800, David Witbrodt wrote:
>
> > Hi, From the root console:
> > # /usr/bin/xcdroast
> >
> > The reply:
> >
> > (xcdroast:18770): Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open
> > display:
> >
> > If I start from a user console I get the window that
> > sa
No luck - I get the same results.
Thanks, bob
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 07:39:56PM -0300, Stephen Cormier wrote:
> On November 15, 2007 06:01:33 pm Robert Van Horn wrote:
> > Hi, From the root console:
> > # /usr/bin/xcdroast
> >
> > The reply:
> >
> > (
> Hi, From the root console:
> # /usr/bin/xcdroast
>
> The reply:
>
> (xcdroast:18770): Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open
> display:
>
> If I start from a user console I get the window that
> says you must first start as root to set up.
>
> If I set the su
Hi, From the root console:
# /usr/bin/xcdroast
The reply:
(xcdroast:18770): Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display:
If I start from a user console I get the window that
says you must first start as root to set up.
If I set the suid bit on xcdroast it tries to start
from a user but dies.
Any
On November 15, 2007 06:01:33 pm Robert Van Horn wrote:
> Hi, From the root console:
> # /usr/bin/xcdroast
>
> The reply:
>
> (xcdroast:18770): Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display:
>
> If I start from a user console I get the window that
> says you must first start as r
On pon, 2007-01-08 at 12:27 +0100, csanyipal wrote:
> Sorry, but how can I fill a bug report easily?
Use reportbug.
--
[] BorgDOS 6.0i: FORMAT C: [Y/y]...Resistance
[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] is futile.
[ http://epsilon.eu.org/ ]
[]
--
To UNSU
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 10:41:54AM +0100, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> > -->
> > ** (xcdroast:9724): WARNING **: Invalid readcd version -unknown- found.
> > Expecting at least version 1.1.0
> > Start xcdroast with the -n option t
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 00:44 +0100, csanyipal wrote:
> I upgraded from Sarge to Etch. :)
>
> Now I try to run Xcdroast (from an xterm), but get an error message:
>
> ------>
> ** (xcdroast:9724): WARNING **: Invalid readcd version -unknown- found.
> Expectin
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 12:44:40AM +0100, csanyipal wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I upgraded from Sarge to Etch. :)
>
> Now I try to run Xcdroast (from an xterm), but get an error message:
>
> -->
> ** (xcdroast:9724): WARNING **: Invalid readcd version -unk
Hello!
I upgraded from Sarge to Etch. :)
Now I try to run Xcdroast (from an xterm), but get an error message:
-->
** (xcdroast:9724): WARNING **: Invalid readcd version -unknown- found.
Expecting at least version 1.1.0
Start xcdroast with the -n option to override (
M-L wrote:
> I get this error message when invoking XCDRoast:-
>
> ** (xcdroast:7879): WARNING **: Invalid mkisofs version -unknown- found.
> Expecting at least version 1.15a17
> Start xcdroast with the -n option to override (not recommended!)
>
> It appear
I get this error message when invoking XCDRoast:-
** (xcdroast:7879): WARNING **: Invalid mkisofs version -unknown- found.
Expecting at least version 1.15a17
Start xcdroast with the -n option to override (not recommended!)
It appears I have this version of mkisofs installed
On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 19:04:21 +0100, Stephan Seitz wrote:
> Don't use the group disk, use group cdrom instead. Anyone in group disk
> can read and write direct to the disks (e.g deleting partitions). You
> don't want this.
Ah, sure ! - I think now it is perfect.
Thanks,
Uwe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 01:22:47AM +0800, Uwe Dippel wrote:
# ls -l /dev/hdd
brw-rw 1 root disk 22, 64 2004-04-30 08:27 /dev/hdd
The only thing needed is that your user is member of group 'disk'. The
latter shows why.
Don’t use the group disk, use group cdrom instead. Anyone in group disk
dev=ATA: -scanbus' is the way to go.
3. Then use the result of 2 above for your commands for cdrecord; as in
cdrecord -v blank=fast dev=ATA:1,1,0 (whatever 2 came up with).
4. Delete the found device in xcdroast, add [ATA:1,1,0] manually in the
setup, wait for it to recognize the drive. Save.
E
Здравствуйте, GalbraithP.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Подпишите меня на спам
--
С уважением,
victim mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I am using GNOME on a Debian Sid and on another Fedora Core 4.
All 2.6.14 kernel.
I use Xcdroast to burn/duplicate my CDs
I know about k3b and all others, but I wonder about one thing on
xcdroast:
I cant duplicate CDs properly.
If, for instance, I insert an XP CD (to duplicate for private
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:40:06PM +0200, CoolFox wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have the following problem:
> I burn a data cd with xcdroast
> When i try to execute one of the programs burned on this cd with windows Xp,
> a
> dos window appears and disappears immediatly and nothing
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 02:47:16PM +0200, CoolFox wrote:
> Nate Bargmann a écrit :
> >* CoolFox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005 Sep 15 06:41 -0500]:
> >
> >>Hello
> >>
> >>I have the following problem:
> >>I burn a data cd with xcdroast
> &
Nate Bargmann a écrit :
* CoolFox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005 Sep 15 06:41 -0500]:
Hello
I have the following problem:
I burn a data cd with xcdroast
When i try to execute one of the programs burned on this cd with windows
Xp, a dos window appears and disappears immediatly and nothin
* CoolFox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005 Sep 15 06:41 -0500]:
> Hello
>
> I have the following problem:
> I burn a data cd with xcdroast
> When i try to execute one of the programs burned on this cd with windows
> Xp, a dos window appears and disappears immediatly and noth
Hello
I have the following problem:
I burn a data cd with xcdroast
When i try to execute one of the programs burned on this cd with windows
Xp, a dos window appears and disappears immediatly and nothing else happens.
I verified permissions and made a chmod 777 (just to be sure) but it
Hello,
I am using Xcdroast on my Digital Alphastation in Gnome desktop. The
Machine is monitor-less so the primary X-server ist Xvnc (replaced in
xdm.conf) and I use the desktop only for GUI programs via VNC from my
Windows Laptop. One of this GUI programs is Xcdroast. The only problem here
is
he latest Debian cdrecord version and a 2.6.8
or greater kernel, to disable scsi-emulation and manually configure
the device of Xcdroast with the "standard" ide device name (something
like /dev/hdX) or using the cdrecord naming scheme but after running
"cdrecord dev=ATA: -scanbus&qu
On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 08:58:30AM -0500, Tom Allison wrote:
[snip]
>
> I was able to get the scsi emulation turned back on easily enough. And
> it did burn one CD, the one I needed. But now I need to access the
> stupid thing and I have no idea which device it really is.
> sr1 (according to
Tom Allison wrote:
Guilty as charged on the video card. But it's one of the better ones I
could find. In the future what would you recommend for 3D graphics cards?
Here's the dirty little secret of all the holier-than-thou "don't use
binary only drivers" people out there There's no alt
Rogério Brito wrote:
On Dec 31 2004, Tom Allison wrote:
Unfortunately what is not solved in kernel 2.6.9 is my NVIDIA drivers
won't install. why? I don't know..
I know. Because you shouldn't have bought a card with binary only drivers
in the first place.
Doing that results in you having the pro
On Dec 31 2004, Tom Allison wrote:
> This brings up another point. How are you supposed to know what USB
> device is assigned to a USB storage device? My only solution is to plug
> it in and watch the logs. Are there any better alternatives?
Yes, use udev and make it create device files speci
On Dec 31 2004, Tom Allison wrote:
> Unfortunately what is not solved in kernel 2.6.9 is my NVIDIA drivers
> won't install. why? I don't know..
I know. Because you shouldn't have bought a card with binary only drivers
in the first place.
Doing that results in you having the problems that you'r
2.6 kernel.
Hi,
Got the same problem. When recompiling my 2.6 for the first time, i
switched off SCSI emulation as it's said not to be needed any more.
But xcdroast still _does_ need SCSI emulation. If you take a look on
their site, you'll see :
"I had several reports that the
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004, Tom Allison wrote:
Martin Fluch wrote:
There is some problem with 2.6.8 and 2.6.8.1 kernels and cd/dvd burning.
it's solved in 2.6.9...
Unfortunately what is not solved in kernel 2.6.9 is my NVIDIA drivers won't
install. why? I don't know.. But this is getting just silly.
ed for the 2.6 kernel.
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Got the same problem. When recompiling my 2.6 for the first time, i
> > switched off SCSI emulation as it's said not to be needed any more.
> >
> > But xcdroast still _does_ need SCSI emulation. I
Martin Fluch wrote:
There is some problem with 2.6.8 and 2.6.8.1 kernels and cd/dvd burning.
it's solved in 2.6.9...
Unfortunately what is not solved in kernel 2.6.9 is my NVIDIA drivers
won't install. why? I don't know.. But this is getting just silly.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
it's said not to be needed any more.
But xcdroast still _does_ need SCSI emulation. If you take a look on
their site, you'll see :
"I had several reports that the last 2.6.x kernel broke CD-Writing
using the ATAPI driver. Don't update if you want to continue to use
X-CD-Roas
> No! xcdrecord _does_ need cdrecord. And cdrecord runs without SCSI
> emulation on 2.6.
Maybe misunderstanding from mine ...
But cdrecord runs perfectly well on command line with my 2.6 and
without scsi emulation. XcdRoast doesn't, thought ! It claims for scsi
emulation ! This
Got the same problem. When recompiling my 2.6 for the first time, i
> switched off SCSI emulation as it's said not to be needed any more.
>
> But xcdroast still _does_ need SCSI emulation. If you take a look on
> their site, you'll see :
No! xcdrecord _does_ need cdrec
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 the mental interface of
Tom Allison told:
> I'm using the Kernel 2.6.8
[...]
> cdrecord: Drive does not support SAO recording.
> Supported modes:
> cdrecord: Illegal write mode for this drive.
> Drive buf size : 3317760 = 3240 KB
Fireup xcdroast or cdreco
ause I was under the
impression that it was no longer required for the 2.6 kernel.
Not directly answering your question, but are you able to use k3b
instead of xcdroast?
I've never got around to sorting out SCSI emulation with my current
setup and have failed to make cdrecord work properly manually
27;s said not to be needed any more.
But xcdroast still _does_ need SCSI emulation. If you take a look on
their site, you'll see :
"I had several reports that the last 2.6.x kernel broke CD-Writing
using the ATAPI driver. Don't update if you want to continue to use
X-CD-Roast, or s
ble to use k3b
instead of xcdroast?
I've never got around to sorting out SCSI emulation with my current
setup and have failed to make cdrecord work properly manually. However,
k3b is *very* good at examining your system setup and getting it all to
work properly ...
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart - [EMAIL
Any suggesions?
errors as follows----
Calling: /usr/lib/xcdroast/bin/xcdrwrap CDRECORD dev= "ATAPI:0,0,0"
gracetime=2 fs=16384k driveropts=burnfree -v -useinfo speed=24 -dao
-eject -pad -overburn -data "/home/tallison/ipcop-1.4.2.iso" ...
scsidev: 'ATAPI:0,0,0'
dev
Roy Pluschke wrote:
> On November 24, 2004 18:13, Adam Aube wrote:
>> Roy Pluschke wrote:
>> > There appears to be a problem with 2.6.8 and 2.6.9 kernels and
>> > cdrecord. This problem is well documented -- see for example:
>> > http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/3644
>> This bug existed in 2.6.8.
On November 24, 2004 18:13, Adam Aube wrote:
> Roy Pluschke wrote:
> > There appears to be a problem with 2.6.8 and 2.6.9 kernels and cdrecord.
> > This problem is well documented -- see for example:
> > http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/3644
>
> This bug existed in 2.6.8. It was fixed in 2.6.9.
>
>
Roy Pluschke wrote:
> There appears to be a problem with 2.6.8 and 2.6.9 kernels and cdrecord.
> This problem is well documented -- see for example:
> http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/3644
This bug existed in 2.6.8. It was fixed in 2.6.9.
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
Roy Pluschke wrote:
There appears to be a problem with 2.6.8 and 2.6.9 kernels and cdrecord. This
problem is well documented -- see for example:
http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/3644
You either have to apply a patch or burn cd's as root. Some people are also
having trouble burning audio cd's whe
On November 24, 2004 14:21, H. S. wrote:
> I discovered today that for some reason my xcdroast had been removed. I
> was a bit surprised since I never removed it myself.
>
> Anyhow, I reinstalled it using dselect and tried to configure it. During
> installation I told it NOT to use
I discovered today that for some reason my xcdroast had been removed. I
was a bit surprised since I never removed it myself.
Anyhow, I reinstalled it using dselect and tried to configure it. During
installation I told it NOT to use SCSI emulation and NOT to make
/dev/sg? devices.
But now it
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 08:11:40PM +0100, Alan Chandler wrote:
> On Monday 18 October 2004 01:51, Uwe Dippel wrote:
> > Sitting on Sarge as-it-comes, daily updated.
> > Suddenly xcdroast stops working today; last week it was okay.
> >
> > This is what I get:
> >
&
olutely right. I didn't think of limits of setuid.
>
> > AFAIK xcdroast is just a front end to cdrecord just like k3b.
>
> Sure, it is. But I prefered to use the app I'm simply more used to.
>
> > Maybe I'm wrong but I can't see how running a binary as ro
On Monday 18 October 2004 01:51, Uwe Dippel wrote:
> Sitting on Sarge as-it-comes, daily updated.
> Suddenly xcdroast stops working today; last week it was okay.
>
> This is what I get:
>
> Calling: /usr/lib/xcdroast/bin/xcdrwrap CDRECORD dev= "ATAPI:0,1,0"
>
Robert Parker wrote:
I think it's wong with 2.6.8. For security reasons it won't allow you to run
setuid root programs. The only way you can run cdrecord is as the root user.
You're abolutely right. I didn't think of limits of setuid.
AFAIK xcdroast is just a front end to cd
On Monday 18 October 2004 21:23, Uwe Dippel wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 03:20:06 +0200, Uwe Dippel wrote:
> > Linux dell 2.6.8-1-686 #1 Thu Oct 7 03:15:25 EDT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
> > xcdroast 0.98+0alpha15
>
> No solution, yet.
> But something wrong with 2.6.8:
&g
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 19:23:26 +0800, Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 03:20:06 +0200, Uwe Dippel wrote:
>
> > Linux dell 2.6.8-1-686 #1 Thu Oct 7 03:15:25 EDT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
> > xcdroast 0.98+0alpha15
>
> No solution, yet.
&g
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 03:20:06 +0200, Uwe Dippel wrote:
> Linux dell 2.6.8-1-686 #1 Thu Oct 7 03:15:25 EDT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
> xcdroast 0.98+0alpha15
No solution, yet.
But something wrong with 2.6.8:
I simply booted to 2.6.3 and everything worked splendid; without any other
changes
Sitting on Sarge as-it-comes, daily updated.
Suddenly xcdroast stops working today; last week it was okay.
This is what I get:
Calling: /usr/lib/xcdroast/bin/xcdrwrap CDRECORD dev= "ATAPI:0,1,0" gracetime=2
fs=4096k driveropts=burnfree -v -useinfo speed=24 -dao -eject -pad -data
&qu
Hi Stefan,
Your tips got me started and finally I got at least the gtk 1.x thing
figured out.
It's actually quite simple, but has a small bug (at least the way I did
it, maybe there is a simpler and better way)
That's the way I did it:
1. install themes that support gtk 1 (search for gtk-engin
On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 05:30:17PM +0200, Pascal Bonesh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just wondered why some apps turn out to look ugly/oldfashioned.
>
> I.e. gktalog, nmapfe, xcdroast and acroread. Are they plain X-11 apps or
> are they using some old gtk 1.x toolkit?
>
> I would
Hi,
I just wondered why some apps turn out to look ugly/oldfashioned.
I.e. gktalog, nmapfe, xcdroast and acroread. Are they plain X-11 apps or
are they using some old gtk 1.x toolkit?
I would like to change the look of these apps so that they closer match
my gnome 2.6 Simple theme.
Does
Micha Feigin wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 07:24:09PM -0400, Tom Allison wrote:
I have the 2.6 kernel.
using this I've assumed I can run ATAPI burners, but XCDroast has heart
burn itself...
I have 2.6.5 kernel, debian unstable
xcdroast warns me tht I should be using scsi devices but
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 07:24:09PM -0400, Tom Allison wrote:
> I have the 2.6 kernel.
> using this I've assumed I can run ATAPI burners, but XCDroast has heart
> burn itself...
>
Used xcdroast with atapi cdrom under 2.6 kernel. Worked fine, except it
would take forever if there
<#secure method=pgp mode=sign>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have the 2.6 kernel.
> using this I've assumed I can run ATAPI burners, but XCDroast has
> heart burn itself...
>
> help?
Please help us he
On Fri, 2004-09-10 at 19:24, Tom Allison wrote:
> I have the 2.6 kernel.
> using this I've assumed I can run ATAPI burners, but XCDroast has heart
> burn itself...
>
> help?
What errors? Which 2.6 kernel?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
I have the 2.6 kernel.
using this I've assumed I can run ATAPI burners, but XCDroast has heart
burn itself...
help?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
robably author the
> mpg file and another person said that instead of creating a vcd
> I probably just created a data cd.
The few times I created VCDs, I used the following tools:
avidemux, mjpegtools, vcdimager and cdrdao.
> So my question is this: I am using xcdroast. I think I have
>
question is this: I am using xcdroast. I think I have correctly
authored the mpg file. So now do I just burn the 2 files to a disk or
is there some special way I need to burn it? For example, maybe I need
to create an iso or I've seen a lot of mention of cue and bin files.
I have
Anthony Campbell wrote:
On 15 Jun 2004, Anthony Campbell wrote:
It's supposed to be unnecessary to use scsi-emulation in 2.6 kernels but
if I try to use ATAPI, xcdroast simply hangs with a message saying it
won't work properly (this is latest version from Sid).
I therefore gave up an
On 15 Jun 2004, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> It's supposed to be unnecessary to use scsi-emulation in 2.6 kernels but
> if I try to use ATAPI, xcdroast simply hangs with a message saying it
> won't work properly (this is latest version from Sid).
>
> I therefore gave up a
It's supposed to be unnecessary to use scsi-emulation in 2.6 kernels but
if I try to use ATAPI, xcdroast simply hangs with a message saying it
won't work properly (this is latest version from Sid).
I therefore gave up and compiled a kernel with SCSI emulation, which
worked for me in
v/hdb.
Now the drive is gentle to me: it can be mounted; an audio-CD can
be played, and cdrecord -dev=ATAPI -scanbus gives the particulars.
Two questions remain:
1. Some posters say that you need to add hdc=cdrom to your boot
parameters. Is this correct ? Anything needed at all ?
2. xcdroast
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 09:48:54 +0100, stephen parkinson wrote:
> actually xcdroast works quite nicely, in 2.6 with hdc=cdrom hdd=cdrom
> and no ide-scsi anywhere in sight
You *think* so; or it *does* ??
Then tell us your secret. I tried ... root=/dev/hda5 hdb=cdrom
and re-detected the driv
On Sun, 2004-04-25 at 10:00, Uwe Dippel wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 07:30:05 +0200, Mike Chandler wrote:
>
> > I give up. What is wrong with k3b?
>
> Everything. Especially the 'k'. Because it means you run KDE. Look at the
> dependencies !
> That is one of the
forward a front-end that does?
Ide-scsi will continue to work for some time.
actually xcdroast works quite nicely, in 2.6 with hdc=cdrom hdd=cdrom
and no ide-scsi anywhere in sight
stephen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 07:30:05 +0200, Mike Chandler wrote:
> I give up. What is wrong with k3b?
Everything. Especially the 'k'. Because it means you run KDE. Look at the
dependencies !
That is one of the great things of xcdroast: You can run it from any
desktop environment. Non-bloa
On Saturday 24 April 2004 09:21 pm, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Marc Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 07:49:20PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> >> Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> > I do understand that we don't want scsi-emulation any longer. So far
> >> > so good.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marc Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 07:49:20PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > I do understand that we don't want scsi-emulation any longer. So far so
>> > good.
>>
>> Whatwh
Marc Wilson wrote:
> It's true that ide-scsi is depreciated, but I can't think of a
> single front-end to cdrecord that supports ATAPI device specifications
> other than k3b, and who wants to use *that*?
>
> Anyone want to put forward a front-end that does?
I use CDR Toaster without problems.
A
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 05:10:07 +0200, Marc Wilson wrote:
> Ide-scsi will continue to work for some time.
It, actually, doesn't. At least, not in all occasions. It is considered
broken.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECT
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 04:50:07 +0200, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Whatwhatwhat? This changed? I upgraded from 2.4 to 2.6 and didn't
> lose my burner...I'm now confused and surprised I didn't.
Because you left the scsi-emulation as boot parameter. But it is badly
broken in 2.6.X and Linus fully recommen
On Sat, 24 Apr 2004 23:00:08 +0200, Adam Aube wrote:
> In your case, since your CD-ROM is /dev/hdb, that should be "hdb=cdrom", not
> "hdc=cdrom".
Ah, sure. Typo.
Question is: *do* I need this boot parameter ??
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 07:49:20PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I do understand that we don't want scsi-emulation any longer. So far so
> > good.
>
> Whatwhatwhat? This changed? I upgraded from 2.4 to 2.6 and didn't
> lose my burner...I'm now confuse
Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I do understand that we don't want scsi-emulation any longer. So far so
> good.
Whatwhatwhat? This changed? I upgraded from 2.4 to 2.6 and didn't
lose my burner...I'm now confused and surprised I didn't.
--
Paul Johnson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux. You
Uwe Dippel wrote:
> I did change the link /dev/cdrom to /dev/hdb, consequentially.
> In order to have access to the drive, I also had to chgrp cdrom /dev/hdb.
>
> Some posters say that you need to add hdc=cdrom to your boot
> parameters. Is this correct ? Anything needed at all ?
In your case, s
ve is gentle to me: it can be mounted; an audio-CD can
be played, and cdrecord -dev=ATAPI -scanbus gives the particulars.
Two questions remain:
1. Some posters say that you need to add hdc=cdrom to your boot
parameters. Is this correct ? Anything needed at all ?
2. xcdroast takes literally minut
then remounting.
Hope this helps others who are looking to make multi-session CDs with
xcdroast.
Thanks and Regards
Ramesh
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I tried vainly yesterday to make a muti-session CD-RW using xcdroast (in sarge).
There are menu
items to create such a CD but I am messing up. I looked for manuals and the html
version that gets
installed with xcdroast does not talk about how to make muti-session CDs. Also I do
not know
Always used xcdroast successfully on RedHat.
Now, after I moved to Debian (Testing), all CDRs fail to write at one
point or another.
Details:
1.setting non-root mode and run as non-root user:
scsidev: '0,0,0'
scsibus: 0 target: 0 lun: 0
Linux sg driver version: 3.1.25
SCSI buffer s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 06:17:20PM +, Gavin Seddon wrote:
> Hi,
> This is what I get.
>
> 1# uname -r
> 2.2.20-idepci
Hi,
This is your magic fix.
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTEC
Hello
Gavin Seddon (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
(quoting fixed)
>> I checked the config file for that kernel, and I found this:
>>
>> CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDESCSI=m
>>
>> So the ide-scsi module should be there. Run
>>
>> find /lib/modules/2.2.20-idepci/ -name ide-scsi.o
>>
>> to see if it can be f
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 11:38:51AM +, Gavin Seddon wrote:
> this find command returned nothing. Also, I noticed people are irritated by
> my replies. But, each time I send a message to debian list it starts a new
> thread and I am unable to reply directly to messages. So, what do I do?
'a
I checked the config file for that kernel, and I found this:
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDESCSI=m
So the ide-scsi module should be there. Run
find /lib/modules/2.2.20-idepci/ -name ide-scsi.o
to see if it can be found.
Dear Andreas,
this find command returned nothing. Also, I noticed people are irrita
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 14:20:56 -0500,
Mark Roach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 13:17, Gavin Seddon wrote:
> > Hi,
> > This is what I get.
> >
> > 1# uname -r
> > 2.2.20-idepci
>
> Was this supposed to be meaningful to someone, or just for fun?
Hello
Mark Roach (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 13:17, Gavin Seddon wrote:
>>
>> This is what I get.
>>
>> 1# uname -r
>> 2.2.20-idepci
>
> Was this supposed to be meaningful to someone, or just for fun? ;-)
It means that he replies to a message, but started a new thread
On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 13:17, Gavin Seddon wrote:
> Hi,
> This is what I get.
>
> 1# uname -r
> 2.2.20-idepci
Was this supposed to be meaningful to someone, or just for fun? ;-)
--
Mark Roach
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA
Hi,
This is what I get.
1# uname -r
2.2.20-idepci
Thanks
Gavin.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello
Gavin Seddon (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 December 2003 12:31, Andreas Janssen wrote:
>> modprobe ide-scsi
> Yes the conf file is ok, but when I run modprobe Iget
>
> modprobe ide-scsi
> modprobe: Can't locate module ide-scsi
That is strange. What kernel do you use? What
On Tuesday 16 December 2003 12:31, Andreas Janssen wrote:
> modprobe ide-scsi
Yes the conf file is ok, but when I run modprobe Iget
modprobe ide-scsi
modprobe: Can't locate module ide-scsi
Also, when I run cdrecord it complains of not being there. It must be
installed though .
Gavin
--
To U
Hello
Gavin Seddon (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I put the append line in my lilo.conf and success in that I get the
> hdc found when I reboot. However, when I start xcdroast the cdrw is
> still not found. Can you help pls?
What did the line look like? And did you re-run li
Hello,
I put the append line in my lilo.conf and success in that I get the hdc found
when I reboot. However,
when I start xcdroast the cdrw is still not found. Can you help pls?
Gavin.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
Nevermind... it looks like I can still use xcdroast without having to play
with any settings or fix anything.
emma :)
--
Emma Jane Hogbin
[[ 416 417 2868 ][ www.xtrinsic.com ]]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi All,
I've found that copying data CD's (such as the Debian Woody set) to a
blank disc with xcdroast gives me errors when I try and read some of
the packages. (Only a few of the packages, the majority is fine.) This
is burning at speeds of 2x to 4x, on a 16x burner.
Howeve
1 - 100 of 213 matches
Mail list logo
