Update problem key signature

Hello, On a remote server at OVH provider, I upgraded from Debian 8 to 9 and 9 to 10. I did'nt care if the problem appears after the last migration, because it's not my server, I just helped temporarily. But now: # apt-get update Err:1 http://debian.mirrors.ovh.net/debian buster-updates

Re: Apt Update Problem

Thanks for the reply. Well, that's a relief. On 02/27/2019 09:22 AM, Dan Ritter wrote: Stephen P. Molnar wrote: I am running up-to-date Stretch. This morning when I did 'apt update' I got: root@AbNormal:/home/comp# apt update Ign:1 http://debian.uchicago.edu/debian stretch InRelease Hit:2

Re: Apt Update Problem

Stephen P. Molnar wrote: > I am running up-to-date Stretch. > > This morning when I did 'apt update' I got: > > root@AbNormal:/home/comp# apt update > Ign:1 http://debian.uchicago.edu/debian stretch InRelease > Hit:2 http://debian.uchicago.edu/debian stretch-updates InRelease > Hit:3

Apt Update Problem

I am running up-to-date Stretch. This morning when I did 'apt update' I got: root@AbNormal:/home/comp# apt update Ign:1 http://debian.uchicago.edu/debian stretch InRelease Hit:2 http://debian.uchicago.edu/debian stretch-updates InRelease Hit:3 http://debian.uchicago.edu/debian stretch-backports

Re: update problem

On 2018-09-12, Default User wrote: > > Now, regarding other distributions: > > Void? > Heard the project leader just sort of wandered away. > Maybe after Void matures for a few years, I'll check it out. > 'Void' might be considered a kind of nominative aposematism. -- “An oak is a tree. A rose

Re: update problem

On 12/09/2018 14:56, Default User wrote: Arch? [...] But the wiki is good . . . (And much of it is applicable to other distributions, including Debian.) +1 for the Arch wiki. I haver never used Arch, but the Arch wiki has helped me many times. Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-Davies

Re: update problem

On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 10:56:14 -0400 Michael Stone wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 07:50:28AM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote: > >Plus, you have the advantage of a system that is customized to your > >hardware and personal tastes. System runs and boots faster. > > Confirmation bias is such a

Re: update problem

On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 07:50:28AM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote: Plus, you have the advantage of a system that is customized to your hardware and personal tastes. System runs and boots faster. Confirmation bias is such a powerful thing...

Re: update problem

On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 22:56:55 -0400 Default User wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 1:16 PM Patrick Bartek > wrote: > > > On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:56:03 -0400 > > Default User wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018, 23:42 Patrick Bartek > > > wrote: > > > > > > [big snip] > > > > > > > > Well,

Re: update problem

On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 1:16 PM Patrick Bartek wrote: > On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:56:03 -0400 > Default User wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018, 23:42 Patrick Bartek > > wrote: > > > > [big snip] > > > > > > Well, it is Unstable. So, problems are expected. It's the nature > > > of the beast. Let

Re: update problem

On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:56:03 -0400 Default User wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018, 23:42 Patrick Bartek > wrote: > > [big snip] > > > > Well, it is Unstable. So, problems are expected. It's the nature > > of the beast. Let us know how it goes. At worst, since .17 works, > > stick with it

Re: update problem

On Mon, Sep 10, 2018, 23:42 Patrick Bartek wrote: > On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 20:14:05 -0400 > Default User wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 9, 2018, 20:09 Patrick Bartek wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 10:52:39 -0400 > > > Default User wrote: > > &g

Re: update problem

On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 20:14:05 -0400 Default User wrote: > On Sun, Sep 9, 2018, 20:09 Patrick Bartek wrote: > > > On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 10:52:39 -0400 > > Default User wrote: > > > > > UPDATE: > > > > > > Problem still occurring as of 2018-09

Re: update problem

On Mon, Sep 10, 2018, 22:59 Jimmy Johnson wrote: > On 09/10/2018 05:14 PM, Default User wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 9, 2018, 20:09 Patrick Bartek wrote: > > > >> On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 10:52:39 -0400 > >> Default User wrote: > >> > >>> UPDATE: >

Re: update problem

On 09/10/2018 05:14 PM, Default User wrote: On Sun, Sep 9, 2018, 20:09 Patrick Bartek wrote: On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 10:52:39 -0400 Default User wrote: UPDATE: Problem still occurring as of 2018-09-09 14.50 UT. No indication of whether anyone else is experiencing this condition. I don't run

Re: update problem

On Sun, Sep 9, 2018, 20:09 Patrick Bartek wrote: > On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 10:52:39 -0400 > Default User wrote: > > > UPDATE: > > > > Problem still occurring as of 2018-09-09 14.50 UT. > > No indication of whether anyone else is experiencing this condition.

Re: update problem

On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 10:52:39 -0400 Default User wrote: > UPDATE: > > Problem still occurring as of 2018-09-09 14.50 UT. > No indication of whether anyone else is experiencing this condition. > I don't run Sid/Unstable, but "updates" on both Wheezy which I ran for

Re: update problem

UPDATE: Problem still occurring as of 2018-09-09 14.50 UT. No indication of whether anyone else is experiencing this condition. On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 3:38 PM Default User wrote: > Hello . . . > Running Sid (amd-64) on standard x86-64 hardware, conventional software > setup, nothin

update problem

Hello . . . Running Sid (amd-64) on standard x86-64 hardware, conventional software setup, nothing unusual. For several days now, after I do: sudo aptitude -Pvv update If there is anything to upgrade, if I do: sudo aptitude -Pvv safe-upgrade (or) sudo aptitude -Pvv full-upgrade it will

Re: System Update Problem

Many thanks On 08/10/2018 07:29 AM, john doe wrote: On 8/10/2018 12:33 PM, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: I am running Stretch on my 64 bit Linux platform. This morning, when I run apt-get update as root I get: root@AbNormal:/home/comp# apt update Ign:1 http://debian.uchicago.edu/debian stretch

Re: System Update Problem

On 8/10/2018 12:33 PM, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: I am running  Stretch on my 64 bit Linux platform. This morning, when  I run apt-get update as root I get: root@AbNormal:/home/comp# apt update Ign:1 http://debian.uchicago.edu/debian stretch InRelease Hit:2 http://debian.uchicago.edu/debian

Re: System Update Problem

Stephen P. Molnar, Fr 10 Aug 2018 12:33:12 CEST: > I am running Stretch on my 64 bit Linux platform. This morning, when I > run apt-get update as root I get: > > root@AbNormal:/home/comp# apt update > Ign:1 http://debian.uchicago.edu/debian stretch InRelease > Hit:2

System Update Problem

I am running Stretch on my 64 bit Linux platform. This morning, when I run apt-get update as root I get: root@AbNormal:/home/comp# apt update Ign:1 http://debian.uchicago.edu/debian stretch InRelease Hit:2 http://debian.uchicago.edu/debian stretch-updates InRelease Hit:3

Re: Update on my update problem with gnome system.

> > Wow! I said "bad things" about Ubuntu regarding this topic but, just > > today, experienced the same kind of thing, with Debian Stretch, regarding > > the vlc "uber Package". Seems it's replacing libvlccore8 with > libvlccore9, > > along with several other replacements! So Debian also uses

Re: Update on my update problem with gnome system.

On Sun 03 Jun 2018 at 20:05:39 (-0400), Kenneth Parker wrote: > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 10:02 PM, Kenneth Parker wrote: > > > > > > >> > >> >dist-upgrade > >> >dist-upgrade in addition to performing the function of > >> upgrade, also intelligently > >> >

Re: Update on my update problem with gnome system.

On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 10:02 PM, Kenneth Parker wrote: > > >> >> >dist-upgrade >> >dist-upgrade in addition to performing the function of >> upgrade, also intelligently >> >handles changing dependencies with new versions of packages; >> apt-get has a "smart"

Re: Update on my update problem with gnome system.

On Saturday, May 26, 2018 02:08:59 PM Pétùr wrote: > I don't use aptitude. I use only apt and apt-get but I believe apt is > just a shortcut for apt-get. `apt update` is equivalent for me to > `apt-get update` and `apt dist-upgrade` to `apt-get dist-upgrade` > (correct me if I am wrong). *

Re: Update on my update problem with gnome system.

On Wed, 30 May 2018 18:53:54 +0100 Brian wrote: > On Wed 30 May 2018 at 00:31:25 +0300, Abdullah Ramazanoğlu wrote: > > > On Tue, 29 May 2018 20:39:28 +0100 Brian said: > > > > > If a package is upgraded, surely a user would want any new > > > packages to be installed if they are required to

Re: Update on my update problem with gnome system.

On 2018-05-30, Brian wrote: > > I'm at a loss to understand the argument here. 'apt update/upgrade' > also provides information that the user can act on. If a package on > your system acquires a new dependency X, 'apt-get upgrade' will not > upgrade it (is that really an upgrade? :) ) but apt

Re: Update on my update problem with gnome system.

On Wed 30 May 2018 at 10:37:32 -0400, John Cunningham wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 5:37 PM Brian wrote: > > > On Tue 29 May 2018 at 15:52:12 -0400, John Cunningham wrote: > > > > > Not necessarily. Sometimes the dependencies get out of hand, like when a > > > big project adopts a small

Re: Update on my update problem with gnome system.

On Wed 30 May 2018 at 00:31:25 +0300, Abdullah Ramazanoğlu wrote: > On Tue, 29 May 2018 20:39:28 +0100 Brian said: > > > If a package is upgraded, surely a user would want any new packages > > to be installed if they are required to satisfy dependencies. apt's > > designed behaviour looks more

Re: Update on my update problem with gnome system.

On Wed 30 May 2018 at 08:59:31 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 08:39:28PM +0100, Brian wrote: > > [...] > > > If a package is upgraded, surely a user would want any new packages > > to be installed if they are required to satisfy dependencies. apt's > > designed

Re: Update on my update problem with gnome system.

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 5:37 PM Brian wrote: > On Tue 29 May 2018 at 15:52:12 -0400, John Cunningham wrote: > > > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 3:39 PM Brian wrote: > > > > > On Tue 29 May 2018 at 21:57:31 +0300, Abdullah Ramazanoğlu wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, 29 May 2018 13:18:16 -0500 David

Re: Update on my update problem with gnome system.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 08:39:28PM +0100, Brian wrote: [...] > If a package is upgraded, surely a user would want any new packages > to be installed if they are required to satisfy dependencies. apt's > designed behaviour looks more sensible than

Re: Update on my update problem with gnome system.

On Wed 30 May 2018 at 00:31:25 (+0300), Abdullah Ramazanoğlu wrote: > On Tue, 29 May 2018 20:39:28 +0100 Brian said: > > > If a package is upgraded, surely a user would want any new packages > > to be installed if they are required to satisfy dependencies. apt's > > designed behaviour looks more

Re: Update on my update problem with gnome system.

On Tue 29 May 2018 at 22:37:08 (+0100), Brian wrote: > On Tue 29 May 2018 at 15:52:12 -0400, John Cunningham wrote: > > > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 3:39 PM Brian wrote: > > > > > On Tue 29 May 2018 at 21:57:31 +0300, Abdullah Ramazanoğlu wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, 29 May 2018 13:18:16 -0500

Re: Update on my update problem with gnome system.

On Tue 29 May 2018 at 15:52:12 -0400, John Cunningham wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 3:39 PM Brian wrote: > > > On Tue 29 May 2018 at 21:57:31 +0300, Abdullah Ramazanoğlu wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 29 May 2018 13:18:16 -0500 David Wright said: > > > > On Tue 29 May 2018 at 18:38:40 (+0300),

Re: Update on my update problem with gnome system.

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 3:39 PM Brian wrote: > On Tue 29 May 2018 at 21:57:31 +0300, Abdullah Ramazanoğlu wrote: > > > On Tue, 29 May 2018 13:18:16 -0500 David Wright said: > > > On Tue 29 May 2018 at 18:38:40 (+0300), Abdullah Ramazanoğlu wrote: > > > > On Tue, 29 May 2018 09:14:12 -0400 Greg

Re: Update on my update problem with gnome system.

On Tue 29 May 2018 at 21:57:31 +0300, Abdullah Ramazanoğlu wrote: > On Tue, 29 May 2018 13:18:16 -0500 David Wright said: > > On Tue 29 May 2018 at 18:38:40 (+0300), Abdullah Ramazanoğlu wrote: > > > On Tue, 29 May 2018 09:14:12 -0400 Greg Wooledge said: > > > > On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 09:31:14PM

Re: Update on my update problem with gnome system.

On Tue, 29 May 2018 13:18:16 -0500 David Wright said: > On Tue 29 May 2018 at 18:38:40 (+0300), Abdullah Ramazanoğlu wrote: > > On Tue, 29 May 2018 09:14:12 -0400 Greg Wooledge said: > > > On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 09:31:14PM +0300, Abdullah Ramazanoğlu wrote: > --✁ > > > > I never use

Re: Update on my update problem with gnome system.

On Tue 29 May 2018 at 18:38:40 (+0300), Abdullah Ramazanoğlu wrote: > On Tue, 29 May 2018 09:14:12 -0400 Greg Wooledge said: > > > On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 09:31:14PM +0300, Abdullah Ramazanoğlu wrote: > > > apt or apt-get upgrade does upgrade in passive mode: It never install new > > > packages,

Re: Update on my update problem with gnome system.

On Tue, 29 May 2018 09:14:12 -0400 Greg Wooledge said: > On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 09:31:14PM +0300, Abdullah Ramazanoğlu wrote: > > apt or apt-get upgrade does upgrade in passive mode: It never install new > > packages, never removes existing ones. Just upgrades existing ones as far as > >

Re: Update on my update problem with gnome system.

On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 09:31:14PM +0300, Abdullah Ramazanoğlu wrote: > apt or apt-get upgrade does upgrade in passive mode: It never install new > packages, never removes existing ones. Just upgrades existing ones as far as > possible. That's incorrect. One of the differences between apt and

Re: Update on my update problem with gnome system.

On Sat 26 May 2018 at 15:45:02 (-0400), Cindy-Sue Causey wrote: > On 5/26/18, Pétùr wrote: > > Le 25/05/2018 à 21:33, Joe a écrit : > >>> Le 19/05/2018 à 21:03, Hans a écrit : > Isn't it today "apt update" and "apt full-upgrade"? > >>> Thanks, I didn't know this new

Re: Update on my update problem with gnome system.

On 5/26/18, Pétùr wrote: > Le 25/05/2018 à 21:33, Joe a écrit : >>> Le 19/05/2018 à 21:03, Hans a écrit : Isn't it today "apt update" and "apt full-upgrade"? >>> Thanks, I didn't know this new "full-upgrade" command. >>> >>> Is "apt full-upgrade" equivalent to "apt-get

Re: Update on my update problem with gnome system.

On Sat, 26 May 2018 20:08:59 +0200 Pétùr said: > I don't use aptitude. I use only apt and apt-get but I believe apt is > just a shortcut for apt-get. `apt update` is equivalent for me to > `apt-get update` and `apt dist-upgrade` to `apt-get dist-upgrade` > (correct me if I am wrong). > > My

Re: Update on my update problem with gnome system.

Le 25/05/2018 à 21:33, Joe a écrit : >> Le 19/05/2018 à 21:03, Hans a écrit : >>> Isn't it today "apt update" and "apt full-upgrade"? >> Thanks, I didn't know this new "full-upgrade" command. >> >> Is "apt full-upgrade" equivalent to "apt-get dist-upgrade" (or apt >> dist-upgrade)? > More or

Re: Update on my update problem with gnome system.

On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Pétùr wrote: > > > >dist-upgrade > >dist-upgrade in addition to performing the function of > upgrade, also intelligently > >handles changing dependencies with new versions of packages; > apt-get has a

Re: Update on my update problem with gnome system.

On Fri, 25 May 2018 20:17:52 +0200 Pétùr wrote: > Le 19/05/2018 à 21:03, Hans a écrit : > > Isn't it today "apt update" and "apt full-upgrade"? > > Thanks, I didn't know this new "full-upgrade" command. > > Is "apt full-upgrade" equivalent to "apt-get dist-upgrade" (or

Re: Update on my update problem with gnome system.

Le 19/05/2018 à 21:03, Hans a écrit : > Isn't it today "apt update" and "apt full-upgrade"? Thanks, I didn't know this new "full-upgrade" command. Is "apt full-upgrade" equivalent to "apt-get dist-upgrade" (or apt dist-upgrade)? According to the man pages (man apt and man apt-get), dist-upgrade

Re: Update on my update problem with gnome system.

On Sat, 19 May 2018 21:27:42 +0300 Abdullah Ramazanoğlu said: > On Sat, 19 May 2018 10:37:08 -0400 Matthew Dyer said: >> root@matt-the-cat:/home/matthew# apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade >> Hit:1 http://security.debian.org/debian-security testing/updates InRelease >> Hit:2

Re: Update on my update problem with gnome system.

Matthew Dyer wrote: ... these things come to mind: - perhaps you have automatic upgrades set up on Gnome? there should be some record in /var/log/apt or /var/log/dpkg.log of what is being updated. - if you have a fast enough connection it doesn't hurt to make sure /var/lib/apt/lists

Re: Update on my update problem with gnome system.

Am Samstag, 19. Mai 2018, 20:26:25 CEST schrieb songbird: Isn't it today "apt update" and "apt full-upgrade"? It is also possible, to use "aptitude" (aptitude update && aptittude dist- upgrade) but be warned: aptitude for upgrading from one release to another is no good choice. However,

Re: Update on my update problem with gnome system.

Matthew Dyer wrote: > Mornning all, > > > A few days ago I reported a  problem whare the gnome testing system > which I am now using to write this message.  Here is the resault. > > > I did a clean install of the system using the alfa testing image.  I > then edited the sources list and changed

Update on my update problem with gnome system.

Mornning all, A few days ago I reported a  problem whare the gnome testing system which I am now using to write this message.  Here is the resault. I did a clean install of the system using the alfa testing image.  I then edited the sources list and changed the lines from buster to

apt update problem when it works with local apt-mirror repository

My internet provider blocks e-mails sending to smtp server so sending a letter via the web. It is seemed to 813786 resolved bug you can see: From: Julian Andres Klode To: 813786-cl...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#813786: fixed in apt 1.4~beta3 Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 21:03:45

Re: Package update problem...{***SOLVED***}

On Wednesday, 12/14/16 11:06:52 AM Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Tuesday 13 December 2016 19:23:49 Mark Neidorff wrote: > > On Monday, 12/12/16 11:49:01 PM kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Mark Neidorff wrote: > > > > Sorry to seem stubborn, but I

Re: Package update problem...{***SOLVED***}

On Tuesday 13 December 2016 19:23:49 Mark Neidorff wrote: > On Monday, 12/12/16 11:49:01 PM kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Mark Neidorff wrote: > > > Sorry to seem stubborn, but I don't consider giving a user account full > > > administrative

Re: Package update problem...{***SOLVED***}

On Tuesday, 12/13/16 02:34:00 PM Henning Follmann wrote: > > Good news! I solved the problem. This solution came from the openSUSE > > forums... (just giving credit where credit is due) > > > > As root, in the folder /etc/cron.* (where * is either daily, hourly, etc. > > depending on how often

Re: Package update problem...{***SOLVED***}

> > > Good news! I solved the problem. This solution came from the openSUSE > forums... (just giving credit where credit is due) > > As root, in the folder /etc/cron.* (where * is either daily, hourly, etc. > depending on how often you want the check to take place): > > 1. Create a file

Re: Package update problem...{***SOLVED***}

On Monday, 12/12/16 11:49:01 PM kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Mark Neidorff wrote: > > Sorry to seem stubborn, but I don't consider giving a user account full > > administrative access acceptable, even if there is only one user on the > >

Re: Package update problem...

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Mark Neidorff wrote: > > Sorry to seem stubborn, but I don't consider giving a user account full > administrative access acceptable, even if there is only one user on the > system. My reasoning is that by default if the user goes to a "naughty"

Re: Package update problem...

On Sunday, 12/11/16 02:45:41 PM kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: > On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Mark Neidorff wrote: > > I'm running Jesse 8.6 with a KDE desktop. > > > > I get a desktop notification that there is one or more package updates > > available. I select the

Re: Package update problem...

On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Mark Neidorff wrote: > I'm running Jesse 8.6 with a KDE desktop. > > I get a desktop notification that there is one or more package updates > available. I select the package(s) and then I'm asked for authentication. I > type in the root

Package update problem...

I'm running Jesse 8.6 with a KDE desktop. I get a desktop notification that there is one or more package updates available. I select the package(s) and then I'm asked for authentication. I type in the root password, but it is rejected. I also try my user password, but that is also rejected.

Re: Wheezy to Jessie update problem: packages with bugs

Lisi Reisz writes: > I would do the dist-upgrade first and clear up any mess remaining afterwards. Thanks, Lisi. I was coming to that conclusion, too, but I was looking for any sort of confirmation that I wasn't guaranteed to brick the machine. I'll report back,

Re: Wheezy to Jessie update problem: packages with bugs

On Monday 04 July 2016 21:52:49 Bill Harris wrote: > Gary Dale writes: > > On 04/07/16 03:23 PM, Bill Harris wrote: > >>> The simplest solution would be to reinstall the offending > >>> packages. Apt-get doesn't have that option but aptitude does. I can't > >>> try this at

Re: Wheezy to Jessie update problem: packages with bugs

Bill Harris writes: > - I have yet to do the `apt dist-upgrade` (I downloaded all the packages > and then quit), so I've got to do that at some time. > > - My question was whether I > > - reinstall the packages first, and then do the dist-upgrade later, or

Re: Wheezy to Jessie update problem: packages with bugs

Gary Dale writes: > On 04/07/16 03:23 PM, Bill Harris wrote: >>> The simplest solution would be to reinstall the offending >>> packages. Apt-get doesn't have that option but aptitude does. I can't >>> try this at home but it may resolve the conflicts. Install aptitude >>>

Re: Wheezy to Jessie update problem: packages with bugs

On 04/07/16 03:23 PM, Bill Harris wrote: Gary Dale writes: On 04/07/16 12:32 PM, Bill Harris wrote: Summary: emacs24(1 bug), dbus(1 bug), gnome-settings-daemon(1 bug), libxml2(1 bug), debhelper(1 bug), openbsd-inetd(1 bug), smartmontools(1 bug), ruby-hpricot(1

Re: Wheezy to Jessie update problem: packages with bugs

Gary Dale writes: > On 04/07/16 12:32 PM, Bill Harris wrote: >> Summary: >> emacs24(1 bug), dbus(1 bug), gnome-settings-daemon(1 bug), libxml2(1 bug), >> debhelper(1 bug), openbsd-inetd(1 bug), smartmontools(1 bug), ruby-hpricot(1 >> bug), cdrdao(1 bug),

Re: Wheezy to Jessie update problem: packages with bugs

Cindy-Sue Causey writes: > I've used "apt-get install --reinstall" successfully a couple times > during issues. From "man apt-get", this flag's description is: > > "Re-install packages that are already installed and at the newest version." I thought I had seen that

Re: Wheezy to Jessie update problem: packages with bugs

On Mon 04 Jul 2016 at 15:09:35 -0400, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote: > On 7/4/16, Gary Dale wrote: > > > > The simplest solution would be to reinstall the offending packages. > > Apt-get doesn't have that option but aptitude does. I can't try this at > > home but it may resolve

Re: Wheezy to Jessie update problem: packages with bugs

On 7/4/16, Gary Dale wrote: > On 04/07/16 12:32 PM, Bill Harris wrote: >> I updated one laptop a month or two ago using the process on >> https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html, >> and it worked smoothly. Then I tried the same thing

Re: Wheezy to Jessie update problem: packages with bugs

On 04/07/16 12:32 PM, Bill Harris wrote: I updated one laptop a month or two ago using the process on https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html, and it worked smoothly. Then I tried the same thing yesterday on a second laptop, except that I forgot to get

Wheezy to Jessie update problem: packages with bugs

I updated one laptop a month or two ago using the process on https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html, and it worked smoothly. Then I tried the same thing yesterday on a second laptop, except that I forgot to get rid of a wheezy backports entry; instead, I

Re: libssl update problem

On Monday 09 May 2016 03:39:49 Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote: > If no amd64 packages needed on this machine, maybe the amd64 > architecture could be removed: > > dpkg --remove-architecture amd64 > > Then it won't install another amd64 package in the future. > Which is how I got into this mess in the

Re: libssl update problem

If no amd64 packages needed on this machine, maybe the amd64 architecture could be removed: dpkg --remove-architecture amd64 Then it won't install another amd64 package in the future. Regards, jvp.

Re: libssl update problem

On Sunday 08 May 2016 06:10:36 Gene Heskett wrote: > Greetings; > > Synaptic is telling me it cannot configure the new i386 version of > libssl and friends on an i386 install, because it THINKS the amd64 > version is installed. It's been hand nuked when I found that it was > not available to be

libssl update problem

Greetings; Synaptic is telling me it cannot configure the new i386 version of libssl and friends on an i386 install, because it THINKS the amd64 version is installed. It's been hand nuked when I found that it was not available to be nuked if the architecture wasn't set to include amd64 stuff.

Re: apt-get update problem

On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 06:20:38PM -0700, John Conover wrote: Running apt-get update on one of my machines gives: W: Failed to fetch

Re: apt-get update problem

Darac Marjal writes: On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 06:20:38PM -0700, John Conover wrote: Running apt-get update on one of my machines gives: W: Failed to fetch

Re: apt-get update problem

On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 06:20:38PM -0700, John Conover wrote: Running apt-get update on one of my machines gives: W: Failed to fetch

apt-get update problem

Running apt-get update on one of my machines gives: W: Failed to fetch copy:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/Debian%20GNU_Linux%207%20%5fWheezy%5f%20-%20Official%20Snapshot%20i386%20LIVE_INSTALL%20Binary%2020140723-18:32_dists_wheezy_main_binary-i386_Packages Failed to stat - stat (2: No such

Re: update problem

On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 01:08:08PM +0800, lina wrote: Hi, when I tried to update, it showed me something like: libgnutlsxx26 removed (configs remain) ; install (was: install). Extra # apt-get install libgnutlsxx2 ^ you missed a 6 here. Reading package

Re: update problem

On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Darac Marjal mailingl...@darac.org.uk wrote: On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 01:08:08PM +0800, lina wrote: Hi, when I tried to update, it showed me something like: libgnutlsxx26 removed (configs remain) ;  install (was: install).  Extra # apt-get install

Re: update problem

My laptop just forzen, can't react, is it possible due to lack of package? and this certain package, libgnutlsxx27 lina P.S I can't ssh from outside either. On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 6:31 PM, lina lina.lastn...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Darac Marjal

Re: update problem

On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 20:23:16 +0800 lina lina.lastn...@gmail.com wrote: Hello lina, My laptop just forzen, can't react, is it possible due to lack of package? and this certain package, libgnutlsxx27 That package does TLS/SSL negotiation stuff over a network It's unlikely, I would have

Re: update problem

On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Brad Rogers b...@fineby.me.uk wrote: On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 20:23:16 +0800 lina lina.lastn...@gmail.com wrote: Hello lina, My laptop just forzen, can't react, is it possible due to lack of package? and this certain package, libgnutlsxx27 That package does

Re: update problem

libgnutlsxx26 depends on libgnutls26 (= 2.10.5-3) On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 1:08 PM, lina lina.lastn...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, when I tried to update, it showed me something like: libgnutlsxx26 removed (configs remain) ;  install (was: install).  Extra # apt-get install libgnutlsxx2 Reading

gcc-avr update problem

Hi, everyone I'm using gcc-avr in etch. If I upgrade my debian to lenny and wish to use gcc-avr etch version not lenny version, how can I install gcc-avr and avr other package of etch in lenny environment? Regards, J.H.Kim -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org

Re: gcc-avr update problem

2009/6/17 J.Hwan.Kim frog1...@gmail.com Hi, everyone I'm using gcc-avr in etch. If I upgrade my debian to lenny and wish to use gcc-avr etch version not lenny version, how can I install gcc-avr and avr other package of etch in lenny environment? maybe apt pinnning can be of use

apt-get update problem

Hello, We have 2 (of out many) machines that will not do a apt-get update properly (since the 4.0 upgrade a couple days ago). These 2 machine are old but have working just fine. The message I get on both of these machines are: Get:5 http://security.debian.org etch/updates/main Sources

[Waiting for headers] gzip: stdin: not in gzip format (was Re: apt-get update problem)

On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 10:42:34AM -0700, Account for Debian group mail wrote: Hello, We have 2 (of out many) machines that will not do a apt-get update properly (since the 4.0 upgrade a couple days ago). These 2 machine are old but have working just fine. The message I get on both of

Re: ftp.debian.org update - Problem solved.

On 12/3/07, Daniel Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Were you getting the same thing from apt-get commands? I didn't try apt-get commands, actually. Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ftp.debian.org update - Problem solved.

On 12/3/07, David Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Previously: OK, I got bitten and just checked my /etc/apt/sources.list, and noticed all my debian references were to ftp.debian.org. I beg penance. snip explanation and aptitude output. Found what I think is the issue. I still had a few

Re: ftp.debian.org update - Problem solved.

On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 09:52:33PM -0800, David Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: On 12/3/07, David Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Previously: OK, I got bitten and just checked my /etc/apt/sources.list, and noticed all my debian references were to ftp.debian.org. I beg penance.

Re: aptitude update Problem

On Tuesday 16 October 2007 21:37, Douglas A. Tutty wrote: On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 06:09:50PM -0500, Randy Patterson - [Tech] wrote: Hey, When I run this command; aptitude update I get the following output; Hit ftp://debian.mirrors.tds.net lenny Release.gpg Get:1

Re: aptitude update Problem

On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 07:01 -0500, Randy Patterson - [Tech] wrote: On Tuesday 16 October 2007 21:37, Douglas A. Tutty wrote: On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 06:09:50PM -0500, Randy Patterson - [Tech] wrote: Hey, When I run this command; aptitude update I get the following output;

aptitude update Problem

Hey, When I run this command; aptitude update I get the following output; Hit ftp://debian.mirrors.tds.net lenny Release.gpg Get:1 ftp://debian.mirrors.tds.net lenny/main Translation-en_US Ign ftp://debian.mirrors.tds.net lenny/main Translation-en_US Get:2 ftp://debian.mirrors.tds.net

  1   2   3   >