-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Don't know if there is a person that might know more about this server(or
admin), but it isn't responding to my apt-get, nor pings.
tatah
- --
Jaye Inabnit\ARS ke6sls\/A GNU-Debian linux user\/ http://www.qsl.net/ke6sls
If it's stupid, but works,
Jaye Inabnit ke6sls wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>
>Don't know if there is a person that might know more about this server(or
>admin), but it isn't responding to my apt-get, nor pings.
>
>
>
It responds from here.
Paul Scott
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
Jaye Inabnit ke6sls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Don't know if there is a person that might know more about this server(or
> admin), but it isn't responding to my apt-get, nor pings.
Works fine for me.
Tschoe Udo.
--
Zu vermieten.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a sub
On 31.08.2002 23:42:45 Paul Scott wrote:
> Jaye Inabnit ke6sls wrote:
>
> >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >Hash: SHA1
> >
> >
> >Don't know if there is a person that might know more about this
server(or
> >admin), but it isn't responding to my apt-get, nor pings.
> >
> >
> >
> It responds
anyone have an answer why security.debian.org sends active FTP
transfers from a high port rather than port 20?
--
martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
\ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; net@madduck
"she is absolutely in
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-06 20:30:36 +0200]:
> anyone have an answer why security.debian.org sends active FTP
> transfers from a high port rather than port 20?
IIRC there is nothing particularly interesting in that. The ftpd will
open a connection back to your p
If I'm running Debian testing, and if security updates aren't really
applicable to a testing/unstable system, then is there any point in having
deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main contrib non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/debian-non-US stable/non-US main contri
> If I'm running Debian testing, and if security updates aren't really
> applicable to a testing/unstable system, then is there any point in
> having
>
> deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main contrib non-free deb
no, since 'stable' and 't
[snip]
> for a short
> time debian did maintain a 'testing' security update site at
> security.debian.org (I think it started after the semi-recent SSH stuff
> that came out), but I don't know if they still are doing it(I would expect
> them to not be doing it).
T
On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 17:07, nate wrote:
> > If I'm running Debian testing, and if security updates aren't really
> > applicable to a testing/unstable system, then is there any point in
> > having
> >
> > deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates mai
10 matches
Mail list logo