On 2022-07-17, Rick Thomas wrote:
> I'm experimenting with installing Bullseye on a Cubox-i4Pro I keep around for
> testing purposes.
>
> I followed the instructions at:
>
>
On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 06:37:55PM -0700, Rick Thomas wrote:
> I'm experimenting with installing Bullseye on a Cubox-i4Pro I keep around for
> testing purposes.
>
> I followed the instructions at:
>
>
On Sun, Jul 17, 2022, at 6:37 PM, Rick Thomas wrote:
> I'm experimenting with installing Bullseye on a Cubox-i4Pro I keep
> around for testing purposes.
>
> I followed the instructions at:
>
>
>
I'm experimenting with installing Bullseye on a Cubox-i4Pro I keep around for
testing purposes.
I followed the instructions at:
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/bullseye/main/installer-armhf/current/images/netboot/SD-card-images/README.concatenateable_images
Then I dd'ed the
Hello,
On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 06:30:18PM +0200, Linux-Fan wrote:
> Andy Smith writes:
> > It's a way of working that's served me well for about 25 years. It's
> > hard to imagine going back to having data spread all over the place.
>
> What do you use as your file server? Is it running 24/7 or
Andy Smith writes:
Hello,
On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 11:30:26AM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> For Gene, he could conceivably just rename the RAID setup that he has
> mounted
> under /home to some new top level mountpoint. (Although he probably has
> some
> scripts or similar stuff that
On 2022-06-10 at 02:54, gene heskett wrote:
> On Friday, 10 June 2022 00:22:53 EDT David Wright wrote:
>>
>> On Thu 09 Jun 2022 at 15:44:48 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
>>> Here is that partitioner menu snapshot, obtained by a network
>>> ssh login, smunched to 81kb base-64'd. Showing that d-i
On Friday, 10 June 2022 00:22:53 EDT David Wright wrote:
> On Thu 09 Jun 2022 at 15:44:48 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
> > On Thursday, 9 June 2022 11:04:15 EDT David Wright wrote:
> > > On Thu 09 Jun 2022 at 03:46:12 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, 9 June 2022 00:33:33 EDT David
On Thu 09 Jun 2022 at 03:22:56 (-0400), Felix Miata wrote:
> gene heskett composed on 2022-06-09 02:59 (UTC-0400):
>
> > Are you saying that I can partition this new drive with gparted and make
> > the d-i use that? That would be the holy grail if so.
>
> This possibility became reality in
On Thu 09 Jun 2022 at 15:44:48 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
> On Thursday, 9 June 2022 11:04:15 EDT David Wright wrote:
> > On Thu 09 Jun 2022 at 03:46:12 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
> > > On Thursday, 9 June 2022 00:33:33 EDT David Wright wrote:
> > > > On Tue 07 Jun 2022 at 16:24:02 (-0400),
On Thursday, 9 June 2022 11:04:15 EDT David Wright wrote:
> On Thu 09 Jun 2022 at 03:46:12 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
> > On Thursday, 9 June 2022 00:33:33 EDT David Wright wrote:
> > > On Tue 07 Jun 2022 at 16:24:02 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, 7 June 2022 15:16:16 EDT
On Thursday, 9 June 2022 11:03:52 EDT David Wright wrote:
> On Thu 09 Jun 2022 at 03:31:30 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
> > On Thursday, 9 June 2022 00:34:28 EDT David Wright wrote:
> > > On Wed 08 Jun 2022 at 14:04:44 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 08:33:56 EDT
On Thursday, 9 June 2022 11:05:27 EDT David Wright wrote:
> On Thu 09 Jun 2022 at 06:04:08 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
> > On Thursday, 9 June 2022 04:18:04 EDT Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 02:59:43AM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, 9 June 2022 00:31:55
Hello,
On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 11:30:26AM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> For Gene, he could conceivably just rename the RAID setup that he has mounted
> under /home to some new top level mountpoint. (Although he probably has some
> scripts or similar stuff that looks for stuff in /home/
I want to make a comment on this thread that is at least a little bit (maybe a
lot) off point, it is more a suggestion on what might be a better way next time
(although it could be done this time with a little work, I believe). Because
I don't see a good place to put this comment in context,
On Thu 09 Jun 2022 at 06:04:08 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
> On Thursday, 9 June 2022 04:18:04 EDT Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 02:59:43AM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> > > On Thursday, 9 June 2022 00:31:55 EDT David Wright wrote:
> > > > On Tue 07 Jun 2022 at 16:07:13
On Thu 09 Jun 2022 at 03:46:12 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
> On Thursday, 9 June 2022 00:33:33 EDT David Wright wrote:
> > On Tue 07 Jun 2022 at 16:24:02 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, 7 June 2022 15:16:16 EDT Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 02:17:08PM
On Thu 09 Jun 2022 at 03:31:30 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
> On Thursday, 9 June 2022 00:34:28 EDT David Wright wrote:
> > On Wed 08 Jun 2022 at 14:04:44 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 08:33:56 EDT rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > Or exchange the memory card (if you
On Thursday, 9 June 2022 04:18:04 EDT Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 02:59:43AM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> > On Thursday, 9 June 2022 00:31:55 EDT David Wright wrote:
> > > On Tue 07 Jun 2022 at 16:07:13 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, 7 June 2022 15:03:41
On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 02:59:43AM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> On Thursday, 9 June 2022 00:31:55 EDT David Wright wrote:
> > On Tue 07 Jun 2022 at 16:07:13 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, 7 June 2022 15:03:41 EDT gene heskett wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, 7 June 2022 14:35:50 EDT
On Thursday, 9 June 2022 03:22:56 EDT Felix Miata wrote:
> gene heskett composed on 2022-06-09 02:59 (UTC-0400):
> > Are you saying that I can partition this new drive with gparted and
> > make the d-i use that? That would be the holy grail if so.
>
> This possibility became reality in antiquity.
On Thursday, 9 June 2022 00:33:33 EDT David Wright wrote:
> On Tue 07 Jun 2022 at 16:24:02 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 7 June 2022 15:16:16 EDT Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 02:17:08PM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> > >
> > > Fourth: Use the text mode
On Thursday, 9 June 2022 00:34:28 EDT David Wright wrote:
> On Wed 08 Jun 2022 at 14:04:44 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 08:33:56 EDT rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > Or exchange the memory card (if you have an appropriate card reader
> > > for (one of) your
gene heskett composed on 2022-06-09 02:59 (UTC-0400):
> Are you saying that I can partition this new drive with gparted and make
> the d-i use that? That would be the holy grail if so.
This possibility became reality in antiquity. I never would have completed my
first Debian installation
On Thursday, 9 June 2022 00:31:55 EDT David Wright wrote:
> On Tue 07 Jun 2022 at 16:07:13 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 7 June 2022 15:03:41 EDT gene heskett wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, 7 June 2022 14:35:50 EDT David Wright wrote:
> > > > On Tue 07 Jun 2022 at 14:17:08 (-0400), gene
On Wed 08 Jun 2022 at 14:04:44 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
> On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 08:33:56 EDT rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Or exchange the memory card (if you have an appropriate card reader for
> > (one of) your computer(s))?
>
> I do. but dragging the card out of the camera's, all of
On Tue 07 Jun 2022 at 16:24:02 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday, 7 June 2022 15:16:16 EDT Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 02:17:08PM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> > Fourth: Use the text mode expert install.
>
> I have so far, but powered off to bail out when I
On Tue 07 Jun 2022 at 16:07:13 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday, 7 June 2022 15:03:41 EDT gene heskett wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 7 June 2022 14:35:50 EDT David Wright wrote:
> > > On Tue 07 Jun 2022 at 14:17:08 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
> > > > But I've put another drive in, that I want
On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 08:33:56 EDT rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 07, 2022 04:24:02 PM gene heskett wrote:
> > The D-I needs to grow the capability to mount an otherwise unused
> > drive, and store as png's, snapshots of the screen. That way no one
> > can accuse me of copy/paste
On Tuesday, June 07, 2022 04:24:02 PM gene heskett wrote:
> The D-I needs to grow the capability to mount an otherwise unused drive,
> and store as png's, snapshots of the screen. That way no one can accuse
> me of copy/paste fibbing. I can also take screen shots but the list
> server, even if I
gene heskett composed on 2022-06-07 16:07 (UTC-0400):
> The only way I know how to do that is take a screen shot with my camera.
> But thats not possible when running the D-I cuz w/o gimp, its at least 5
> megs bigger than the server will accept. BTDT.
You have lots of computers. Surely at
On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 04:24:02PM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday, 7 June 2022 15:16:16 EDT Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 02:17:08PM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> > > But I've put another drive in, that I want to install a non efi
> > > system on too.
> > >
> > >
>
On Tuesday, 7 June 2022 15:16:16 EDT Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 02:17:08PM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> > But I've put another drive in, that I want to install a non efi
> > system on too.
> >
> >
> > Ideas as to how to proceed?
>
> Hi Gene,
>
> First: get yourself an
On Tuesday, 7 June 2022 15:03:41 EDT gene heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday, 7 June 2022 14:35:50 EDT David Wright wrote:
> > I was sitting here rereading the thread "had another crash, reboot
> > usb
> > failed, powerdown reboot usb failed" when this came in:
> >
> > On Tue 07 Jun 2022 at 14:17:08
On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 02:17:08PM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> But I've put another drive in, that I want to install a non efi system on
> too.
>
>
> Ideas as to how to proceed?
>
Hi Gene,
First: get yourself an iso with all the firmware on to start with.
Second: Disconnect all your FTDI
On Tuesday, 7 June 2022 14:35:50 EDT David Wright wrote:
> I was sitting here rereading the thread "had another crash, reboot usb
> failed, powerdown reboot usb failed" when this came in:
>
> On Tue 07 Jun 2022 at 14:17:08 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
> > But I've put another drive in, that I
gene heskett wrote:
> But I've put another drive in, that I want to install a non efi system on
> too.
>
> booted back to bullseye to id the drive, its this one: (from dmesg)
> [ 18.508537] ata5.00: ATA-11: Samsung SSD 870 QVO 1TB, SVQ02B6Q, max
> UDMA/133
> ===
> [ 18.508541]
I was sitting here rereading the thread "had another crash, reboot usb
failed, powerdown reboot usb failed" when this came in:
On Tue 07 Jun 2022 at 14:17:08 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
> But I've put another drive in, that I want to install a non efi system on
> too.
>
> booted back to
But I've put another drive in, that I want to install a non efi system on
too.
booted back to bullseye to id the drive, its this one: (from dmesg)
[7.366909] ata5: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300)
[7.374281] ata5.00: both IDENTIFYs aborted, assuming NODEV
[7.686897]
On Sb, 11 dec 21, 06:04:09, Tim Woodall wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Dec 2021, Steve Dondley wrote:
>
> > > I've not used apt to install packages from files but can you put
> > > ../roundcube*.deb?
Yes, that would have worked.
> > Thanks but I just figured it out literally 30 seconds ago. Had to do the
On Sat, 11 Dec 2021, Steve Dondley wrote:
I've not used apt to install packages from files but can you put
../roundcube*.deb?
You need to install both roundcube and roundcube-core from your local
build.
If mt first suggestion doesn't work, try installing roundcube-core
first.
If you
I've not used apt to install packages from files but can you put
../roundcube*.deb?
You need to install both roundcube and roundcube-core from your local
build.
If mt first suggestion doesn't work, try installing roundcube-core
first.
If you haven't built roundcube-core then you need to
On Fri, 10 Dec 2021, Steve Dondley wrote:
I'm running bullseye with roundcube version 1.4.11 currently installed. I am
trying to upgrade to version 1.5.1.
I followed the instructions at "SimpleBackportCreation" at
https://wiki.debian.org/SimpleBackportCreation
Everything went fine until
I'm running bullseye with roundcube version 1.4.11 currently installed.
I am trying to upgrade to version 1.5.1.
I followed the instructions at "SimpleBackportCreation" at
https://wiki.debian.org/SimpleBackportCreation
Everything went fine until the very last step:
===
$ sudo
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 09:49:04PM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Vi, 24 iul 20, 17:53:53, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
> Aren't those files an internal implementation detail? Most users won't
> ever need to interact with those files or even be aware of their
> existence.
Strictly
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 09:49:04PM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> Aren't those files an internal implementation detail? Most users won't
> ever need to interact with those files or even be aware of their
> existence.
The whole design is built around "you can do this with systemctl commands,
or
On Vi, 24 iul 20, 17:53:53, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 05:18:24PM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Vi, 24 iul 20, 15:00:32, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 01:26:50PM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > > > Seriously?
> > >
> > > Yes seriously. This is
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 05:18:24PM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Vi, 24 iul 20, 15:00:32, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 01:26:50PM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > > Seriously?
> >
> > Yes seriously. This is a pain point that could be avoided. I'm not a
> > systemd
On Vi, 24 iul 20, 15:00:32, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 01:26:50PM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > Seriously?
>
> Yes seriously. This is a pain point that could be avoided. I'm not a
> systemd hater. I do some quite advanced things with it. But I don't
> think it's above
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 09:52:29AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
[...]
> I don't know of any specific term for a directory's physical
> manifestation, other than "directory".
>
> In the olden days, a directory was basically a series of 16-byte
> records (14 bytes for the filename, 2 bytes for the
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 09:56:27AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2020-07-24 at 09:50, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
> Since writing that, I've had occasion to remember the term 'dirent',
> which I think is more the in-memory representation of a directory than
> the on-disk representation, but
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 01:26:50PM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
Seriously?
Yes seriously. This is a pain point that could be avoided. I'm not a
systemd hater. I do some quite advanced things with it. But I don't
think it's above criticism, and this is an area I feel is worthy of
criticism.
On 2020-07-24 at 09:50, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 09:42:24AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> On 2020-07-24 at 09:22, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>>> Nitpick: the directory entry is the one carrying the name.
>>
>> I had the impression that even a directory is stored in/as
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 09:42:24AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2020-07-24 at 09:22, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 07:54:27AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 07:49:26AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> >>
> >>> Sounds like a case where
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 09:42:24AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
On 2020-07-24 at 09:22, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 07:54:27AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 07:49:26AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
Sounds like a case where directly editing the
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 09:42:24AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2020-07-24 at 09:22, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 07:54:27AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 07:49:26AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> >>
> >>> Sounds like a case where
On 2020-07-24 at 09:22, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 07:54:27AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 07:49:26AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
>>
>>> Sounds like a case where directly editing the underlying device,
>>> to modify inode-or-equivalent contents
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 07:54:27AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 07:49:26AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> > Sounds like a case where directly editing the underlying device, to
> > modify inode-or-equivalent contents such that the slash is no longer
^
Nitpick:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 07:49:26AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> Sounds like a case where directly editing the underlying device, to
> modify inode-or-equivalent contents such that the slash is no longer
> there, might even be *advisable*.
Yeah, some sort of direct hex-edit on the unmounted file
On 2020-07-24 at 07:45, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 07:16:06PM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> On 2020-07-23 at 06:26, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>>> Seriously? Could you please show me how would I create a file on
>>> *nix containing '/' in the name?
>>
>> It's theoretically
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 07:16:06PM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2020-07-23 at 06:26, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > Seriously? Could you please show me how would I create a file on *nix
> > containing '/' in the name?
>
> It's theoretically possible, but AFAIK basically nothing would support
> it
On Vi, 24 iul 20, 10:58:24, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> It's as if they were copying the disruptive antipatterns of proprietary
> software companies. But we don't need those antipatterns in the free
> software context, do we?
One person's bug is another's feature.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 06:48:10PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Thu 23 Jul 2020 at 10:12:09 (+0200), to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
> > Hours of fun :-)
>
> Sure, I agree. But they're hours I don't really have. That's one
> reason why I don't run a DE: I just don't understand what's going on
On Thu 23 Jul 2020 at 10:12:09 (+0200), to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 02:22:32PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> > On Wed 22 Jul 2020 at 14:23:48 (-0400), rhkramer wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > The basic solution involved stopping gparted [...]
>
> > AIUI gparted locks up the disks
>>> Yes. Unfortunately Systemd decided to forbid '/' in unit names,
You can probably work around that by using '⁄', for example ;-)
Stefan
On 2020-07-23 at 06:26, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Mi, 22 iul 20, 16:26:24, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 07:38:54AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>>
>>> Apparently this unit refers to the root file system. I have no
>>> idea why it's masked for you, but that's where I'd
On Mi, 22 iul 20, 16:26:24, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 07:38:54AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > Apparently this unit refers to the root file system. I have no idea
> > why it's masked for you, but that's where I'd start looking.
>
> Yes. Unfortunately Systemd decided to
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 02:22:32PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Wed 22 Jul 2020 at 14:23:48 (-0400), rhkramer wrote:
[...]
> > The basic solution involved stopping gparted [...]
> AIUI gparted locks up the disks when you run it [...]
Whatever "locking up the disks" means, in this context.
On Wednesday, July 22, 2020 02:54:27 PM Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 02:23:48PM -0400, rhkramer wrote:
> > The basic solution involved stopping gparted (I don't know why, but
> > google found a page that described the same problem I had and the page
> > said it occurred with
On Wed 22 Jul 2020 at 14:23:48 (-0400), rhkramer wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 22, 2020 7:08:40 AM EDT Andrew Cater wrote:
> > It should "just work" - if you can "ssh localhost" - the server is running.
>
> Thanks for the reply. The problem is solved, and I'll mention the solution
> here with
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 02:23:48PM -0400, rhkramer wrote:
> The basic solution involved stopping gparted (I don't know why, but google
> found a page that described the same problem I had and the page said it
> occurred with gparted running and went away with gparted stopped.
Fascinating.
Greg Wooledge writes:
> unicorn:~$ systemctl status -.mount
> systemctl: invalid option -- '.'
> Hint: to specify units starting with a dash, use "--":
> systemctl [OPTIONS...] {COMMAND} -- -.mount ...
> unicorn:~$ systemctl status -- -.mount
> ● -.mount - /
>Loaded: loaded
On Wednesday, July 22, 2020 7:08:40 AM EDT Andrew Cater wrote:
> It should "just work" - if you can "ssh localhost" - the server is running.
Thanks for the reply. The problem is solved, and I'll mention the solution
here with maybe more details in replies to Greg Wooledge and/or Jonathan
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 07:38:54AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
Apparently this unit refers to the root file system. I have no idea
why it's masked for you, but that's where I'd start looking.
Yes. Unfortunately Systemd decided to forbid '/' in unit names, and also
to map all mounts to units.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 09:48:22PM -0400, rhkramer wrote:
> I get this error when trying to apt-get install openssh-server on my (up to
> date) Buster system:
>
> Error: GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.systemd1.UnitMasked: Unit -.mount is
> masked.
>
> I tried (based on the reference below):
>
>
It should "just work" - if you can "ssh localhost" - the server is running.
Hope this helps
Andy C
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 2:06 AM rhkramer wrote:
> I get this error when trying to apt-get install openssh-server on my (up
> to
> date) Buster system:
>
> Error:
I get this error when trying to apt-get install openssh-server on my (up to
date) Buster system:
Error: GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.systemd1.UnitMasked: Unit -.mount is
masked.
I tried (based on the reference below):
root@s32:/# systemctl unmask org.freedesktop.systemd1.UnitMasked
Unit
humbert.olivie...@free.fr writes:
> - Mail original -
> De: "Rodolfo Medina"
> Envoyé: Samedi 20 Avril 2019 09:33:17
> Objet: Trying to install Audiveris
>
>> I'm experimenting difficulty in installing Audiveris... Anyone has already
>> instal
Rodolfo Medina writes:
> didier gaumet writes:
>
>> Le 14/06/2019 à 20:26, Rodolfo Medina a écrit :
>> [...]
>>> Could not determine java version from '11.0.4'.
>> [...]
>>
>> I would say you are probably (assuming you are still running Debian
>> Unstable), you need to install openjdk-11-jdk
didier gaumet writes:
> Le 14/06/2019 à 20:26, Rodolfo Medina a écrit :
> [...]
>> Could not determine java version from '11.0.4'.
> [...]
>
> I would say you are probably (assuming you are still running Debian
> Unstable), you need to install openjdk-11-jdk and to verify
> tesseract-ocr and
Le 14/06/2019 à 20:26, Rodolfo Medina a écrit :
[...]
> Could not determine java version from '11.0.4'.
[...]
>From their website, I quote:
"You also need a suitable Java SE Development Kit for a 64-bit
environment (a 32-bit environment would not work, because of the deep
learning library) Note:
didier gaumet writes:
> Le 20/04/2019 à 09:33, Rodolfo Medina a écrit :
>
>> I'm experimenting difficulty in installing Audiveris... Anyone has already
>> installed it...? Please help.
>
> What kind of difficulties?
I'm following the steps described at:
On 23/4/19 3:43 am, humbert.olivie...@free.fr wrote:
I've got a working package of 5.1.0 in a testing phase.
You can find the package (32 and/or 64 bits) here :
https://download.tuxfamily.org/librazik/decepas/pool/main/a/audiveris/
I'm very interested about feedback if you test it.
Thanks
humbert.olivie...@free.fr writes:
I'm experimenting difficulty in installing Audiveris... Anyone has
already installed it...? Please help.
>>>
>>> I've got a working package of 5.1.0 in a testing phase.
>>>
>>> You can find the package (32 and/or 64 bits) here :
>>>
>>> I'm experimenting difficulty in installing Audiveris... Anyone has already
>>> installed it...? Please help.
>>
>> I've got a working package of 5.1.0 in a testing phase.
>>
>> You can find the package (32 and/or 64 bits) here :
>>
humbert.olivie...@free.fr writes:
> - Mail original -
> De: "Rodolfo Medina"
> Envoyé: Samedi 20 Avril 2019 09:33:17
> Objet: Trying to install Audiveris
>
>> I'm experimenting difficulty in installing Audiveris... Anyone has already
>> instal
- Mail original -
De: "Rodolfo Medina"
Envoyé: Samedi 20 Avril 2019 09:33:17
Objet: Trying to install Audiveris
> I'm experimenting difficulty in installing Audiveris... Anyone has already
> installed it...? Please help.
I've got a working package of 5.1.0 in a tes
Le 20/04/2019 à 09:33, Rodolfo Medina a écrit :
> I'm experimenting difficulty in installing Audiveris... Anyone has already
> installed it...? Please help.
What kind of difficulties?
I do not use Audiveris myself, but there are instructions for building
it from source on their wiki and into
Rodolfo Medina writes:
> Rodolfo Medina writes:
>
>> It would be great to have running under Linux (and Debian, of course) one of
>> those music scanning tools such as (for MS Windows) Sharpeye... So to
>> convert any PDF sheet music into digital format, e.g. XML.
>>
>> Please suggest whoever
On Tue 05 Feb 2019 at 04:42:02 (-0500), Albretch Mueller wrote:
> On 1/31/19, David Wright wrote:
> >> If for whatever reason you disown that computer, you would just
> >> delete that partition. Your own data you will keep on a USB pen or
> >> microdrive.
> >
> > Something like that. I'd run
On 1/31/19, David Wright wrote:
>> If for whatever reason you disown that computer, you would just
>> delete that partition. Your own data you will keep on a USB pen or
>> microdrive.
>
> Something like that. I'd run badblocks over the unencrypted partitions.
>
Why? Do you mean the low level
On Wed 30 Jan 2019 at 00:30:40 (-0500), Albretch Mueller wrote:
> use case:
>
> Say, you have a computer preinstalled with Windows, on which you
> would like to install a Debian Linux base. You would:
>
> 1) resize the larger, Windows proper (/dev/sda3) partition
Yes, the largest partition
On Tue 29 Jan 2019 at 23:36:27 (-0500), Albretch Mueller wrote:
> On 1/29/19, David Wright wrote:
> > However, the second method uses manual partitioning of the disks with
> > gdisk, so I don't see why sda should not contain a(nother) FAT
> > partition which is ignored.
>
> I don't see why
On 1/30/19 11:05 AM, Brian wrote:
On Wed 30 Jan 2019 at 19:51:06 +0100, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Le 30/01/2019 à 16:01, Brian a écrit :
On Wed 30 Jan 2019 at 06:42:30 -0800, David Christensen wrote:
To avoid confusion, install (and update/upgrade) on a computer with
no other drives connected
On 1/30/19 11:03 AM, Thomas D Dial wrote:
On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 06:42 -0800, David Christensen wrote:
If you want a portable Debian installation, install Debian on a USB
flash drive. To avoid confusion, install (and update/upgrade) on a
computer with no other drives connected (so that GRUB
On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 06:42 -0800, David Christensen wrote:
> On 1/29/19 9:30 PM, Albretch Mueller wrote:
> > use case:
> >
> > Say, you have a computer preinstalled with Windows, on which you
> > would like to install a Debian Linux base. You would:
> >
> > 1) resize the larger, Windows
On Wed 30 Jan 2019 at 19:51:06 +0100, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 30/01/2019 à 16:01, Brian a écrit :
> > On Wed 30 Jan 2019 at 06:42:30 -0800, David Christensen wrote:
> > >
> > > To avoid confusion, install (and update/upgrade) on a computer with
> > > no other drives connected (so that GRUB
Le 29/01/2019 à 13:45, Albretch Mueller a écrit :
I got one of those office computers I would like to recycle. It has a
fat16 (as /dev/sda1) partition with some manufacturer’s selftests
which I would like to keep. So, I wiped the rest of the other two
partitions to install Debian encrypted,
Le 30/01/2019 à 16:01, Brian a écrit :
On Wed 30 Jan 2019 at 06:42:30 -0800, David Christensen wrote:
To avoid confusion, install (and update/upgrade) on a computer with
no other drives connected (so that GRUB does not create boot menu entries
for other operating systems).
(...)
Wouldn't
On Wed 30 Jan 2019 at 06:42:30 -0800, David Christensen wrote:
> On 1/29/19 9:30 PM, Albretch Mueller wrote:
> > use case:
> >
> > Say, you have a computer preinstalled with Windows, on which you
> > would like to install a Debian Linux base. You would:
> >
> > 1) resize the larger,
1 - 100 of 360 matches
Mail list logo
