Re: Sources list with contrib repositories on DVD-1

On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 05:02:00PM +, mu...@disroot.org wrote: > Wouldn't it be necessary to update this document then? > > "The main archive area forms the Debian distribution. > > Packages > in the other archive areas (contrib, non-free) are not considered to be > part of the Debian dist

Re: Sources list with contrib repositories on DVD-1

Wouldn't it be necessary to update this document then? "The main archive area forms the Debian distribution. Packages in the other archive areas (contrib, non-free) are not considered to be part of the Debian distribution, although we support their use and provide infrastructure for them (such

Re: Sources list with contrib repositories on DVD-1

On Sun 15 Aug 2021 at 22:07:27 (+), Ramon Mulin wrote: > The DVD-1 image is coming with contrib enabled on the cd-rom, > security and update lines. This is normal? AIUI the selection of software on DVD-1 is designed to give as comprehensive a collection as possible, based partly on popularity,

Sources list with contrib repositories on DVD-1

Hello everybody. The DVD-1 image is coming with contrib enabled on the cd-rom, security and update lines. This is normal? The netinstall image is just with main. P.S.: Sorry for my english. Ramon Mulin Professor de História

Re: MX Sources List

On 2021-05-06 14:57, Greg Wooledge wrote: On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 04:49:09PM +0300, ellanios82 wrote:  - please, for MX , what would be an appropriate Sources List ?? https://mxlinux.org/support/ being curious and looked. https://mxlinux.org/wiki/system/repos-mx-19/ mick -- Key ID

Re: MX Sources List

On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 04:49:09PM +0300, ellanios82 wrote: >  - please, for MX , what would be an appropriate Sources List ?? https://mxlinux.org/support/

MX Sources List

Dear List ,  - i am , unfortunately, a very confused newby :((  - please, for MX , what would be an appropriate Sources List ?? ...  thank you .

Re: Jessie sources list

On 11/15/20 9:26 AM, The Wanderer wrote: On 2020-11-15 at 11:23, Fred wrote: Hello, What is the proper sources.list for Jessie? I have tried: http://archive.debian.org/debian/dists/ but apt-get is not happy with update. Per https://www.debian.org/distrib/archive : If you are using APT t

Re: Jessie sources list

On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 09:23:57AM -0700, Fred wrote: > Hello, > > What is the proper sources.list for Jessie? > > I have tried: > > http://archive.debian.org/debian/dists/ > > but apt-get is not happy with update. > > I am in the process up upgrading but I need to install a Debian package > f

Re: Jessie sources list

On 2020-11-15 at 11:23, Fred wrote: > Hello, > > What is the proper sources.list for Jessie? > > I have tried: > > http://archive.debian.org/debian/dists/ > > but apt-get is not happy with update. Per https://www.debian.org/distrib/archive : >> If you are using APT the relevant sources.list

Jessie sources list

Hello, What is the proper sources.list for Jessie? I have tried: http://archive.debian.org/debian/dists/ but apt-get is not happy with update. I am in the process up upgrading but I need to install a Debian package first. Best regards, Fred Boatwright

Re: [OT] testing on unstable sources list

On 4/1/20 6:46 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Mi, 01 apr 20, 15:49:25, dalios wrote: >> On 3/30/20 2:26 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote: >> [...] and still retain testing in sources.list (having testing in >>> sources.list when running unstable is a good idea anyway). >> >> Can you be so kind and ex

Re: [OT] testing on unstable sources list

On Mi, 01 apr 20, 15:49:25, dalios wrote: > On 3/30/20 2:26 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > >> [...] and still retain testing in sources.list (having testing in > > sources.list when running unstable is a good idea anyway). > > Can you be so kind and explain to me how is that a good idea? I am > _

Re: [OT] testing on unstable sources list

On 3/30/20 2:26 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote: (snip) >> [...] and still retain testing in sources.list (having testing in > sources.list when running unstable is a good idea anyway). (snip) > Kind regards, > Andrei > Can you be so kind and explain to me how is that a good idea? I am _definitely

Re: Sources list, was Re: Gparted error report

On 1/2/19, Richard Owlett wrote: > On 01/01/2019 07:59 PM, David Wright wrote: >> On Tue 01 Jan 2019 at 13:45:48 (-0500), Lee wrote: >>> On 1/1/19, Richard Owlett wrote: On 01/01/2019 08:03 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Tue, Jan 01, 2019 at 06:07:21AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:

Re: Sources list, was Re: Gparted error report

On 01/01/2019 07:59 PM, David Wright wrote: On Tue 01 Jan 2019 at 13:45:48 (-0500), Lee wrote: On 1/1/19, Richard Owlett wrote: On 01/01/2019 08:03 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: On Tue, Jan 01, 2019 at 06:07:21AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote: I am trying to modify the partitioning of a 240GB US

Sources list, was Re: Gparted error report

releases (cf. > >> FrankenDebian) or from alien repositories, this is just a first > >> approximation. > > > > My system reports 9.1 {as I thought it was} > > It was initially installed from a purchased DVD 1. > > If you've been keeping the system update

Re: line length and netiquette (was: Proper sources list from Jessie > Stretch)

Op 06-06-17 om 16:00 schreef Fungi4All: From: wool...@eeg.ccf.org On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 06:59:20PM -0400, Fungi4All wrote: > ONLY MORONS USE RETURN WITHIN THE SAME PARAGRAPH EVER > SINCE TYPEWRITERS RUN OUT OF INK AND DIED. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1855 In html there is for line bre

Re: line length and netiquette (was: Proper sources list from Jessie > Stretch)

From: wool...@eeg.ccf.org On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 06:59:20PM -0400, Fungi4All wrote: > ONLY MORONS USE RETURN WITHIN THE SAME PARAGRAPH EVER > SINCE TYPEWRITERS RUN OUT OF INK AND DIED. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1855 In html there is for line break and for paragraph. How long or short sho

Re: Proper sources list from Jessie > Stretch

On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 01:19:40PM +0200, Siard wrote: > I do not quite agree. Bottom posting and top posting are different > styles of responding; choosing between them depends on your purpose. Regardless of this, the messages from that funguy person are unreadable. It looks like he's using Micro

Re: Proper sources list from Jessie > Stretch

On Mon, 5 Jun 2017 13:19:40 +0200 Siard wrote: > Ric Moore: > > Fungi4All: > > > Sorry for the top-post but I think it is appropriate > > > > It is not ever appropriate, no matter what you think. Ric > > I do not quite agree. Bottom posting and top posting are different > styles of respon

Re: Proper sources list from Jessie > Stretch

On Monday, June 05, 2017 07:19:40 AM Siard wrote: > Ric Moore: > > Fungi4All: > > > Sorry for the top-post but I think it is appropriate > > > > It is not ever appropriate, no matter what you think. Ric > > I do not quite agree. Bottom posting and top posting are different > styles of responding;

Re: Proper sources list from Jessie > Stretch

Ric Moore: > Fungi4All: > > Sorry for the top-post but I think it is appropriate > > It is not ever appropriate, no matter what you think. Ric I do not quite agree. Bottom posting and top posting are different styles of responding; choosing between them depends on your purpose. Especially in a c

Re: Proper sources list from Jessie > Stretch

On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 07:27:06PM -0400, Ric Moore wrote: On 06/02/2017 10:41 AM, Fungi4All wrote: Sorry for the top-post but I think it is appropriate It is not ever appropriate, no matter what you think. Ric I disagree. I think that top-posting is MOST appropriate when forwarding a messag

Re: Proper sources list from Jessie > Stretch

On Sunday 04 June 2017 00:27:06 Ric Moore wrote: > On 06/02/2017 10:41 AM, Fungi4All wrote: > > Sorry for the top-post but I think it is appropriate > > It is not ever appropriate, no matter what you think. Ric +1 Lisi

Re: Proper sources list from Jessie > Stretch

On 06/02/2017 10:41 AM, Fungi4All wrote: Sorry for the top-post but I think it is appropriate It is not ever appropriate, no matter what you think. Ric -- My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say: "There are two Great Sins in the world... ..the Sin of Ignorance, and the Sin of Stupidity. Onl

Re: Proper sources list from Jessie > Stretch

patched due to this security issue on jessie. This is one package as an example. Original Message Subject: Re: Proper sources list from Jessie > Stretch Local Time: June 1, 2017 2:28 PM UTC Time: June 1, 2017 11:28 AM From: d...@randomstring.org To: Dejan Jocic debian-u

Re: Proper sources list from Jessie > Stretch

On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 09:19:29AM +0200, Dejan Jocic wrote: > On 01-06-17, Fjfj109 wrote: > > Hi - wondering if with a standard sources list in Jessie (or any stable): > It is usually enough to change it to stretch, if you follow it up with > all those update and upgrade com

Re: Proper sources list from Jessie > Stretch

On 01-06-17, Fjfj109 wrote: > Hi - wondering if with a standard sources list in Jessie (or any stable): > > deb > http://deb.debian.org/debian > jessie main > deb-src > http://deb.debian.org/debian > jessie main > > deb > http://deb.debian.org/debian >

Proper sources list from Jessie > Stretch

Hi - wondering if with a standard sources list in Jessie (or any stable): deb http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie main deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie main deb http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-updates main deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-updates main deb http

Re: Installing Mate - Sources List

an: deb http://ftp.deban.org/debian/ wheezy-updates main contrib Had Ethan given either the full error report, or the information about his sources list, at an earlier stage the problem would have been solved sooner. > The sources.list does not need to be a single file anymore for some > time.

Re: Installing Mate - Sources List

On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 09:44 +0200, Jochen Spieker wrote: > Ethan Rosenberg, PhD: > > > > You will probably need my sources list to help with my previous question. > > You would really help us helping you if you reply in your own threads > instead of creating a new mail

Re: Installing Mate - Sources List

Ethan Rosenberg, PhD: > > You will probably need my sources list to help with my previous question. You would really help us helping you if you reply in your own threads instead of creating a new mail with no reference to the previous one. > Here it is: > > root@meow:/etc/apt# c

Installing Mate - Sources List

Dear List - You will probably need my sources list to help with my previous question. Here it is: root@meow:/etc/apt# cat sources.list # # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 6.0.1a _Squeeze_ - Official i386 DVD Binary-1 20110322-15:11]/ squeeze contrib main # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 6.0.1a

Re: Debian Sources List Generator

On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 09:14:51 -0500 Cybe R. Wizard wrote: > On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 01:38:35 -0700 > Alan Ianson wrote: > > > On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 09:25:49 +0200 (CEST) > > Pierre Frenkiel wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 11 Jun 2013, Alan Ianson wrote: > > > > > > > It looks like a mirror. Is it listed as

Re: Debian Sources List Generator

On Tuesday 11 June 2013 15:14:51 Cybe R. Wizard wrote: > On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 01:38:35 -0700 > > Alan Ianson wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 09:25:49 +0200 (CEST) > > > > Pierre Frenkiel wrote: > > > On Tue, 11 Jun 2013, Alan Ianson wrote: > > > > It looks like a mirror. Is it listed as such at > >

Re: Debian Sources List Generator

On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 01:38:35 -0700 Alan Ianson wrote: > On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 09:25:49 +0200 (CEST) > Pierre Frenkiel wrote: > > > On Tue, 11 Jun 2013, Alan Ianson wrote: > > > > > It looks like a mirror. Is it listed as such at > > > deb-multimedia.org? > > > >Yes, it is, alas. > >I alr

Re: Debian Sources List Generator

On Tue, 11 Jun 2013, John Hasler wrote: If you want to install Marillat's packages go to his site. http://www.las.ic.unicamp.br/pub/debian-multimedia is on Marillat's mirror list He may not get along with

Re: Debian Sources List Generator

Pierre Frenkiel writes: > what is the difference between [deb > http://www.las.ic.unicamp.br/pub/debian-multimedia/] and Marillat's > deb-multimedia? See and

Re: Debian Sources List Generator

On Tue, 11 Jun 2013, Alan Ianson wrote: What mess did this repo make? I have been using deb-multimedia for years and have never had any mess. look at what Chris Bannister wrote on this list on 4 Feb 2013 Just

Re: Debian Sources List Generator

On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 09:25:49 +0200 (CEST) Pierre Frenkiel wrote: > On Tue, 11 Jun 2013, Alan Ianson wrote: > > > It looks like a mirror. Is it listed as such at deb-multimedia.org? > >Yes, it is, alas. >I already experienced that, as said by Chris Bannister >"The deb-multimedia repos

Re: Debian Sources List Generator

On Tue, 11 Jun 2013, Alan Ianson wrote: It looks like a mirror. Is it listed as such at deb-multimedia.org? Yes, it is, alas. I already experienced that, as said by Chris Bannister "The deb-multimedia repository is toxic to a healthy wheezy system" It took me sevaral days to get rid of

Re: Debian Sources List Generator

On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 09:04:59 +0200 (CEST) Pierre Frenkiel wrote: > hi, > After the release of Wheezy, I tried the Debian Sources List > Generator (at http://debgen.simplylinux.ch/), and was surprised to > see in the resulting sources.list: > > deb http://www.las.ic.uni

Debian Sources List Generator

hi, After the release of Wheezy, I tried the Debian Sources List Generator (at http://debgen.simplylinux.ch/), and was surprised to see in the resulting sources.list: deb http://www.las.ic.unicamp.br/pub/debian-multimedia/ stable main although http://www.las.ic.unicamp.br is "

Re: apt-get – problem configuring /etc/apt/sources .list

Thank you Bob and Eugene. Bob -- Yes, inserting: deb http://archive.debian.org/debian sarge main into /etc/apt/sources.list and then running #apt-get update does the trick. Might there be a guide to using apt that is conceptually clearer than the man page? Best Regards, Vwaju -- To UNS

Re: [solved] sources list not found repository debian

ehm...I apologize, excuse me for my mistake. I solved to use backports, thanks again at all. -- Micaela 2008/1/4, Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I think this was meant for the list. > > Regards, > Andrei > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe".

Re: [half solved] sources list not found repository debian

I think this was meant for the list. Regards, Andrei On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 08:11:26PM +0100, Micaela Gallerini wrote: > 2008/1/2, Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > Did you try backports? > > No, I try and then I'll write if it solved, thanks very much. > > > > > > > Hhmm, maybe

Re: [half solved] sources list not found repository debian

On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 08:04:15PM +0100, Micaela Gallerini wrote: > 2008/1/2, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 12:01:42PM +0100, Micaela Gallerini wrote: > > > 2007/12/31, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > > > > > This doesn't sound like an insult

Re: [half solved] sources list not found repository debian

2008/1/2, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 12:01:42PM +0100, Micaela Gallerini wrote: > > 2007/12/31, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > > This doesn't sound like an insult. Based on the package management > > > knowledge base you have demonstrated in

Re: [half solved] sources list not found repository debian

On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 12:01:42PM +0100, Micaela Gallerini wrote: > 2007/12/31, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > This doesn't sound like an insult. Based on the package management > > knowledge base you have demonstrated in this thread, it would seem > > prudent. Most people aren'

Re: [half solved] sources list not found repository debian

and > I talk only of the operative system to reduce DoS attach, security bug > etcetera etcetera with some stable package (network or office suite) > and some unstable package (programming package)? Did you try backports? > > Etch is very stable when you give it a sources list that

Re: [half solved] sources list not found repository debian

2008/1/1, s. keeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Micaela Gallerini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > 2007/12/30, s. keeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > I think you need to know a lot more about how the packaging system > > > works to be comfortable running a hybrid. > > > > I think you don't know a person I

Re: [half solved] sources list not found repository debian

ive system to reduce DoS attach, security bug etcetera etcetera with some stable package (network or office suite) and some unstable package (programming package)? > > Etch is very stable when you give it a sources list that is only for > Etch. Give it a messed-up sources.list and you get

Re: [half solved] sources list not found repository debian

Micaela Gallerini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2007/12/30, s. keeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I think you need to know a lot more about how the packaging system > > works to be comfortable running a hybrid. > > I think you don't know a person I don't talk so^^ That "you" was intended generall

Re: [half solved] sources list not found repository debian

, just stick with plain unadaulterated Etch. What's the problem? > > Learn how it works. > > > > I think that if etch don't work like a stable system like might be, I > run again sarge or I run another distribution that permit to work > correctly a simple program

Re: [half solved] sources list not found repository debian

2007/12/30, s. keeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I think you need to know a lot more about how the packaging system > works to be comfortable running a hybrid. I think you don't know a person I don't talk so^^ I know that I installed, but I don't know that the system is locked in this way. It's

Re: [half solved] sources list not found repository debian

Micaela Gallerini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > the problem seem to be some package I installed that don't be stable > and so block the entire update. Do you know what that package is? Do you use aptitude? If so, see /var/log/aptitude* > I might add the repository unstable I suppose, right? I

[half solved] sources list not found repository debian

2007/12/28, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 07:14:36PM +0100, Micaela Gallerini wrote: > > again I have problem with the sources list. > > If I try to update and upgrade my system I have this error: > > > > xxx

Re: sources list not found repository debian

2007/12/28, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Why do you have two security.debian.org lines? Since your main source > doesn't include non-free, you don't need non-free in security updates. > Remove the second security lines. > done > ftp.debian.org is no-longer. Use a country-specific m

Re: sources list not found repository debian

Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 07:14:36PM +0100, Micaela Gallerini wrote: > > again I have problem with the sources list. > > If I try to update and upgrade my system I have this error: > > > > x:/# apt-get update > &

Re: sources list not found repository debian

On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 07:14:36PM +0100, Micaela Gallerini wrote: > again I have problem with the sources list. > If I try to update and upgrade my system I have this error: > > x:/# apt-get update > Err http://security.debian.org etch/updates Release.gpg > Connec

sources list not found repository debian

hi all, again I have problem with the sources list. If I try to update and upgrade my system I have this error: x:/# apt-get update Err http://security.debian.org etch/updates Release.gpg Connection falled Err http://ftp.debian.org etch Release.gpg Connection falled Ign http

Re: Sources list for upgrade from sarge to etch?

Michelle Konzack wrote the following on 18.04.2007 19:46: > Am 2007-04-09 23:35:38, schrieb Thilo Six: >> afaik >>> Deb ftp://ftp.usdebian.org/debian/ oldstable main contrib. non-free > ^ > This SLASH should not be there. > >> ^^^

Re: Sources list for upgrade from sarge to etch?

Am 2007-04-09 23:35:38, schrieb Thilo Six: > afaik > > Deb ftp://ftp.usdebian.org/debian/ oldstable main contrib. non-free ^ This SLASH should not be there. > ^^^ ^^ > | | |

Re: Sources list for upgrade from sarge to etch?

Because > it says in the release notes to make sure it points to sarge when doing the > update. Since etch is now the stable I have tried changing the sources list > to oldstable and even tried sarge and it couldn't connect with the changes. > I saw and email or something the sa

Re: Sources list for upgrade from sarge to etch?

"Michael Kerwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am trying to upgrade a computer from sarge to etch and I am reading > the release notes about it and it says to use aptitude to update and > etc. > My question is what should I change my sources.list in /etc/apt to? > Because it says in the release

Re: Sources list for upgrade from sarge to etch?

Michael Kerwin wrote the following on 09.04.2007 22:45: > I am trying to upgrade a computer from sarge to etch afaik > Deb ftp://ftp.usdebian.org/debian/ oldstable main contrib. non-free ^^^ ^^ | | |

Re: Sources list for upgrade from sarge to etch?

t; Because it says in the release notes to make sure it points to sarge > when doing the update. Since etch is now the stable I have tried > changing the sources list to oldstable and even tried sarge and it > couldn’t connect with the changes. I saw and email or something the > s

Sources list for upgrade from sarge to etch?

update. Since etch is now the stable I have tried changing the sources list to oldstable and even tried sarge and it couldn't connect with the changes. I saw and email or something the sarge was changing to oldstable. I only have 3 line in my sources list. Deb ftp://ftp.usdebian.org/d

sources list

I would like to use the Samba 3.0.4 debs from the www.samba.org site. Am running Sarge. My sources.list is as follows: #deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 r1 _Woody_ - Official i386 Binary-2 (20021218)]/ unstable contrib main non-US/contrib non-US/main #deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 r1 _Woody_ - Of

Re: odd line in sources list

On Mon, 02 Jun 2003 07:07:12 +, mosele wrote: > My system was messed up a bit because of the mix of stable and unstable. Usually it's a better idea to mix adjacent distributions: stable and testing or testing and unstable, not stable and unstable. -- Leandro Guimarães Faria Corset

Re: odd line in sources list

On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 08:31:24AM +0100, steve downes wrote: > I'd like to add cyrus imap from unstable to my otherwise testing setup. > I have read back through the list & it would seem to be possible to add > this to my sources list but I cannot sort the exact line to add. Ca

Re: odd line in sources list

> > AFAIK u have to add the sources.list line for unstable and then install only > > cyrus from that using something like apt-get install -t unstable cyrus > > Yes, but there are things to do before that. Better take a good > read at the apt HOWTO manual. > hmmm, ya and that's what i meant when i

Re: odd line in sources list

On Mon, 02 Jun 2003 13:25:17 +0530, Sharninder Singh-662 wrote: > AFAIK u have to add the sources.list line for unstable and then install only > cyrus from that using something like apt-get install -t unstable cyrus Yes, but there are things to do before that. Better take a good read at

Re: odd line in sources list

> I'd like to add cyrus imap from unstable to my otherwise testing setup. > I have read back through the list & it would seem to be possible to add > this to my sources list but I cannot sort the exact line to add. Can > anyone suggest the line for a single package from unst

odd line in sources list

I'd like to add cyrus imap from unstable to my otherwise testing setup. I have read back through the list & it would seem to be possible to add this to my sources list but I cannot sort the exact line to add. Can anyone suggest the line for a single package from unstable. Steve

Re: Up to date sources list

> > > also netselect-apt > > Geordie and Matthias, thanks for answering: > > I have netselect-apt, which is why I'm in the need of now entering my sources > list manually. After running netselect-apt several times I'm presented with this > error: "Couldn't

Re: Up to date sources list

n the need of now entering my sources list manually. After running netselect-apt several times I'm presented with this error: "Couldn't stat sources list - such package or directory". The information received from netselect-apt seems to have buggered me up. I think the easiest way o

Re: Up to date sources list

said Matthias Hentges (on 2002-12-19), > apt-spy will build you an up-to-date sources.list also netselect-apt Geordie. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Up to date sources list

Am Don, 2002-12-19 um 04.04 schrieb Steve: > I can't find a sources list on the Debian web site. Google seems to return lists > for packages other than the official Debian stuff. Is their an url that I could > go to? apt-spy will build you an up-to-date sources.list -- Ma

Up to date sources list

I can't find a sources list on the Debian web site. Google seems to return lists for packages other than the official Debian stuff. Is their an url that I could go to? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: apt-sources List

On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 04:51:17PM -0700, Vineet Kumar wrote: > * Matt Chipman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020423 15:51]: > > Is there a list of or a method of finding alternative apt-able archives for > > both woody and potato? > > see these pages: > http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/apt-howto/ch-basico

Re: apt-sources List

* Matt Chipman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020423 15:51]: > Is there a list of or a method of finding alternative apt-able archives for > both woody and potato? see these pages: http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/apt-howto/ch-basico.en.html http://www.debian.org/mirror/mirrors_full > > I have uncommente

apt-sources List

Is there a list of or a method of finding alternative apt-able archives for both woody and potato? I have uncommented the sources option in the potato install and am getting 404 errors :( I need another archive thanks -Matt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "un

Re: Help recovering from mistake in sources list

buggy yesterday on unstable (seen it on debian-devel). I think there's already a new working version available. So you should perhaps restore the unstable lines in your sources-list, change back the preferences file, apt-get update && apt-get install libxml2 (I think) to upgrade to t

Help recovering from mistake in sources list

I acidently copied over /etc/apt/sources.list from another machien yesterday without copying over the /etc/apt/preferences file :-( The sources.list contained a reference to unstable, so, needles to say I hosed my nice workign woody machine. A helpful list meber sugeset that I try removing the uns

Re: apt sources list

* Michael Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Dec 02. 2001 21:19]: > > The best thing to do, IMO, is to use netselect-apt. > > Hello Brian, > > I think, you mean apt-spy. This little programm looks for > debian-mirrors and then write the /etc/apt/sources.list. Nope, I'm positive I mean netselect-apt. I

Re: apt sources list

On Sunday, 02. Dec. 2001 at 18:40:46, Brian Clark wrote: > * Eric Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Dec 02. 2001 18:38]: > > Could anyone who has a good list please post their /etc/apt/sources.list so > > I can use it for a reference. > The best thing to do, IMO, is to use netselect-apt. Hello Brian

Re: apt sources list

On 2001-12-02T18:35:37 +, Eric Brooks wrote: > Could anyone who has a good list please post their /etc/apt/sources.list so I > can use it for a reference. Generally speaking, it is far wiser for every user to decide about the servers he/she wants to use for himself. I, for example, use the d

Re: apt sources list

Hackers have put my user id into some redistributing list of your technical forum. I can't unsubcribe with automated system because my user id is not on the main list. Please help. I received tons of unwanted mails. Please forward this request to the list owner Thanks --- Eric Brooks <[EMAIL PRO

Re: apt sources list

Hackers have put my user id into some redistributing list of your technical forum. I can't unsubcribe with automated system because my user id is not on the main list. Please help. I received tons of unwanted mails. Please forward this request to the list owner Thanks --- Brian Clark <[EMAIL PRO

Re: apt sources list

* Eric Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Dec 02. 2001 18:38]: > I read the list and see apt-get lines that work for other folks but when I > try them the target item is not found. An example: apt-get install libgpcl0. > I assume that the problem is that I am either using the wrong source servers > o

apt sources list

I read the list and see apt-get lines that work for other folks but when I try them the target item is not found. An example: apt-get install libgpcl0. I assume that the problem is that I am either using the wrong source servers or using the wrong source level (i.e., stable vs. unstable). Co

Re: sources list additions

Hi Martin , On 03-Nov-01, you wrote: > My sources list: > deb http://ftp.bg.debian.org/debian testing main contrib non-free > > I am in Czech republic but I think that bulgarian servers are "bloody" fast > :) It sure is fast, but it dosn't seem to have t

Re: sources list additions

On Saturday 03 November 2001 09:52, Martin Kacerovsky wrote: > My sources list: > deb http://ftp.bg.debian.org/debian testing main contrib non-free > > > I am in Czech republic but I think that bulgarian servers are "bloody" fast > :) QUIET! don't tell e

Re: sources list additions

Hi Martin , On 03-Nov-01, you wrote: >> Can someone let me know the correct format for the following lines that I >> have added to my sources.list, all I get is "file or directory" does not >> exist. > My sources list: > deb http://ftp.bg.debian.org/de

Re: sources list additions

John Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > deb ftp://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian testing main binary-powerpc > deb ftp://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian testing contrib binary-powerpc > deb ftp://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian testing non-free binary-powerpc Just drop "binary-powerpc" in each line.

Re: sources list additions

co.uk ICQ 110130385 > Nick = Chaos A1200 BlizzardPPC 240mhz 060/50 BlizzardVision OS3.9 > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] My sources list: deb http://ftp.bg.debian.or

sources list additions

Hello, Can someone let me know the correct format for the following lines that I have added to my sources.list, all I get is "file or directory" does not exist. deb ftp://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian testing main binary-powerpc deb ftp://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian testing contrib binary-powerpc deb ft

apt sources list

Now that Debian 2.1r4 has been released, I'm wondering what an appropriate /etc/apt/sources.list file should be. I have been using the following to pick up all the updates, etc. that have been made to the slink baseline: deb http://ftp.netgod.net x/ deb http://www.debian.org/~vincent/ slink-update

  1   2   >