On Thu, 9 Jul 1998, Jeff Schreiber wrote:
I'm with you. I think a larger subset of folks will screw this up. I'm sure
it's an attempt to save a bit of bandwidth, but . . .
Personally I think it's cool.
i agree. just cut and paste the line into an xterm window or console.
what
On Thu, 9 Jul 1998, Jeff Schreiber wrote:
I'm with you. I think a larger subset of folks will screw this up. I'm sure
it's an attempt to save a bit of bandwidth, but . . .
Personally I think it's cool.
i agree. just cut and paste the line into an xterm window or console.
what could be
On Thu, Jul 09, 1998 at 01:50:13AM -0400, Daniel Martin at cush wrote:
Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] /dev/null
Does this message strike anyone as significantly less helpful than the
former mail a message with the subject unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] message? I'll
On Wed, Jul 08, 1998 at 11:22:47PM -0700, Pann McCuaig wrote:
On Thu, Jul 09, 1998 at 01:50:13AM -0400, Daniel Martin at cush wrote:
Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] /dev/null
Does this message strike anyone as significantly less helpful than the
former mail a
Pann McCuaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does this message strike anyone as significantly less helpful than the
former mail a message with the subject unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] message? I'll grant you that
people screwed that up too, but this seems to be asking for people to
get
On Thu, Jul 09, 1998 at 01:50:13AM -0400, Daniel Martin at cush wrote:
Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/dev/null
Does this message strike anyone as significantly less helpful than the
former mail a message with the subject unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] message? I'll
6 matches
Mail list logo
