I want to share my experiences - I have not searched for an issue.
Same issue here - but not limited to terminal - occurs also in Graphical
mode (KDE). When the screen flickers it flickers both in GUI and terminal.
The flickering is fast moving left and right. Sometimes the top ~1/5 of the
displa
Ok, thanks for the info.
On Jan 2, 2018 2:32 AM, "Tino Calancha" wrote:
>
>
> >Instead the following fix works:
> >Create a file:
> >/usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d/10-fix-screen-flickering.conf
>
> >with content:
> >--8<-cut here---start--
> --->8---
>
>Instead the following fix works:
>Create a file:
>/usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d/10-fix-screen-flickering.conf
>with content:
>--8<-cut here---start->8---
>Section "Device"
> Identifier "Intel Graphics"
> Driver "intel"
> Option "A
FWIW I have been suffering screenn flickering in Debian 9 since 1 or 2
weeks ago.
The flickering is _very_ serious: it makes my box almost unusable.
Booting with kernel option:
i915.enable_rc6=0
significantly reduces the problem but it doesn't completely fix it.
Instead the following fix works:
We had similar issues (flickering and continous moving of the screen
horizontally) for 2 of our dell latitude 3460 running on Debian 9.3 configured
with i915 driver. Observed that it was mostly on terminal with some key
combinations like CTRL + C but happened randomly.
We choose advance option
On Fri, 15 Dec 2017, davidson wrote:
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017, josh cha wrote:
How do i fix screen flickering while scrolling and pressing down
buttion? While im on my command-line applications like w3m?
I notice screen flickering while scrolling on down button. its a
problem since stretch
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017, josh cha wrote:
How do i fix screen flickering while scrolling and pressing down
buttion? While im on my command-line applications like w3m?
I notice screen flickering while scrolling on down button. its a
problem since stretch release.
Does this happen all the time, or
How do i fix screen flickering while scrolling and pressing down buttion?
While im on my command-line applications like w3m?
I notice screen flickering while scrolling on down button. its a problem
since stretch release.
My laptop
Levono thinkpad T510
Core i5 450m
4gb
240gb ssd
Reco writes:
> Hi.
>
> On Sat, 05 Nov 2016 19:22:02 -0600
> Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
>
>> Recently, I've been getting email messages that look like this:
>>
>> *** stack smashing detected ***: /usr/bin/w3m terminated
>
> This is recently fixed
Hi.
On Sat, 05 Nov 2016 19:22:02 -0600
Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
> Recently, I've been getting email messages that look like this:
>
> *** stack smashing detected ***: /usr/bin/w3m terminated
> === Backtrace: =
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x70bcb)[0x
Recently, I've been getting email messages that look like this:
*** stack smashing detected ***: /usr/bin/w3m terminated
=== Backtrace: =
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x70bcb)[0x7f03ee523bcb]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__fortify_fail+0x37)[0x7f03ee5ac0e7]
/lib/x86_64-
On Friday 07 October 2016 19:00:12 Tony Baldwin wrote:
> I have a little business card website up for my big brother's media
> consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me.
> Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm
> getting redirected to a yahoo! search f
On Sunday 09 October 2016 12:28:03 Tony Baldwin wrote:
> I kind of think Montenegro should be .Mn, really (or that for the US
> stat of Minnesota).
Except that it is Mongolia. Country TLDs have to be unique.
Lisi
Hi Andy,
Thanks very much! It looks like quite a comprehensive answer (including
links) that I'll surely have to read more than once to absorb. (At that
point, I'll ask more questions if I feel the need.)
regards,
Randy Kramer
On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 10:18:38 PM Andy Smith wrote:
> On
Hi rhkramer,
On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 04:23:45PM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> I'm not the OP, and I'm sort of piggybacking and going somewhat (or a lot?)
> OT,
In that case it would be good to change the subject of the email.
I've done so here.
> but I am curious about how old inet4 (right
I'm not the OP, and I'm sort of piggybacking and going somewhat (or a lot?)
OT, but I am curious about how old inet4 (right term?) and the new inet6
addresses interact.
When I do ifconfig, I see that eth0 has both a 32 bit (e.g., 192.168.1.19) and
an inet6 address assigned.
Can anybody point m
rrect, Iceweasel, w3m, lynx and e-links all load the proper
page/site.
Chrome and dolphin on my android phone do fine, as well, but apparently
chrome on iOS (what my brother was using when he found the problem),
does not.
I would try these :
purge chromium and chrome.
Install chromium and go to
Richard Hector writes:
>
> It appears that Montenegro only came into existence (most recently) in
> 2006 - it was part of Yugoslavia, then 'Serbia and Montenegro'. So all
> the 'good' codes were presumably taken.
I'd imagine .me would, like .tv (Tuvalo) be one that a small country
could use to bo
Are you logged in with a google account on that chrome/chromium ? By the
way, how did you install them ?
To resume :
On your debian computer, only for this website, you get redirect to ads
only with chrome/chromium ?
I would try these :
purge chromium and chrome.
Install chromium and go to your
On 10/09/2016 07:36 AM, Richard Hector wrote:
On 10/10/16 00:28, Tony Baldwin wrote:
But we're getting a bit off-topic :-)
Richard
Indeed we are, but I thank you for humoring my curiosity.
Thanks,
Tony
--
http://tonybaldwin.me
all tony, all the time
On 10/10/16 00:28, Tony Baldwin wrote:
>
>
> On 10/09/2016 07:23 AM, Richard Hector wrote:
>> On 10/10/16 00:20, Tony Baldwin wrote:
>>> What country is .me? here in th US, of course, it could be the
>>> State of Maine.
>>
>> Montenegro, apparently. According to a quick web search ;-)
>>
>> Ric
On 10/09/2016 02:28 PM, Tony Baldwin wrote:
>
>
> On 10/09/2016 07:23 AM, Richard Hector wrote:
>> On 10/10/16 00:20, Tony Baldwin wrote:
>>> What country is .me? here in th US, of course, it could be the State of
>>> Maine.
>>
>> Montenegro, apparently. According to a quick web search ;-)
>>
>>
On 10/09/2016 07:23 AM, Richard Hector wrote:
On 10/10/16 00:20, Tony Baldwin wrote:
What country is .me? here in th US, of course, it could be the State of
Maine.
Montenegro, apparently. According to a quick web search ;-)
Richard
Thanks, I was curious, couldn't think of anything, all t
On 10/10/16 00:20, Tony Baldwin wrote:
> What country is .me? here in th US, of course, it could be the State of
> Maine.
Montenegro, apparently. According to a quick web search ;-)
Richard
On 10/09/2016 07:11 AM, Richard Hector wrote:
On 08/10/16 07:00, Tony Baldwin wrote:
I have a little business card website up for my big brother's media
consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me.
Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm
getting redi
On 08/10/16 07:00, Tony Baldwin wrote:
> I have a little business card website up for my big brother's media
> consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me.
> Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm
> getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web",
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 11:35:21AM -0400, Tony Baldwin wrote:
[...]
> >Can you use the chrome developper tools to see what's going on ? (Press
> >the F12 key while chrome is open) Select the network tab, and type the
> >url in your address bar.
> >Th
search for "create web",
If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy
landing page,
But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine,
and nothing
has changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by
search for "create web",
If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy
landing page,
But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine,
and nothing
has changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by
http://playomatic.myownsite.me.
>>> Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm
>>> getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web",
>>> If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page,
>>> But
, I'm
getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web",
If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page,
But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and nothing
has changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by an intruder
or any such
, I'm
getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web",
If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page,
But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and nothing has
changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by an intruder or any
such
quot;create web",
If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page,
But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and nothing has
changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by an intruder or any
such thing), also neither ping nor traceroute seem
ry to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy
landing page,
But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and
nothing
has changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by an
intruder
or any such thing), also neither p
consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me.
>> Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm
>> getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web",
>> If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page,
ry to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm
getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web",
If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page,
But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and nothing
has changed on my server (no redirect add
n the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page,
But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and nothing
has changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by an intruder
or any such thing), also neither ping nor traceroute seem to indicate
anything untoward or fishy.
The
On 9 June 2016 at 19:27, Morten Bo Johansen wrote:
> On 2016-06-08 Johann Spies wrote:
>
>
> I use the following in ~/.mailcap:
>
> text/html; chromium %s;
> text/html; /usr/bin/elinks -force-html -dump %s; copiousoutput
>
> and in ~/.muttrc:
>
> bind attachview-mailcap
> alternative
On 2016-06-08 Johann Spies wrote:
> Until a few weeks ago, I could open firefox from mutt by 'v' and then
> select the html-part of the email and press enter.
>
> Now firefox does not but w3m handles everything - which is not preferred
> when some links are important
Until a few weeks ago, I could open firefox from mutt by 'v' and then
select the html-part of the email and press enter.
Now firefox does not but w3m handles everything - which is not preferred
when some links are important.
I have in my .mailcap:
#text/html; firefox -new-tab %s &
Hello.
w3m-img adds the capability of viewing inline images with the
framebuffer to w3m. Is there any key combo or command line option to
switch between image and non-image mode? w3m with w3m-img is working,
but i didn't find out yet how to switch back to text-only mode without
uninsta
On 2008-10-11 12:52 +0200, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Another question: isn't there in Debian an emacs-w3m package?
There are even two of them, called w3m-el and w3m-el-snapshot. However,
you cannot install them concurrently, so you must which on to use.
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
I can't access my e-mail box when navigating with w3m: the following messages
are appear:
unable to get local issue certificate: accept? (y/n)
accept unsecure SSL session: unverified: unable to get local issuer certificate
. Please, how to work this out?
Another question: isn'
I have installed the w3m package in Debian sarge and read in the
documentation that the lynx key bindings can be chosen at compile time.
I'm used to the lynx bindings, is it possible to get them in the package
or are w3m bindings more convenient in this case and I should learn them?
Thank yo
Hi,
my favorite browser is w3m but unfortunately I'm not able to get ssl
certificates to work correctly under w3m.
I have installed w3m-ssl (from woody) and set:
ssl_ca_file /home/myhome/.w3m/ssl-ca.pem
ssl_ca_path /home/myhome/.w3m/
ssl_key_file
ssl_cert_file
ssl_verify_ser
n Randhol wrote:
> >
> > Thanks. How does one express the option ... checking
> > /usr/bin/X11 showed no mozilla or netscape.
> > The other option - /home/adam/.mozilla - did not work in w3m
> > ... we'll see.
>
> /home/adam/.mozilla is a directory not a program
Preben Randhol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-22 10:10:49 +0200]:
> By the way there is a shell called bush which can be interesting (at
> least for scripting) : http://www.pegasoft.ca/bush.html
Interesting! Thanks for sharing that.
Bob
msg03060/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
e/adam/.mozilla - did not work in w3m
> ... we'll see.
/home/adam/.mozilla is a directory not a program so you must type
/usr/bin/mozilla
But change the http_prgs line (in /etc/urlview/url_handler.sh) to:
http_prgs="/usr/bin/mozilla:PW /usr/bin/w3m:XT"
or if you do a : apt-get
Bob Proulx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 22/09/2002 (10:01) :
> It pains me that you used that harsh language to describe my comment.
Sorry it wasn't my intention.
> just caught up in the excitement of the moment! :-) Those are /bin/sh
> syntax, which I prefer better than anything that depends u
Preben Randhol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-21 10:55:48 +0200]:
> Bob Proulx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 19/09/2002 (18:07) :
> > quote format just to be explicit. And it makes cut-n-paste easier.
> >
> > which mozilla
> >
> > But instead of that old csh script 'which' I prefer newer command
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 03:50:00PM +0200 or thereabouts, Preben Randhol wrote:
> Adam Bogacki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21/09/2002 (13:36) :
> > Hi, I have now got w3m working with Mozilla on HTML attachments
> > but in the case of urlview (^B to get a list of URL'
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-21 15:09:40 +0100]:
> Possibly. It's hard to tell as 'command -v' is an extension to POSIX,
> not in POSIX sh itself.
It is used in SUSv3, however, and therefore should be good for anyone
that complies with that. And actually that was specifically why I
* Preben Randhol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [21-09-2002 15:57]:
> > If you are reading what he wrote again, it says that he never saw
> > scrolling text in the status bar in Mozilla, because of the option to
> > turn it off. At least that is how I understand it.
>
> Ah I understood it as he never saw th
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 03:58:30PM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21/09/2002 (15:55) :
> > I regard portable scripts as ones that work on systems other than
> > Debian. In particular, I need that condition in my work environment.
> > Also the script above
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21/09/2002 (15:55) :
>
> I regard portable scripts as ones that work on systems other than
> Debian. In particular, I need that condition in my work environment.
> Also the script above has a bug that as far as I can tell can't be
> fixed properly without
Michael Kristensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21/09/2002 (15:53) :
> * Preben Randhol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-21 15:42:17]:
> > Robert Ian Smit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21/09/2002 (11:25) :
> > > pointing to. If I remember correctly, I never saw that in Mozilla.
> >
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 03:44:38PM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21/09/2002 (11:51) :
> > Well, obviously if you're using #! /bin/sh then you don't need to
> > worry about what csh will make of it. Actually 'type' works in bash,
> > ash, and zsh, while 'c
* Preben Randhol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-21 15:42:17]:
> Robert Ian Smit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21/09/2002 (11:25) :
> > In Mozilla I could prevent websites to change the status-bar
> > message. I am not sure if this does what I think it does. But a big
> > annoyance is scrolling text t
Adam Bogacki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21/09/2002 (13:36) :
> Hi, I have now got w3m working with Mozilla on HTML attachments
> but in the case of urlview (^B to get a list of URL's in the
> message) the hard drive just grinds away and nothing happens.
> Is there a way
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21/09/2002 (11:51) :
>
> Well, obviously if you're using #! /bin/sh then you don't need to
> worry about what csh will make of it. Actually 'type' works in bash,
> ash, and zsh, while 'command -v' works in bash and ash. Both are
> extensions to the strict
Robert Ian Smit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21/09/2002 (11:25) :
> In Mozilla I could prevent websites to change the status-bar
> message. I am not sure if this does what I think it does. But a big
> annoyance is scrolling text that prevents seeing where a link is
> pointing to. If I remember cor
Hi, I have now got w3m working with Mozilla on HTML attachments
but in the case of urlview (^B to get a list of URL's in the
message) the hard drive just grinds away and nothing happens.
Is there a way of connecting 'urlview' to Mozilla, perhaps via
w3m ?
Adam Bogacki,
[EMAIL PROT
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 10:55:48AM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
> Bob Proulx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 19/09/2002 (18:07) :
> > type mozilla
> >
> > command -v mozilla
>
> Isn't it kind of stupid to suggest a bash only solution? Especially if
> you want to use this in a script like:
>
>
* Preben Randhol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [21-09-2002 10:56]:
> Although it also puzzels me why people use mozilla when galeon has a
> much better interface.
Agreed, one thing I miss though. (Please make my day if this is also
possible within Galeon.)
In Mozilla I could prevent websites to change the
On Sat, 2002-09-21 at 04:55, Preben Randhol wrote:
[SNIP!!!]
>
> Although it also puzzels me why people use mozilla when galeon has a
> much better interface.
>
> --
> Preben Randhol http://www.pvv.org/~randhol/ --
> "Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent", Isaac Asim
Bob Proulx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 19/09/2002 (18:07) :
> quote format just to be explicit. And it makes cut-n-paste easier.
>
> which mozilla
>
> But instead of that old csh script 'which' I prefer newer commands
> such as 'command' or 'type'. (Yes I see that on debian which is now a
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) writes:
> DvB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-20 16:50:14 -0500]:
> > csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 01:20:21 -0600
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) wrote:
> >
> > > unless I under-read the man page, can't do wild-card history searc
DvB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-20 16:50:14 -0500]:
> csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 01:20:21 -0600
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) wrote:
>
> > unless I under-read the man page, can't do wild-card history searches.
For the record I did not write that. csj <[EMAI
csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 01:20:21 -0600
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) wrote:
> unless I under-read the man page, can't do wild-card history searches.
I haven't tried this, but you might be able to remap emacs'
regexp-isearch-backward to something that doesn't r
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 01:20:21 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) wrote:
> > > > > I'm curious. In what packages can you find these commands?
> > > > apt-cache show mozilla-browser
> > > I think he was looking for 'type' and 'command', not 'mozilla'.
>
> Oh, okay. I parsed the grammer the
> > > > I'm curious. In what packages can you find these commands?
> > > apt-cache show mozilla-browser
> > I think he was looking for 'type' and 'command', not 'mozilla'.
Oh, okay. I parsed the grammer the other way. The messages are the
almost same when the command you are looking for, mozi
csj wrote:
> vega:~> type mozilla
> type: Command not found.
> vega:~> command -v mozilla
> command: Command not found.
>
> I'm curious. In what packages can you find these commands?
Bash -- they're shell builtins. Not sure what other shells support them.
What shell are you using?
Craig
--
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, I wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> > csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-20 07:21:58 +0800]:
> > > vega:~> type mozilla
> > > type: Command not found.
> > > vega:~> command -v mozilla
> > > command: Command not found.
> > >
> > > I'm curious. In what package
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Bob Proulx wrote:
> csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-20 07:21:58 +0800]:
> > vega:~> type mozilla
> > type: Command not found.
> > vega:~> command -v mozilla
> > command: Command not found.
> >
> > I'm curious. In what packages can you find these commands?
>
> apt-cache s
csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-20 07:21:58 +0800]:
> vega:~> type mozilla
> type: Command not found.
> vega:~> command -v mozilla
> command: Command not found.
>
> I'm curious. In what packages can you find these commands?
apt-cache show mozilla-browser
Bob
msg02602/pgp0.pgp
Descript
* DvB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [19-09-2002 17:59]:
> I was merely following commonly accepted punctuation rules for American
> English which state that, when a comma (or period) follows a quoted
> passage, the comma should be placed before the final quote.
Oh man, now I can't sleep before I remember
On 19 Sep 2002 11:22:05 -0500
DvB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) writes:
> > DvB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-19 10:50:34 -0500]:
[snip]
> > I have taken to offsetting in a block
> > quote format just to be explicit. And it makes cut-n-paste easier.
> >
> > which
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) writes:
> DvB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-19 10:50:34 -0500]:
> > > > try running "which mozilla," minus the quotes and the comma from the
> > > > command line.
>
> > I was merely following commonly accepted punctuation rules for American
> > English which state t
DvB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-19 10:50:34 -0500]:
> > > try running "which mozilla," minus the quotes and the comma from the
> > > command line.
> I was merely following commonly accepted punctuation rules for American
> English which state that, when a comma (or period) follows a quoted
Ah,
Robert Ian Smit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * DvB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [19-09-2002 16:22]:
> > try running "which mozilla," minus the quotes and the comma from the
> > command line.
>
> Why did you put the comma there in the first place. Is it some kind
> of notation I have never seen before?
* DvB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [19-09-2002 16:22]:
> try running "which mozilla," minus the quotes and the comma from the
> command line.
Why did you put the comma there in the first place. Is it some kind
of notation I have never seen before?
Now it looks like: type "which mozilla have a nice day" w
Adam Bogacki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
> Mutt goes into w3m when I open a HTML attachment,
> but when I hit 'M' to launch Mozilla, GKrellm shows the CPU
> operating at 99% ... but no Mozilla.
>
> I hit 'o' for the option menu an
--Adam Bogacki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Friday, 20 September 2002, 12:04 AM +1000):
> Mutt goes into w3m when I open a HTML attachment,
> but when I hit 'M' to launch Mozilla, GKrellm shows the CPU
> operating at 99% ... but no Mozilla.
>
> I
Hi,
Mutt goes into w3m when I open a HTML attachment,
but when I hit 'M' to launch Mozilla, GKrellm shows the CPU
operating at 99% ... but no Mozilla.
I hit 'o' for the option menu and replaced the
external viewer option with '/home/adam/.mozilla' .
spawn another window (galeon). so, i unset $DISPLAY in that term, and
| | mutt uses w3m to view html. this is nice, i like it better.
| | i just found w3m-img, (displays images even in Eterm) which is currently
| | in sid (i'm running woody, it installed just fine).
| | my problem is, with $DIS
, and
| mutt uses w3m to view html. this is nice, i like it better.
| i just found w3m-img, (displays images even in Eterm) which is currently
| in sid (i'm running woody, it installed just fine).
| my problem is, with $DISPLAY unset, w3m will not display the images. is
| there any way, withi
hello,
i run mutt in Eterm. with $DISPLAY set, it launches galeon to view html,
but not only does galeon not find mutt.html (?), but i don't want to
spawn another window (galeon). so, i unset $DISPLAY in that term, and
mutt uses w3m to view html. this is nice, i like it better.
i just foun
t; http://kmself.home.netcom.com/GNU/Linux/FAQs/browsers.html
> > >
> > > ...but I take it back. Galeon Kicks Ass®.
> >
> > s/GNU\///
> >
> > http://kmself.home.netcom.com/Linux/FAQs/browsers.html
>
> Speaking of browsers, how does one "go back and fo
inux/FAQs/browsers.html
> > >
> > > ...but I take it back. Galeon Kicks Ass®.
> >
> > s/GNU\///
> >
> > http://kmself.home.netcom.com/Linux/FAQs/browsers.html
>
> Speaking of browsers, how does one "go back and forward" in w3m?
While in w3m
back. Galeon Kicks Ass®.
>
> s/GNU\///
>
> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/Linux/FAQs/browsers.html
Speaking of browsers, how does one "go back and forward" in w3m?
Alec
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
SSL error: error:02001002:system library:fopen:No such file or directory
When attempting to access SSL sites with w3m under Sid, I'm getting the
following error:
SSL error: error:02001002:system library:fopen:No such file or directory
...and the site doesn't load.
I don'
I am not able to get w3m to run successfully from within emacs. w3m works fine
outside of emacs, and I can browse-url successfully with w3 or with lynx from
within emacs.
Each time I try to start w3m, either with "M-x w3m", I get messages back
starting with "Dump Header",
it's there.
> > ..and, IMVAO, w3's rendering is less than ideal.
>
> I use it to view URLs when I'm using gnus for mail, and I don't do that in
> X. So I hafta beg out of that one.
Hmmm Looking at things, I'm still trying to figure out if w3 and
w
when I'm using gnus for mail, and I don't do that in
> X. So I hafta beg out of that one.
Hmm...
Ok, upgraded to emacs20. My font-lock highlighting colors have changed
(for the worse). Any suggestions on fixing this?
w3 appears to call w3m. Are they in fact the s
On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 01:27:31PM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> I've got emacs19 installed, have been told by a friend on the XEmacs
> team that it may lack some required support. Am installing emacs20 now.
> Am under the impression that emacs20-dl might be a better option than
> emacs20,
on Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 10:05:35AM -0500, Bob Bernstein ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 03:00:11AM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>
> > Actually, it doesn't. Same error:
> >
> > Symbol's function definition is void: set-process-coding-system
>
> Eeek. Fwiw, here's
On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 03:00:11AM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> Actually, it doesn't. Same error:
>
> Symbol's function definition is void: set-process-coding-system
Eeek. Fwiw, here's what I have here, that seems to work with no errors:
w3-el-e20 4.0pre.46-9 running in
emacs20
on Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 10:21:27PM -0500, Bob Bernstein ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 02:28:07PM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>
> > > > Discovered there's a w3m module, but when I launch it under either emacs
> > > > or xema
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 02:28:07PM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> > > Discovered there's a w3m module, but when I launch it under either emacs
> > > or xemacs I get (different) error messages.
Why not try good ole plain w3?
It's a fairly nice browser, and with
on Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 10:41:45AM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com
(kmself@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
> on Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 01:02:11AM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com
> (kmself@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
> > I'm reaquainting myself with emacs after a several years absense.
> >
>
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
