On 6/20/23 2:51 AM, David Wright wrote:
On Fri 16 Jun 2023 at 23:32:12 (-0400), Maureen L Thomas wrote:
On 6/15/23 8:27 AM, ogis wrote:
15.06.2023 08:09, Maureen L Thomas пишет:
Failed to receive portal pid: org.freedesktop.DBus, error,
NameHasNoOwner
Hello. Just check this:
https://forums.d
On Fri 16 Jun 2023 at 23:32:12 (-0400), Maureen L Thomas wrote:
> On 6/15/23 8:27 AM, ogis wrote:
> > 15.06.2023 08:09, Maureen L Thomas пишет:
> > > Failed to receive portal pid: org.freedesktop.DBus, error,
> > > NameHasNoOwner
> >
> > Hello. Just check this:
> >
> > https://forums.debian.net/v
I followed the instructions but they did not work. Now what?
On 6/15/23 8:27 AM, ogis wrote:
Hello. Just check this:
https://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?t=150193
15.06.2023 08:09, Maureen L Thomas пишет:
Failed to receive portal pid: org.freedesktop.DBus, error,
NameHasNoOwner
Le jeudi 15 juin 2023 à 01:09 -0400, Maureen L Thomas a écrit :
>
> I was checking my logs and this came up:
>
> Security Failed to receive portal pid: org.freedesktop.DBus, error,
> NameHasNoOwner:
>
> Sender: pipewire
Is that with pipewire 0.3.71 just recently updated from Debian/sid?
Ma
On 2023-06-15 at 08:38, Cindy Sue Causey wrote:
> No answer, only adding in hopes that it helps trigger an ah-ha moment
> for someone. I've been seeing a FAILED alert on every reboot.
> Ultimately, it points at multiple lines such as:
>
> /var/log/user.log:2023-06-13T21:43:42.789226-04:00 northpo
On 6/15/23, Maureen L Thomas wrote:
> I was checking my logs and this came up:
>
> Security Failed to receive portal pid: org.freedesktop.DBus, error,
> NameHasNoOwner:
>
> Sender: pipewire
>
> Time: 12:12:39 AM
>
> Message: Failed to receive portal pid: org.freedesktop.DBus, error,
> NameHasNoOw
Hello. Just check this:
https://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?t=150193
15.06.2023 08:09, Maureen L Thomas пишет:
Failed to receive portal pid: org.freedesktop.DBus, error, NameHasNoOwner
I was checking my logs and this came up:
Security Failed to receive portal pid: org.freedesktop.DBus, error,
NameHasNoOwner:
Sender: pipewire
Time: 12:12:39 AM
Message: Failed to receive portal pid: org.freedesktop.DBus, error,
NameHasNoOwner:
Session:3
Priority:3
I have absolutely no
Hi all,
I have a motherboard with integrated network card Intel I219-V
This is the information from lspci:
00:1f.6 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Ethernet Connection (2)
I219-V
but I can see a strange message (only one on every system restart). This
is the output of dmesg
On 01/13/2018 04:43 AM, Curt wrote:
On 2018-01-11, The Wanderer wrote:
Googling on that error message (with the presumed typo corrected) leads
me to http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=3D5&t=3D133578 as a first
hit.
That's funny; I am led here first-hit wise:
https://lists.debian.org/
On 2018-01-11, The Wanderer wrote:
>
> Googling on that error message (with the presumed typo corrected) leads
> me to http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=3D5&t=3D133578 as a first
> hit.
>
That's funny; I am led here first-hit wise:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2017/04/msg00192.h
On 01/12/2018 09:29 AM, David Wright wrote:
On Fri 12 Jan 2018 at 06:19:57 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote:
[snip]
Not sure. Noticed it recently after fixing a long standing problem
involving a bad UUID for the swap partition.
Perhaps it's no coincidence then that the Wanderer's earlier
forum r
On 01/12/2018 09:29 AM, David Wright wrote:
On Fri 12 Jan 2018 at 06:19:57 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote:
On 01/11/2018 01:43 PM, David Wright wrote:
On Thu 11 Jan 2018 at 11:10:33 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote:
I multi-boot several varieties of Debian.
When booting one specific install, it di
On 01/11/2018 11:38 AM, The Wanderer wrote:
[snip]
On my system (stable+testing, though with sysvinit rather than systemd):
$ dlocate scripts/local-block
mdadm: /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/local-block
mdadm: /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/local-block/mdadm
lvm2: /usr/share/initramfs-
On 01/11/2018 11:22 AM, bw wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018, Richard Owlett wrote:
[snip]
journalctl -xb > jan11test
The string of interest not present.
/usr/share/initramfs-tools/ does not exist
/etc/initramfs-tools/scripts has 10 empty folders
Doesn't sound right.
[snip]
Something is lookin
On Fri 12 Jan 2018 at 06:19:57 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 01/11/2018 01:43 PM, David Wright wrote:
> >On Thu 11 Jan 2018 at 11:10:33 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote:
> >>I multi-boot several varieties of Debian.
> >>When booting one specific install, it displays many repetitions of:
> Be
On 2018-01-11 at 12:45, bw wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jan 2018, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> On 2018-01-11 at 12:35, bw wrote:
>>
>> > On stretch local_block is a function in a script named local, maybe using
>> > a stretch tool on jessie has things confused? or the initramfs-tools pkg
>> > is hosed on
On 01/11/2018 01:43 PM, David Wright wrote:
On Thu 11 Jan 2018 at 11:10:33 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote:
I multi-boot several varieties of Debian.
When booting one specific install, it displays many repetitions of:
Begin: Running /scripts/local-block ... done.
It then proceeds to bring up a
On 01/11/2018 01:28 PM, bw wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 01/11/2018 11:35 AM, bw wrote:
[snip]
Sounds complicated, one version of grub but
separate boot partitions always gets me confused too.
Not sure best solution.
But I'm used to it and have not discovered any pot
On Thu 11 Jan 2018 at 11:10:33 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote:
> I multi-boot several varieties of Debian.
> When booting one specific install, it displays many repetitions of:
> >>Begin: Running /scripts/local-block ... done.
> It then proceeds to bring up an apparently normal system.
[…]
> sda8 -
On 01/11/2018 11:35 AM, bw wrote:
[snip]
Sounds complicated, one version of grub but
separate boot partitions always gets me confused too.
Not sure best solution.
But I'm used to it and have not discovered any potholes. YET ;/
I've had it that way since Squeeze in order to force update-grub to
On 2018-01-11 at 12:35, bw wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jan 2018, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> On 2018-01-11 at 12:10, Richard Owlett wrote:
>>
>> > I multi-boot several varieties of Debian.
>> > When booting one specific install, it displays many repetitions of:
>> >>> Begin: Running /scripts/local-block ..
On 2018-01-11 10:44 -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2018-01-11 at 10:35, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
>> wooledg:~$ ls -l /sbin/init
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 Jul 5 2017 /sbin/init -> /lib/systemd/systemd
>> wooledg:~$ cat /proc/1/comm
>> systemd
>
> So it's smart enough to bypass the name of the s
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018, Richard Owlett wrote:
> I multi-boot several varieties of Debian.
> When booting one specific install, it displays many repetitions of:
> > > Begin: Running /scripts/local-block ... done.
>
> It then proceeds to bring up an apparently normal system.
> Would this be logged s
On 2018-01-11 at 12:10, Richard Owlett wrote:
> I multi-boot several varieties of Debian.
> When booting one specific install, it displays many repetitions of:
>>> Begin: Running /scripts/local-block ... done.
>
> It then proceeds to bring up an apparently normal system.
> Suggested diagnostics
I multi-boot several varieties of Debian.
When booting one specific install, it displays many repetitions of:
Begin: Running /scripts/local-block ... done.
It then proceeds to bring up an apparently normal system.
Would this be logged somewhere?
Where?
Specifics:
sda1 - Always has the latest v
On 2018-01-11 at 10:35, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 10:27:33AM -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> On 2018-01-11 at 10:23, Brian wrote:
>>> Guaranteed: 'cat /proc/1/comm'.
>>
>> On my system:
>>
>> $ dlocate /sbin/init
>> sysvinit-core: /sbin/init
>> $ cat /proc/1/comm
>> init
>>
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 10:27:33AM -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2018-01-11 at 10:23, Brian wrote:
>
> > On Thu 11 Jan 2018 at 09:45:35 -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
> >
> >> What init system are you running?
> >>
> >> Usually, this can be determined by 'dlocate /sbin/init', but I can't
> >> guar
On 2018-01-11 at 10:23, Brian wrote:
> On Thu 11 Jan 2018 at 09:45:35 -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> What init system are you running?
>>
>> Usually, this can be determined by 'dlocate /sbin/init', but I can't
>> guarantee that that will hold for all systems.
>
> Guaranteed: 'cat /proc/1/comm'
On Thu 11 Jan 2018 at 09:45:35 -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
> What init system are you running?
>
> Usually, this can be determined by 'dlocate /sbin/init', but I can't
> guarantee that that will hold for all systems.
Guaranteed: 'cat /proc/1/comm'.
--
Brian.
On 2018-01-11 at 09:36, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 01/11/2018 07:26 AM, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, January 11, 2018 05:29:42 AM Richard Owlett wrote:
>>
>>> OOPS, typos and awkward phrasing. It should have read:
>>> When booting one specific install, it displays many repetitions o
On 01/11/2018 07:26 AM, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, January 11, 2018 05:29:42 AM Richard Owlett wrote:
OOPS, typos and awkward phrasing. It should have read:
When booting one specific install, it displays many repetitions of the
line to the effect that it is beginning a specific scrip
On Thursday, January 11, 2018 05:29:42 AM Richard Owlett wrote:
> OOPS, typos and awkward phrasing. It should have read:
> When booting one specific install, it displays many repetitions of the
> line to the effect that it is beginning a specific script.
>
Did it give you the name of the specific
On 01/11/2018 02:32 AM, Jeroen Mathon wrote:
Hey Richard,
Perhaps it is just me but i am having trouble deciphering this
sentence:
"When booting one specific install I many repetitions to the effect
that it is beginning a specific script." could you please elaborate
upon it?
OOPS, typos and a
Hey Richard,
Perhaps it is just me but i am having trouble deciphering this sentence:
"When booting one specific install I many repetitions to the effect that
it is beginning a specific script." could you please elaborate upon it?
On 01/10/2018 03:22 PM, Richard Owlett wrote:
> I multi-boot sev
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 08:22:51AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
I multi-boot several varieties of Debian.
When booting one specific install I many repetitions to the effect
that it is beginning a specific script.
It then proceeds to bring up an apparently normal system.
Would this be logged s
On Wed 10 Jan 2018 at 08:22:51 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote:
> I multi-boot several varieties of Debian.
> When booting one specific install I many repetitions to the effect
> that it is beginning a specific script.
>
> It then proceeds to bring up an apparently normal system.
>
> Would this be
I multi-boot several varieties of Debian.
When booting one specific install I many repetitions to the effect that
it is beginning a specific script.
It then proceeds to bring up an apparently normal system.
Would this be logged somewhere?
Where?
TIA
Hi,
myc...@tutanota.com wrote:
> I keep getting this message from maxvid...@hotmail.fr :-
> ...
> Does anyone else receive the above message ?
I do, as probably the other subscribers of debian-user.
Looks like texts snippets taken from a french book about the art history
of old church acessories
I keep getting this message from maxvid...@hotmail.fr :-
Bonjour Angelique
A l' entrée du choeur se dressait autrefois le jubé édifié en 1291. Son
démantèlement au xvllle siècle découle des mutations de la liturgie. Des
emmarchements de marbre rouge et une grille
On 20141118_0932+, Darac Marjal wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:03:41PM -0700, Paul E Condon wrote:
> > The newer version of gnuplot is issuing a warning that I have never
> > seen before:
> >
> > Qt: Session management error: Authentication Rejected, reason :
> > None of the authenticatio
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:03:41PM -0700, Paul E Condon wrote:
> The newer version of gnuplot is issuing a warning that I have never
> seen before:
>
> Qt: Session management error: Authentication Rejected, reason :
> None of the authentication protocols specified are supported and
> host-based au
The newer version of gnuplot is issuing a warning that I have never
seen before:
Qt: Session management error: Authentication Rejected, reason :
None of the authentication protocols specified are supported and
host-based authentication failed
Apparently Qt believes it has to 'authenticate' the da
On Mon, 08 Sep 2014 10:31:36 -0400 The Wanderer sent:
> I suspect that what happened is that when you installed and removed
> ifupdown-extra, the stray /etc/network/if-up.d/00check-network-cable
> got removed, and so the problem it was causing went away too.
>
> The question is why that file was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 09/08/2014 at 10:07 AM, Charlie wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Sep 2014 09:15:23 -0400 The Wanderer sent:
>
>> On 09/08/2014 at 09:06 AM, Charlie wrote:
>>> It appears as you and Julien suggest to be that bug from
>>> October 2013? Never fixed?
>>
>> Act
On Mon, 08 Sep 2014 09:15:23 -0400 The Wanderer sent:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 09/08/2014 at 09:06 AM, Charlie wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 08 Sep 2014 08:33:41 -0400 The Wanderer sent:
> >
> >> On 09/08/2014 at 08:22 AM, Charlie wrote:
> >>
> >>> Using Debian Jessie,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 09/08/2014 at 09:06 AM, Charlie wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Sep 2014 08:33:41 -0400 The Wanderer sent:
>
>> On 09/08/2014 at 08:22 AM, Charlie wrote:
>>
>>> Using Debian Jessie, new install
>>>
>>> Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
On Mon, 08 Sep 2014 08:33:41 -0400 The Wanderer sent:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 09/08/2014 at 08:22 AM, Charlie wrote:
>
> > Using Debian Jessie, new install
> >
> > Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
> > RTL8101E/RTL8102E PCI Express Fast Ethe
2014-09-08 14:22 GMT+02:00 Charlie :
>
> Using Debian Jessie, new install
>
> Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8101E/RTL8102E
> PCI Express Fast Ethernet controller (rev 07)
>
> When I type this "ifup eth0" into a root terminal get this message:
>
> bound to 192.168.2.2 -- r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 09/08/2014 at 08:22 AM, Charlie wrote:
> Using Debian Jessie, new install
>
> Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
> RTL8101E/RTL8102E PCI Express Fast Ethernet controller (rev 07)
>
> When I type this "ifup eth0" into a root te
Using Debian Jessie, new install
Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8101E/RTL8102E
PCI Express Fast Ethernet controller (rev 07)
When I type this "ifup eth0" into a root terminal get this message:
bound to 192.168.2.2 -- renewal in 2147483648 seconds.
/etc/network/if-up.d/0
Hi all,
I am having a stable Debian distribution with GNOME on MIPS24KF
(mipsel).
When I run several applications after a while (3-4 hours not
deterministic) my applications crashes.
My dmesg shows the following:
Nov 6 21:08:43 hz-stb-1 gconfd (root-1799): starting (version
2.16.1), pid 1799 user
Hi all,
I am having a stable Debian distribution with GNOME on MIPS24KF
(mipsel).
When I run several applications after a while (3-4 hours not
deterministic) my applications crashes.
My dmesg shows the following:
Nov 6 21:08:43 hz-stb-1 gconfd (root-1799): starting (version
2.16.1), pid 1799 user
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 08:15:32PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
>
> Oh snap, did they send me a broken decoder ring? First the
> disappointment with the X-ray goggles, now this...
just remember not to put the sea monkeys in the sun...
A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 13:04:09 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 08:05:35PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
[...]
> > It is not spam, it is actually a coded message. If you have the secret
> > decoder ring then you can find out what it says:
> >
> > "The administrators
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 08:05:35PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 19:50:03 +0200, Shams Fantar wrote:
> > ArcticFox wrote:
> >> Anyone know what this means? I got it returned after I sent my last email
> >> to the list.
> >>
> >> On Jul 11, 2007, at 9:32 PM, MDaemon AT ture
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 19:50:03 +0200, Shams Fantar wrote:
> ArcticFox wrote:
>> Anyone know what this means? I got it returned after I sent my last email
>> to the list.
>>
>> On Jul 11, 2007, at 9:32 PM, MDaemon AT turei.co.cu wrote:
>>
>>> Delivery of the attached message:
>>>
>>> From : gen
ArcticFox wrote:
Anyone know what this means? I got it returned after I sent my last
email to the list.
On Jul 11, 2007, at 9:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Delivery of the attached message:
From : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date : Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:31:15 -0500
Subje
ArcticFox wrote:
Anyone know what this means? I got it returned after I sent my last
email to the list.
On Jul 11, 2007, at 9:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Delivery of the attached message:
From : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date : Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:31:15 -0500
Subje
Anyone know what this means? I got it returned after I sent my last
email to the list.
On Jul 11, 2007, at 9:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Delivery of the attached message:
From : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date : Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:31:15 -0500
Subject: (Archive Copy)
I had something like this in my server with some crashes. I changed the network
card and resolved.
Probably your network card is crashed too.
Gilberto
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006 11:07:21 +0200
KLEIN Stéphane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've strange message in my
KLEIN Stéphane wrote:
> Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 064b0008 ...
This is called a kernel oops. It means that something in your kernel
crashed and it might be dangerous to continue running.
It may indicate either a bug in the kernel, or hardware failure, but I
am not
Hello,
I've strange message in my /var/log/syslog file.
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 064b0008 ...
Full message is in my attached file.
Thanks for your help,
--Stéphane
EXT3 FS on hda1, internal journal
EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
eth1:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 04:57:34PM -0200, Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> I installed imap package in a Debian GNU/Linux and every time I
> access it there's a new message like this:
[snip]
> How to prevent to send this thing?
Use a different IMAP ser
Hi all,
I still have to provide POP to my users.
It's shame that every user has to read this message. :(
Thanks, Paulo Henrique
Em Mon, 15 Oct 2001 21:54:54 -0700 (PDT), Mike Egglestone
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> Hi,
> I remeber awhile ago I had the sa
Mike Egglestone wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I remeber awhile ago I had the same problem.
> I not too sure, but I believe was initially running qpopper
> first, and then installed imap.
> Then that message started to appear.
> I removed qpopper and just ran imap.
> Everything is good now.
> I think I like ima
Hi,
I remeber awhile ago I had the same problem.
I not too sure, but I believe was initially running qpopper
first, and then installed imap.
Then that message started to appear.
I removed qpopper and just ran imap.
Everything is good now.
I think I like imap better than pop anyway.
Are you running
On Mon, 15 Oct 2001, Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> I installed imap package in a Debian GNU/Linux and every time I
> access it there's a new message like this:
>
> > From: "Mail System Internal Data" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
>
> How to prevent to sen
On Mon, 15 Oct 2001 20:41:03 -0200
Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> isnt there another solution?
> This solutions seem to touch the problem, not really solve this.
> TIA,Paulo Henrique
A file which helps IMAP to do it's
Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> I installed imap package in a Debian GNU/Linux and every time I
> access it there's a new message like this:
>
> > From: "Mail System Internal Data" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 7:37 PM
> > Subject: D
Hi,
isnt there another solution?
This solutions seem to touch the problem, not really solve this.
TIA,Paulo Henrique
Em Mon, 15 Oct 2001 18:21:51 -0200, Christoph Simon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2001 18:04:35 -0200
> Paulo Henrique
On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 06:04:35PM -0200, Paulo Henrique Baptista de
Oliveira wrote:
> Em Mon, 15 Oct 2001 15:37:38 -0400, dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> > On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 04:57:34PM -0200, Paulo Henrique Baptista de
> > Oliveira wrote:
> > | I installed imap package in a Debian GNU
On Mon, 15 Oct 2001 18:04:35 -0200
Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> How I explain to all my users that they have to delete this message
> every time?! :(
> They are lusers. Is there any way to do this?
> TIA,Paulo Henrique
Pro
Hi,
How I explain to all my users that they have to delete this message
every time?! :(
They are lusers. Is there any way to do this?
TIA,Paulo Henrique
Em Mon, 15 Oct 2001 15:37:38 -0400, dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 04:57:34PM
Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira wrote:
> I installed imap package in a Debian GNU/Linux and every time I
> access it there's a new message like this:
>
> > From: "Mail System Internal Data" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 7:37 PM
> > Subject: DON'T DELETE THIS M
On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 04:57:34PM -0200, Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira
wrote:
|
| Hi all,
| I installed imap package in a Debian GNU/Linux and every time I
| access it there's a new message like this:
|
| > From: "Mail System Internal Data" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > Sent: Thursd
Hi all,
I installed imap package in a Debian GNU/Linux and every time I
access it there's a new message like this:
> From: "Mail System Internal Data" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 7:37 PM
> Subject: DON'T DELETE THIS MESSAGE -- FOLDER INTERNAL DATA
>
>
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 02:08:17PM +0100, Alexis Roda wrote:
> Susumu Takuwa wrote:
> >
> > >>>>> On Fri, 9 Feb 2001 10:58:35 +0100
> > Hans Marcus Kruger writes:
> >
> > HMK> Thats the strange message:
> > HMK> DEBUG: --Relat
Susumu Takuwa wrote:
>
> >>>>> On Fri, 9 Feb 2001 10:58:35 +0100
> Hans Marcus Kruger writes:
>
> HMK> Thats the strange message:
> HMK> DEBUG: --Relation pg_tables--
>
> Probably, pg is PostgreSQL.
It is. It started to appear in my co
>>>>> On Fri, 9 Feb 2001 10:58:35 +0100
Hans Marcus Kruger writes:
HMK> Thats the strange message:
HMK> DEBUG: --Relation pg_tables--
Probably, pg is PostgreSQL. If you don't use it, you
might stop PostgreSQL daemon.
# /etc/init.d/postgresql stop
Susumu Takuwa
Hi guys,
I am having a strange message at my computer (dual-pentium running ebian
potato up-to-date).
The thing is, I don't have a clou what causes this message. Can someone help
me o give me a hint?
Thats the strange message:
DEBUG: --Relation pg_t
Michael Abraham Shulman wrote:
> Every so often when logged into the console, I get a message looking
> like this:
>
> PAM_unix[28529]: (cron) session opened for user mail by (uid=0)
>
> Can anyone tell me what this means? Is it a problem, and if so, what
> can I do about it?
This particular me
> Why does the message pop up on my console, then, instead of going to a
> log file somewhere?
syslog has a log level. so does your console. change the log-level of the
console to avoid this.
cheers
--
Damien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://repose.ath.cx/
An age is called Dark not because the l
"Eric" == Eric G Miller writes:
Eric> On Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 11:51:12AM -0800, Michael Abraham Shulman wrote:
>> Every so often when logged into the console, I get a message
>> looking like this:
>>
>> PAM_unix[28529]: (cron) session opened for user mail by (uid=0)
>>
>> Can anyone tell me wh
On Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 11:51:12AM -0800, Michael Abraham Shulman wrote:
> Every so often when logged into the console, I get a message looking
> like this:
>
> PAM_unix[28529]: (cron) session opened for user mail by (uid=0)
>
> Can anyone tell me what this means? Is it a problem, and if so, wha
Every so often when logged into the console, I get a message looking
like this:
PAM_unix[28529]: (cron) session opened for user mail by (uid=0)
Can anyone tell me what this means? Is it a problem, and if so, what
can I do about it?
\\// | R | T R | L B | //\\ ~ Michael Abraham Shulman
mailto:[E
Subject: Re: Strange message on ps -a
Date: Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 06:50:27PM +0100
In reply to:Johannes Jörg
Quoting Johannes Jörg([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I /*did/* reboot, and this thing did not happen the first few time. Any
> other ideas
>
> joerg
>
> >
on Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 06:50:27PM +0100, Johannes Jörg ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> > At 09:09 AM 11/8/00 +0100, you wrote:
> > >The following message appears each time I make "ps" or "ps -a":
> > >
> > >{floppy_open} {scsi_init_free}
> > >Warning: /boot/System.map-2.2.17 does not match kernel d
I /*did/* reboot, and this thing did not happen the first few time. Any
other ideas
joerg
> You've compiled a new kernel but not rebooted to load it?
> If so, then this is one of the few times in linux when a reboot is
> required.
>
> At 09:09 AM 11/8/00 +0100, you wrote:
> >Hello Everybody
> >
You've compiled a new kernel but not rebooted to load it?
If so, then this is one of the few times in linux when a reboot is required.
At 09:09 AM 11/8/00 +0100, you wrote:
Hello Everybody
The following message appears each time I make "ps" or "ps -a":
{floppy_open} {scsi_init_free}
Warning: /
Hello Everybody
The following message appears each time I make "ps" or "ps -a":
{floppy_open} {scsi_init_free}
Warning: /boot/System.map-2.2.17 does not match kernel data.
Then the running processes are listet just right. Any idea what happened
to my System.map? I compiled my own kernel (with bu
Stefano Calza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Today my linux box has started sending me this message:
>159.xxx.xxx.23 sent an invalid ICMP error to a broadcast
>What does it means? How can I get rid of it?
>It pops up on then screen every few minuts.
It's due to certain systems with misconfigured TCP/
Hi everyboby.
Today my linux box has started sending me this message:
159.xxx.xxx.23 sent an invalid ICMP error to a broadcast
What does it means? How can I get rid of it?
It pops up on then screen every few minuts.
I use a debian 2.2 on a laptop connected to a LAN.
Thanks,
Stefano
On Tue, Jun 13, 2000 at 03:13:44PM +0100, Moore, Paul wrote:
> I'm getting strange messages on the console of my Debian machine, namely
> eth0: too much work in el3_rx
> Can anyone give me any hints as to (a) what it means, (b) whether it
> indicates a problem, and(c) how to get rid of it (as
I'm getting strange messages on the console of my Debian machine, namely
eth0: too much work in el3_rx
Can anyone give me any hints as to (a) what it means, (b) whether it
indicates a problem, and(c) how to get rid of it (as it corrupts my working
screen).
Thanks,
Paul Moore.
PS If I need t
that's what i get on a sun machine:
/etc/cron.daily/suidmanager:
File /usr/X11R6/bin/xscreensaver registered but not installed
how to solve it ?
thanks
.oesse.
--
--
+-+-+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|m|a|r|c|o| |g|i|a|r|d|i|n|i|
+-+
It's a new log message (umm, why are you running 1.3.96 if you're not
reading [EMAIL PROTECTED] it's been hashed to death
there...) to catch a certain usage of flock in libc, which should have
been fixed around 1.3.10... Apparently the 5.3.x libc has the fix
now, but you'll only get that message f
97 matches
Mail list logo
