Hello.
Works here.
2024-04-17, tr, 12:23 Marco Moock rašė:
>
> Am 17.04.2024 um 05:26:57 Uhr schrieb fxkl4...@protonmail.com:
>
> > is it broken or just me
>
> Works here.
>
> Please give more details and run
> sudo traceroute -T -p 80 security.debian.org -6
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 05:26:57AM +, fxkl4...@protonmail.com wrote:
> have a look at
>
> https://security.debian.org/debian-security/dists/bookworm-security/updates/
>
> is it broken or just me
Works here, too.
Folks -- "broken" is a very short problem descript
Am 17.04.2024 um 05:26:57 Uhr schrieb fxkl4...@protonmail.com:
> is it broken or just me
Works here.
Please give more details and run
sudo traceroute -T -p 80 security.debian.org -6
--
Gruß
Marco
Send unsolicited bulk mail to 1713324417mu...@cartoonies.org
In days of yore (Wed, 17 Apr 2024), fxkl4...@protonmail.com thus quoth:
> have a look at
>
> https://security.debian.org/debian-security/dists/bookworm-security/updates/
>
> is it broken or just me
>
w.f.m. from here (Sweden).
--
Kind regards,
/S
have a look at
https://security.debian.org/debian-security/dists/bookworm-security/updates/
is it broken or just me
> > something else?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> bullseye/updates is not the location for bullseye's security repo.
> Change the relevant line in your sources.list to:
>
> deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security/ bullseye-security main
>
> Add contrib and non-free
hanks.
> >
> bullseye/updates is not the location for bullseye's security repo.
> Change the relevant line in your sources.list to:
>
> deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security/ bullseye-security main
FYI, the Debian Handbook says that this was changed in Debian 11
Bu
evant line in your sources.list to:
deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security/ bullseye-security main
Add contrib and non-free at the end if you use them.
Regards,
Frank
Hi. I did a apt-get update changing from buster to bullseye and got
the above message -- should I just wait a few days and try again or
something else?
Thanks.
--
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is:
How do
you spend it?
John Covici wb2una
c
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 10:34:24AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> Some Debian releases can run two completely different kernel versions,
> like buster with 4.19 and 5.10. IIRC jessie could run 4.9 kernels from
> backports.
The possible range of kernels is quite large. You can actually run a
kernel
On Tue 13 Jul 2021 at 12:09:13 (+0200), Michael Lange wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 09:27:35 + mabi wrote:
>
> (...)
> > So I can simply skip upgrading to 3.16.0-10 and upgrading directly to
> > 3.16.0-11 by downloading the .deb package as you suggest?
"Skipping" isn't a useful concept with re
Hi,
On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 09:27:35 +
mabi wrote:
(...)
> So I can simply skip upgrading to 3.16.0-10 and upgrading directly to
> 3.16.0-11 by downloading the .deb package as you suggest?
>
> Then is it simply a matter of running "dpkg -i
> linux-image-3.16.0-11-amd64_3.16.84-1_amd64.deb" and
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, July 13th, 2021 at 10:26 AM, Michael Lange
wrote:
> I know this does not answer your question about the sources.list, but if
>
> it is only about the linux-image package and for some reason you cannot
>
> use a kernel newer than 3.16, maybe instead o
Hi,
On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 04:29:59 +
mabi wrote:
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
>
> On Tuesday, July 13th, 2021 at 3:29 AM, David Wright
> wrote:
>
> > Your sources.list generated the URL:
> >
> > http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/l/linux/li
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, July 13th, 2021 at 3:29 AM, David Wright
wrote:
> Your sources.list generated the URL:
>
> http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/l/linux/linux-image-3.16.0-10-amd64_3.16.81-1_amd64.deb
>
> whereas this file is availabl
On Mon 12 Jul 2021 at 19:47:37 (+), mabi wrote:
> Thank you Dan for your hint regarding the archive.debian.org APT repo. I have
> now the following in my sources.list file:
>
> deb http://archive.debian.org/debian/ jessie contrib main non-free
> deb http://security.debian.org/
Thank you Dan for your hint regarding the archive.debian.org APT repo. I have
now the following in my sources.list file:
deb http://archive.debian.org/debian/ jessie contrib main non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main contrib non-free
Unfortunately it still does not work
On 7/12/21 10:07 PM, mabi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I still have an older Debian 8.11 system running and would like to apply the
> latest security patches. Unfortunately it seems like some packages are
> missing from http://security.debian.org as you can see in the apt-get
> upd
mabi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I still have an older Debian 8.11 system running and would like to apply the
> latest security patches. Unfortunately it seems like some packages are
> missing from http://security.debian.org as you can see in the apt-get
> update/upgrade"
Hello,
I still have an older Debian 8.11 system running and would like to apply the
latest security patches. Unfortunately it seems like some packages are missing
from http://security.debian.org as you can see in the apt-get update/upgrade"
below:
$ sudo apt-get update
Ign
Thanks Reco, adding the slash did the trick.
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi.
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 08:40:20AM +0100, Szilárd Andai wrote:
> The entry for security.debian.org in /etc/apt/sources.list contains these two
> rows, which use plain HTTP and not HTTPS for getting the Debian security
> updates:
> deb http://security.debian.org/deb
Hi,
The entry for security.debian.org in /etc/apt/sources.list contains
these two rows, which use plain HTTP and not HTTPS for getting the
Debian security updates:
deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye-security main
deb-src http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye
On 7/5/20 10:00 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
>
>> does anybody know why http://security.debian.org is so slow.
>
>> Today and yesterday I downloaded security updates and download speed
>> was about 700-800 Kbytes/s.
>
> security.debian.o
Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
> does anybody know why http://security.debian.org is so slow.
> Today and yesterday I downloaded security updates and download speed
> was about 700-800 Kbytes/s.
security.debian.org is provided through the Fastly CDN, so the slowness
really depends on the ne
Hi list,
does anybody know why http://security.debian.org is so slow.
Today and yesterday I downloaded security updates and download speed was
about 700-800 Kbytes/s.
Kind regards
Georgi
rves an HTTP redirect to http://security.debian.org
>
> That doesn't seem to be true. As I said last week, my workplace's
> firewall has recently started blocking Debian's package mirrors, but
>
> deb https://deb.debian.org/debian-security buster/updates main
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 09:13:43PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> Technically, you can: https://deb.debian.org/debian-security
> Not that using it will not be useful in any way as currently it just
> serves an HTTP redirect to http://security.debian.org
That doesn't seem to be true. As I
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 09:13:43PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 06:48:59PM +0100, André Rodier wrote:
> > I am investigating the option to enforce https access on my network,
> > and I am surprised I have no way to access security.debian.org.
Hi.
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 06:48:59PM +0100, André Rodier wrote:
> I am investigating the option to enforce https access on my network,
> and I am surprised I have no way to access security.debian.org.
Technically, you can: https://deb.debian.org/debian-security
Not that using i
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 06:48:59PM +0100, André Rodier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am investigating the option to enforce https access on my network,
> and I am surprised I have no way to access security.debian.org.
>
> Is there any reason why https is not supported (yet?), espe
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 07 iul 19, 08:23:59, songbird wrote:
>> with the change to testing the past day the error message pops up:
>>=20
>> E: The repository 'http://security.debian.org/debian-security testing/upd=
> ates Release' no longer has a Relea
On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 11:54:01AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Lu, 08 iul 19, 03:10:53, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 07, 2019 at 03:22:40PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > That will be actually a permanent change, see
> > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2019/06/ms
On Lu, 08 iul 19, 03:10:53, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 07, 2019 at 03:22:40PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > That will be actually a permanent change, see
> > https://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2019/06/msg00015.html . The
> > intention was actually do to it already in earlier
On Du, 07 iul 19, 08:23:59, songbird wrote:
> with the change to testing the past day the error message pops up:
>
> E: The repository 'http://security.debian.org/debian-security testing/updates
> Release' no longer has a Release file.
Not sure why you even have 'se
On Sun, Jul 07, 2019 at 03:22:40PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> That will be actually a permanent change, see
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2019/06/msg00015.html . The
> intention was actually do to it already in earlier cycle, but was not
> possible (cf.
> https://lists.debian
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 07, 2019 at 09:06:29AM -0400, songbird wrote:
> Dan Purgert wrote:
> > songbird wrote:
> >> with the change to testing the past day the error message pops up:
> >>
> >> E: The repository 'http://security.debian.org/debian-security
>
Dan Purgert wrote:
> songbird wrote:
>> with the change to testing the past day the error message pops up:
>>
>> E: The repository 'http://security.debian.org/debian-security
>> testing/updates Release' no longer has a Release file.
>>
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
songbird wrote:
> with the change to testing the past day the error message pops up:
>
> E: The repository 'http://security.debian.org/debian-security
> testing/updates Release' no longer has a Release file.
>
> is
with the change to testing the past day the error message pops up:
E: The repository 'http://security.debian.org/debian-security testing/updates
Release' no longer has a Release file.
is this a temporary glitch or a permanent change?
thanks!
songbird
t; The following NEW packages will be installed:
> libmagick++5
> 0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 315 not
> upgraded.
> Need to get 237 kB of archives. After unpacking 635 kB will be used.
> Err http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updat
5 not upgraded.
Need to get 237 kB of archives. After unpacking 635 kB will be used.
Err http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates/main libmagick++5
amd64 8:6.7.7.10-5+deb7u6
404 Not Found [IP: 128.101.240.215 80]
0% [Working]E: Failed to fetch
http://security.debian.org/pool/updates
anage by firewalls.
>
> I could not get http to work; don't know why. Any ideas?
HTTP virtual host setup, I guess. /dists, /pool or /debian-security seem
to only exist in the security.debian.org virtual host on these servers.
likely OpenDNS has some load balancing of their own perhaps
> >>>> forwarding the request to different internal servers.
> >>>>
> >>>> Perhaps the only solution is to fix a specific IP address for
> >>>> security.debian.org in my local DNS server and t
ferent internal servers.
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps the only solution is to fix a specific IP address for
>>>> security.debian.org in my local DNS server and then only use that!
>>>
>>> Or don't use OpenDNS servers.
>>
>> Or don't try to
; >> Perhaps the only solution is to fix a specific IP address for
> >> security.debian.org in my local DNS server and then only use that!
>
> > Or don't use OpenDNS servers.
>
> Or don't try to build firewall rules based on DNS lookups.
Or amend sources.
Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Greencopper a écrit :
>> Most likely OpenDNS has some load balancing of their own perhaps
>> forwarding the request to different internal servers.
>>
>> Perhaps the only solution is to fix a specific IP address for
>> security.debian.or
Greencopper a écrit :
>
> Most likely OpenDNS has some load balancing of their own perhaps forwarding
> the request to different internal servers.
>
> Perhaps the only solution is to fix a specific IP address for
> security.debian.org in my local DNS server and then only use t
This is actually getting very frustrating!
Doing a nslookup specifying the DNS server provides different results when
done minutes apart!
$ nslookup security.debian.org 208.67.222.222
Server:208.67.222.222
Address:208.67.222.222#53
Non-authoritative answer:
Name
>> Doing a nslookup on the firewall and on the kids boxes provides the same IP
>> addresses for security.debian.org:
>>
>> # nslookup security.debian.org
>> Non-authoritative answer:
>> Name: security.debian.org
>> Address: 212.211.132.32
>> Name:
There seems to be some geographically
El 21/10/15 a las 13:34, David Wright escribió:
Quoting Greencopper (greencopperm...@gmail.com):
I have a firewall with some whitelisted addresses for the kids, one of them is
security.debian.org.
The firewall flushes the tables with fresh IP addresses
Greencopper a écrit :
>
> Doing a nslookup on the firewall and on the kids boxes provides the same IP
> addresses for security.debian.org:
>
> # nslookup security.debian.org
> Non-authoritative answer:
> Name: security.debian.org
> Address: 212.211.132.32
>
On 10/21/2015 09:47 PM, Mario Castelán Castro wrote:
>...
> There seems to be a geographical dependent load balancing DNS server for
> security.debian.org; maybe that is the source of the OP's problem. From
> Mexico I get this:
> ...
I, too, get different answers depending on
On Oct 21, 2015, at 12:34 PM, David Wright wrote:
>> # nslookup security.debian.org
>> Non-authoritative answer:
>> Name: security.debian.org
>> Address: 212.211.132.32
>> Name: security.debian.org
>> Address: 195.20.242.89
>> Name: security.debi
Quoting Greencopper (greencopperm...@gmail.com):
> I have a firewall with some whitelisted addresses for the kids, one of them is
> security.debian.org.
>
> The firewall flushes the tables with fresh IP addresses using a scripted
> cronjob with a nslookup that pulls th
I have a firewall with some whitelisted addresses for the kids, one of them
is security.debian.org.
The firewall flushes the tables with fresh IP addresses using a scripted
cronjob with a nslookup that pulls the addresses and automatically adds
them to the whitelist.
Doing a nslookup on the
I also tested with wget; of these addresses, only 128.31.0.63 supports
HTTPS and has a bad certificate. The output is in Spanish; and it says
that:
Remove "The output is in Spanish" when reading the message. I first
pasted the output of wget when using it with the default language, then
I repl
Thanks you.
I reported the problem as a bug against pseudopackage "debian-security"
<http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=802539>.
I get a different set of IP addresses for security.debian.org; there may
be some geographically dependent load balancing:
-B
bian.org:443 -servername security.debian.org CONNECTED(0003) depth=2 C = US, ST = New Jersey, L = Jersey
> City, O = The USERTRUST Network, CN = USERTrust RSA Certification
> Authority verify error:num=20:unable to get local issuer
> certificate verify return:0
back home now, had anot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 20/10/15 09:01, Michael Jones wrote:
> no peer certificate available
correction, needed sni, will re-test
mike@mike-laptop3:~$ openssl s_client -showcerts -connect
debian.org:443 -servername security.debian.org ...;.f.x...
0030 -
me resolution, instead of, or overriding
> the usual DNS resolution procedure.
>
> I do not understand how I could use /etc/hosts to work around this
> problem. Suppose I make "security.debian.org" resolve to one of the
> IP addresses of "debian.org". Apt will still &q
could use /etc/hosts to work around this
problem. Suppose I make "security.debian.org" resolve to one of the IP
addresses of "debian.org". Apt will still "think" that is is connecting
to "security.debian.org", so there will still be a certificate mismatch,
plu
(for example mirrors.kernel.org). I configured one of them in my
"sources.list".
When I run "apt-get update", I get the following error:
-BEGIN PASTED TEXT
Err https://security.debian.org wheezy/updates/main Sources
SSL: certificate subject name (debian.org) does n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
- Forwarded Message
clicked reply, not reply list...
On 20/10/15 00:15, Mario Castelán Castro wrote:
> My question is: How can I make "apt-get" accept the certificate
> anyway, but only _this_ certificate or other certificates tha
* Fresel Michal:
> just wanted to get some feedback on mailing to > t...@security.debian.org
>
> any knowledge why there is no answer or any ACK of recieve after 8h?
There is no autoresponder, so all replies you receive are written by
hand.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi
00:51 schrieb Fresel Michal - hi competence e.U.:
> hi
>
> just wanted to get some feedback on mailing to > t...@security.debian.org
>
> any knowledge why there is no answer or any ACK of recieve after 8h?
>
> any spam-filter cutting my mails?
> or did i just misspe
hi
just wanted to get some feedback on mailing to > t...@security.debian.org
any knowledge why there is no answer or any ACK of recieve after 8h?
any spam-filter cutting my mails?
or did i just misspelled something?
Greets
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-r
Hi,
It seems like this solved it for me:
apt-get -f update
++Tim Hinnerk Heuer++
Website: http://www.ihostnz.com - Free Hosting!
Blog: http://timheuer.com/hinnerk
; >>
> >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=549880
> >
>
> The bugtracker link I sent states that a time in the past on the host
> seems to cause this installer issue - maybe Richard's VirtualBox somehow
> has whack host time?
I'm pretty sur
On Sat, 2009-10-31 at 23:02 -0400, Tim Tebbit wrote:
> Reading this thread made me realize I haven't seen an update for Sid in
> 2 full days. Perhaps something else is going on.
Could be the ftp masters' meeting this week; they seem to have been
working hard on developing and testing improvements,
On Sunday 01 November 2009 05:36:00 Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Andrew Reid:
> > http://security.debian.org//srv/security-master.debian.org/ftp/pool/updat
> >es/main/e/expat/libexpat1_2.0.1-4+lenny1_amd64.deb
>
> This should have been fixed by now.
>
> During an internal m
* Andrew Reid:
> http://security.debian.org//srv/security-master.debian.org/ftp/pool/updates/main/e/expat/libexpat1_2.0.1-4+lenny1_amd64.deb
>
This should have been fixed by now.
During an internal migration, incorrect package metadata was pushed to
the security mirror network. Sorry
Tim Tebbit wrote:
> Reading this thread made me realize I haven't seen an update for Sid in
> 2 full days. Perhaps something else is going on.
Spoke too soon, or awakened the mouse running in that wheel.
Current status: 25 updates [+18].
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@
Jaime Di Cristina wrote:
> I think that there is something wrong with security.debian.org. A
> couple of days ago I did "aptitude update" and the updates did not come
> in until the third time i did "aptitude update", I then installed the
> update as normal (neve
continue [Y/n]?
Err http://security.debian.org lenny/updates/main libexpat1 2.0.1-4+lenny1
404 Not Found [IP: 128.101.240.212 80]
Failed to fetch
http://security.debian.org//srv/security-master.debian.org/ftp/pool/updates/main/e/expat/libexpat1_2.0.1-4+lenny1_amd64.deb
404 Not Foun
e freed.
> Do you want to continue [Y/n]?
> Err http://security.debian.org lenny/updates/main libexpat1 2.0.1-4+lenny1
> 404 Not Found [IP: 128.101.240.212 80]
> Failed to fetch
http://security.debian.org//srv/security-master.debian.org/ftp/pool/updates/main/e/expat/libexpat1_2.0.1-4+lenn
Pavlos Parissis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:00:15 -0700
> Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I started having trouble downloading packages from security.debian.org
>> over the weekend. aptitude fails with:
>>
>>
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:00:15 -0700
Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I started having trouble downloading packages from security.debian.org
> over the weekend. aptitude fails with:
>
> Err http://security.debian.org etch/updates/main iceweasel 2.0.0.16-0etch1
>
I started having trouble downloading packages from security.debian.org
over the weekend. aptitude fails with:
Err http://security.debian.org etch/updates/main iceweasel 2.0.0.16-0etch1
Connection failed [IP: 130.89.175.54 80]
Err http://security.debian.org etch/updates/main libxul0d
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 06:00:35 +, Chris Morley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[ Please try to post using plain text only if possible - thanks ]
> > > I run 'apt-get update' and it throws an error:> > > > W: GPG error:
> > > http://security.debian
> > I run 'apt-get update' and it throws an error:> > > > W: GPG error:
> > http://security.debian.org etch/updates Release: The following signatures
> > were invalid: BADSIG A70DAF536070D3A1 Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key
> > (4.0/etch) <
On 07/09/2008 01:08 PM, Chris Morley wrote:
Hi, this morning i was unable to run apt-get update on any of my etch boxes.
I run 'apt-get update' and it throws an error:
W: GPG error: http://security.debian.org etch/updates Release: The following signatures were inval
Hi, this morning i was unable to run apt-get update on any of my etch boxes.
I run 'apt-get update' and it throws an error:
W: GPG error: http://security.debian.org etch/updates Release: The following
signatures were invalid: BADSIG A70DAF536070D3A1 Debian Archive Automatic
Signin
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 11:00:04 +0200
Lorenzo Bettini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I cannot access these update sites anymore with apt... actually, if I
> try with a browser they always redirect to skype site (?!)
They come up correctly (in IW) here.
> Lorenzo Bettini, PhD in Computer Science, DSI
I cannot access these update sites anymore with apt... actually, if I
try with a browser they always redirect to skype site (?!)
--
Lorenzo Bettini, PhD in Computer Science, DSI, Univ. di Firenze
ICQ# lbetto, 16080134 (GNU/Linux User # 158233)
HOME: http://www.lorenzobettini.it MUSIC: http:/
Hello,
Running ">wget http://security.debian.org/dists/etch/updates/Release";
and ">wget http://security.debian.org/dists/etch/updates/Release.gpg";
three times and comparing:
>diff Release.128.31.0.36 Release.212.211.132.250
5c5
< Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 16:4
On 4/10/07, Kushal Kumaran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/10/07, Siju George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> W: GPG error: http://ftp.uk.debian.org etch Release: Unknown error
> executing gpgv
> W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
>
Does /usr/bin/gpgv exist? If it does
Siju
===
testsrv:~# apt-get update
Reading package lists... Done
W: GPG error: http://security.debian.org etch/updates Release: Unknown
error executing gpgv
W: GPG error: http://ftp.uk.debian.org etch Release: Unknown error
executing gpgv
W: You may want to run apt-get
update
Get:1 http://ftp.uk.debian.org etch Release.gpg [378B]
Get:2 http://security.debian.org etch/updates Release.gpg [189B]
Hit http://ftp.uk.debian.org etch Release
Err http://ftp.uk.debian.org etch Release
Hit http://security.debian.org etch/updates Release
Err http://security.debian.org etch
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 10:30:04 -0700
Raquel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:21:12 -0400
> Wayne Topa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have had a problem with security.debian.org for a few days
> > now. Either it isn't there or when it is,
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:21:12 -0400
Wayne Topa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have had a problem with security.debian.org for a few days now.
> Either it isn't there or when it is, it times out.
>
> Is anyone else having this problem or is it just me?
>
> VT1
Wayne Topa wrote:
> I have had a problem with security.debian.org for a few days now.
> Either it isn't there or when it is, it times out.
>
> Is anyone else having this problem or is it just me?
>
> VT1 root-3-TESTING:~# aptitude -y upgrade
> Get:1 http://security.
I have had a problem with security.debian.org for a few days now.
Either it isn't there or when it is, it times out.
Is anyone else having this problem or is it just me?
VT1 root-3-TESTING:~# aptitude -y upgrade
Get:1 http://security.debian.org testing/updates/main ttf-opensymbol
2.0.4
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:23:52 -0400 (EDT), Faheem Mitha
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Release.gpg keys on security.debian.org are currently empty files. This
>only seems to be causing problems on one machine, but does anyone know
>what is going on here, and how long it might be bef
Hi,
Release.gpg keys on security.debian.org are currently empty files. This
only seems to be causing problems on one machine, but does anyone know
what is going on here, and how long it might be before it is fixed?
Faheem
J F wrote:
> I am getting an error from aptitude (and apt-get update):
>
> http://security.debian.org stable/updates/man Packages {ERROR}
> Could not connect to security.debian.org:80 (128.101.240.212), connection
> timed out
>
> It repeats the error twice for main, contrib
I am getting an error from aptitude (and apt-get update):
http://security.debian.org stable/updates/man Packages {ERROR}
Could not connect to security.debian.org:80 (128.101.240.212), connection timed
out
It repeats the error twice for main, contrib, and non-free .
It waits about 5 minutes at
update apt-file and I'm getting the
following error:
--16:47:53--
http://security.debian.org//dists/stable/updates/Contents-i386.gz
=>
`/var/cache/apt/security.debian.org_dists_stable_updates_Contents-i386.gz'
Resolving security.debian.org... 194.109.137.218, 1
ge Indexdateien konnten nicht heruntergeladen werden, sie wurden
> ignoriert oder alte an ihrer Stelle benutzt.
http://security.debian.org/dists/etch/updates/main/
As you can see, there is no amd64 directory on the server.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of &quo
Hello again,I've searched on security.debian.org for the folder binary-amd64. Well, it's not there, but I have found the following folder: main/binary-ia64/
Is this the same one as the binary-amd64? If so, How can I make the apt-get tool look for this folder and not the other one?Thanks
1 - 100 of 177 matches
Mail list logo
