Re: very simple lan question

2000-08-27 Thread Tom Pfeifer
The /etc/network/interfaces file is new starting with potato, while previous releases used /etc/init.d/network. Although /etc/network/interfaces would now be considered the "preferred Debian way", I don't know of any reason why you can't continue to use the old method if you want. Of course if you

Re: very simple lan question

2000-08-27 Thread Patrick Dahiroc
this is the first time i've looked at my /etc/network/interfaces file and everything is commented out. currently i configure my network interfaces from /etc/init.d/network. if i set my network from /etc/network/interfaces does this mean that i can remove /etc/init.d/network? what is the preferre

Re: very simple lan question

2000-08-26 Thread Brian Stults
You can't connect two boxes directly with an RJ45 cable. You need either a hub between them or a crossover cable. That is, the "send" wires from one box have to be connected to the "receive" wires from the other box, and vice versa. If you're only going to be using two computers on this network,

Re: very simple lan question

2000-08-26 Thread Phil Brutsche
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said... > Hi, I have two boxes (one woody, one potato) with ethernet cards, > connected by a RJ45 cable. I'd like to be able to ssh/sftp betwixt them. > > [I admit I don't grok networking much yet (that's partly why I'm doing > this, to learn).

very simple lan question

2000-08-26 Thread Aaron Maxwell
Hi, I have two boxes (one woody, one potato) with ethernet cards, connected by a RJ45 cable. I'd like to be able to ssh/sftp betwixt them. [I admit I don't grok networking much yet (that's partly why I'm doing this, to learn). I've mainly been reading the Net-HOWTO and the man pages for ifconfi