machines. Many thank in ad
hi there we can ourself but we can not see each
other all cables have been tested and checked
Mans Joling wrote:
> Hi,
> I have installed a 3c905b network card using modconf.
> After linux starting up I see that he found him.
> I have edit the host file and added the 2 ip adresses and look like
> this
> 127.0.0.1 localhost
> 192.168.1.9 myhost
> 192.168.1.8 other
> reboot
> When I do a pi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Wed, 18 Dec 1996 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi! I have the Debian Linux installed on my PC, but I want to know how
> can I make a Telnet connection from a Windows 3.1 system to Linux. Where can
> I
> get the TCP/IP configuration for Windows and Linux.
If
At 01:03 PM 12/18/96 +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hi! I have the Debian Linux installed on my PC, but I want to know how
>can I make a Telnet connection from a Windows 3.1 system to Linux. Where
can I
>get the TCP/IP configuration for Windows and Linux.
> I want to know what's the E-Mai
Run 'lspci' to find out what ethernet card you have. You then need to locate
the matching module under 'modconf'.
An alternative is to install discover to automatically load all modules. This
is the package that Knoppix and Mandrake uses and is now on Debian's new beta
installation CD.
--
To
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 04:57:01PM -0700, Glenn English wrote:
> (Another problem: I can't find the boot log.
> Where is it on Debian?)
dmesg
> The networking isn't set at all - eth0 doesn't
> exist (ifconfig and webmin both say so, and the ready LED on the Orinoco
> card is off) and there's no de
On 01 Apr 2003 16:57:01 -0700
Glenn English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm afraid I've bent my networking, and I can't figure out how to fix
> it. It used to work.
>
> Sarge, Dell Latitude, 512 MB RAM, PCMCIA Orinoco wireless.
In /etc/network/interfaces, if you have "auto eth0" comment it out
On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 17:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In /etc/network/interfaces, if you have "auto eth0" comment it out.
>
> Then restart networking:
>
> /etc/init.d/networking restart
>
> Then try restarting PCMCIA:
>
> /etc/init.d/pcmcia restart
>
> The idea is that pcmcia should bring u
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 07:46:11PM -0700, Glenn English wrote:
> That did it - pretty much. It took killall cardmrg to get pcmcia to
> stop. Restart said it was busy. There's only one PCMCIA card in this
> machine. I don't know what it was busy doing...
i think cardmgr manages the pcmcia controller
You can not connect a ethernet controller and a modem together. They are
two different protocols and can not talk. You can pickup an ethernet card
for your P3 based PC though and connect a cat5 crossover cable between
them.
Mike
On 7 Jan 2003 03:33:06 -, "rahul i" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 02:05:49PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> I have plugged in a supplied cat-5 jumper into a port of the local switch
> serving that room and now need to find it on my local net IF it has a ping
> responder.
>
> So the questions are:
> What do I need to change in my network co
On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 02:05:49PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> Greetings all netsperts;
>
> I've purchased a new 3d printer which is factory equipt with klipper.
[...]
> So the questions are:
> What do I need to change in my network config on this machine so I can ping
> all 65536 address of t
On 11/9/23 14:41, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 02:05:49PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
Greetings all netsperts;
I've purchased a new 3d printer which is factory equipt with klipper.
[...]
So the questions are:
What do I need to change in my network config on this machine s
On 11/9/23 14:15, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 02:05:49PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
I have plugged in a supplied cat-5 jumper into a port of the local switch
serving that room and now need to find it on my local net IF it has a ping
responder.
So the questions are:
What do I n
On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 04:40:22PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> On 11/9/23 14:41, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
> A possibility I hadn't considered yet, but that might need the CIDR changed
> also.
You don't change CIDR. You change your netmask.
No you don't have to: tcpdump puts your interface
On Thu 04 Apr 2024 at 19:11:31 (+0200), Hans wrote:
> again an easy thing, I did not understand and where I did not find a clear
> answer in the web.
>
> Question:
>
> In network-manager I find "network-priority" set to "0".
>
> Is zero the highes priority or the lowest?
This might be what y
On 05/04/2024 04:29, David Wright wrote:
autoconnect-priorityint32 0 [...]
from
https://developer-old.gnome.org/NetworkManager/stable/settings-connection.html
(I don't know the significance of -old.)
It is documented in nm-settings-nmcli(5)
Am Wed, 19 Jun 2024 10:14:32 +0800
schrieb Jeff Peng :
> when my server is a vps who has floating IP (that means, the server's
> iP is an internal IP, the public ip is bond on provider's
> router/firewall devices), then my ssh client connecting to the server
> will never disconnect even if I chang
Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> hi,
> I have the following problem on my laptop.
> my /etc/network/interfaces file contains:
>auto enp0s1
>iface enp0s1 inet static
>address 192.168.1.10
>netmask 255.255.255.0
>gateway 192.168.1.1
>
>but after boot, ifconfig gives
>
>address
On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 10:00:45PM +0200, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> hi,
> I have the following problem on my laptop.
> my /etc/network/interfaces file contains:
>auto enp0s1
>iface enp0s1 inet static
>address 192.168.1.10
>netmask 255.255.255.0
>gateway 192.168.1.1
>
>but a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, October 5, 2021 2:00 PM, Pierre Frenkiel
wrote:
> hi,
> I have the following problem on my laptop.
> my /etc/network/interfaces file contains:
> auto enp0s1
> iface enp0s1 inet static
> address 192.16
Hi.
On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 10:00:45PM +0200, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> hi,
> I have the following problem on my laptop.
> my /etc/network/interfaces file contains:
>auto enp0s1
>iface enp0s1 inet static
>address 192.168.1.10
>netmask 255.255.255.0
>gateway 192.168.1.1
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 05:44:50PM +0400, ruslan axundov wrote:
> I tried to use debian 9 and when I
> enter static dns server for debian in resolve.conf then after reboot
> debian all dns ip removed from resolv.conf file. I tried multiple method to
> prevent this feature but nothing happen. what
Le 02/08/2017 à 16:19, Greg Wooledge a écrit :
1) Make sure the Debian "resolvconf" package is *not* installed.
You should reconsider this advice. resolvconf may be your best ally to
handle such a situation.
3) I have utterly no idea how Network-Manager works
Me neither, but I know one t
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 08:10:23PM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 02/08/2017 à 16:19, Greg Wooledge a écrit :
> >
> > 1) Make sure the Debian "resolvconf" package is *not* installed.
>
> You should reconsider this advice. resolvconf may be your best ally to
> handle such a situation.
OK, I'v
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 05:44:50PM +0400, ruslan axundov wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a problem with debian 9 as static nameserver .
> So that I used before ubuntu 16.04 and I have configure satatic ip and dns
> and it worked perfectly but today I tried to use debian 9 and when I
> enter static dns s
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 02:55:50PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 08:10:23PM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> > Le 02/08/2017 à 16:19, Greg Wooledge a écrit :
> > >
> > > 1) Make sure the Debian "resolvconf" package is *not* installed.
> >
> > You should reconsider this advi
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 11:09:48AM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> Perhaps in certain scenarios, yes - the world's full of wierd
> networks :)
Concrete examples? OK.
Work system: the Information Technology Division (ITD) runs the DHCP
servers, which are basically built around the assumption that
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 08:53:27AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> But the problem is, various Unix DHCP client daemons do *too much*.
> All I want them to do is set the IP address, netmask, and gateway.
> I *don't* want them to change the system hostname, or the system
> resolv.conf (in which I have
On 08/02/2017 06:56 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>
> I've preferred a static networking config for years, and resolvconf
> works well in this situation - but once resolvconf is configured,
> I've always put the dns setting in /etc/networks/interfaces
I agree with this as well. If you want to use st
Le 03/08/2017 à 15:52, Zenaan Harkness a écrit :
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 08:53:27AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
But the problem is, various Unix DHCP client daemons do *too much*.
All I want them to do is set the IP address, netmask, and gateway.
I *don't* want them to change the system hostname
Le 03/08/2017 à 17:20, Joshua Schaeffer a écrit :
Configuration in /etc/network/interfaces only works when NetworkManager isn't
installed,
Wrong. The default NetworkManager behaviour is not to manage interfaces
defined in /etc/network/interfaces.
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 08:53:06PM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 03/08/2017 à 17:20, Joshua Schaeffer a écrit :
> >
> > Configuration in /etc/network/interfaces only works when NetworkManager
> > isn't installed,
>
> Wrong. The default NetworkManager behaviour is not to manage interfaces
>
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 08:49:05PM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 03/08/2017 à 15:52, Zenaan Harkness a écrit :
> > On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 08:53:27AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > > But the problem is, various Unix DHCP client daemons do *too much*.
> > > All I want them to do is set the IP
On Fri, 4 Aug 2017 10:59:13 +1000
Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>
> Given the uniqueness of how you seem to want to do your networking,
> perhaps that's the best option to make it less abnormal - looks like
> it to me.
>
I don't think it's really all that unique, or unreasonable, for a
computer user
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 08:49:05PM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 03/08/2017 à 15:52, Zenaan Harkness a écrit :
> >On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 08:53:27AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> >>But the problem is, various Unix DHCP client daemons do *too much*
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 10:14:20AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 08:49:05PM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> > Le 03/08/2017 à 15:52, Zenaan Harkness a écrit :
> > >On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 08:53:27AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > >>But the problem is, various Unix DHCP c
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 09:01:32AM +0100, Joe wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Aug 2017 10:59:13 +1000
> Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > Given the uniqueness of how you seem to want to do your networking,
> > perhaps that's the best option to make it less abnormal - looks like
> > it to me.
>
> I don't think it's r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 12:11:28AM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 10:14:20AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[chattr]
> Another command that could be add to /e/n/i :)
you nasty ;-)
cheers
- -- t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
On Saturday 05 August 2017 04:13:24 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 12:11:28AM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 10:14:20AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> [chattr]
>
> > Another command that could be add to /e/n/i :)
>
> you nasty ;-)
>
> cheers
> -- t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 10:37:42AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Saturday 05 August 2017 04:13:24 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 12:11:28AM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 10:14:20AM +0200, to...@tu
On Thu, 22 Mar 2018, David wrote:
> Does Debian keep a table of MAC addresses? If so where can I locate it?
The kernel does. You can get the ARP table e.g. with
ip neigh list
This table is relatively short-lived and if you haven't talked to that
device recently it might not show up in the ta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 09:46:02AM +, Thomas Pircher wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2018, David wrote:
> > Does Debian keep a table of MAC addresses? If so where can I locate it?
>
> The kernel does. You can get the ARP table e.g. with
>
> ip neigh li
On Thu, 2018-03-22 at 11:15 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 09:46:02AM +, Thomas Pircher wrote:
> > On Thu, 22 Mar 2018, David wrote:
> > > Does Debian keep a table of MAC addresses? If so where can I locate it?
> >
> > The kernel does. You can get the ARP table e.g. wi
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:50:59AM +, David wrote:
On Thu, 2018-03-22 at 11:15 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 09:46:02AM +, Thomas Pircher wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2018, David wrote:
> > Does Debian keep a table of MAC addresses? If so where can I locate it?
>
> Th
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 02:45:07PM +, Darac Marjal wrote:
> So, what about locally-created Ethernet devices (e.g. Virtual Machine
> interfaces, or devices without a burned-in MAC address)? For these,
> you don't need to apply for your own OUI. The MAC address standard
> states that if the seco
On 8/6/2018 1:53 AM, Ilyass Kaouam wrote:
If I choose to configure the network during installation, where can I
configure the network after?
on which file, because in /etc/network/interfaces I don't see the ip
address, subnetwork ...
It depends which pkg you choose to install during installati
pened to the text on that site since I put it up in pure
ascii without any markup editing. If need be, I think I can find it
among my files here.
On Mon, 6 Aug 2018, john doe wrote:
> Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 02:02:52
> From: john doe
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Sub
On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 04:01:44 -0400
Jude DaShiell wrote:
> If you do a command line install with no graphics, you end up with no
> network configuration once installation completes.
Not in my experience.
At one time, if you did a non-expert install with no network DHCP
server, then you got no net
On 2018-08-06, Joe wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 04:01:44 -0400
> Jude DaShiell wrote:
>
>> If you do a command line install with no graphics, you end up with no
>> network configuration once installation completes.
>
> Not in my experience.
>
> At one time, if you did a non-expert install with no
Thank you for all your reply,
I configured the network via the GUI during installation, the network works
perfectly.
I just want to know if I want to change the address or ..., without going
through the GUI, where I can make my changes, knowing that the
/etc/network/interfaces file does not conta
On 8/6/2018 11:16 AM, Ilyass Kaouam wrote:
Thank you for all your reply,
I configured the network via the GUI during installation, the network works
perfectly.
I just want to know if I want to change the address or ..., without going
through the GUI, where I can make my changes, knowing that the
On 8/6/2018 12:12 PM, Ilyass Kaouam wrote:
I configured my network here (see attached picture please)
[image: Capture d’écran 2018-08-06 à 12.12.06.png]
I don't have access to images.
What is the output of:
$ cat /etc/resolv.conf
--
John Doe
# Generated by NetworkManager
nameserver 8.8.8.8
Le lun. 6 août 2018 à 14:01, john doe a écrit :
> On 8/6/2018 12:12 PM, Ilyass Kaouam wrote:
> > I configured my network here (see attached picture please)
> >
> > [image: Capture d’écran 2018-08-06 à 12.12.06.png]
> >
>
> I don't have access t
Thank's John :) :)
Le lun. 6 août 2018 à 21:40, john doe a écrit :
> On 8/6/2018 9:15 PM, Ilyass Kaouam wrote:
> > # Generated by NetworkManager
> >
>
> Ok -- The app "NetworkManager" is managing your interfaces.
>
> To deal with NetworkManager through the CLI and config files you will
> need to
On 8/6/2018 9:15 PM, Ilyass Kaouam wrote:
# Generated by NetworkManager
Ok -- The app "NetworkManager" is managing your interfaces.
To deal with NetworkManager through the CLI and config files you will
need to do some reading:
https://developer.gnome.org/NetworkManager/stable/nm-settings-k
Hi, I've never used OVH. How certain are you that the e1000 network driver
is the correct one?
Under VMWare/ESX the network driver choice can be crucial, for example.
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 6:30 AM Kevin DAGNEAUX
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've a server in OVH datacenter, on this server i've 7 VMs, on 1
Hi.
Please do not top post. This is a mailing list, not a corporate e-mail
spamfest.
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 01:18:52PM -0500, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
> Hi, I've never used OVH. How certain are you that the e1000 network driver
> is the correct one?
> Under VMWare/ESX the network driver
Dear all,
the explanation of Reco seems quite good for me.
If you use load generator on your mobile device it could be the reason.
What happens if you use a normal download for a large file? Do you get the
same result?
If yes, I advise to look at your hardware configuration like flow control.
Th
Dear Kevin,
and just one more thing.
I am beginner with iptables, but your POSTROUTING doesn't seem good as well.
You made a POSTROUTING in the case of VM-s what you manage (they can see
the internet), but there is no source change on IP packets which goes in
the direction of your VM-s. Your curr
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 2:00 PM Reco wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 01:18:52PM -0500, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
> > Hi, I've never used OVH. How certain are you that the e1000 network driver
> > is the correct one?
> > Under VMWare/ESX the network driver choice can be crucial, for example.
>
> 1)
> ... I advise to look at your hardware configuration like flow control.
> This line doesn't seem good for me (mind the text in bold):
>
> "Aug 28 15:50:34 ovh-1 kernel: e1000e: enp1s0 NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps Full
> Duplex, *Flow Control: None"*
In general, enabling flow control is a bad idea - mo
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 09:58:47PM +0300, Reco wrote:
3) e1000e may be bad, but vmxnet3 will make oom-killer an everyday
reality. SR-IOV is a way to go.
everyday? really? when did you last try this?
Hi.
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 03:37:52PM -0500, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 2:00 PM Reco wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 01:18:52PM -0500, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
> > > Hi, I've never used OVH. How certain are you that the e1000 network driver
> > > is the correct
Hi.
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 06:43:00PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 09:58:47PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> > 3) e1000e may be bad, but vmxnet3 will make oom-killer an everyday
> > reality. SR-IOV is a way to go.
>
> everyday? really? when did you last try this?
Saw the
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 07:32:24AM +0300, Reco wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 06:43:00PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 09:58:47PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> 3) e1000e may be bad, but vmxnet3 will make oom-killer an everyday
> reality. SR-IOV is a way to go.
everyday? really? whe
Hi.
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 06:38:50AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 07:32:24AM +0300, Reco wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 06:43:00PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 09:58:47PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> > > > 3) e1000e may be bad, but vmxnet
Hi
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 09:26:56AM -0400, Roman Gelfand wrote:
> Looking at the tcp stream, below, of a smtp conversation, it appears
> there is 5 second delay before the actual smtp conversation begins.
> Is this normal behavior. If not, any ideas what/where specifically,
> in networking, I s
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 09:26:56AM -0400, Roman Gelfand wrote:
> Looking at the tcp stream, below, of a smtp conversation, it appears
> there is 5 second delay before the actual smtp conversation begins.
> Is this normal behavior. If not, any ideas what/where specifically,
> in networking, I shoul
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Conder
To: Debian User List
Sent: 7/11/01 9:27 AM
Subject: Network Startup
Greetings,
Thanks to everyone's help I am pretty much up and running :)
And I finally bought a book "Running Linux", it's been a lot
of help too.
I created a file etc/init.d/networ
> The cards have a chip with 82559 on it, which I believe is a re-branded
> Intel chip. I have downloaded all the linux drivers for this chipset from
> http://www.intel.com and copied them to FDD. The files are .tar.gz which I
> think is a compressed file format which (luckily) WinZip opens. The
Hi,
i think there's some file called README or INSTALL among the files in the
archive. Read these! There usually is explained how to install the drivers.
I also think that what you've downloaded are only the sources. You have to
compile them first to get the real drivers out. But as saif before, t
> i think there's some file called README or INSTALL among the
> files in the
> archive. Read these! There usually is explained how to
> install the drivers.
> I also think that what you've downloaded are only the
> sources. You have to
> compile them first to get the real drivers out. But as sa
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 11:52:55AM +0100, Andrew Laurence wrote:
| > i think there's some file called README or INSTALL among the
| > files in the
| > archive. Read these! There usually is explained how to
| > install the drivers.
| > I also think that what you've downloaded are only the
| > sou
1 - 100 of 2069 matches
Mail list logo
