On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 23:37:36 -0700
Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
...
But yes it is hard to avoid proprietary protocols. Tax forms are in
PDF. Videos are in Flash, or worse Silverlight. Audio files are in
I think we've discussed this before, but is it really correct to call
PDF a
Ahoj,
Dňa Sun, 19 Jan 2014 08:24:14 -0500 Celejar cele...@gmail.com napísal:
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 23:37:36 -0700
Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
...
But yes it is hard to avoid proprietary protocols. Tax forms are in
PDF. Videos are in Flash, or worse Silverlight. Audio files are
On Sun, 19 Jan 2014 14:32:09 +0100
Slavko li...@slavino.sk wrote:
Ahoj,
Dňa Sun, 19 Jan 2014 08:24:14 -0500 Celejar cele...@gmail.com napísal:
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 23:37:36 -0700
Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
...
But yes it is hard to avoid proprietary protocols. Tax
On 2014-01-16 11:41 PM, Ma Xiaojun damage3...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adobe_Flash#Vendor_dependence
So you are so freedom loving, why don't you abandon
Flash-using-website altogether?
Is it so hard?
Le 17/01/2014 05:11, Patrick Bartek a écrit :
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Jo, 16 ian 14, 09:58:43, Patrick Bartek wrote:
I am using the flashplugin from Debian's nonfree repo. If there are
any security updates for it from Adobe shouldn't those updates
ultimately end up
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 1:42 AM, Patrick Bartek bartek...@yahoo.com
wrote:
My primary browser. Same problem whether using Adobe Flash or
Google's version. In fact, if using Google's, those problem
sites don't even recognize it, and say You need to
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014, François Patte wrote:
Le 17/01/2014 05:11, Patrick Bartek a écrit :
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Jo, 16 ian 14, 09:58:43, Patrick Bartek wrote:
[snip]
I was unaware of this. I thought it was the plugin. I have since
read the the Debian
Le 17/01/2014 18:28, Patrick Bartek a écrit :
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014, François Patte wrote:
Le 17/01/2014 05:11, Patrick Bartek a écrit :
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Jo, 16 ian 14, 09:58:43, Patrick Bartek wrote:
[snip]
I was unaware of this. I thought it was the plugin.
On Mi, 15 ian 14, 19:06:12, Patrick Bartek wrote:
Query: Wouldn't apt-get update and upgrade do the same
thing, if there were a new security update? And if you have
the nonfree repo enabled, of course.
apt-get only understands package (as in .deb) versions, so if a newer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/15/2014 08:02 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
Jarth Berilcosm wrote:
Good advice. On Jessie and later I have this:
cat /etc/cron.daily/adobe-flashplugin-local
#!/bin/sh
update-flashplugin-nonfree --quiet --install
If your version produces
On 20140116_101618, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Mi, 15 ian 14, 19:06:12, Patrick Bartek wrote:
Query: Wouldn't apt-get update and upgrade do the same
thing, if there were a new security update? And if you have
the nonfree repo enabled, of course.
apt-get only understands package (as in
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Patrick Bartek
bartek...@yahoo.com wrote:
FWIW: Adobe says that 11.2.202 is the last and final Linux version
of Flash. Although, they will continue backported security updates.
Windows/OSX version is up to
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Mi, 15 ian 14, 19:06:12, Patrick Bartek wrote:
Query: Wouldn't apt-get update and upgrade do the same
thing, if there were a new security update? And if you have
the nonfree repo enabled, of course.
apt-get only understands package (as
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014, Paul Cartwright wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/15/2014 08:02 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
Jarth Berilcosm wrote:
Good advice. On Jessie and later I have this:
cat /etc/cron.daily/adobe-flashplugin-local
#!/bin/sh
On Jo, 16 ian 14, 09:58:43, Patrick Bartek wrote:
I am using the flashplugin from Debian's nonfree repo. If there are
any security updates for it from Adobe shouldn't those updates
ultimately end up in the repo just like all other nonfree stuff? Or
would the security updates end up in some
On 2014-01-16, Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course, the package could set up a cron job to do the update=20
automatically, but most people would hate that (me included) and it's=20
trivial to do it yourself.
It could check for an updated version and, if one is available,
On Jo, 16 ian 14, 18:25:34, Curt wrote:
On 2014-01-16, Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course, the package could set up a cron job to do the update=20
automatically, but most people would hate that (me included) and it's=20
trivial to do it yourself.
It could check
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
Patrick Bartek wrote:
I am using the flashplugin from Debian's nonfree repo. If there are
any security updates for it from Adobe shouldn't those updates
ultimately end up in the repo just like all other nonfree stuff? Or
would the security updates end up in some
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
Curt wrote:
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
Of course, the package could set up a cron job to do the update
automatically, but most people would hate that (me included) and it's
trivial to do it yourself.
It could check for an updated version and, if one is available,
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Jo, 16 ian 14, 09:58:43, Patrick Bartek wrote:
I am using the flashplugin from Debian's nonfree repo. If there are
any security updates for it from Adobe shouldn't those updates
ultimately end up in the repo just like all other nonfree
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 1:42 AM, Patrick Bartek bartek...@yahoo.com wrote:
My primary browser. Same problem whether using Adobe Flash or Google's
version. In fact, if using Google's, those problem sites don't even
recognize it, and say You need to install Flash.
Contact Google for support.
In my quest to get Flash to work on a couple sites requiring version
11.8 or greater when 11.2 is the last Linux version, I was having no
luck until today: Got an update/upgrade of Chrome, my primary browser,
and its Pepper version of Flash is 12.0.0.41. The problem sites now
work just fine.
Ma Xiaojun wrote:
Patrick Bartek wrote:
The OS is not the problem. All the other sites I frequent work just
fine. It's just a couple that don't, but used to -- a month or so ago.
A sane OS doesn't lock you at 11.2; a broken one does.
Adobe Flash is a proprietary plugin from Adobe. Adobe
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adobe_Flash#Vendor_dependence
So you are so freedom loving, why don't you abandon
Flash-using-website altogether?
Is it so hard?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
Ma Xiaojun wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adobe_Flash#Vendor_dependence
So you are so freedom loving, why don't you abandon
Flash-using-website altogether?
Is it so hard?
You may be confusing me with comments made by others. I wasn't the
one with the Flash
If you have flash-player non-free installed make sure to run
update-flashplugin-nonfree --install
update-flashplugin-nonfree --status
Flash Player version installed on this system : 11.2.202.335
Flash Player version available on upstream site: 11.2.202.335
Thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140115171435.GA15671@jessie.gatewire
On 16/01/14 02:56, Jarth Berilcosm wrote:
If you have flash-player non-free installed make sure to run
update-flashplugin-nonfree --install
update-flashplugin-nonfree --status
Flash Player version installed on this system : 11.2.202.335
Flash Player version available on upstream
Jarth Berilcosm wrote:
If you have flash-player non-free installed make sure to run
update-flashplugin-nonfree --install
update-flashplugin-nonfree --status
...
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/58396 documents what's up with an old
exploit used in new scenario's.
Good advice. On Jessie
On Wed, 15 Jan 2014, Bob Proulx wrote:
Jarth Berilcosm wrote:
If you have flash-player non-free installed make sure to run
update-flashplugin-nonfree --install
update-flashplugin-nonfree --status
...
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/58396 documents what's up with an
old exploit
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Patrick Bartek bartek...@yahoo.com wrote:
FWIW: Adobe says that 11.2.202 is the last and final Linux version of
Flash. Although, they will continue backported security updates.
Windows/OSX version is up to 12.something-or-other, IIRC. And I'm
beginning to
31 matches
Mail list logo
