Re: SOLVED (was: Re: using mbuffer: what am i doing wrong?)

2024-04-14 Thread Marc SCHAEFER
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 04:14:33PM +0200, DdB wrote: > - the resulting transfer is way faster than say ... ssh. AFAIK ssh is mono-threaded (like OpenVPN, unless you use the kernel module). wireguard is multi-threaded. The symptom will be one CPU ("core") at 100% and the rest mostly idle.

SOLVED (was: Re: using mbuffer: what am i doing wrong?)

2024-04-11 Thread DdB
Am 11.04.2024 um 15:49 schrieb Marc SCHAEFER: > Hello, > > On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 03:13:01PM +0200, DdB wrote: >> from my research, the abbreviated takeaway is: > > I never used mbuffer, I use buffer combined with netcat-traditional: > ># receiver (TCP server on port 8000) >nc -l -p 800

Re: using mbuffer: what am i doing wrong?

2024-04-11 Thread Marc SCHAEFER
Hello, On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 03:13:01PM +0200, DdB wrote: > from my research, the abbreviated takeaway is: I never used mbuffer, I use buffer combined with netcat-traditional: # receiver (TCP server on port 8000) nc -l -p 8000 | buffer -S 1048576 -s 32768 -o /dev/null # sender (TCP c

Re: using mbuffer: what am i doing wrong?

2024-04-09 Thread DdB
Am 09.04.2024 um 15:30 schrieb Arno Lehmann: > I'd propose to use > > ss -f inet -lpn > > ss instead of netstat... I try to catch up with changing times :-) (...) > > Arno > > Thank you so much! Your suggestion did help big time, and the transfer is working now as desired. Great relief and

Re: using mbuffer: what am i doing wrong?

2024-04-09 Thread Michael Kjörling
On 9 Apr 2024 15:13 +0200, from debianl...@potentially-spam.de-bruyn.de (DdB): >> port=8000 # just an example >> filename=test.bin # created before >> >> # Start the receiver first, like: >> mbuffer -I $port -o $filename >> >> # Then start the sender like: >> mbuffer -i $filename -O ${receiverIP}

Re: using mbuffer: what am i doing wrong?

2024-04-09 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hello, I have not used mbuffer for a long time, so won't comment on that. But your netstat call looks unsuitable to diagnose. I'd propose to use ss -f inet -lpn ss instead of netstat... I try to catch up with changing times :-) -f inet because in this case, you're (probably) just interested

using mbuffer: what am i doing wrong?

2024-04-09 Thread DdB
Hello list, from my research, the abbreviated takeaway is: > port=8000 # just an example > filename=test.bin # created before > > # Start the receiver first, like: > mbuffer -I $port -o $filename > > # Then start the sender like: > mbuffer -i $filename -O ${receiverIP}:$port On my LAN (all vir