On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 22:48:18 +0400, wlan wrote in message
CAP=r6j15mdjdkojhf+2qnvh39vwegyesy_moqvb2p3c4sod...@mail.gmail.com:
2012/3/30 Russell L. Harris rlhar...@broadcaster.org
* Russell L. Harris rlhar...@broadcaster.org [120324 07:15]:
From the standpoint of protection of a LAN (two
* Russell L. Harris rlhar...@broadcaster.org [120324 07:15]:
From the standpoint of protection of a LAN (two or three machines) for
a home or home office...
...
Is there a good firewall application in Debian which provides a secure
default configuration? Or must I learn how to configure a
I think netfilter are better firewall, you can read documentation from
iptables. It's really cool. =)
2012/3/30 Russell L. Harris rlhar...@broadcaster.org
* Russell L. Harris rlhar...@broadcaster.org [120324 07:15]:
From the standpoint of protection of a LAN (two or three machines) for
a
On 2012-03-24, Charles Kroeger ckro...@frankensteinface.com wrote:
You won't get a 'stealth' rating at grc. Shorewall seems to leave port 0
That's all hooey anyway, that stealth business, as if you're some kind
of combat aircraft over an Iranian nuclear installation or something,
prospect which
On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 12:17:50 +
Chris Davies chris-use...@roaima.co.uk wrote:
Russell L. Harris rlhar...@broadcaster.org wrote:
From the standpoint of protection of a LAN (two or three machines)
for a home or home office, how effective is a firmware-based
firewall/router in comparison
On Sb, 24 mar 12, 11:16:08, Charles Kroeger wrote:
You won't get a 'stealth' rating at grc. Shorewall seems to leave port 0
visible but closed. I don't know why this is but would be interested to know
if someone on this list knew the reason.
Port 0? I haven't used Shorewall in a while, but
From the standpoint of protection of a LAN (two or three machines) for
a home or home office, how effective is a firmware-based
firewall/router in comparison with a software-based stand-alone
firewall/router? Is either significantly better than the other?
I am thinking in terms of devoting an
On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 07:02:42 +, Russell L. Harris wrote:
From the standpoint of protection of a LAN (two or three machines) for
a home or home office, how effective is a firmware-based firewall/router
in comparison with a software-based stand-alone firewall/router?
I'd say even the SPI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I use UFW as firewall on all computers at home. It's very easy to
configure.
UFW (package ufw) can be found from Debian repositories. For
documentation see https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UFW . There is
also graphical user interface called
Russell L. Harris wrote at 2012-03-24 02:02 -0500:
Is there a good firewall application in Debian which provides a secure
default configuration? Or must I learn how to configure a firewall?
Hopefully you are able to find something simple to use, but if you do learn
how to configure a
Russell L. Harris rlhar...@broadcaster.org wrote:
From the standpoint of protection of a LAN (two or three machines)
for a home or home office, how effective is a firmware-based
firewall/router in comparison with a software-based stand-alone
firewall/router? Is either significantly better
Is there a good firewall application in Debian which provides a secure
default configuration? Or must I learn how to configure a firewall?
The package: 'arno-iptables-firewall' will do that. You will have to tell it
how you're connecting (e.g. eth0) but after that it will configure a
'default'
On Saturday 24 Mar 2012 16:16:08 Charles Kroeger wrote:
You won't get a 'stealth' rating at grc. Shorewall seems to leave port 0
visible but closed. I don't know why this is but would be interested to
know if someone on this list knew the reason.
What is the deal with port 0?
I have just
13 matches
Mail list logo
